IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/envirb/v46y2019i2p225-242.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Can people memorize multilevel building as volumetric map? A study of multilevel atrium building

Author

Listed:
  • Yi Lu
  • Yu Ye

Abstract

The question of whether multilevel buildings are memorized as volumetric map or collection of floors is central to spatial cognition and wayfinding studies about multilevel buildings. The stacked-floor buildings used in previous studies may limit people’s ability to integrate floors into a volumetric mental map. In this study, we assessed wayfinding and cognitive performances of 31 participants in a multilevel shopping mall with five atriums which provided adequate visual access and smooth floor transitions. (1) In the wayfinding task, we observed path choice for 31 participants in this mall. The participants’ choice for all path segments, also vertical path segments, clearly gravitated toward the most accessible spaces in the whole building, rather than most accessible space within individual floors. (2) Participants were also asked to identify the locations where they can see maximum number of stores. The identified locations can be reliably predicted by objectively measured three-dimensional visibility information, but not two-dimensional visibility information. (3) In the pointing task, participants can accurately point to out-of-sight targets in the same floor and in the different floor, in both azimuth and elevation direction. In sum, those findings suggest that people can memorize a multilevel atrium building as a volumetric map. This study also demonstrates the usefulness of developing three-dimensional configurational variables to explain human spatial behavior and spatial cognition.

Suggested Citation

  • Yi Lu & Yu Ye, 2019. "Can people memorize multilevel building as volumetric map? A study of multilevel atrium building," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 46(2), pages 225-242, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:envirb:v:46:y:2019:i:2:p:225-242
    DOI: 10.1177/2399808317705659
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/2399808317705659
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/2399808317705659?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Lam, W.H.K. & Tam, Mei-ling & Wong, S.C. & Wirasinghe, S.C., 2003. "Wayfinding in the passenger terminal of Hong Kong International Airport," Journal of Air Transport Management, Elsevier, vol. 9(2), pages 73-81.
    2. Churchill, Anthony & Dada, Ezekiel & de Barros, Alexandre G. & Wirasinghe, S.C., 2008. "Quantifying and validating measures of airport terminal wayfinding," Journal of Air Transport Management, Elsevier, vol. 14(3), pages 151-158.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Minhua Shao & Congcong Xie & Lijun Sun & Lijuan Jiang, 2019. "Optimal Layout of Static Guidance Information in Comprehensive Transportation Hubs Based on Passenger Pathfinding Behavior," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(13), pages 1-21, July.
    2. Phelipe Medeiros da Rocha & Helder Gomes Costa & Glauco Barbosa da Silva, 2022. "Gaps, Trends and Challenges in Assessing Quality of Service at Airport Terminals: A Systematic Review and Bibliometric Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(7), pages 1-17, March.
    3. Tsui, Wai Hong Kan & Fung, Michael Ka Yiu, 2016. "Analysing passenger network changes: The case of Hong Kong," Journal of Air Transport Management, Elsevier, vol. 50(C), pages 1-11.
    4. Wenting Jin & Ying Yao & Guichao Ren & Xiaohua Zhao, 2022. "Evaluation of Integration Information Signage in Transport Hubs Based on Building Information Modeling and Virtual Reality Technologies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(16), pages 1-20, August.
    5. Paul Symonds & David H.K. Brown & Valeria Lo Iacono, 2017. "Exploring an Absent Presence: Wayfinding as an Embodied Sociocultural Experience," Sociological Research Online, , vol. 22(1), pages 48-67, February.
    6. Skorupski, Jacek & Wierzbińska, Magdalena, 2015. "A method to evaluate the time of waiting for a late passenger," Journal of Air Transport Management, Elsevier, vol. 47(C), pages 79-89.
    7. Yong Fang & Wenli Zhang & Hua Hu & Jiayi Zhou & Dianliang Xiao & Shaojie Li, 2022. "Adaptive Aging Safety of Guidance Marks in Rail Transit Connection Systems Based on Eye Movement Data," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(2), pages 1-12, January.
    8. Han, Seohui & Ham, Seonok (Sunny) & Yang, Ilsun & Baek, Seunghee, 2012. "Passengers’ perceptions of airline lounges: Importance of attributes that determine usage and service quality measurement," Tourism Management, Elsevier, vol. 33(5), pages 1103-1111.
    9. Thampan, Aromal & Sinha, Kapil & Gurjar, B.R. & Rajasekar, E., 2020. "Functional efficiency in airport terminals: A review on Overall and Stratified Service Quality," Journal of Air Transport Management, Elsevier, vol. 87(C).
    10. Tam, Mei Ling, 2011. "An optimization model for wayfinding problems in terminal building," Journal of Air Transport Management, Elsevier, vol. 17(2), pages 74-79.
    11. Huang, Ling & Wong, S.C. & Zhang, Mengping & Shu, Chi-Wang & Lam, William H.K., 2009. "Revisiting Hughes' dynamic continuum model for pedestrian flow and the development of an efficient solution algorithm," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 43(1), pages 127-141, January.
    12. Churchill, Anthony & Dada, Ezekiel & de Barros, Alexandre G. & Wirasinghe, S.C., 2008. "Quantifying and validating measures of airport terminal wayfinding," Journal of Air Transport Management, Elsevier, vol. 14(3), pages 151-158.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:envirb:v:46:y:2019:i:2:p:225-242. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.