IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v10y2018i7p2256-d155402.html

CO 2 Payoff of Extensive Green Roofs with Different Vegetation Species

Author

Listed:
  • Takanori Kuronuma

    (Center for Environment, Health and Field Sciences, Chiba University, 6-2-1 Kashiwa-no-ha, Kashiwa, Chiba 277-0882, Japan)

  • Hitoshi Watanabe

    (Center for Environment, Health and Field Sciences, Chiba University, 6-2-1 Kashiwa-no-ha, Kashiwa, Chiba 277-0882, Japan)

  • Tatsuaki Ishihara

    (Kyodo KY-Tec Corporation, 1-15-1, Ebisu-minami, Shibuya-ku, Tokyo 150-0022, Japan)

  • Daitoku Kou

    (Kyodo KY-Tec Corporation, 1-15-1, Ebisu-minami, Shibuya-ku, Tokyo 150-0022, Japan)

  • Kazunari Toushima

    (Kyodo KY-Tec Corporation, 1-15-1, Ebisu-minami, Shibuya-ku, Tokyo 150-0022, Japan)

  • Masaya Ando

    (Center for Environment, Health and Field Sciences, Chiba University, 6-2-1 Kashiwa-no-ha, Kashiwa, Chiba 277-0882, Japan)

  • Satoshi Shindo

    (Center for Environment, Health and Field Sciences, Chiba University, 6-2-1 Kashiwa-no-ha, Kashiwa, Chiba 277-0882, Japan)

Abstract

Green roofs are considered effective in the reduction of atmospheric CO 2 because of their ability to reduce energy consumption of buildings and sequester carbon in plants and substrates. However, green roof system components (substrate, water proofing membrane, etc.) may cause CO 2 emissions during their life cycle. Therefore, to assess the CO 2 -payoff for extensive green roofs, we calculated CO 2 payback time it takes their CO 2 sequestration and reduction to offset the CO 2 emitted during its production process and maintenance practices. The amount of CO 2 emitted during the production of a modular green roof system was found to be 25.2 kg-CO 2 ·m −2 . The annual CO 2 emission from the maintenance of green roofs was 0.33 kg-CO 2 ·m −2 ·yr −1 . Annual CO 2 sequestration by three grass species with irrigation treatment was about 2.5 kg-CO 2 ·m −2 ·yr −1 , which was higher than that of Sedum aizoon . In the hypothetical green roofs, annual CO 2 reduction due to saved energy was between 1.703 and 1.889 kg-CO 2 ·m −2 ·yr −1 . From these results, we concluded that the CO 2 payback time of the extensive green roofs was between 5.8 and 15.9 years, which indicates that extensive green roofs contribute to CO 2 reduction within their lifespan.

Suggested Citation

  • Takanori Kuronuma & Hitoshi Watanabe & Tatsuaki Ishihara & Daitoku Kou & Kazunari Toushima & Masaya Ando & Satoshi Shindo, 2018. "CO 2 Payoff of Extensive Green Roofs with Different Vegetation Species," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(7), pages 1-12, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:10:y:2018:i:7:p:2256-:d:155402
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/10/7/2256/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/10/7/2256/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Sherwani, A.F. & Usmani, J.A. & Varun, 2010. "Life cycle assessment of solar PV based electricity generation systems: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 14(1), pages 540-544, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Mihalakakou, Giouli & Souliotis, Manolis & Papadaki, Maria & Menounou, Penelope & Dimopoulos, Panayotis & Kolokotsa, Dionysia & Paravantis, John A. & Tsangrassoulis, Aris & Panaras, Giorgos & Giannako, 2023. "Green roofs as a nature-based solution for improving urban sustainability: Progress and perspectives," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 180(C).
    2. Sri Yuliani & Gagoek Hardiman & Erni Setyowati, 2020. "Green-Roof: The Role of Community in the Substitution of Green-Space toward Sustainable Development," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(4), pages 1-14, February.
    3. Saeed Ur Rahman & Zia Ur Rahman & Maryam Ibrahim, 2022. "Validity of Environmental Kuznets Curve in the Malaysian Economy: A Fresh Evidence," Journal of Economic Impact, Science Impact Publishers, vol. 4(3), pages 278-288.
    4. Dong, Xin & He, Bao-Jie, 2023. "A standardized assessment framework for green roof decarbonization: A review of embodied carbon, carbon sequestration, bioenergy supply, and operational carbon scenarios," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 182(C).
    5. Elaouzy, Youssef & El Fadar, Abdellah, 2023. "Sustainability of building-integrated bioclimatic design strategies depending on energy affordability," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 179(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. He, Zhoulei & Yang, Jingze & Li, Aijun & Deng, Qian & Yao, Hong, 2025. "Life cycle greenhouse gas emission assessment of solar power tower plant based on supercritical CO2 cycle operating at peak-shaving scenarios," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 332(C).
    2. Ludin, Norasikin Ahmad & Mustafa, Nur Ifthitah & Hanafiah, Marlia M. & Ibrahim, Mohd Adib & Asri Mat Teridi, Mohd & Sepeai, Suhaila & Zaharim, Azami & Sopian, Kamaruzzaman, 2018. "Prospects of life cycle assessment of renewable energy from solar photovoltaic technologies: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 96(C), pages 11-28.
    3. Gerbinet, Saïcha & Belboom, Sandra & Léonard, Angélique, 2014. "Life Cycle Analysis (LCA) of photovoltaic panels: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 38(C), pages 747-753.
    4. Bocca, Alberto & Chiavazzo, Eliodoro & Macii, Alberto & Asinari, Pietro, 2015. "Solar energy potential assessment: An overview and a fast modeling approach with application to Italy," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 49(C), pages 291-296.
    5. Tyagi, V.V. & Rahim, Nurul A.A. & Rahim, N.A. & Selvaraj, Jeyraj A./L., 2013. "Progress in solar PV technology: Research and achievement," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 20(C), pages 443-461.
    6. M. A. Parvez Mahmud & Nazmul Huda & Shahjadi Hisan Farjana & Candace Lang, 2018. "Environmental Impacts of Solar-Photovoltaic and Solar-Thermal Systems with Life-Cycle Assessment," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(9), pages 1-21, September.
    7. Koppelaar, R.H.E.M., 2017. "Solar-PV energy payback and net energy: Meta-assessment of study quality, reproducibility, and results harmonization," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 72(C), pages 1241-1255.
    8. Khalilpour, Rajab & Vassallo, Anthony, 2016. "Planning and operation scheduling of PV-battery systems: A novel methodology," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 53(C), pages 194-208.
    9. Bhutto, Abdul Waheed & Bazmi, Aqeel Ahmed & Zahedi, Gholamreza, 2012. "Greener energy: Issues and challenges for Pakistan—Solar energy prospective," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 16(5), pages 2762-2780.
    10. Desideri, U. & Zepparelli, F. & Morettini, V. & Garroni, E., 2013. "Comparative analysis of concentrating solar power and photovoltaic technologies: Technical and environmental evaluations," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 102(C), pages 765-784.
    11. Karni Siraganyan & Amarasinghage Tharindu Dasun Perera & Jean-Louis Scartezzini & Dasaraden Mauree, 2019. "Eco-Sim: A Parametric Tool to Evaluate the Environmental and Economic Feasibility of Decentralized Energy Systems," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(5), pages 1-22, February.
    12. Amor, Mourad Ben & Pineau, Pierre-Olivier & Gaudreault, Caroline & Samson, Réjean, 2012. "Assessing the economic value of renewable distributed generation in the Northeastern American market," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 16(8), pages 5687-5695.
    13. Pramod Rajput & Maria Malvoni & Nallapaneni Manoj Kumar & O. S. Sastry & Arunkumar Jayakumar, 2020. "Operational Performance and Degradation Influenced Life Cycle Environmental–Economic Metrics of mc-Si, a-Si and HIT Photovoltaic Arrays in Hot Semi-arid Climates," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-20, February.
    14. Hernández-Moro, J. & Martínez-Duart, J.M., 2013. "Analytical model for solar PV and CSP electricity costs: Present LCOE values and their future evolution," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 20(C), pages 119-132.
    15. Mansouri, Noura Y. & Crookes, Roy J. & Korakianitis, Theodosios, 2013. "A projection of energy consumption and carbon dioxide emissions in the electricity sector for Saudi Arabia: The case for carbon capture and storage and solar photovoltaics," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 63(C), pages 681-695.
    16. Ouedraogo, Bachir I. & Kouame, S. & Azoumah, Y. & Yamegueu, D., 2015. "Incentives for rural off grid electrification in Burkina Faso using LCOE," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 78(C), pages 573-582.
    17. Kesler, Selami & Kivrak, Sinan & Dincer, Furkan & Rustemli, Sabir & Karaaslan, Muharrem & Unal, Emin & Erdiven, Utku, 2014. "The analysis of PV power potential and system installation in Manavgat, Turkey—A case study in winter season," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 31(C), pages 671-680.
    18. Dadouche, F. & Béthoux, O. & Kleider, J.-P., 2011. "New silicon thin-film technology associated with original DC–DC converter: An economic alternative way to improve photovoltaic systems efficiencies," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 36(3), pages 1749-1757.
    19. Solangi, K.H. & Islam, M.R. & Saidur, R. & Rahim, N.A. & Fayaz, H., 2011. "A review on global solar energy policy," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 15(4), pages 2149-2163, May.
    20. Khan, Jibran & Arsalan, Mudassar H., 2016. "Solar power technologies for sustainable electricity generation – A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 55(C), pages 414-425.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:10:y:2018:i:7:p:2256-:d:155402. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.