Author
Listed:
- El Kassar, Razan
- Al Takash, Ahmad
- El Rassy, Elissa
- Hammoud, Mohammad
- Py, Xavier
Abstract
Life cycle environmental consequences of photovoltaic systems, from raw material extraction to end-of-life (EoL) management, have attracted more interest in recent years. Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) is a vital tool to analyze the sustainability of PV panels based on parameters such as energy payback time (EPBT), greenhouse gas emissions (GHG), and cumulative energy demand (CED). Several studies have considered standalone PV technologies, while the environmental ramifications of integrating cooling systems have not been adequately investigated, even with their increasing relevance in enhancing PV efficiency and lifespan. This review fills the identified gap by systematically assessing the life cycle performance of the PV technologies considered here, alongside several cooling methods - air-based, liquid-based, phase change materials (PCM), radiative, and hybrid systems - for their combined performance, economic, and environmental trade-offs. Results show that Cadmium Telluride and Copper Indium Gallium Selenide technologies exhibit low energy payback times and global warming potential (GWP). Water-based cooling shows the lowest GWP, although water use remains a cause for concern. PCM cooling provides long-term energy savings but comes with recyclability issues. High-value EoL management with recycling would lower GWP. With these fragmented LCA findings, the review provides a common framework for assessing the PV cooling technologies and also provides a case of the need for consolidated datasets and harmonized methodologies. Future research needs to enhance the LCA databases relating to PV cooling systems and establish policy-driven steps to support circularity and sustainable pathways for PV technology.
Suggested Citation
El Kassar, Razan & Al Takash, Ahmad & El Rassy, Elissa & Hammoud, Mohammad & Py, Xavier, 2026.
"Evaluating the sustainability of pv technologies and their cooling systems: a life cycle assessment review,"
Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 404(C).
Handle:
RePEc:eee:appene:v:404:y:2026:i:c:s0306261925019178
DOI: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2025.127187
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to
for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:appene:v:404:y:2026:i:c:s0306261925019178. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/405891/description#description .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.