IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v10y2018i7p2226-d155082.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Concept of Urban Freight Transport Projects Durability and Its Assessment within the Framework of a Freight Quality Partnership

Author

Listed:
  • Kinga Kijewska

    (Faculty of Economics and Engineering of Transport, Maritime University of Szczecin, 11 Pobożnego Str., 70-507 Szczecin, Poland)

  • Mariusz Jedliński

    (Faculty of Economics and Engineering of Transport, Maritime University of Szczecin, 11 Pobożnego Str., 70-507 Szczecin, Poland)

Abstract

This article focuses on the role of Urban Freight Transport (UFT) projects in improving the life quality of city inhabitants. The main focus of the deliberations is the aspect of UFT projects’ durability. The authors take an original approach to the definition of UFT project durability and also provide the results of a research study carried out in 2018. This made it possible to furnish an answer to the research questions that boiled down to the analysis of the current status of the relevant academic literature, to attempt to define the total durability of a UFT project, and to indicate the critical gaps in perception among the key stakeholders of the projects. In this study, particular attention is paid to the terminological synthesis and the conclusion resulting from adopting induction and deduction as the methods of solving research study problems. A novelty is the approach adopted in the project evaluation emphasising the mentioned durability aspect as one of the major success factors. This is particularly important for implementation of a Freight Quality Partnership as a solution enabling development of sustainable systems of urban logistics. The solution was treated as a specific implementation project for which the issue of key importance is the identification of success factors in the context of satisfying the needs of diverse groups of UFT stakeholders. It should be stressed that durability of projects in the area of UFT is critically important, even though there is a significant conceptual gap in that regard. The research study involved the originally developed concept of the Pyramid of Stakeholders Survey. By means of this concept, FQP durability was analysed on the example of the experience gained in the course of the solution functioning in Szczecin.

Suggested Citation

  • Kinga Kijewska & Mariusz Jedliński, 2018. "The Concept of Urban Freight Transport Projects Durability and Its Assessment within the Framework of a Freight Quality Partnership," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(7), pages 1-18, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:10:y:2018:i:7:p:2226-:d:155082
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/10/7/2226/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/10/7/2226/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Dov Dvir & Stanislav Lipovetsky & Aaron J. Shenhar & Asher Tishler, 2003. "What is really important for project success? A refined, multivariate, comprehensive analysis," International Journal of Management and Decision Making, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 4(4), pages 382-404.
    2. Jesus Gonzalez-Feliu & Joëlle Morana, 2010. "Are City Logistics Solutions Sustainable? The Cityporto case," Post-Print halshs-00530016, HAL.
    3. Dablanc, Laetitia, 2007. "Goods transport in large European cities: Difficult to organize, difficult to modernize," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 41(3), pages 280-285, March.
    4. Allen, J. & Browne, M. & Cherrett, T., 2012. "Investigating relationships between road freight transport, facility location, logistics management and urban form," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 24(C), pages 45-57.
    5. George Yannis & John Golias & Constantinos Antoniou, 2006. "Effects of Urban Delivery Restrictions on Traffic Movements," Transportation Planning and Technology, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 29(4), pages 295-311, April.
    6. Joëlle Morana, 2014. "Sustainable Supply Chain Management in Urban Logistics," Post-Print halshs-01475787, HAL.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Demostenis Ramos Cassiano & Bruno Vieira Bertoncini & Leise Kelli de Oliveira, 2021. "A Conceptual Model Based on the Activity System and Transportation System for Sustainable Urban Freight Transport," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(10), pages 1-13, May.
    2. Magdalena Mucowska, 2021. "Trends of Environmentally Sustainable Solutions of Urban Last-Mile Deliveries on the E-Commerce Market—A Literature Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-26, May.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Vieira, José Geraldo Vidal & Fransoo, Jan C. & Carvalho, Carla Deguirmendjian, 2015. "Freight distribution in megacities: Perspectives of shippers, logistics service providers and carriers," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 46(C), pages 46-54.
    2. Pedro A. P. Dias & Hugo Yoshizaki & Patricia Favero & Jose Geraldo Vidal Vieira, 2019. "Daytime or Overnight Deliveries? Perceptions of Drivers and Retailers in São Paulo City," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(22), pages 1-16, November.
    3. Maria Lindholm, 2013. "Urban freight transport from a local authority perspective – a literature review," European Transport \ Trasporti Europei, ISTIEE, Institute for the Study of Transport within the European Economic Integration, issue 54, pages 1-3.
    4. Kang, Sanggyun, 2020. "Warehouse location choice: A case study in Los Angeles, CA," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 88(C).
    5. McLeod, Sam & Schapper, Jake H.M. & Curtis, Carey & Graham, Giles, 2019. "Conceptualizing freight generation for transport and land use planning: A review and synthesis of the literature," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 74(C), pages 24-34.
    6. Wanjie Hu & Jianjun Dong & Bon-gang Hwang & Rui Ren & Zhilong Chen, 2019. "A Scientometrics Review on City Logistics Literature: Research Trends, Advanced Theory and Practice," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(10), pages 1-27, May.
    7. Snežana Tadić & Mladen Krstić & Svetlana Dabić-Miletić & Mladen Božić, 2023. "Smart Material Handling Solutions for City Logistics Systems," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(8), pages 1-26, April.
    8. Zanni, Alberto M. & Bristow, Abigail L., 2010. "Emissions of CO2 from road freight transport in London: Trends and policies for long run reductions," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 38(4), pages 1774-1786, April.
    9. Abiye Tob-Ogu & Niraj Kumar & John Cullen & Erica E. F. Ballantyne, 2018. "Sustainability Intervention Mechanisms for Managing Road Freight Transport Externalities: A Systematic Literature Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(6), pages 1-18, June.
    10. Nayara Louise de Carvalho & José Geraldo Vidal Vieira & Paula Nakamura da Fonseca & Maxim A. Dulebenets, 2020. "A Multi-Criteria Structure for Sustainable Implementation of Urban Distribution Centers in Historical Cities," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(14), pages 1-15, July.
    11. Nilesh Anand & Ron van Duin & Hans Quak & Lori Tavasszy, 2015. "Relevance of City Logistics Modelling Efforts: A Review," Transport Reviews, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 35(6), pages 701-719, November.
    12. Behiri, Walid & Belmokhtar-Berraf, Sana & Chu, Chengbin, 2018. "Urban freight transport using passenger rail network: Scientific issues and quantitative analysis," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 115(C), pages 227-245.
    13. Jesus Gonzalez-Feliu & Joëlle Morana, 2014. "Assessing urban logistics pooling sustainability via a hierarchic dashboard from a group decision perspective," Working Papers halshs-01053887, HAL.
    14. Sakai, Takanori & Kawamura, Kazuya & Hyodo, Tetsuro, 2017. "Spatial reorganization of urban logistics system and its impacts: Case of Tokyo," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 60(C), pages 110-118.
    15. Yang, Chao & Chen, Mingyang & Yuan, Quan, 2021. "The geography of freight-related accidents in the era of E-commerce: Evidence from the Los Angeles metropolitan area," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 92(C).
    16. Daniele Crotti & Elena Maggi, 2023. "Social Responsibility and Urban Consolidation Centres in Sustainable Freight Transport Markets," Italian Economic Journal: A Continuation of Rivista Italiana degli Economisti and Giornale degli Economisti, Springer;Società Italiana degli Economisti (Italian Economic Association), vol. 9(2), pages 829-850, July.
    17. Sandrine Ville & Jesus Gonzalez-Feliu & Laetitia Dablanc, 2010. "The limits of public policy intervention in urban logistics: The case of Vicenza (Italy) and lessons for other European cities," Post-Print halshs-00742857, HAL.
    18. Thomas Baudel & Laetitia Dablanc & Penelope Aguiar-Melgarejo & Jean Ashton, 2015. "Optimizing Urban Freight Deliveries: From Designing and Testing a Prototype System to Addressing Real Life Challenges," Post-Print hal-01255153, HAL.
    19. Nathalia de Castro Zambuzi & Cláudio Barbieri da Cunha & Edgar Blanco & Hugo T.Y. Yoshizaki & Carla D.Rosa Carvalho, 2013. "The Aspects of the Urban Distribution in a Megacity: A Comparison Between São Paulo’s and Boston’s Urban Deliveries," LARES lares_2013_858-1006-1-sm, Latin American Real Estate Society (LARES).
    20. Santos, Lui­s & Coutinho-Rodrigues, João & Current, John R., 2008. "Implementing a multi-vehicle multi-route spatial decision support system for efficient trash collection in Portugal," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 42(6), pages 922-934, July.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:10:y:2018:i:7:p:2226-:d:155082. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.