IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v10y2018i4p1264-d142156.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Role of Mimicry Isomorphism in Sustainable Development Operationalisation by SMEs in South Africa

Author

Listed:
  • Reginald Masocha

    (School of Economics and Management, University of Limpopo, Sovenga 0727, South Africa)

  • Olawale Fatoki

    (School of Economics and Management, University of Limpopo, Sovenga 0727, South Africa)

Abstract

The study surveyed 222 small and medium enterprises (SMEs) from the Limpopo province of South Africa on the impact of mimicry isomorphism in making sustainable development operational. The research made use of self-administered questionnaires which were distributed, and the convenience sampling technique was used. Data analysis primarily comprised of exploratory factor analysis (EFA) through SPSS software version 24 confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) and structural equation modelling (SEM) through AMOS software version 24. The SEM results revealed that all three measured dimensions of sustainable development—namely, economic, environmental, and social—were significantly influenced by mimicry isomorphism. As such, the implications of the study are that strong evidence exists pertaining to the operationalisation of sustainable development due to mimetic isomorphism.

Suggested Citation

  • Reginald Masocha & Olawale Fatoki, 2018. "The Role of Mimicry Isomorphism in Sustainable Development Operationalisation by SMEs in South Africa," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(4), pages 1-16, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:10:y:2018:i:4:p:1264-:d:142156
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/10/4/1264/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/10/4/1264/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Timothy Bartram, 2011. "Employee management systems and organizational contexts: a population ecology approach," Management Research Review, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 34(6), pages 663-677, May.
    2. Corina Joseph & Ross Taplin, 2012. "Local government website sustainability reporting: a mimicry perspective," Social Responsibility Journal, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 8(3), pages 363-372, July.
    3. Assefa, G. & Frostell, B., 2007. "Social sustainability and social acceptance in technology assessment: A case study of energy technologies," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 29(1), pages 63-78.
    4. Fábio Marques & Paulo Sérgio Miranda Mendonça & Charbel José Chiappetta Jabbour, 2010. "Social dimension of sustainability in retail: case studies of small and medium Brazilian supermarkets," Social Responsibility Journal, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 6(2), pages 237-251, June.
    5. Makena Coffman & Karen Umemoto, 2010. "The triple-bottom-line: framing of trade-offs in sustainability planning practice," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 12(5), pages 597-610, October.
    6. Sitalakshmi Venkatraman & Raveendranath Ravi Nayak, 2015. "Corporate sustainability: an IS approach for integrating triple bottom line elements," Social Responsibility Journal, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 11(3), pages 482-501, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Musaab Alnaim & Abdelmoneim Bahyeldin Mohamed Metwally, 2024. "Institutional Pressures and Environmental Management Accounting Adoption: Do Environmental Strategy Matter?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(7), pages 1-20, April.
    2. Agnieszka Karman, 2022. "The Homogenization of Carbon Management Practices: How Organizations Response to Isomorphic Pressures to Reduce GHG Emissions," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(1), pages 148-173.
    3. Obey Dzomonda & Olawale Fatoki, 2020. "Environmental Sustainability Commitment and Financial Performance of Firms Listed on the Johannesburg Stock Exchange (JSE)," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(20), pages 1-21, October.
    4. Reginald Masocha, 2019. "Normative Environmental Configuration of SMEs within the Sustainable Development Discourse in South Africa: An Empirical Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(23), pages 1-13, November.
    5. Reginald Masocha & Olawale Fatoki, 2018. "The Impact of Coercive Pressures on Sustainability Practices of Small Businesses in South Africa," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(9), pages 1-14, August.
    6. Reginald Masocha, 2019. "Social Sustainability Practices on Small Businesses in Developing Economies: A Case of South Africa," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(12), pages 1-13, June.
    7. Muafi Muafi, 2021. "Attitudes toward information and communications technology, mimetic isomorphism and strategic management in Islamic perspective: The moderating role of Qur’anic work ethics," Bussecon Review of Social Sciences (2687-2285), Bussecon International Academy, vol. 3(1), pages 20-27, January.
    8. Mehfooz Ullah & Muhammad Waris Ali Khan & Lee Chia Kuang & Ammar Hussain & Faisal Rana & Asadullah Khan & Mirza Rizwan Sajid, 2020. "A Structural Model for the Antecedents of Sustainable Project Management in Pakistan," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(19), pages 1-19, September.
    9. Edvard Tijan & Adrijana Agatić & Marija Jović & Saša Aksentijević, 2019. "Maritime National Single Window—A Prerequisite for Sustainable Seaport Business," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(17), pages 1-21, August.
    10. Il Park, Byung & Xiao, Shufeng (Simon), 2021. "Doing good by combating bad in the digital world: Institutional pressures, anti-corruption practices, and competitive implications of MNE foreign subsidiaries," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 137(C), pages 194-205.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Reginald Masocha & Olawale Fatoki, 2018. "The Impact of Coercive Pressures on Sustainability Practices of Small Businesses in South Africa," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(9), pages 1-14, August.
    2. Ashfaq Ahmad Khan & Wiqar Ahmad, 2013. "Matching resources with demand: a flawed strategy?," Asia-Pacific Development Journal, United Nations Economic and Social Commission for Asia and the Pacific (ESCAP), vol. 20(1), pages 63-89, June.
    3. Wilson, Christopher & van der Velden, Maja, 2022. "Sustainable AI: An integrated model to guide public sector decision-making," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 68(C).
    4. Antoine Boche & Clément Foucher & Luiz Fernando Lavado Villa, 2022. "Understanding Microgrid Sustainability: A Systemic and Comprehensive Review," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(8), pages 1-29, April.
    5. Ana Beatriz Hernández-Lara & Juan Pablo Gonzales-Bustos & Amado Alarcón-Alarcón, 2021. "Social Sustainability on Corporate Boards: The Effects of Female Family Members on R&D," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-13, February.
    6. Ponce, Pedro & Polasko, Kenneth & Molina, Arturo, 2016. "End user perceptions toward smart grid technology: Acceptance, adoption, risks, and trust," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 60(C), pages 587-598.
    7. Andreas Moursellas & Debashree De & Thomas Wurzer & Antonios Skouloudis & Gerald Reiner & Atanu Chaudhuri & Theodoros Manousidis & Chrisovalantis Malesios & Konstantinos Evangelinos & Prasanta Kumar D, 2023. "Sustainability Practices and Performance in European Small-and-Medium Enterprises: Insights from Multiple Case Studies," Circular Economy and Sustainability,, Springer.
    8. Concepción Garcés-Ayerbe & Pilar Rivera-Torres & Josefina L. Murillo-Luna & Cristina Suárez-Gálvez, 2022. "Does it pay more to be green in family firms than in non-family firms?," Review of Managerial Science, Springer, vol. 16(5), pages 1365-1386, July.
    9. Jimin Shim & Joonho Moon & Won Seok Lee & Namho Chung, 2021. "The Impact of CSR on Corporate Value of Restaurant Businesses Using Triple Bottom Line Theory," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-14, February.
    10. Mikelis Grivins & Talis Tisenkopfs & Zaklina Stojanovic & Bojan Ristic, 2016. "A Comparative Analysis of the Social Performance of Global and Local Berry Supply Chains," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(6), pages 1-20, June.
    11. Mingjie Song & DongMei Chen & Katie Woodstock & Zuo Zhang & Yuling Wu, 2019. "An RP-MCE-SOP Framework for China’s County-Level “Three-Space” and “Three-Line” Planning—An Integration of Rational Planning, Multi-Criteria Evaluation, and Spatial Optimization," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(11), pages 1-23, May.
    12. Z. Goosen & E. J. Cilliers, 2020. "Enhancing Social Sustainability Through the Planning of Third Places: A Theory-Based Framework," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 150(3), pages 835-866, August.
    13. Eirini Triantafyllidou & Anastasia Zabaniotou, 2022. "From Theory to Praxis: ‘Go Sustainable Living’ Survey for Exploring Individuals Consciousness Level of Decision-Making and Action-Taking in Daily Life Towards a Green Citizenship," Circular Economy and Sustainability,, Springer.
    14. Yuan, Xueliang & Zuo, Jian & Ma, Chunyuan, 2011. "Social acceptance of solar energy technologies in China--End users' perspective," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 39(3), pages 1031-1036, March.
    15. Sarvenaz Pakravan & Shahin Keynoush & Ehsan Daneshyar, 2022. "Proposing a Pedagogical Framework for Integrating Urban Agriculture as a Tool to Achieve Social Sustainability within the Interior Design Studio," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(12), pages 1-32, June.
    16. Amrinder Kaur & Puja Chhabra Sharma, 2018. "Social sustainability in supply chain decisions: Indian manufacturers," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 20(4), pages 1707-1721, August.
    17. Florin Mariasiu, 2013. "Consumers’ Attitudes Related to Biofuel Use in Transportation," International Review of Management and Marketing, Econjournals, vol. 3(1), pages 1-9.
    18. Shunichi Hienuki & Kazuhiko Noguchi & Tadahiro Shibutani & Takahiro Saigo & Atsumi Miyake, 2019. "The Balance of Individual and Infrastructure Values in Decisions Regarding Advanced Science and Technology," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(12), pages 1-15, June.
    19. Irene Martín-Rubio & Diego Andina, 2016. "University Knowledge Transfer Offices and Social Responsibility," Administrative Sciences, MDPI, vol. 6(4), pages 1-19, December.
    20. Weiss, Daniel & Nemeczek, Fabian, 2021. "A text-based monitoring tool for the legitimacy and guidance of technological innovation systems," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 66(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:10:y:2018:i:4:p:1264-:d:142156. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.