IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v10y2018i1p237-d127367.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Review and Analysis of Alternatives for the Valorisation of Agro-Industrial Olive Oil By-Products

Author

Listed:
  • Julio Berbel

    (Water, Environmental and Agricultural Resources Economics (WEARE) Research Group, Universidad de Córdoba, 14014 Córdoba, Spain)

  • Alejandro Posadillo

    (Seneca Green Catalyst, S.L., 14014 Córdoba, Spain)

Abstract

By-products and waste from olive production (agriculture) and the olive oil industry (mills and refineries) are an important environmental issue in Mediterranean areas. Industrial waste and by-products contain highly valuable components that can also be phytotoxic. This article reviews recent research on the valorisation of olive by-products under the bioeconomy strategy. The alternatives are classified according to the ‘bioeconomy value pyramid’, which prioritises higher value uses over the current energy and compost valorisation. Special attention is paid to the use of these by-products for animal feed that can be improved by reducing the content of saturated fatty acids (SFAs) and increase the polyunsaturated fatty acids amount considered beneficial in response to their use; this makes the food healthier for humans while simultaneously reducing feeding costs and the environmental impact of livestock.

Suggested Citation

  • Julio Berbel & Alejandro Posadillo, 2018. "Review and Analysis of Alternatives for the Valorisation of Agro-Industrial Olive Oil By-Products," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(1), pages 1-9, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:10:y:2018:i:1:p:237-:d:127367
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/10/1/237/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/10/1/237/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Kes McCormick & Niina Kautto, 2013. "The Bioeconomy in Europe: An Overview," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 5(6), pages 1-20, June.
    2. Rolf Meyer, 2017. "Bioeconomy Strategies: Contexts, Visions, Guiding Implementation Principles and Resulting Debates," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(6), pages 1-32, June.
    3. Calero, Juan & Luna, Diego & Sancho, Enrique D. & Luna, Carlos & Bautista, Felipa M. & Romero, Antonio A. & Posadillo, Alejandro & Berbel, Julio & Verdugo-Escamilla, Cristóbal, 2015. "An overview on glycerol-free processes for the production of renewable liquid biofuels, applicable in diesel engines," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 42(C), pages 1437-1452.
    4. J Berbel & A Posadillo, 2018. "Opportunities for the Bioeconomy of Olive Oil Byproducts," Biomedical Journal of Scientific & Technical Research, Biomedical Research Network+, LLC, vol. 2(1), pages 2094-2096, January.
    5. Alessio Siciliano & Maria Assuntina Stillitano & Carlo Limonti, 2016. "Energetic Valorization of Wet Olive Mill Wastes through a Suitable Integrated Treatment: H 2 O 2 with Lime and Anaerobic Digestion," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(11), pages 1-15, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Sarah Stempfle & Domenico Carlucci & Bernardo Corrado de Gennaro & Luigi Roselli & Giacomo Giannoccaro, 2021. "Available Pathways for Operationalizing Circular Economy into the Olive Oil Supply Chain: Mapping Evidence from a Scoping Literature Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(17), pages 1-22, August.
    2. Mechthild Donner & Ivana Radić & Yamna Erraach & Fatima El Hadad-Gauthier, 2022. "Implementation of Circular Business Models for Olive Oil Waste and By-Product Valorization," Resources, MDPI, vol. 11(7), pages 1-18, July.
    3. Marquina, Jesús & Colinet, María José & Pablo-Romero, María del P., 2021. "The economic value of olive sector biomass for thermal and electrical uses in Andalusia (Spain)," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 148(C).
    4. Idiano D’Adamo & Pasquale Marcello Falcone & Massimo Gastaldi & Piergiuseppe Morone, 2019. "A Social Analysis of the Olive Oil Sector: The Role of Family Business," Resources, MDPI, vol. 8(3), pages 1-17, August.
    5. Pablo Doménech & Aleta Duque & Isabel Higueras & Raquel Iglesias & Paloma Manzanares, 2020. "Biorefinery of the Olive Tree—Production of Sugars from Enzymatic Hydrolysis of Olive Stone Pretreated by Alkaline Extrusion," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(17), pages 1-13, September.
    6. Do, Quynh & Mishra, Nishikant & Colicchia, Claudia & Creazza, Alessandro & Ramudhin, Amar, 2022. "An extended institutional theory perspective on the adoption of circular economy practices: Insights from the seafood industry," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 247(C).
    7. Mechthild Donner & Ivana Radić, 2021. "Innovative Circular Business Models in the Olive Oil Sector for Sustainable Mediterranean Agrifood Systems," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(5), pages 1-21, February.
    8. Mechthild Donner & Ivana Radić & Yamna Erraach & Fatima El Hadad-Gauthier, 2022. "Implementation of circular business models for olive oil waste and by-product valorization," Post-Print hal-03756908, HAL.
    9. Luca Adami & Marco Schiavon, 2021. "From Circular Economy to Circular Ecology: A Review on the Solution of Environmental Problems through Circular Waste Management Approaches," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(2), pages 1-20, January.
    10. Paweł Sobczak & Kazimierz Zawiślak & Agnieszka Starek & Wioletta Żukiewicz-Sobczak & Agnieszka Sagan & Beata Zdybel & Dariusz Andrejko, 2020. "Compaction Process as a Concept of Press-Cake Production from Organic Waste," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(4), pages 1-11, February.
    11. Mechthild Donner & Taoufik Yatribi & Yamna Erraach & Feliu López-I-Gelats & Judit Manuel & Ivana Radic & Sandrine Costa & Fatima El Hadad-Gauthier, 2021. "Valorising olive waste and by-products in the Mediterranean region: a socio-economic perspective," Post-Print hal-03275085, HAL.
    12. Muhammad Ashraf Sumrah & Muhammad Jan Leghari & Syed Hamza Mahfooz & Jamil Akhtar & Muhammad Farhan Khan Pasha & Muhammad Ramzan Anser, 2022. "Economical Olive Cultivation by Selection of Suitable Variety in Pothwar Region of Pakistan," Journal of Economic Impact, Science Impact Publishers, vol. 4(3), pages 213-217.
    13. José Carlos Martínez-Patiño & Irene Gómez-Cruz & Inmaculada Romero & Beatriz Gullón & Encarnación Ruiz & Mladen Brnčić & Eulogio Castro, 2019. "Ultrasound-Assisted Extraction as a First Step in a Biorefinery Strategy for Valorisation of Extracted Olive Pomace," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(14), pages 1-13, July.
    14. Do, Quynh & Ramudhin, Amar & Colicchia, Claudia & Creazza, Alessandro & Li, Dong, 2021. "A systematic review of research on food loss and waste prevention and management for the circular economy," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 239(C).
    15. Anna Dedousi & Maria-Zoi Kritsa & Mirjana Đukić Stojčić & Themistoklis Sfetsas & Antonios Sentas & Evangelia Sossidou, 2022. "Production Performance, Egg Quality Characteristics, Fatty Acid Profile and Health Lipid Indices of Produced Eggs, Blood Biochemical Parameters and Welfare Indicators of Laying Hens Fed Dried Olive Pu," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(6), pages 1-23, March.
    16. Massimiliano Borrello & Stefano Pascucci & Luigi Cembalo, 2020. "Three Propositions to Unify Circular Economy Research: A Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(10), pages 1-22, May.
    17. G. Venkatesh, 2022. "Circular Bio-economy—Paradigm for the Future: Systematic Review of Scientific Journal Publications from 2015 to 2021," Circular Economy and Sustainability,, Springer.
    18. Mechthild Donner & Ivana Radić, 2021. "Innovative circular business models in the olive oil sector for sustainable mediterranean agrifood systems," Post-Print hal-03158870, HAL.
    19. Anxo Carreira-Casais & Paz Otero & Pascual Garcia-Perez & Paula Garcia-Oliveira & Antia G. Pereira & Maria Carpena & Anton Soria-Lopez & Jesus Simal-Gandara & Miguel A. Prieto, 2021. "Benefits and Drawbacks of Ultrasound-Assisted Extraction for the Recovery of Bioactive Compounds from Marine Algae," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(17), pages 1-25, August.
    20. Cristina Truzzi & Silvia Illuminati & Federico Girolametti & Matteo Antonucci & Giuseppe Scarponi & Sara Ruschioni & Paola Riolo & Anna Annibaldi, 2019. "Influence of Feeding Substrates on the Presence of Toxic Metals (Cd, Pb, Ni, As, Hg) in Larvae of Tenebrio molitor : Risk Assessment for Human Consumption," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(23), pages 1-15, November.
    21. Murillo Vetroni Barros & Rômulo Henrique Gomes Jesus & Bruno Silva Ribeiro & Cassiano Moro Piekarski, 2023. "Going in Circles: Key Aspects for Circular Economy Contributions to Agro-industrial Cooperatives," Circular Economy and Sustainability,, Springer.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Marquina, Jesús & Colinet, María José & Pablo-Romero, María del P., 2021. "The economic value of olive sector biomass for thermal and electrical uses in Andalusia (Spain)," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 148(C).
    2. Lisa Biber-Freudenberger & Amit Kumar Basukala & Martin Bruckner & Jan Börner, 2018. "Sustainability Performance of National Bio-Economies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(8), pages 1-20, August.
    3. George B. Frisvold & Steven M. Moss & Andrea Hodgson & Mary E. Maxon, 2021. "Understanding the U.S. Bioeconomy: A New Definition and Landscape," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-24, February.
    4. Christina-Ioanna Papadopoulou & Efstratios Loizou & Katerina Melfou & Fotios Chatzitheodoridis, 2021. "The Knowledge Based Agricultural Bioeconomy: A Bibliometric Network Analysis," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(20), pages 1-15, October.
    5. Manuel Hafner & Lukas Fehr & Jan Springorum & Artur Petkau & Reinhard Johler, 2020. "Perceptions of Bioeconomy and the Desire for Governmental Action: Regional Actors’ Connotations of Wood-Based Bioeconomy in Germany," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(23), pages 1-13, November.
    6. Andrew M. Neill & Cathal O’Donoghue & Jane C. Stout, 2020. "A Natural Capital Lens for a Sustainable Bioeconomy: Determining the Unrealised and Unrecognised Services from Nature," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(19), pages 1-24, September.
    7. Juha Peltomaa, 2018. "Drumming the Barrels of Hope? Bioeconomy Narratives in the Media," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(11), pages 1-14, November.
    8. Durwin H.J. Lynch & Pim Klaassen & Lan van Wassenaer & Jacqueline E.W. Broerse, 2020. "Constructing the Public in Roadmapping the Transition to a Bioeconomy: A Case Study from the Netherlands," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(8), pages 1-18, April.
    9. Giurca, Alexandru & Befort, Nicolas, 2023. "Deconstructing substitution narratives: The case of bioeconomy innovations from the forest-based sector," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 207(C).
    10. Valeria Ferreira Gregorio & Laia Pié & Antonio Terceño, 2018. "A Systematic Literature Review of Bio, Green and Circular Economy Trends in Publications in the Field of Economics and Business Management," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(11), pages 1-39, November.
    11. Gabriel Cucui & Constantin Aurelian Ionescu & Ioana Raluca Goldbach & Mihaela Denisa Coman & Elena Liliana Moiceanu Marin, 2018. "Quantifying the Economic Effects of Biogas Installations for Organic Waste from Agro-Industrial Sector," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(7), pages 1-16, July.
    12. Andreas Nicolaidis Lindqvist & Sarah Broberg & Linda Tufvesson & Sammar Khalil & Thomas Prade, 2019. "Bio-Based Production Systems: Why Environmental Assessment Needs to Include Supporting Systems," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(17), pages 1-26, August.
    13. Tobias Stern & Ursula Ploll & Raphael Spies & Peter Schwarzbauer & Franziska Hesser & Lea Ranacher, 2018. "Understanding Perceptions of the Bioeconomy in Austria—An Explorative Case Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(11), pages 1-17, November.
    14. Carmen Priefer & Rolf Meyer, 2019. "One Concept, Many Opinions: How Scientists in Germany Think About the Concept of Bioeconomy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(15), pages 1-21, August.
    15. DeBoer, Jennifer & Panwar, Rajat & Kozak, Robert & Cashore, Benjamin, 2020. "Squaring the circle: Refining the competitiveness logic for the circular bioeconomy," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 110(C).
    16. Marianne Duquenne & Hélène Prost & Joachim Schöpfel & Franck Dumeignil, 2020. "Open Bioeconomy—A Bibliometric Study on the Accessibility of Articles in the Field of Bioeconomy," Publications, MDPI, vol. 8(4), pages 1-33, December.
    17. Franz Grossauer & Gernot Stoeglehner, 2020. "Bioeconomy—Spatial Requirements for Sustainable Development," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(5), pages 1-28, March.
    18. De-Chang Li & Zhengyi Pan & Zhengbin Tian & Qian Zhang & Xiaohui Deng & Heqing Jiang & Guang-Hui Wang, 2024. "Frustrated Lewis pair catalyst realizes efficient green diesel production," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 15(1), pages 1-10, December.
    19. Daniela Pasnicu & Mihaela Ghenta & Aniela Matei, 2019. "Transition to Bioeconomy: Perceptions and Behaviors in Central and Eastern Europe," The AMFITEATRU ECONOMIC journal, Academy of Economic Studies - Bucharest, Romania, vol. 21(50), pages 1-9, February.
    20. Ruxandra Bejinaru & Cristian Valentin Hapenciuc & Iulian Condratov & Pavel Stanciu, 2018. "The University Role in Developing the Human Capital for a Sustainable Bioeconomy," The AMFITEATRU ECONOMIC journal, Academy of Economic Studies - Bucharest, Romania, vol. 20(49), pages 583-583, August.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:10:y:2018:i:1:p:237-:d:127367. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.