IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/bstrat/v35y2026i4p4641-4658.html

Sustainability Assessment of Circular Strategies in the Agri‐Food Industry: The Case of Olive Mills' By‐Product Valorization

Author

Listed:
  • David Polonio
  • Rubén Granado‐Díaz
  • José A. Gómez‐Limón
  • Anastasio J. Villanueva

Abstract

This study integrates multidimensional sustainability indicators into a unified assessment approach to evaluate circular strategies in agri‐food industry businesses. This methodological approach is applied to empirically examine the case of the olive oil industry's by‐product valorization. Specifically, three valorization alternatives are evaluated: composting, gasification, and pomace oil extraction. A new integrated framework encompassing life cycle assessment (LCA) is used to assess environmental indicators, while economic and social indicators are used to assess all three dimensions of sustainability. Results suggest that extraction is the most sustainable circular strategy due to its excellent economic performance, which offsets the medium–low environmental and social performance. Gasification almost matches the overall sustainability performance of extraction, as it shows high environmental and moderate social performance, but medium–low economic performance. Composting excels in the social dimension, fostering rural employment, yet struggles with profitability. These results are confirmed by robustness tests based on Monte Carlo simulations and using different normalization, weighting, and aggregation methods.

Suggested Citation

  • David Polonio & Rubén Granado‐Díaz & José A. Gómez‐Limón & Anastasio J. Villanueva, 2026. "Sustainability Assessment of Circular Strategies in the Agri‐Food Industry: The Case of Olive Mills' By‐Product Valorization," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 35(4), pages 4641-4658, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:bstrat:v:35:y:2026:i:4:p:4641-4658
    DOI: 10.1002/bse.70371
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.70371
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/bse.70371?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:bstrat:v:35:y:2026:i:4:p:4641-4658. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10.1002/(ISSN)1099-0836 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.