IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v10y2018i12p4392-d185236.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Sustainable Logistics Management in the 21st Century Requires Wholeness Systems Thinking

Author

Listed:
  • David Holman

    (Department of Logistics and Quality Management, ŠKODA AUTO University, Na Karmeli 1457, Mladá Boleslav 293 01, Czech Republic)

  • Pavel Wicher

    (Department of Logistics and Quality Management, ŠKODA AUTO University, Na Karmeli 1457, Mladá Boleslav 293 01, Czech Republic)

  • Radim Lenort

    (Department of Logistics and Quality Management, ŠKODA AUTO University, Na Karmeli 1457, Mladá Boleslav 293 01, Czech Republic)

  • Venuše Dolejšová

    (Manufactus GmbH, Theresienstrasse 8, 82319 Starnberg, Germany)

  • David Staš

    (Department of Logistics and Quality Management, ŠKODA AUTO University, Na Karmeli 1457, Mladá Boleslav 293 01, Czech Republic)

  • Ioana Giurgiu

    (Department of Logistics and Quality Management, ŠKODA AUTO University, Na Karmeli 1457, Mladá Boleslav 293 01, Czech Republic)

Abstract

The 21st century is characterised by the unprecedented speed and scope of changes, creating a new external environment, where the logistics systems are managed. The latest development in logistics management is influenced by sustainability, which complements the economic dimension with environmental and social dimensions. The fundamental principle of logistics management is systems thinking (ST). Until now, the reductionism ST (RST), focusing on the maximal economic performance of a logistics system’s parts and interactions has been applied. However, the RST approach does not sufficiently consider the implication of the external environment to the economic performance. The article’s aim is the introduction of the new wholeness ST (WST) approach and confirmation of its fundamental role in deriving of the performance of the selected logistics system’s parts and interactions from the external environment. WST’s role was demonstrated in a case study, comparing the WST and RST approach in management of particular automotive logistics’ system. The WST approach in the management of the whole selected logistics system assures a considerable reduction in the consumption of resources. Based on the comparative case study’s results, the conceptual framework for the application of the WST approach in all sustainable dimensions is proposed.

Suggested Citation

  • David Holman & Pavel Wicher & Radim Lenort & Venuše Dolejšová & David Staš & Ioana Giurgiu, 2018. "Sustainable Logistics Management in the 21st Century Requires Wholeness Systems Thinking," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(12), pages 1-26, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:10:y:2018:i:12:p:4392-:d:185236
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/10/12/4392/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/10/12/4392/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jesus Gonzalez-Feliu & Joëlle Morana, 2014. "Assessing urban logistics pooling sustainability via a hierarchic dashboard from a group decision perspective," Working Papers halshs-01053887, HAL.
    2. Joëlle Morana & Jesus Gonzalez-Feliu, 2014. "A sustainable urban logistics dashboard from the perspective of a group of logistics managers," Post-Print halshs-01053885, HAL.
    3. David Wittstruck & Frank Teuteberg, 2012. "Understanding the Success Factors of Sustainable Supply Chain Management: Empirical Evidence from the Electrics and Electronics Industry," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 19(3), pages 141-158, May.
    4. Esfahbodi, Ali & Zhang, Yufeng & Watson, Glyn, 2016. "Sustainable supply chain management in emerging economies: Trade-offs between environmental and cost performance," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 181(PB), pages 350-366.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Bing Qing Tan & Fangfang Wang & Jia Liu & Kai Kang & Federica Costa, 2020. "A Blockchain-Based Framework for Green Logistics in Supply Chains," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(11), pages 1-13, June.
    2. David Holman & Eva Švejdarová, 2023. "The 21st-Century Empowering Wholeness Adaptive (EWA) Educational Model Transforming Learning Capacity and Human Capital through Wholeness Systems Thinking towards a Sustainable Future," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(2), pages 1-35, January.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Sonagnon Hounwanou & Natacha Gondran & Jesus Gonzalez-Feliu, 2016. "Retail location and freight flow generation: proposition of a method estimating upstream and downstream movements generated by city center stores and peripheral shopping centers," Post-Print hal-01357008, HAL.
    2. Ehsan Shekarian & Behrang Ijadi & Amirreza Zare & Jukka Majava, 2022. "Sustainable Supply Chain Management: A Comprehensive Systematic Review of Industrial Practices," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(13), pages 1-30, June.
    3. Zhifeng Wu & Senjing Zhai & Jiangtao Hong & Yibin Zhang & Keren Shi, 2018. "Building Sustainable Supply Chains for Organizations Based on QFD: A Case Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 15(12), pages 1-12, December.
    4. repec:hal:wpaper:hal-01152592 is not listed on IDEAS
    5. Sharma, Varun & Vijayaraghavan, T.A.S. & Raghu Ram, Tata L., 2023. "Resolving operational paradox of sustainable supply chain: A decision framework approach," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 87(PB).
    6. Dina Andriankaja & Natacha Gondran & Jesus Gonzalez-Feliu, 2015. "Assessing the Environmental Impacts of Different IPSS Deployment Scenarios for the Light Commercial Vehicle Industry," Post-Print hal-01152592, HAL.
    7. Dandan He & Zhongfu Li & Chunlin Wu & Xin Ning, 2018. "An E-Commerce Platform for Industrialized Construction Procurement Based on BIM and Linked Data," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(8), pages 1-21, July.
    8. Cleophas, Catherine & Cottrill, Caitlin & Ehmke, Jan Fabian & Tierney, Kevin, 2019. "Collaborative urban transportation: Recent advances in theory and practice," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 273(3), pages 801-816.
    9. Joëlle Morana & Jesus Gonzalez-Feliu, 2015. "A sustainable urban logistics dashboard from the perspective of a group of operational managers," Management Research Review, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 38(10), pages 1068-1085, October.
    10. Rebeca B. Sánchez-Flores & Samantha E. Cruz-Sotelo & Sara Ojeda-Benitez & Ma. Elizabeth Ramírez-Barreto, 2020. "Sustainable Supply Chain Management—A Literature Review on Emerging Economies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(17), pages 1-27, August.
    11. Mourad Makaci & Paul J. Reaidy & Karine Evrard Samuel & Valérie Botta-Genoulaz & Thibaud Monteiro, 2017. "Pooled warehouse management : An empirical study," Post-Print hal-01531304, HAL.
    12. repec:hal:wpaper:halshs-01176134 is not listed on IDEAS
    13. Josep-Maria Salanova Grau & Jesus Gonzalez-Feliu, 2015. "Comparing fast VRP algorithms for collaborative urban freight transport systems: a solution probleming analysis," Post-Print halshs-01176134, HAL.
    14. Mohsin Malik & Salam Abdallah, 2019. "Sustainability Initiatives in Emerging Economies: A Socio-Cultural Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(18), pages 1-19, September.
    15. Radojko LUKIÆ, 2013. "Sustainable Cost Management in Retail," REVISTA DE MANAGEMENT COMPARAT INTERNATIONAL/REVIEW OF INTERNATIONAL COMPARATIVE MANAGEMENT, Faculty of Management, Academy of Economic Studies, Bucharest, Romania, vol. 14(2), pages 268-280, May.
    16. Hoyoung Lee, 2020. "The Role of Environmental Uncertainty, Green HRM and Green SCM in Influencing Organization s Energy Efficacy and Environmental Performance," International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, Econjournals, vol. 10(3), pages 332-339.
    17. Amer Saeed & Yun Jun & Saviour Ayertey Nubuor & Hewawasam Puwakpitiyage Rasika Priyankara & Mahabaduge Prasad Fernando Jayasuriya, 2018. "Institutional Pressures, Green Supply Chain Management Practices on Environmental and Economic Performance: A Two Theory View," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(5), pages 1-24, May.
    18. Miao Su & Su‐Han Woo & Xiaochun Chen & Keun‐sik Park, 2023. "Identifying critical success factors for the agri‐food cold chain's sustainable development: When the strategy system comes into play," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 32(1), pages 444-461, January.
    19. Siddharth Shankar Rai & Shivam Rai & Nitin Kumar Singh, 2021. "Organizational resilience and social-economic sustainability: COVID-19 perspective," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 23(8), pages 12006-12023, August.
    20. Muhammad Ridwan Andi Purnomo & Adhe Rizky Anugerah & Bella Taradipa Dewipramesti, 2020. "Sustainable Supply Chain Management Framework in a Higher Education Laboratory using Intuitionistic Fuzzy Cognitive Map," Post-Print cirad-02907401, HAL.
    21. Abbas Mardani & Dalia Streimikiene & Edmundas Kazimieras Zavadskas & Fausto Cavallaro & Mehrbakhsh Nilashi & Ahmad Jusoh & Habib Zare, 2017. "Application of Structural Equation Modeling (SEM) to Solve Environmental Sustainability Problems: A Comprehensive Review and Meta-Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(10), pages 1-65, October.
    22. Omar Alsetoohy & Baker Ayoun & Mahmoud Abou-Kamar, 2021. "COVID-19 Pandemic Is a Wake-Up Call for Sustainable Local Food Supply Chains: Evidence from Green Restaurants in the USA," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(16), pages 1-24, August.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:10:y:2018:i:12:p:4392-:d:185236. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.