IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v10y2018i10p3461-d172533.html

Potential for Methane Generation by Lignocellulosic Household Waste

Author

Listed:
  • Karla Peña Contreras

    (Instituto de Investigaciones Agropecuarias y Forestales, Universidad Michoacana de San Nicolás de Hidalgo, Av. San Juanito Itzicuaro S/N, Col. San Juanito Itzícuaro, Morelia 58000, Mexico)

  • Juan Manuel Sánchez Yáñez

    (Instituto de Investigaciones Quimico-Biológicas, Gral. Francisco J. Mugica S/N, Morelia 58000, Mexico)

  • Quetzalli Aguilar-Virgen

    (Facultad de Ciencias Químicas e Ingeniería, Universidad Autónoma de Baja California, Calzada Universidad No. 14418, Mesa de Otay, Tijuana 22390, Mexico)

  • Paul Taboada-González

    (Facultad de Ciencias Químicas e Ingeniería, Universidad Autónoma de Baja California, Calzada Universidad No. 14418, Mesa de Otay, Tijuana 22390, Mexico)

  • Liliana Marquez-Benavides

    (Instituto de Investigaciones Agropecuarias y Forestales, Universidad Michoacana de San Nicolás de Hidalgo, Av. San Juanito Itzicuaro S/N, Col. San Juanito Itzícuaro, Morelia 58000, Mexico)

Abstract

The contribution of domestic lignocellulosic waste and its potential for biodegradation by components, for each category of paper and cardboard, have scarcely been reported. To achieve integral proposals, for managing this type of waste, is essential to know each individual contribution to the “paper and cardboard” category. The objective of this study was to characterize the paper and cardboard waste from the domestic solid waste stream, in the city of Morelia, Mexico, and estimate its methane generation potential (CH 4 ). The generation of lignocellulosic waste was studied in a housing complex of social interest. The domestic lignocellulosic residues (DLW) that were chemically characterized were derived from paper and cardboard. The average daily generation was 0.5 kg/inhabitant. The highest content of lignin was found in newspaper (24.5%), and toilet paper was the material with the lowest lignin content (1%). The bond paper had a DLW of higher Y CH4 , when degraded anaerobically, in a semi-solid phase and a mesophilic regime. The variety of paper and cardboard, such as DLW, presented differences in their generation (kg/person), chemical composition (lignin content), and their potential for anaerobic biodegradability.

Suggested Citation

  • Karla Peña Contreras & Juan Manuel Sánchez Yáñez & Quetzalli Aguilar-Virgen & Paul Taboada-González & Liliana Marquez-Benavides, 2018. "Potential for Methane Generation by Lignocellulosic Household Waste," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(10), pages 1-15, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:10:y:2018:i:10:p:3461-:d:172533
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/10/10/3461/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/10/10/3461/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ben Hassen Trabelsi, Aïda & Zaafouri, Kaouther & Baghdadi, Withek & Naoui, Slim & Ouerghi, Aymen, 2018. "Second generation biofuels production from waste cooking oil via pyrolysis process," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 126(C), pages 888-896.
    2. Antonio Molino & Vincenzo Larocca & Simeone Chianese & Dino Musmarra, 2018. "Biofuels Production by Biomass Gasification: A Review," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(4), pages 1-31, March.
    3. Liu, Hengwei & Ni, Weidou & Li, Zheng & Ma, Linwei, 2008. "Strategic thinking on IGCC development in China," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 36(1), pages 1-11, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Dmitry Porshnov, 2022. "Evolution of pyrolysis and gasification as waste to energy tools for low carbon economy," Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Energy and Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 11(1), January.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Guido Busca, 2021. "Production of Gasolines and Monocyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons: From Fossil Raw Materials to Green Processes," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(13), pages 1-32, July.
    2. Andrea Di Giuliano & Stefania Lucantonio & Katia Gallucci, 2021. "Devolatilization of Residual Biomasses for Chemical Looping Gasification in Fluidized Beds Made Up of Oxygen-Carriers," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(2), pages 1-16, January.
    3. Munawar, Muhammad Assad & Khoja, Asif Hussain & Naqvi, Salman Raza & Mehran, Muhammad Taqi & Hassan, Muhammad & Liaquat, Rabia & Dawood, Usama Fida, 2021. "Challenges and opportunities in biomass ash management and its utilization in novel applications," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 150(C).
    4. Hoffmann, Bettina Susanne & Szklo, Alexandre, 2011. "Integrated gasification combined cycle and carbon capture: A risky option to mitigate CO2 emissions of coal-fired power plants," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 88(11), pages 3917-3929.
    5. Beims, R.F. & Simonato, C.L. & Wiggers, V.R., 2019. "Technology readiness level assessment of pyrolysis of trygliceride biomass to fuels and chemicals," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 112(C), pages 521-529.
    6. Zhang, Jianyun & Zhou, Zhe & Ma, Linwei & Li, Zheng & Ni, Weidou, 2013. "Efficiency of wet feed IGCC (integrated gasification combined cycle) systems with coal–water slurry preheating vaporization technology," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 51(C), pages 137-145.
    7. Zhi, Qiang & Su, Jun & Ru, Peng & Anadon, Laura Diaz, 2013. "The evolution of China's National Energy RD&D Programs: The role of scientists in science and technology decision making," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 61(C), pages 1568-1585.
    8. Sérgio Ferreira & Eliseu Monteiro & Paulo Brito & Cândida Vilarinho, 2019. "A Holistic Review on Biomass Gasification Modified Equilibrium Models," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(1), pages 1-31, January.
    9. Setter, C. & Oliveira, T.J.P., 2022. "Evaluation of the physical-mechanical and energy properties of coffee husk briquettes with kraft lignin during slow pyrolysis," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 189(C), pages 1007-1019.
    10. Singh, Omvir & Agrawal, Ankit & Dhiman, Neha & Vempatapu, Bhanu Prasad & Chiang, Ken & Tripathi, Shailendra & Sarkar, Bipul, 2021. "Production of renewable aromatics from jatropha oil over multifunctional ZnCo/ZSM-5 catalysts," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 179(C), pages 2124-2135.
    11. Achiraya Jiraprasertwong & Kornpong Vichaitanapat & Malinee Leethochawalit & Sumaeth Chavadej, 2018. "Three-Stage Anaerobic Sequencing Batch Reactor (ASBR) for Maximum Methane Production: Effects of COD Loading Rate and Reactor Volumetric Ratio," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(6), pages 1-16, June.
    12. Jin Wu & Jiangjiang Wang & Jing Wu & Chaofan Ma, 2019. "Exergy and Exergoeconomic Analysis of a Combined Cooling, Heating, and Power System Based on Solar Thermal Biomass Gasification," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(12), pages 1-19, June.
    13. Hossam A. Gabbar & Mohamed Aboughaly & Stefano Russo, 2017. "Conceptual Design and Energy Analysis of Integrated Combined Cycle Gasification System," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(8), pages 1-18, August.
    14. Sheriff, S. Abdul & Kumar, Indrala Kishan & Mandhatha, Petluri Sai & Jambal, Samraj Sunder & Sellappan, Raja & Ashok, B. & Nanthagopal, K., 2020. "Emission reduction in CI engine using biofuel reformulation strategies through nano additives for atmospheric air quality improvement," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 147(P1), pages 2295-2308.
    15. Maximilian Lackner & Maghsoud Besharati, 2025. "Agricultural Waste: Challenges and Solutions, a Review," Waste, MDPI, vol. 3(2), pages 1-32, June.
    16. Kirkels, Arjan F. & Verbong, Geert P.J., 2011. "Biomass gasification: Still promising? A 30-year global overview," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 15(1), pages 471-481, January.
    17. Mukherjee, C. & Denney, J. & Mbonimpa, E.G. & Slagley, J. & Bhowmik, R., 2020. "A review on municipal solid waste-to-energy trends in the USA," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 119(C).
    18. Se-Won Park & Sang-Yeop Lee & Yean-Ouk Jeong & Gun-Ho Han & Yong-Chil Seo, 2018. "Effects of Oxygen Enrichment in Air Oxidants on Biomass Gasification Efficiency and the Reduction of Tar Emissions," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(10), pages 1-13, October.
    19. Aui, A. & Wang, Y. & Mba-Wright, M., 2021. "Evaluating the economic feasibility of cellulosic ethanol: A meta-analysis of techno-economic analysis studies," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 145(C).
    20. Marcin Dębowski & Magda Dudek & Marcin Zieliński & Anna Nowicka & Joanna Kazimierowicz, 2021. "Microalgal Hydrogen Production in Relation to Other Biomass-Based Technologies—A Review," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-27, September.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:10:y:2018:i:10:p:3461-:d:172533. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.