IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsoctx/v10y2020i4p79-d428197.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Dealignment: Class in Britain and Class in British Sociology Since 1945

Author

Listed:
  • Ken Roberts

    (Law and Social Justice Building, University of Liverpool, Liverpool L69 7ZA, UK)

Abstract

This paper sets changes in Britain’s class structure since 1945 alongside the parallel sociological controversies about class. Since the 1970s, the class scheme developed by John Goldthorpe and colleagues for initial use in their study of social mobility in Britain has become sociology’s standard template for thinking about and researching class. Versions have been adopted by the UK government and the European Union as their official socio-economic classifications. This paper does not dispute that the Goldthorpe scheme is still the best available for classifying by occupation, or that occupation remains our best single indicator of class, or that a constant class scheme must be used if the purpose is to measure trends over time in rates of relative inter-generational mobility. Despite these merits, it is argued that the sociological gaze has been weakened by failing to represent changes over time in the class structure itself and, therefore, how class is experienced in lay people’s lives. There has been a relative neglect of absolute social mobility flows (which have changed over time), and a pre-occupation with the inter-generational and a relative neglect of intra-career mobilities and immobilities.

Suggested Citation

  • Ken Roberts, 2020. "Dealignment: Class in Britain and Class in British Sociology Since 1945," Societies, MDPI, vol. 10(4), pages 1-13, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsoctx:v:10:y:2020:i:4:p:79-:d:428197
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2075-4698/10/4/79/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2075-4698/10/4/79/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jenkins, Stephen P., 2015. "The income distribution in the UK: a picture of advantage and disadvantage," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 103980, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    2. Robert M. Blackburn, 1998. "A New System of Classes: But What are they and Do We Need Them?," Work, Employment & Society, British Sociological Association, vol. 12(4), pages 735-741, December.
    3. David Rose, 1998. "Once more Unto the Breach: In Defence of Class Analysis Yet Again," Work, Employment & Society, British Sociological Association, vol. 12(4), pages 755-767, December.
    4. Geoff Payne, 1987. "Mobility and Social Class," Palgrave Macmillan Books, in: Employment and Opportunity, chapter 8, pages 189-192, Palgrave Macmillan.
    5. Hazel Conley, 2002. "A State of Insecurity: Temporary Work in the Public Services," Work, Employment & Society, British Sociological Association, vol. 16(4), pages 725-737, December.
    6. Bukodi, Erzsébet & Goldthorpe, John H. & Waller, Lorraine & Kuha, Jouni, 2015. "The mobility problem in Britain: new findings from the analysis of birth cohort data," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 60249, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Mullan, Killian & Egerton, Muriel, 2006. "An analysis and monetary valuation of formal and informal voluntary work by gender and educational attainment," ISER Working Paper Series 2006-22, Institute for Social and Economic Research.
    2. Christian Grund & Kirsten Thommes, 2017. "The Role of Contract Types for Employees’ Public Service Motivation," Schmalenbach Business Review, Springer;Schmalenbach-Gesellschaft, vol. 18(4), pages 377-398, October.
    3. Driouchi, Ahmed & Gamar, Alae, 2016. "The Gap between Educational & Social Intergenerational Mobility in Arab Countries," MPRA Paper 73998, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    4. Yaojun Li & Frank Bechhofer & Robert Stewart & David McCrone & Michael Anderson & Lynn Jamieson, 2002. "A Divided Working Class? Planning and Career Perception in the Service and Working Classes," Work, Employment & Society, British Sociological Association, vol. 16(4), pages 617-636, December.
    5. David Chant & Mark Western, 1991. "The Analysis of Mobility Regimes," Sociological Methods & Research, , vol. 20(2), pages 256-286, November.
    6. Macmillan, Lindsey & Mcknight, Abigail Ann, 2022. "Understanding recent patterns in intergenerational social mobility: differences by gender, ethnicity, education, and their intersections," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 121554, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    7. Geoffrey Evans & Colin Mills, 1998. "Assessing the Cross-Sex Validity of the Goldthorpe Class Schema Using Log-linear Models with Latent Variables," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 32(3), pages 275-296, August.
    8. Lindsey Macmillan & Abigail McKnight, 2022. "Understanding recent patterns in intergenerational social mobility: differences by gender, ethnicity, education, and their intersections," CASE - Social Policies and Distributional Outcomes Research Papers 11, Centre for Analysis of Social Exclusion, LSE.
    9. Bazillier, Rémi & Héricourt, Jérôme & Ligonnière, Samuel, 2021. "Structure of income inequality and household leverage: Cross-country causal evidence," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 132(C).
    10. D'Orlando, Fabio & Ferrante, Francesco, 2015. "The benefits of stabilization policies revisited," MPRA Paper 67321, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    11. Rainald Borck & Matthias Wrede, 2018. "Spatial and social mobility," Journal of Regional Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 58(4), pages 688-704, September.
    12. Francesconi, Marco & Brynin, Malcolm, 2002. "The material returns to partnership: the effects of educational matching on labour market outcomes and gender equality," ISER Working Paper Series 2002-23, Institute for Social and Economic Research.
    13. Buscha, Franz & Gorman, Emma & Sturgis, Patrick, 2020. "Spatial and Social Mobility in England and Wales: Moving Out to Move On?," IZA Discussion Papers 13437, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    14. Kaixing Huang & Nicholas Sim & Hong Zhao, 2020. "Does Fdi Actually Affect Income Inequality? Insights From 25 Years Of Research," Journal of Economic Surveys, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 34(3), pages 630-659, July.
    15. repec:osf:socarx:rm9qy_v1 is not listed on IDEAS
    16. Francis Green, 2008. "Temporary Work and Insecurity in Britain: A Problem Solved?," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 88(1), pages 147-160, August.
    17. Michelle Jackson, 2001. "Non-Meritocratic Job Requirements and the Reproduction of Class Inequality: An Investigation," Work, Employment & Society, British Sociological Association, vol. 15(3), pages 619-630, September.
    18. Buscha, Franz & Gorman, Emma & Sturgis, Patrick, 2021. "Spatial and social mobility in England and Wales: a sub-national analysis of differences and trends over time," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 111605, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    19. Ernest Aigner & Lucia Baratech Sanchez & Desiree Alicia Bernhardt & Benjamin Curnow & Christian Hödl & Heidi Leonhardt & Anran Luo, 2016. "Sustainable Work. WWWforEurope Working Paper No. 112," WIFO Studies, WIFO, number 58685.
    20. Bukodi, Erzsébet & Goldthorpe, John H. & Waller, Lorraine & Kuha, Jouni, 2015. "The mobility problem in Britain: new findings from the analysis of birth cohort data," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 60249, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    21. Ilan Talmud & Vered Kraus & Yuval Yonay, 2003. "Class Analysis and Earnings Inequality: Nested and Non-Nested Comparisons of Two Class Models in Israel," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 37(1), pages 21-41, February.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsoctx:v:10:y:2020:i:4:p:79-:d:428197. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.