IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsoctx/v10y2020i3p52-d386109.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

An Analysis of the Factors Influencing Public Attitudes toward Implementing Basic Income (BI) from an Individual Perspective: A Case Study of Hokuriku Region, Japan

Author

Listed:
  • Jiaqi Yang

    (Graduate Program in Sustainability Science Global Leadership Initiative, The University of Tokyo, Chiba 2778563, Japan)

  • Geetha Mohan

    (Institute for the Advanced Study of Sustainability, United Nations University, Tokyo 1508925, Japan
    Institute for Future Initiatives, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo 1138654, Japan)

  • Kensuke Fukushi

    (Institute for the Advanced Study of Sustainability, United Nations University, Tokyo 1508925, Japan
    Institute for Future Initiatives, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo 1138654, Japan)

Abstract

With increasing interest in basic income (BI) in recent years around the world, a precise understanding of public attitudes toward this policy can provide valuable evidence for discussions on its feasibility among scholars and policymakers. This study quantitatively investigates what factors influence public attitudes toward implementing BI, taking the Hokuriku region of Japan as an example. The hypothesis and variables were designed based on the theories of retrenchment and social innovation, and a detailed consideration of the theoretical impacts of BI on human society, and of the social, economic and cultural characteristics of Japan. A questionnaire containing a BI proposal for Japan was developed, then a survey was conducted of 1028 local residents in the Hokuriku region. The logistic regression model was employed for the empirical analysis. The results showed that age, individual income level, family structure and interest in participating in non-market activities tend to influence respondents’ attitudes toward BI, due to concerns about the gains and losses from a trade-off selection between BI and the existing policies that it would replace. From the perspective of individual value, it was also found that the perception of the future vision of a society reshaped by BI also significantly influences public attitudes toward the policy. This research emphasized that the retrenchment of the existing policies accompanied by the implementation of BI lead potential beneficiaries of the current welfare system to weigh the change to their benefits, which consequently forms their attitudes toward BI.

Suggested Citation

  • Jiaqi Yang & Geetha Mohan & Kensuke Fukushi, 2020. "An Analysis of the Factors Influencing Public Attitudes toward Implementing Basic Income (BI) from an Individual Perspective: A Case Study of Hokuriku Region, Japan," Societies, MDPI, vol. 10(3), pages 1-18, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsoctx:v:10:y:2020:i:3:p:52-:d:386109
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2075-4698/10/3/52/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2075-4698/10/3/52/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Lee Soomi, 2018. "Attitudes Toward Universal Basic Income and Welfare State in Europe: A Research Note," Basic Income Studies, De Gruyter, vol. 13(1), pages 1-9, June.
    2. Jante Parlevliet, 2017. "What drives public acceptance of reforms? Longitudinal evidence from a Dutch pension reform," Public Choice, Springer, vol. 173(1), pages 1-23, October.
    3. Karl Widerquist, 2001. "Perspectives on the Guaranteed Income, Part II," Journal of Economic Issues, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 35(4), pages 1019-1030, December.
    4. Velandia, Margarita & Rejesus, Roderick M. & Knight, Thomas O. & Sherrick, Bruce J., 2009. "Factors Affecting Farmers' Utilization of Agricultural Risk Management Tools: The Case of Crop Insurance, Forward Contracting, and Spreading Sales," Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics, Cambridge University Press, vol. 41(1), pages 107-123, April.
    5. Baker John, 2008. "All Things Considered, Should Feminists Embrace Basic Income?," Basic Income Studies, De Gruyter, vol. 3(3), pages 1-8, December.
    6. Elgarte Julieta M., 2008. "Basic Income and the Gendered Division of Labour," Basic Income Studies, De Gruyter, vol. 3(3), pages 1-7, December.
    7. Michael Opielka, 2008. "The likelihood of a basic income in Germany," International Social Security Review, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 61(3), pages 73-94, July.
    8. Evelyn L. Forget & Alexander D. Peden & Stephenson B. Strobel, 2013. "Cash Transfers, Basic Income and Community Building," Social Inclusion, Cogitatio Press, vol. 1(2), pages 84-91.
    9. Michael Howard, 2005. "Basic income, liberal neutrality, socialism, and work," Review of Social Economy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 63(4), pages 613-631.
    10. Charles M. A. Clark & Catherine Kavanagh, 1996. "Basic Income, Inequality, and Unemployment: Rethinking the Linkage between Work and Welfare," Journal of Economic Issues, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 30(2), pages 399-406, June.
    11. Jon Altman & Elise Klein, 2018. "Lessons from a basic income programme for Indigenous Australians," Oxford Development Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 46(1), pages 132-146, January.
    12. William A. Jackson, 1999. "Basic Income and the Right to Work: A Keynesian Approach," Journal of Post Keynesian Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 21(4), pages 639-662, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jiaqi Yang & Geetha Mohan & Supriya Pipil & Kensuke Fukushi, 2021. "Review on basic income (BI): its theories and empirical cases," Journal of Social and Economic Development, Springer;Institute for Social and Economic Change, vol. 23(2), pages 203-239, December.
    2. Mathias Kifmann & Kerstin Roeder, 2014. "The Political Sustainability of a Basic Income Scheme and Social Health Insurance," CESifo Working Paper Series 4986, CESifo.
    3. Dahms Harry F., 2015. "Which Capital, Which Marx? Basic Income between Mainstream Economics, Critical Theory, and the Logic of Capital," Basic Income Studies, De Gruyter, vol. 10(1), pages 115-140, June.
    4. Robeyns Ingrid, 2008. "Introduction: Revisiting the Feminism and Basic Income Debate," Basic Income Studies, De Gruyter, vol. 3(3), pages 1-6, December.
    5. Palermo Kuss Ana Helena & Neumärker K. J. Bernhard, 2018. "Modelling the Time Allocation Effects of Basic Income," Basic Income Studies, De Gruyter, vol. 13(2), pages 1-15, December.
    6. Uhde Zuzana, 2018. "Caring Revolutionary Transformation: Combined Effects of a Universal Basic Income and a Public Model of Care," Basic Income Studies, De Gruyter, vol. 13(2), pages 1-12, December.
    7. Liesivaara, Petri & Myyrä, Sami, 2014. "Government policies in changing climate and the demand for crop insurance," 88th Annual Conference, April 9-11, 2014, AgroParisTech, Paris, France 170520, Agricultural Economics Society.
    8. Mideros Andrés & O’Donoghue Cathal, 2015. "The Effect of Unconditional Cash Transfers on Adult Labour Supply: A Unitary Discrete Choice Model for the Case of Ecuador," Basic Income Studies, De Gruyter, vol. 10(2), pages 225-255, December.
    9. Marangos, John, 2006. "Developing a civilised society in transition economies: The Post Keynesian paradigm," Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics (formerly The Journal of Socio-Economics), Elsevier, vol. 35(4), pages 660-681, August.
    10. Mann Stefan, 2018. "A Mesoeconomic Approach to a Basic Income," Basic Income Studies, De Gruyter, vol. 13(1), pages 1-8, June.
    11. Raza Ullah & Ganesh P. Shivakoti & Farhad Zulfiqar & Muhammad Nadeem Iqbal & Ashfaq Ahmad Shah, 2017. "Disaster risk management in agriculture: tragedies of the smallholders," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 87(3), pages 1361-1375, July.
    12. Jaakko Heikkilä & Jarkko K. Niemi & Katriina Heinola & Eero Liski & Sami Myyrä, 2016. "Anything left for animal disease insurance? A choiceexperiment approach," Review of Agricultural, Food and Environmental Studies, INRA Department of Economics, vol. 97(4), pages 237-249.
    13. Philip Lawn (ed.), 2013. "Globalisation, Economic Transition and the Environment," Books, Edward Elgar Publishing, number 15053.
    14. Yang, Xi & Miao, Ruiqing & Khanna, Madhu, 2014. "Contracting in the Presence of Insurance: The Case of Bioenergy Crop Production," 2014 Annual Meeting, July 27-29, 2014, Minneapolis, Minnesota 170188, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    15. Kurup, Suresh A. & Reddy, A. Amarender & Singh, Dharm Raj & Praveen, K.V, 2021. "Risks in Rainfed Agriculture and Adaptation Strategies in India: Profile and Socio-Economic Correlates," 2021 Conference, August 17-31, 2021, Virtual 315127, International Association of Agricultural Economists.
    16. Sauer, Johannes & Finger, Robert, 2014. "Climate Risk Management Strategies in Agriculture – The Case of Flood Risk," 2014 Annual Meeting, July 27-29, 2014, Minneapolis, Minnesota 172679, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    17. Dilshad Ahmad & Muhammad Afzal & Abdur Rauf, 2021. "Flood hazards adaptation strategies: a gender-based disaggregated analysis of farm-dependent Bait community in Punjab, Pakistan," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 23(1), pages 865-886, January.
    18. Hamed Khalili, 2024. "Can Data and Machine Learning Change the Future of Basic Income Models? A Bayesian Belief Networks Approach," Data, MDPI, vol. 9(2), pages 1-18, January.
    19. Rippo, Ruggiero & Cerroni, Simone, 2021. "Farmers’ Participation in the Income Stabilization Tool: Evidence from the Apple Sector in Italy," 2021 Conference, August 17-31, 2021, Virtual 315191, International Association of Agricultural Economists.
    20. Fahad, Shah & Wang, Jing & Hu, Guangyin & Wang, Hui & Yang, Xiaoying & Shah, Ashfaq Ahmad & Huong, Nguyen Thi Lan & Bilal, Arshad, 2018. "Empirical analysis of factors influencing farmers crop insurance decisions in Pakistan: Evidence from Khyber Pakhtunkhwa province," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 75(C), pages 459-467.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsoctx:v:10:y:2020:i:3:p:52-:d:386109. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.