IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jscscx/v12y2023i5p289-d1141611.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Inner Functioning of Local Governance Networks in Centralized Countries: A ‘Brave New World’?

Author

Listed:
  • Patrícia Silva

    (GOVCOPP (Research Unit on Governance, Competitiveness and Public Policies), Department of Social, Political and Territory Sciences, University of Aveiro, 3810-193 Aveiro, Portugal)

  • Luís F. Mota

    (GOVCOPP (Research Unit on Governance, Competitiveness and Public Policies), Department of Social, Political and Territory Sciences, University of Aveiro, 3810-193 Aveiro, Portugal
    IJP-IPLeiria (Portucalense Institute for Legal Research), School of Technology and Management, Polytechnic of Leiria, 2411-901 Leiria, Portugal)

  • Raúl Carneiro

    (GOVCOPP (Research Unit on Governance, Competitiveness and Public Policies), Department of Social, Political and Territory Sciences, University of Aveiro, 3810-193 Aveiro, Portugal)

  • Raquel Valentim

    (GOVCOPP (Research Unit on Governance, Competitiveness and Public Policies), Department of Social, Political and Territory Sciences, University of Aveiro, 3810-193 Aveiro, Portugal)

  • Filipe Teles

    (GOVCOPP (Research Unit on Governance, Competitiveness and Public Policies), Department of Social, Political and Territory Sciences, University of Aveiro, 3810-193 Aveiro, Portugal)

Abstract

Local governance networks are increasingly seen as the big idea to cope with issues that are complex enough in scope and scale to require a diversity of expertise and resources. While conventional narrative has posited that local networks are optimal for addressing a range of policy problems, and enhancing democratic participation, scarce attention has been devoted to understanding their inner working. A relevant gap in the literature pertains to the impact of central government intervention in igniting such arrangements on the diversity of actors, the intensity of interactions among actors, or their coordination practices. Such assessment is particularly relevant in centralized contexts. This article seeks to map and characterize the inner working of local networks in such a context—Portugal. The empirical analysis highlights the crucial role of central government in igniting local networks and in ensuring higher levels of formal intensity of collaboration to reduce transaction costs. Keeping such arrangements under the radar of central government, however, may curtail the diversity of actors, policy areas, and curb stakeholders’ commitment in local governance arrangements.

Suggested Citation

  • Patrícia Silva & Luís F. Mota & Raúl Carneiro & Raquel Valentim & Filipe Teles, 2023. "The Inner Functioning of Local Governance Networks in Centralized Countries: A ‘Brave New World’?," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 12(5), pages 1-14, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jscscx:v:12:y:2023:i:5:p:289-:d:1141611
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2076-0760/12/5/289/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2076-0760/12/5/289/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Erik Hans Klijn & Ingmar van Meerkerk & Jurian Edelenbos, 2020. "How do network characteristics influence network managers’ choice of strategies?," Public Money & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 40(2), pages 149-159, February.
    2. Daniela Cristofoli & Benedetta Trivellato & Alessandro Sancino & Laura Maccio’ & Josip Markovic, 2021. "Public network leadership and the ties that lead," Journal of Management & Governance, Springer;Accademia Italiana di Economia Aziendale (AIDEA), vol. 25(1), pages 251-274, March.
    3. Chris Skelcher & Helen Sullivan, 2008. "Theory-driven approaches to analysing collaborative performance," Public Management Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 10(6), pages 751-771.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Andrieli Vizzoto & Jorge Renato Verschoore, 2023. "What Drives Network Governance? A Microstructural Approach," International Journal of Business and Management, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 17(11), pages 1-78, February.
    2. Mette Eilstrup-Sangiovanni, 2022. "Ordering global governance complexes: The evolution of the governance complex for international civil aviation," The Review of International Organizations, Springer, vol. 17(2), pages 293-322, April.
    3. Nizkorodov, Evgenia, 2021. "Evaluating risk allocation and project impacts of sustainability-oriented water public–private partnerships in Southern California: A comparative case analysis," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 140(C).
    4. Carmen Echebarria & Jose M. Barrutia, 2011. "Managing Policy Networks: A Social Marketing- And Collective Intelligence Systems-Driven View," ERSA conference papers ersa11p1402, European Regional Science Association.
    5. Kate Broadhurst & Jennifer Ferreira & Nigel Berkeley, 2021. "Collaborative leadership and place-based development," Local Economy, London South Bank University, vol. 36(2), pages 149-163, March.
    6. Sara Rye, 2022. "Analysis of the Disparity between Recurring and Temporary Collaborative Performance: A Literature Review between 1994 and 2021," Logistics, MDPI, vol. 6(4), pages 1-16, October.
    7. Laura Mariani & Benedetta Trivellato & Mattia Martini & Elisabetta Marafioti, 2022. "Achieving Sustainable Development Goals Through Collaborative Innovation: Evidence from Four European Initiatives," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 180(4), pages 1075-1095, November.
    8. Germà Bel & Thomas Elston, 2022. ""When the Time is Right: Testing for Dynamic Effects in Collaborative Performance"," IREA Working Papers 202212, University of Barcelona, Research Institute of Applied Economics, revised Jul 2022.
    9. Rachel Robinson, 2016. "Hybridity: A Theory of Agency in Early Childhood Governance," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 5(1), pages 1-13, February.
    10. Carey Doberstein, 2016. "Designing Collaborative Governance Decision-Making in Search of a ‘Collaborative Advantage’," Public Management Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 18(6), pages 819-841, July.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jscscx:v:12:y:2023:i:5:p:289-:d:1141611. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.