IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jresou/v10y2021i6p57-d566851.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Formulation of Development Strategies for Regional Agricultural Resource Potential: The Ukrainian Case

Author

Listed:
  • Nestor Shpak

    (Institute of Economics and Management, Lviv Polytechnic National University, 79013 Lviv, Ukraine)

  • Ihor Kulyniak

    (Institute of Economics and Management, Lviv Polytechnic National University, 79013 Lviv, Ukraine)

  • Maryana Gvozd

    (Institute of Economics and Management, Lviv Polytechnic National University, 79013 Lviv, Ukraine)

  • Jolita Vveinhardt

    (Faculty of Applied Sciences, WSB University, 41-300 Dąbrowa Górnicza, Poland)

  • Natalia Horbal

    (Institute of Economics and Management, Lviv Polytechnic National University, 79013 Lviv, Ukraine)

Abstract

The agricultural sector is one of the leading ones in the economy of many countries, as it creates the basis for their economic growth. Every region in every country has its own unique sphere of social reproduction due to different resource potential, i.e., fertile soils, favourable climatic conditions, etc. Under such conditions, it is irrelevant to choose a single development path for this sector. Given these facts, the study formulates development strategies for regional agricultural development of the country. In particular, we grouped regions into clusters according to the level of development of crop production and stockbreeding potential, as well as investment attractiveness. The method of cluster analysis was used to group regions by the level of capacity development, whilst the matrix method was used to formulate a matrix for choice of the strategy to improve the agricultural potential of regions. On the basis of the conducted analysis, the 3D matrix for the choice of investment strategy of the regional agricultural development of the country depending on the level of development of crop production and stockbreeding potential and investment attractiveness was constructed.

Suggested Citation

  • Nestor Shpak & Ihor Kulyniak & Maryana Gvozd & Jolita Vveinhardt & Natalia Horbal, 2021. "Formulation of Development Strategies for Regional Agricultural Resource Potential: The Ukrainian Case," Resources, MDPI, vol. 10(6), pages 1-30, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jresou:v:10:y:2021:i:6:p:57-:d:566851
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2079-9276/10/6/57/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2079-9276/10/6/57/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Lubica Bartova & Peter Fandel, 2020. "Membership in agricultural producer organizations and farm technical efficiency in Slovakia," Equilibrium. Quarterly Journal of Economics and Economic Policy, Institute of Economic Research, vol. 15(3), pages 489-509, September.
    2. Oksana Shubat & Irina Shmarova, 2017. "Cluster Analysis as an Analytical Tool of Population Policy," Economy of region, Centre for Economic Security, Institute of Economics of Ural Branch of Russian Academy of Sciences, vol. 1(4), pages 1175-1183.
    3. Olena Kotykova & Mykola Babych, 2019. "Limitations in availability of food in Ukraine as a result of loss and waste," Oeconomia Copernicana, Institute of Economic Research, vol. 10(1), pages 153-172, March.
    4. Ákos Mesterházy & Judit Oláh & József Popp, 2020. "Losses in the Grain Supply Chain: Causes and Solutions," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(6), pages 1-18, March.
    5. Nestor Shpak & Oleh Kuzmin & Olga Melnyk & Mariana Ruda & Włodzimierz Sroka, 2020. "Implementation of a Circular Economy in Ukraine: The Context of European Integration," Resources, MDPI, vol. 9(8), pages 1-15, August.
    6. Lenka Ližbetinová & Peter Štarchoň & Silvia Lorincová & Dagmar Weberová & Petr Průša, 2019. "Application of Cluster Analysis in Marketing Communications in Small and Medium-Sized Enterprises: An Empirical Study in the Slovak Republic," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(8), pages 1-18, April.
    7. Olena Borodina & Vitaliy Krupin, 2018. "Is it Possible to Utilise the Agricultural Potential of Ukraine under the Current Agrarian System?," EuroChoices, The Agricultural Economics Society, vol. 17(1), pages 46-51, April.
    8. Sergii Kyryzyuk & Vitaliy Krupin & Olena Borodina & Adam Wąs, 2020. "Crop Residue Removal: Assessment of Future Bioenergy Generation Potential and Agro-Environmental Limitations Based on a Case Study of Ukraine," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(20), pages 1-23, October.
    9. Wang, Zhaozhi & Zhang, T.Q. & Tan, C.S. & Xue, Lulin & Bukovsky, Melissa & Qi, Z.M., 2021. "Modeling impacts of climate change on crop yield and phosphorus loss in a subsurface drained field of Lake Erie region, Canada," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 190(C).
    10. Armenia ANDRONICEANU, 2020. "Major Structural Changes In The Eu Policies Due To The Problems And Risks Caused By Covid-19," REVISTA ADMINISTRATIE SI MANAGEMENT PUBLIC, Faculty of Administration and Public Management, Academy of Economic Studies, Bucharest, Romania, vol. 2020(34), pages 137-149, June.
    11. Mangirdas MORKUNAS & Artiom VOLKOV & Yuri BILAN & Agota Giedre RAIŠIENE, 2018. "The Role Of Government In Forming Agricultural Policy: Economic Resilience Measuring Index Exploited," REVISTA ADMINISTRATIE SI MANAGEMENT PUBLIC, Faculty of Administration and Public Management, Academy of Economic Studies, Bucharest, Romania, vol. 2018(31), pages 111-131, December.
    12. Armenia Androniceanu, 2019. "Social Responsibility, an Essential Strategic Option for a Sustainable Development in the Field of Bio-Economy," The AMFITEATRU ECONOMIC journal, Academy of Economic Studies - Bucharest, Romania, vol. 21(52), pages 503-503, August.
    13. Komarek, Adam M. & Thierfelder, Christian & Steward, Peter R., 2021. "Conservation agriculture improves adaptive capacity of cropping systems to climate stress in Malawi," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 190(C).
    14. Mahdi Khosravi & Hossein Mehrabi Boshrabadi, 2020. "Agricultural Economic Dynamics in a Bayesian DSGE Model for Iran," Iranian Economic Review (IER), Faculty of Economics,University of Tehran.Tehran,Iran, vol. 24(1), pages 267-297, Winter.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Vasyltsiv, Taras & Mulska, Olha & Hrabynska, Iryna & Ivaniuk, Ulana & Shopska, Yuliya, 2023. "Financial and economic security of agricultural business: specifics, analysis methodology, and measures of stabilization," Agricultural and Resource Economics: International Scientific E-Journal, Agricultural and Resource Economics: International Scientific E-Journal, vol. 9(2), June.
    2. Olena Kasian, 2023. "Analysis of factors in managing digital entrepreneurship development in tourism in Ukraine: challenges and opportunities," Technology audit and production reserves, PC TECHNOLOGY CENTER, vol. 4(4(72)), pages 12-19, August.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Nestor Shpak & Solomiya Ohinok & Ihor Kulyniak & W³odzimierz Sroka & Armenia Androniceanu, 2022. "Macroeconomic Indicators and CO2 Emissions in the EU Region," The AMFITEATRU ECONOMIC journal, Academy of Economic Studies - Bucharest, Romania, vol. 24(61), pages 817-817, August.
    2. Cătălina Silvia Crișan-Mitra & Liana Stanca & Dan-Cristian Dabija, 2020. "Corporate Social Performance: An Assessment Model on an Emerging Market," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(10), pages 1-21, May.
    3. Ane-Mari Androniceanu & Raluca Dana Căplescu & Manuela Tvaronavičienė & Cosmin Dobrin, 2021. "The Interdependencies between Economic Growth, Energy Consumption and Pollution in Europe," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-23, April.
    4. Nestor Shpak & Solomiya Ohinok & Ihor Kulyniak & Włodzimierz Sroka & Yuriy Fedun & Romualdas Ginevičius & Joanna Cygler, 2022. "CO 2 Emissions and Macroeconomic Indicators: Analysis of the Most Polluted Regions in the World," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(8), pages 1-22, April.
    5. Margarita Išoraitė & Gintarė Gulevičiūtė, 2021. "A study of online entrepreneurship education under conditions of a pandemic," Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Issues, VsI Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Center, vol. 8(3), pages 179-192, March.
    6. Felipe Arenas-Torres & Miguel Bustamante-Ubilla & Roberto Campos-Troncoso, 2021. "The Incidence of Social Responsibility in the Adoption of Business Practices," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(5), pages 1-14, March.
    7. Chin‐wei Huang & Hsiao‐Yin Chen, 2023. "Using nonradial metafrontier data envelopment analysis to evaluate the metatechnology and metafactor ratios for the Taiwanese hotel industry," Managerial and Decision Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 44(4), pages 1904-1919, June.
    8. Adrián Csordás & Péter Lengyel & István Füzesi, 2022. "Who Prefers Regional Products? A Systematic Literature Review of Consumer Characteristics and Attitudes in Short Food Supply Chains," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(15), pages 1-17, July.
    9. Zarina N. Amanzholova & Sara K. Idrysheva, 2023. "Experience in regulating public relations during a pandemic," RIVISTA DI STUDI SULLA SOSTENIBILITA', FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 0(1 suppl.), pages 83-99.
    10. Alina Vysochyna & Natalia Stoyanets & Grzegorz Mentel & Tadeusz Olejarz, 2020. "Environmental Determinants of a Country’s Food Security in Short-Term and Long-Term Perspectives," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(10), pages 1-15, May.
    11. Beata GAVUROVA & Matus KUBAK & Martin MIKESKA, 2020. "The Efficiency Of Public Procurement In The Health Sector – The Platform On Sustainable Public Finances," REVISTA ADMINISTRATIE SI MANAGEMENT PUBLIC, Faculty of Administration and Public Management, Academy of Economic Studies, Bucharest, Romania, vol. 2020(35), pages 21-39, December.
    12. Leonidas Sotirios Kyrgiakos & Georgios Kleftodimos & George Vlontzos & Panos M. Pardalos, 2023. "A systematic literature review of data envelopment analysis implementation in agriculture under the prism of sustainability," Operational Research, Springer, vol. 23(1), pages 1-38, March.
    13. Dan-Cristian Dabija & Brândușa Mariana Bejan & Claudiu Pușcaș, 2020. "A Qualitative Approach to the Sustainable Orientation of Generation Z in Retail: The Case of Romania," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 13(7), pages 1-20, July.
    14. Jinwu Wang & Xiaobo Sun & Yanan Xu & Wenqi Zhou & Han Tang & Qi Wang, 2021. "Timeliness Harvesting Loss of Rice in Cold Region under Different Mechanical Harvesting Methods," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-18, June.
    15. Mihai Andronie & George Lăzăroiu & Roxana Ștefănescu & Cristian Uță & Irina Dijmărescu, 2021. "Sustainable, Smart, and Sensing Technologies for Cyber-Physical Manufacturing Systems: A Systematic Literature Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(10), pages 1-23, May.
    16. Pandey, Adya & Bolia, Nomesh B., 2023. "Millet value chain revolution for sustainability: A proposal for India," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 87(PB).
    17. Zhiqiang Zhou & Wenyan Liu & Pengfei Cheng & Zhenjin Li, 2022. "The Impact of the Digital Economy on Enterprise Sustainable Development and Its Spatial-Temporal Evolution: An Empirical Analysis Based on Urban Panel Data in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-23, September.
    18. Mónica Duque-Acevedo & Luis Jesús Belmonte-Ureña & Natalia Yakovleva & Francisco Camacho-Ferre, 2020. "Analysis of the Circular Economic Production Models and Their Approach in Agriculture and Agricultural Waste Biomass Management," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(24), pages 1-32, December.
    19. Monika Adamczyk & Alina Betlej, 2021. "Social determinants of digital exclusion in an ageing society. The case of Poland," Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Issues, VsI Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Center, vol. 8(3), pages 122-135, March.
    20. Ye Yuan & Ming Li & Congshan Tian & Yun Xu, 2023. "Measurements and Influencing Factors of New Rural Collective Economies’ Resilience toward Mountain Disasters in Indigent Areas: A Case Study of Liangshan Yi Autonomous Prefecture, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(11), pages 1-22, November.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jresou:v:10:y:2021:i:6:p:57-:d:566851. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.