IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/aes/amfeco/v21y2019i52p503.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Social Responsibility, an Essential Strategic Option for a Sustainable Development in the Field of Bio-Economy

Author

Listed:
  • Armenia Androniceanu

    (Bucharest University of Economic Studies, Bucharest, Romania)

Abstract

Globalization determines the economic environment to identify new development models that harmoniously integrate the modern digital economy with corporate social responsibility for sustainable development. The aim of the research was to discover the main ways to increase corporate social responsibility in Romanian organizations in 3 key sub-areas of bio-economy. We also sought to identify and analyze the implementation level of fundamental principles and values of corporate social responsibility, strategic priorities and methods used by Romanian companies in the target group to strengthen it. Another objective of the research was to develop a hierarchy of strategic (economic, social and environmental) interests of the top managers of the analyzed organizations, reflecting the new business philosophy. The research tools used were: an online questionnaire, a semi-structured interview with general managers and document analysis, that is: 10 organizational strategies, 60 bi-annual reports on corporate social responsibility and 30 budget executions from the last three years of activity of the organizations involved in the research. The data obtained were correlated and processed in Excel and SPSS. The novelty of the research consists in taking a systemic approach, from a managerial point of view, of corporate social responsibility in the field of bio-economy being the first applied research of its kind on the segment of medium-sized companies from three representative sub-domains of Romanian bio-economy.

Suggested Citation

  • Armenia Androniceanu, 2019. "Social Responsibility, an Essential Strategic Option for a Sustainable Development in the Field of Bio-Economy," The AMFITEATRU ECONOMIC journal, Academy of Economic Studies - Bucharest, Romania, vol. 21(52), pages 503-503, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:aes:amfeco:v:21:y:2019:i:52:p:503
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.amfiteatrueconomic.ro/temp/Article_2836.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Boris Nikiforovich Gerasimov & Vera Ansarovna Vasyaycheva & Kirill Borisovich Gerasimov, 2018. "Identification of the factors of competitiveness of industrial company based on the module approach," Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Issues, VsI Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Center, vol. 6(2), pages 677-691, December.
    2. Evgeny Lisin & Galina Kurdiukova & Natalya Ketoeva & Joana Katina, 2018. "Sustainability issues of territorial power systems in market conditions," Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Issues, VsI Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Center, vol. 6(2), pages 1041-1052, December.
    3. Galagedera, Don U.A., 2019. "Modelling social responsibility in mutual fund performance appraisal: A two-stage data envelopment analysis model with non-discretionary first stage output," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 273(1), pages 376-389.
    4. Atang Hermawan & Ardi Gunardi, 2019. "Motivation for disclosure of corporate social responsibility: evidence from banking industry in Indonesia," Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Issues, VsI Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Center, vol. 6(3), pages 1297-1306, March.
    5. Martina KLIEROVA & Jan KUTIK, 2017. "One Stop Government – Strategy of Public Services for Citizens and Businesses in Slovakia," REVISTA ADMINISTRATIE SI MANAGEMENT PUBLIC, Faculty of Administration and Public Management, Academy of Economic Studies, Bucharest, Romania, vol. 2017(28), pages 66-80, June.
    6. Alvaro Cuervo-Cazurra, 2018. "The Evolution of Business Groups’ Corporate Social Responsibility," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 153(4), pages 997-1016, December.
    7. Armenia ANDRONICEANU & Cristina Raluca POPESCU, 2017. "An Inclusive Model for an Effective Development of the Renewable Energies Public Sector," REVISTA ADMINISTRATIE SI MANAGEMENT PUBLIC, Faculty of Administration and Public Management, Academy of Economic Studies, Bucharest, Romania, vol. 2017(28), pages 81-96, June.
    8. Gyorgy Kovacs & Sebastian Kot, 2016. "New Logistics And Production Trends As The Effect Of Global Economy Changes," Polish Journal of Management Studies, Czestochowa Technical University, Department of Management, vol. 14(2), pages 115-126, December.
    9. Melsa Ararat & Asli M. Colpan & Dirk Matten, 2018. "Business Groups and Corporate Responsibility for the Public Good," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 153(4), pages 911-929, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Won-Yong Oh & Hojae Ree & Young Kyun Chang & Igor Postuła, 2023. "Trees in the Forest: How Do Family Owners Make CSR Decisions in Business Groups?," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 187(4), pages 759-780, November.
    2. Shobha Tewari & Bibek Bhattacharya, 2023. "Financial resources, corporate social responsibility, and ownership type: Evidence from India," Asia Pacific Journal of Management, Springer, vol. 40(3), pages 1093-1132, September.
    3. Rumeng Cui & Zhong Ma & Longfeng Wang, 2022. "Allocation of Decision Rights and CSR Disclosure: Evidence from Listed Business Groups in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(7), pages 1-20, March.
    4. Shahab, Yasir & Hussain, Tanveer & Wang, Peng & Zhong, Ma & Kumar, Satish, 2023. "Business groups and environmental violations: Evidence from China," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 85(C).
    5. Katarzyna Grondys & Armenia Androniceanu & Zdzisława Dacko-Pikiewicz, 2020. "Energy Management in the Operation of Enterprises in the Light of the Applicable Provisions of the Energy Efficiency Directive (2012/27/EU)," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(17), pages 1-16, August.
    6. Rabab Benotsmane & György Kovács & László Dudás, 2019. "Economic, Social Impacts and Operation of Smart Factories in Industry 4.0 Focusing on Simulation and Artificial Intelligence of Collaborating Robots," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 8(5), pages 1-20, May.
    7. Kalpana Tokas & Kartik Yadav, 2023. "Foreign Ownership and Corporate Social Responsibility: The Case of an Emerging Market," Global Business Review, International Management Institute, vol. 24(6), pages 1302-1325, December.
    8. Iuliana Petronela Gârdan & Adrian Micu & Carmen Adina Paștiu & Angela Eliza Micu & Daniel Adrian Gârdan, 2023. "Consumers’ Attitude towards Renewable Energy in the Context of the Energy Crisis," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(2), pages 1-31, January.
    9. Govindan, Kannan & Kannan, Devika & Jørgensen, Thomas Ballegård & Nielsen, Tim Straarup, 2022. "Supply Chain 4.0 performance measurement: A systematic literature review, framework development, and empirical evidence," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 164(C).
    10. Bedjo Santoso & Widodo Widodo & Muhammad Taufiq Akbar & Khaliq Ahmad & Rahmat Heru Setianto, 2022. "The Determinant of Sukuk Rating: Agency Theory and Asymmetry Theory Perspectives," Risks, MDPI, vol. 10(8), pages 1-23, July.
    11. Shahin Bayramov & Iurii Prokazov & Sergey Kondrashev & Jan Kowalik, 2021. "Household Electricity Generation as a Way of Energy Independence of States—Social Context of Energy Management," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(12), pages 1-19, June.
    12. Ivan Montiel & Junghoon Park & Bryan W. Husted & Andres Velez-Calle, 2022. "Tracing the connections between international business and communicable diseases," Journal of International Business Studies, Palgrave Macmillan;Academy of International Business, vol. 53(8), pages 1785-1804, October.
    13. Olivera Blagojevic Popovic & Vinko Nikic & Iva Bulatovic & Milica Delibasic, 2018. "Modeling Perceived Quality, Customer Satisfaction and Probability of Guest Returning to the Destination," Montenegrin Journal of Economics, Economic Laboratory for Transition Research (ELIT), vol. 14(1), pages 69-78.
    14. Ararat, Melsa & Claessens, Stijn & Yurtoglu, B. Burcin, 2021. "Corporate governance in emerging markets: A selective review and an agenda for future research," Emerging Markets Review, Elsevier, vol. 48(C).
    15. Shoukat Ali & Ramiz ur Rehman & Wang Yuan & Muhammad Ishfaq Ahmad & Rizwan Ali, 2022. "Does foreign institutional ownership mediate the nexus between board diversity and the risk of financial distress? A case of an emerging economy of China," Eurasian Business Review, Springer;Eurasia Business and Economics Society, vol. 12(3), pages 553-581, September.
    16. Joel Bothello & Ioannis Ioannou & Vlad‐Andrei Porumb & Yasemin Zengin‐Karaibrahimoglu, 2023. "CSR decoupling within business groups and the risk of perceived greenwashing," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 44(13), pages 3217-3251, December.
    17. Aneta Oniszczuk-Jastrząbek & Ernest Czermański & Giuseppe T. Cirella, 2020. "Sustainable Supply Chain of Enterprises: Value Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(1), pages 1-15, January.
    18. Min, Yijie & Liao, Yi-Chuan & Chen, Zhijun, 2022. "The side effect of business group membership: How do business group isomorphic pressures affect organizational innovation in affiliated firms?," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 141(C), pages 380-392.
    19. Michela Piccarozzi & Barbara Aquilani & Corrado Gatti, 2018. "Industry 4.0 in Management Studies: A Systematic Literature Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(10), pages 1-24, October.
    20. Panos Xidonas & Eric Essner, 2024. "On ESG Portfolio Construction: A Multi-Objective Optimization Approach," Computational Economics, Springer;Society for Computational Economics, vol. 63(1), pages 21-45, January.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    corporate social responsibility (CSR); bio-economy; sustainable development; strategic interests.;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • O13 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Economic Development - - - Agriculture; Natural Resources; Environment; Other Primary Products
    • P16 - Political Economy and Comparative Economic Systems - - Capitalist Economies - - - Capitalist Institutions; Welfare State
    • Q57 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Environmental Economics - - - Ecological Economics

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:aes:amfeco:v:21:y:2019:i:52:p:503. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Valentin Dumitru (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/aseeero.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.