IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jmathe/v13y2025i15p2516-d1718111.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Ternary Historical Memory-Based Robust Clustered Particle Swarm Optimization for Dynamic Berth Allocation and Crane Assignment Problem

Author

Listed:
  • Ruiqi Wu

    (School of Software, Nanjing University of Information Science and Technology, Nanjing 210044, China)

  • Shiming Mao

    (School of Computer Science, Nanjing University of Information Science and Technology, Nanjing 210044, China)

  • Yi Sun

    (School of Computer Science, Nanjing University of Information Science and Technology, Nanjing 210044, China)

Abstract

The berth allocation and crane assignment problem (BACAP) is a key challenge in port logistics, particularly under dynamic and uncertain vessel arrival conditions. To address the limitations of existing methods in handling large-scale and high-disturbance scenarios, this paper proposes a novel optimization framework: Ternary Historical Memory-based Robust Clustered Particle Swarm Optimization (THM-RCPSO). In this method, the initial particle swarm is divided into multiple clusters, each conducting local searches to identify regional optima. These clusters then exchange information to iteratively refine the global best solution. A ternary historical memory mechanism further enhances the optimization by recording and comparing the best solutions from three different strategies, ensuring guidance from historical performance during exploration. Experimental evaluations on 25 dynamic BACAP benchmark instances show that THM-RCPSO achieves the lowest average vessel dwell time in 22 out of 25 cases, with the lowest overall average rank among five tested algorithms. Specifically, it demonstrates significant advantages on large-scale instances with 150 vessels, where it consistently outperforms competing methods such as HRBA, ACO, and GAMCS in both solution quality and robustness. These results confirm THM-RCPSO’s strong capability in solving dynamic and large-scale DBACAP scenarios with high disturbance levels.

Suggested Citation

  • Ruiqi Wu & Shiming Mao & Yi Sun, 2025. "Ternary Historical Memory-Based Robust Clustered Particle Swarm Optimization for Dynamic Berth Allocation and Crane Assignment Problem," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 13(15), pages 1-23, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jmathe:v:13:y:2025:i:15:p:2516-:d:1718111
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7390/13/15/2516/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7390/13/15/2516/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ksciuk, Jana & Kuhlemann, Stefan & Tierney, Kevin & Koberstein, Achim, 2023. "Uncertainty in maritime ship routing and scheduling: A Literature review," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 308(2), pages 499-524.
    2. Mihalis M Golias & Georgios K Saharidis & Maria Boile & Sotirios Theofanis & Marianthi G Ierapetritou, 2009. "The berth allocation problem: Optimizing vessel arrival time," Maritime Economics & Logistics, Palgrave Macmillan;International Association of Maritime Economists (IAME), vol. 11(4), pages 358-377, December.
    3. Clark, Ximena & Dollar, David & Micco, Alejandro, 2004. "Port efficiency, maritime transport costs, and bilateral trade," Journal of Development Economics, Elsevier, vol. 75(2), pages 417-450, December.
    4. Kevin Cullinane & Hercules Haralambides, 2021. "Global trends in maritime and port economics: the COVID-19 pandemic and beyond," Université Paris1 Panthéon-Sorbonne (Post-Print and Working Papers) hal-04046225, HAL.
    5. Ya Xu & Qiushuang Chen & Xiongwen Quan, 2012. "Robust berth scheduling with uncertain vessel delay and handling time," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 192(1), pages 123-140, January.
    6. Lee, Der-Horng & Chen, Jiang Hang & Cao, Jin Xin, 2010. "The continuous Berth Allocation Problem: A Greedy Randomized Adaptive Search Solution," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 46(6), pages 1017-1029, November.
    7. Song, Lili & van Geenhuizen, Marina, 2014. "Port infrastructure investment and regional economic growth in China: Panel evidence in port regions and provinces," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 36(C), pages 173-183.
    8. Correcher, Juan F. & Alvarez-Valdes, Ramon & Tamarit, Jose M., 2019. "New exact methods for the time-invariant berth allocation and quay crane assignment problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 275(1), pages 80-92.
    9. Ünal, Yusuf Ziya & Uysal, Özgür, 2014. "A new mixed integer programming model for curriculum balancing: Application to a Turkish university," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 238(1), pages 339-347.
    10. Kevin Cullinane & Hercules Haralambides, 2021. "Global trends in maritime and port economics: the COVID-19 pandemic and beyond," Post-Print hal-04046225, HAL.
    11. Iris, Çağatay & Lam, Jasmine Siu Lee, 2019. "Recoverable robustness in weekly berth and quay crane planning," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 122(C), pages 365-389.
    12. King-Wah Pang & Jiyin Liu, 2014. "An integrated model for ship routing with transshipment and berth allocation," IISE Transactions, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 46(12), pages 1357-1370, December.
    13. Shang, Xiao Ting & Cao, Jin Xin & Ren, Jie, 2016. "A robust optimization approach to the integrated berth allocation and quay crane assignment problem," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 94(C), pages 44-65.
    14. Imai, Akio & Nishimura, Etsuko & Papadimitriou, Stratos, 2003. "Berth allocation with service priority," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 37(5), pages 437-457, June.
    15. Imai, Akio & Chen, Hsieh Chia & Nishimura, Etsuko & Papadimitriou, Stratos, 2008. "The simultaneous berth and quay crane allocation problem," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 44(5), pages 900-920, September.
    16. M. Flavia Monaco & Marcello Sammarra, 2007. "The Berth Allocation Problem: A Strong Formulation Solved by a Lagrangean Approach," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 41(2), pages 265-280, May.
    17. Y Zhu & A Lim, 2006. "Crane scheduling with non-crossing constraint," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 57(12), pages 1464-1471, December.
    18. Kevin Cullinane & Hercules Haralambides, 2021. "Global trends in maritime and port economics: the COVID-19 pandemic and beyond," Maritime Economics & Logistics, Palgrave Macmillan;International Association of Maritime Economists (IAME), vol. 23(3), pages 369-380, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jia, Shuai & Li, Chung-Lun & Xu, Zhou, 2020. "A simulation optimization method for deep-sea vessel berth planning and feeder arrival scheduling at a container port," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 142(C), pages 174-196.
    2. Yaqiong Lv & Jingwen Wang & Zhongyuan Liu & Mingkai Zou, 2025. "From Heuristics to Multi-Agent Learning: A Survey of Intelligent Scheduling Methods in Port Seaside Operations," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 13(17), pages 1-57, August.
    3. Zhen, Lu & Zhuge, Dan & Wang, Shuaian & Wang, Kai, 2022. "Integrated berth and yard space allocation under uncertainty," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 162(C), pages 1-27.
    4. Feng Li & Jiuh-Biing Sheu & Zi-You Gao, 2015. "Solving the Continuous Berth Allocation and Specific Quay Crane Assignment Problems with Quay Crane Coverage Range," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 49(4), pages 968-989, November.
    5. Raeesi, Ramin & Sahebjamnia, Navid & Mansouri, S. Afshin, 2023. "The synergistic effect of operational research and big data analytics in greening container terminal operations: A review and future directions," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 310(3), pages 943-973.
    6. Rodrigues, Filipe & Agra, Agostinho, 2022. "Berth allocation and quay crane assignment/scheduling problem under uncertainty: A survey," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 303(2), pages 501-524.
    7. Liu, Changchun, 2020. "Iterative heuristic for simultaneous allocations of berths, quay cranes, and yards under practical situations," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 133(C).
    8. Chargui, Kaoutar & Zouadi, Tarik & Sreedharan, V. Raja & El Fallahi, Abdellah & Reghioui, Mohamed, 2023. "A novel robust exact decomposition algorithm for berth and quay crane allocation and scheduling problem considering uncertainty and energy efficiency," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 118(C).
    9. Bierwirth, Christian & Meisel, Frank, 2015. "A follow-up survey of berth allocation and quay crane scheduling problems in container terminals," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 244(3), pages 675-689.
    10. Xiang, Xi & Liu, Changchun & Miao, Lixin, 2017. "A bi-objective robust model for berth allocation scheduling under uncertainty," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 106(C), pages 294-319.
    11. Bierwirth, Christian & Meisel, Frank, 2010. "A survey of berth allocation and quay crane scheduling problems in container terminals," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 202(3), pages 615-627, May.
    12. Shangyao Yan & Chung-Cheng Lu & Jun-Hsiao Hsieh & Han-Chun Lin, 2019. "A Dynamic and Flexible Berth Allocation Model with Stochastic Vessel Arrival Times," Networks and Spatial Economics, Springer, vol. 19(3), pages 903-927, September.
    13. Xiang, Xi & Liu, Changchun, 2021. "An almost robust optimization model for integrated berth allocation and quay crane assignment problem," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 104(C).
    14. Changchun Liu & Xi Xiang & Li Zheng, 2017. "Two decision models for berth allocation problem under uncertainty considering service level," Flexible Services and Manufacturing Journal, Springer, vol. 29(3), pages 312-344, December.
    15. Guo, Liming & Zheng, Jianfeng & Du, Haoming & Du, Jian & Zhu, Zhihong, 2022. "The berth assignment and allocation problem considering cooperative liner carriers," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 164(C).
    16. Changchun Liu & Xi Xiang & Li Zheng, 2020. "A two-stage robust optimization approach for the berth allocation problem under uncertainty," Flexible Services and Manufacturing Journal, Springer, vol. 32(2), pages 425-452, June.
    17. Chu, Zhong & Yan, Ran & Wang, Shuaian, 2024. "Are vessel arrival and port operations affected by COVID-19? Evidence from the Hong Kong port," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 154(C), pages 157-181.
    18. Pekka Leviäkangas & Lauri Ojala & Seong Mok Paik & Veikko Pekkala, 2023. "COVID-19 and the financial resilience of Finland’s seaports," Journal of Shipping and Trade, Springer, vol. 8(1), pages 1-20, December.
    19. Robenek, Tomáš & Umang, Nitish & Bierlaire, Michel & Ropke, Stefan, 2014. "A branch-and-price algorithm to solve the integrated berth allocation and yard assignment problem in bulk ports," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 235(2), pages 399-411.
    20. Xufeng Tang & Chang Liu & Xinqi Li & Ying Ji, 2023. "Distributionally Robust Programming of Berth-Allocation-with-Crane-Allocation Problem with Uncertain Quay-Crane-Handling Efficiency," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(18), pages 1-27, September.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jmathe:v:13:y:2025:i:15:p:2516-:d:1718111. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.