IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/pal/jorsoc/v57y2006i12d10.1057_palgrave.jors.2602110.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Crane scheduling with non-crossing constraint

Author

Listed:
  • Y Zhu

    (University of California)

  • A Lim

    (Hong Kong University of Science and Technology, Clear Water Bay)

Abstract

In this paper, we examine crane scheduling for ports. This important component of port operations management is studied when the non-crossing spatial constraint, which is common to crane operations, is considered. We assume that ships can be divided into holds and that cranes can move from hold to hold but jobs are not pre-emptive, so that only one crane can work on one hold or job to complete it. Our objective is to minimize the latest completion time for all jobs. We formulate this problem as an integer programming problem. We provide the proof that this problem is NP-complete and design a branch-and-bound algorithm to obtain optimal solutions. A simulated annealing meta-heuristic with effective neighbourhood search is designed to find good solutions in larger size instances. The elaborate experimental results show that the branch-and-bound algorithm runs much faster than CPLEX and the simulated annealing approach can obtain near optimal solutions for instances of various sizes.

Suggested Citation

  • Y Zhu & A Lim, 2006. "Crane scheduling with non-crossing constraint," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 57(12), pages 1464-1471, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:pal:jorsoc:v:57:y:2006:i:12:d:10.1057_palgrave.jors.2602110
    DOI: 10.1057/palgrave.jors.2602110
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1057/palgrave.jors.2602110
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1057/palgrave.jors.2602110?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. H Ding & A Lim & B Rodrigues & Y Zhu, 2004. "New heuristics for over-constrained flight to gate assignments," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 55(7), pages 760-768, July.
    2. Daganzo, Carlos F., 1989. "The crane scheduling problem," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 23(3), pages 159-175, June.
    3. Peterkofsky, Roy I. & Daganzo, Carlos F., 1990. "A branch and bound solution method for the crane scheduling problem," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 24(3), pages 159-172, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Bierwirth, Christian & Meisel, Frank, 2010. "A survey of berth allocation and quay crane scheduling problems in container terminals," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 202(3), pages 615-627, May.
    2. Chen, Jiang Hang & Lee, Der-Horng & Goh, Mark, 2014. "An effective mathematical formulation for the unidirectional cluster-based quay crane scheduling problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 232(1), pages 198-208.
    3. Bierwirth, Christian & Meisel, Frank, 2015. "A follow-up survey of berth allocation and quay crane scheduling problems in container terminals," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 244(3), pages 675-689.
    4. Schulz, Arne & Fliedner, Malte & Fiedrich, Benedikt & Pfeiffer, Christian, 2021. "Levelling crane workload in multi-yard rail-road container terminals," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 293(3), pages 941-954.
    5. Yongpei Guan & Kang-Hung Yang & Zhili Zhou, 2013. "The crane scheduling problem: models and solution approaches," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 203(1), pages 119-139, March.
    6. Amir Gharehgozli & Debjit Roy & Suruchika Saini & Jan-Kees Ommeren, 2023. "Loading and unloading trains at the landside of container terminals," Maritime Economics & Logistics, Palgrave Macmillan;International Association of Maritime Economists (IAME), vol. 25(3), pages 549-575, September.
    7. Wu, Lingxiao & Ma, Weimin, 2017. "Quay crane scheduling with draft and trim constraints," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 97(C), pages 38-68.
    8. Li, Wenkai & Goh, Mark & Wu, Yong & Petering, M.E.H. & de Souza, R. & Wu, Y.C., 2012. "A continuous time model for multiple yard crane scheduling with last minute job arrivals," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 136(2), pages 332-343.
    9. Xufeng Tang & Chang Liu & Xinqi Li & Ying Ji, 2023. "Distributionally Robust Programming of Berth-Allocation-with-Crane-Allocation Problem with Uncertain Quay-Crane-Handling Efficiency," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(18), pages 1-27, September.
    10. Boysen, Nils & Briskorn, Dirk & Meisel, Frank, 2017. "A generalized classification scheme for crane scheduling with interference," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 258(1), pages 343-357.
    11. Qin, Tianbao & Du, Yuquan & Chen, Jiang Hang & Sha, Mei, 2020. "Combining mixed integer programming and constraint programming to solve the integrated scheduling problem of container handling operations of a single vessel," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 285(3), pages 884-901.
    12. Gharehgozli, Amir & Yu, Yugang & de Koster, René & Du, Shaofu, 2019. "Sequencing storage and retrieval requests in a container block with multiple open locations," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 125(C), pages 261-284.
    13. Sun, Defeng & Tang, Lixin & Baldacci, Roberto, 2019. "A Benders decomposition-based framework for solving quay crane scheduling problems," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 273(2), pages 504-515.
    14. Shoufeng Ma & Hongming Li & Ning Zhu & Chenyi Fu, 2021. "Stochastic programming approach for unidirectional quay crane scheduling problem with uncertainty," Journal of Scheduling, Springer, vol. 24(2), pages 137-174, April.
    15. Zhang, Xiaoju & Zeng, Qingcheng & Yang, Zhongzhen, 2016. "Modeling the mixed storage strategy for quay crane double cycling in container terminals," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 94(C), pages 171-187.
    16. Kaveshgar, Narges & Huynh, Nathan, 2015. "Integrated quay crane and yard truck scheduling for unloading inbound containers," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 159(C), pages 168-177.
    17. Enrico Angelelli & Thomas Kalinowski & Reena Kapoor & Martin W. P. Savelsbergh, 2016. "A reclaimer scheduling problem arising in coal stockyard management," Journal of Scheduling, Springer, vol. 19(5), pages 563-582, October.
    18. Türkoğulları, Yavuz B. & Taşkın, Z. Caner & Aras, Necati & Altınel, İ. Kuban, 2016. "Optimal berth allocation, time-variant quay crane assignment and scheduling with crane setups in container terminals," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 254(3), pages 985-1001.
    19. Nils Boysen & Malte Fliedner & Florian Jaehn & Erwin Pesch, 2013. "A Survey on Container Processing in Railway Yards," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 47(3), pages 312-329, August.
    20. Zhang, An & Zhang, Wenshuai & Chen, Yong & Chen, Guangting & Chen, Xufeng, 2017. "Approximate the scheduling of quay cranes with non-crossing constraints," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 258(3), pages 820-828.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Briskorn, Dirk & Drexl, Andreas & Hartmann, Sönke, 2005. "Inventory based dispatching of automated guided vehicles on container terminals," Manuskripte aus den Instituten für Betriebswirtschaftslehre der Universität Kiel 596, Christian-Albrechts-Universität zu Kiel, Institut für Betriebswirtschaftslehre.
    2. Andrew Lim & Brian Rodrigues & Fei Xiao & Yi Zhu, 2004. "Crane scheduling with spatial constraints," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 51(3), pages 386-406, April.
    3. J Blazewicz & T C E Cheng & M Machowiak & C Oguz, 2011. "Berth and quay crane allocation: a moldable task scheduling model," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 62(7), pages 1189-1197, July.
    4. Zhang, Chuqian & Wan, Yat-wah & Liu, Jiyin & Linn, Richard J., 2002. "Dynamic crane deployment in container storage yards," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 36(6), pages 537-555, July.
    5. Evrim Ursavas, 2017. "Crane allocation with stability considerations," Maritime Economics & Logistics, Palgrave Macmillan;International Association of Maritime Economists (IAME), vol. 19(2), pages 379-401, June.
    6. Nils Boysen & Malte Fliedner & Florian Jaehn & Erwin Pesch, 2013. "A Survey on Container Processing in Railway Yards," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 47(3), pages 312-329, August.
    7. Ng, W. C., 2005. "Crane scheduling in container yards with inter-crane interference," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 164(1), pages 64-78, July.
    8. Shawn Choo & Diego Klabjan & David Simchi-Levi, 2010. "Multiship Crane Sequencing with Yard Congestion Constraints," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 44(1), pages 98-115, February.
    9. Kim, Kap Hwan & Park, Young-Man, 2004. "A crane scheduling method for port container terminals," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 156(3), pages 752-768, August.
    10. Branislav Dragović & Nam Kyu Park & Zoran Radmilović, 2006. "Ship-berth link performance evaluation: simulation and analytical approaches," Maritime Policy & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 33(3), pages 281-299, July.
    11. Bish, Ebru K., 2003. "A multiple-crane-constrained scheduling problem in a container terminal," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 144(1), pages 83-107, January.
    12. Kap Hwan Kim & Ki Young Kim, 1999. "An Optimal Routing Algorithm for a Transfer Crane in Port Container Terminals," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 33(1), pages 17-33, February.
    13. Zeng, Qingcheng & Yang, Zhongzhen & Lai, Luyuan, 2009. "Models and algorithms for multi-crane oriented scheduling method in container terminals," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 16(5), pages 271-278, September.
    14. Nabil Nehme & Bacel Maddah & Isam A. Kaysi, 2021. "An integrated multi-ship crane allocation in Beirut Port container terminal," Operational Research, Springer, vol. 21(3), pages 1743-1761, September.
    15. Türkoğulları, Yavuz B. & Taşkın, Z. Caner & Aras, Necati & Altınel, İ. Kuban, 2014. "Optimal berth allocation and time-invariant quay crane assignment in container terminals," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 235(1), pages 88-101.
    16. Dirk Briskorn & Florian Jaehn & Andreas Wiehl, 2019. "A generator for test instances of scheduling problems concerning cranes in transshipment terminals," OR Spectrum: Quantitative Approaches in Management, Springer;Gesellschaft für Operations Research e.V., vol. 41(1), pages 45-69, March.
    17. Raymond K. Cheung & Chung-Lun Li & Wuqin Lin, 2002. "Interblock Crane Deployment in Container Terminals," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 36(1), pages 79-93, February.
    18. Kim, Kap Hwan & Moon, Kyung Chan, 2003. "Berth scheduling by simulated annealing," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 37(6), pages 541-560, July.
    19. Henry Lau & Ying Zhao, 2008. "Integrated scheduling of handling equipment at automated container terminals," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 159(1), pages 373-394, March.
    20. Wu, Lingxiao & Ma, Weimin, 2017. "Quay crane scheduling with draft and trim constraints," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 97(C), pages 38-68.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:pal:jorsoc:v:57:y:2006:i:12:d:10.1057_palgrave.jors.2602110. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.palgrave-journals.com/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.