IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jmathe/v13y2025i12p1939-d1676364.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Bridging Crisp-Set Qualitative Comparative Analysis and Association Rule Mining: A Formal and Computational Integration

Author

Listed:
  • Acácio Dom Luís

    (Departamento de Matemáticas para la Economía y la Empresa, Facultad de Economía, Universidad de Valencia, Avda. Tarongers s/n, 46022 Valencia, Spain)

  • Rafael Benítez

    (Departamento de Matemáticas para la Economía y la Empresa, Facultad de Economía, Universidad de Valencia, Avda. Tarongers s/n, 46022 Valencia, Spain)

  • María del Carmen Bas

    (Departamento de Matemáticas para la Economía y la Empresa, Facultad de Economía, Universidad de Valencia, Avda. Tarongers s/n, 46022 Valencia, Spain)

Abstract

In this paper, a novel mathematical formalization of Crisp-Set Qualitative Comparative Analysis (csQCA) that enables a rigorous connection with a specific class of association rule mining (ARM) problems is proposed. Although these two methodologies are frequently used to identify logical patterns in binary datasets, they originate from different traditions. While csQCA is rooted in set theory and Boolean logic and is primarily applied in the social sciences to model causal complexity, ARM originates from data mining and is widely used to discover frequent co-occurrences among items. In this study, we establish a formal mathematical equivalence between csQCA configurations and a subclass of association rules, including both positive and negative conditions. Moreover, we propose a minimization procedure for association rules that mirrors the Quine–McCluskey reduction method employed in csQCA. We demonstrate the consistency of the results obtained using both methodologies through two examples (a small-N study on internet shutdowns in Sub-Saharan Africa and a large-N analysis of immigration attitudes in Europe) and some numerical experiments. However, it is also clear that ARM offers improved scalability and robustness in high-dimensional contexts. Overall, these findings provide researchers with valuable theoretical and practical guidance when choosing between these approaches in qualitative data analysis.

Suggested Citation

  • Acácio Dom Luís & Rafael Benítez & María del Carmen Bas, 2025. "Bridging Crisp-Set Qualitative Comparative Analysis and Association Rule Mining: A Formal and Computational Integration," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 13(12), pages 1-28, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jmathe:v:13:y:2025:i:12:p:1939-:d:1676364
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7390/13/12/1939/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7390/13/12/1939/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Sofia Pagliarin & Salvatore Mendola & Barbara Vis, 2023. "The “qualitative” in qualitative comparative analysis (QCA): research moves, case-intimacy and face-to-face interviews," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 57(1), pages 489-507, February.
    2. Jie Zhao & Can Yan, 2020. "User Acceptance of Information Feed Advertising: A Hybrid Method Based on SEM and QCA," Future Internet, MDPI, vol. 12(12), pages 1-17, November.
    3. Hahsler, Michael & Grün, Bettina & Hornik, Kurt, 2005. "arules - A Computational Environment for Mining Association Rules and Frequent Item Sets," Journal of Statistical Software, Foundation for Open Access Statistics, vol. 14(i15).
    4. Cheong Kim & Francis Joseph Costello & Kun Chang Lee, 2019. "Integrating Qualitative Comparative Analysis and Support Vector Machine Methods to Reduce Passengers’ Resistance to Biometric E-Gates for Sustainable Airport Operations," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(19), pages 1-22, September.
    5. Anup Agrawal & Charles R. Knoeber, "undated". "Firm Performance and Mechanisms to Control Agency Problems between Managers and Shareholders (Revision of 29-94)," Rodney L. White Center for Financial Research Working Papers 08-96, Wharton School Rodney L. White Center for Financial Research.
    6. Martyna Daria Swiatczak, 2022. "Different algorithms, different models," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 56(4), pages 1913-1937, August.
    7. Anup Agrawal & Charles R. Knoeber, "undated". "Firm Performance and Mechanisms to Control Agency Problems between Managers and Shareholders (Revision of 29-94)," Rodney L. White Center for Financial Research Working Papers 8-96, Wharton School Rodney L. White Center for Financial Research.
    8. Kaisa Korhonen-Kurki & Jenniver Sehring & Maria Brockhaus & Monica Di Gregorio, 2014. "Enabling factors for establishing REDD+ in a context of weak governance," Climate Policy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 14(2), pages 167-186, March.
    9. Kumar, Satish & Sahoo, Saumyaranjan & Lim, Weng Marc & Kraus, Sascha & Bamel, Umesh, 2022. "Fuzzy-set qualitative comparative analysis (fsQCA) in business and management research: A contemporary overview," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 178(C).
    10. Agrawal, Anup & Knoeber, Charles R., 1996. "Firm Performance and Mechanisms to Control Agency Problems between Managers and Shareholders," Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, Cambridge University Press, vol. 31(3), pages 377-397, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Minguez-Vera, Antonio & Martin-Ugedo, Juan Francisco, 2007. "Does ownership structure affect value? A panel data analysis for the Spanish market," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 16(1), pages 81-98.
    2. Sheikh, Shahbaz, 2018. "The impact of market competition on the relation between CEO power and firm innovation," Journal of Multinational Financial Management, Elsevier, vol. 44(C), pages 36-50.
    3. Dendi Ramdani & Arjen Witteloostuijn, 2012. "The Shareholder–Manager Relationship and Its Impact on the Likelihood of Firm Bribery," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 108(4), pages 495-507, July.
    4. Chenini Hajer & Jarboui Anis, 2018. "Analysis of the Impact of Governance on Bank Performance: Case of Commercial Tunisian Banks," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 9(3), pages 871-895, September.
    5. Martin Kyere & Marcel Ausloos, 2021. "Corporate governance and firms financial performance in the United Kingdom," International Journal of Finance & Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 26(2), pages 1871-1885, April.
    6. Randall S. Kroszner & Philip E. Strahan, 1999. "Bankers on Boards: Monitoring, Conflicts of Interest, and Lender Liability," NBER Working Papers 7319, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    7. Oxelheim, Lars & Randoy, Trond, 2003. "The impact of foreign board membership on firm value," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 27(12), pages 2369-2392, December.
    8. Panagiotis Staikouras & Christos Staikouras & Maria-Eleni Agoraki, 2007. "The effect of board size and composition on European bank performance," European Journal of Law and Economics, Springer, vol. 23(1), pages 1-27, February.
    9. Pascal Nguyen & Nahid Rahman & Alex Tong & Ruoyun Zhao, 2016. "Board size and firm value: evidence from Australia," Journal of Management & Governance, Springer;Accademia Italiana di Economia Aziendale (AIDEA), vol. 20(4), pages 851-873, December.
    10. Alley Ibrahim S. & Adebayo Abimbola L. & Oligbi Blessing O., 2016. "Corporate Governance and Financial Performance Nexus: Any Bidirectional Causality?," International Journal of Management and Economics, Warsaw School of Economics, Collegium of World Economy, vol. 50(1), pages 82-99, June.
    11. Arunima Haldar & S. V. D. Nageswara Rao & Kirankumar S. Momaya, 2016. "Can Flexibility in Corporate Governance Enhance International Competitiveness? Evidence from Knowledge-Based Industries in India," Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management, Springer;Global Institute of Flexible Systems Management, vol. 17(4), pages 389-402, December.
    12. Christian Weiss & Stefan Hilger, 2012. "Ownership concentration beyond good and evil: is there an effect on corporate performance?," Journal of Management & Governance, Springer;Accademia Italiana di Economia Aziendale (AIDEA), vol. 16(4), pages 727-752, November.
    13. Maurizio La Rocca & Fabiola Montalto & Tiziana La Rocca & Raffaele Staglianò, 2017. "The effect of ownership on firm value: a meta-analysis," Economics Bulletin, AccessEcon, vol. 37(4), pages 2324-2353.
    14. Enrique Yacuzzi, 2005. "A primer on governance and performance in small and medium-sized enterprises," CEMA Working Papers: Serie Documentos de Trabajo. 293, Universidad del CEMA.
    15. Saito, Jun, 2016. "Boards of directors and bank performance in United Arab Emirates," IDE Discussion Papers 583, Institute of Developing Economies, Japan External Trade Organization(JETRO).
    16. Vincenzo Scafarto & Federica Ricci & Elisabetta Magnaghi & Salvatore Ferri, 2021. "Board structure and intellectual capital efficiency: does the family firm status matter?," Journal of Management & Governance, Springer;Accademia Italiana di Economia Aziendale (AIDEA), vol. 25(3), pages 841-878, September.
    17. Luis H. Gutiérrez & Carlos Pombo, 2005. "Corporate Valuation and Governance: Evidence from Colombia," Research Department Publications 3216, Inter-American Development Bank, Research Department.
    18. Nadejda SERDIUC & Hanen KHEMAKHEM, 2015. "The Impact of SOX Adoption on the Compensation of Non-US Companies’ Boards: The Case of Canadian Companies," Expert Journal of Business and Management, Sprint Investify, vol. 3(2), pages 182-188.
    19. Ghosh, Saibal, 2007. "Leverage, managerial monitoring and firm valuation: A simultaneous equation approach," Research in Economics, Elsevier, vol. 61(2), pages 84-98, June.
    20. Maug, Ernst, 1997. "Boards of directors and capital structure: Alternative forms of corporate restructuring," Journal of Corporate Finance, Elsevier, vol. 3(2), pages 113-139, April.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jmathe:v:13:y:2025:i:12:p:1939-:d:1676364. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.