IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jmathe/v13y2025i12p1939-d1676364.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Bridging Crisp-Set Qualitative Comparative Analysis and Association Rule Mining: A Formal and Computational Integration

Author

Listed:
  • Acácio Dom Luís

    (Departamento de Matemáticas para la Economía y la Empresa, Facultad de Economía, Universidad de Valencia, Avda. Tarongers s/n, 46022 Valencia, Spain)

  • Rafael Benítez

    (Departamento de Matemáticas para la Economía y la Empresa, Facultad de Economía, Universidad de Valencia, Avda. Tarongers s/n, 46022 Valencia, Spain)

  • María del Carmen Bas

    (Departamento de Matemáticas para la Economía y la Empresa, Facultad de Economía, Universidad de Valencia, Avda. Tarongers s/n, 46022 Valencia, Spain)

Abstract

In this paper, a novel mathematical formalization of Crisp-Set Qualitative Comparative Analysis (csQCA) that enables a rigorous connection with a specific class of association rule mining (ARM) problems is proposed. Although these two methodologies are frequently used to identify logical patterns in binary datasets, they originate from different traditions. While csQCA is rooted in set theory and Boolean logic and is primarily applied in the social sciences to model causal complexity, ARM originates from data mining and is widely used to discover frequent co-occurrences among items. In this study, we establish a formal mathematical equivalence between csQCA configurations and a subclass of association rules, including both positive and negative conditions. Moreover, we propose a minimization procedure for association rules that mirrors the Quine–McCluskey reduction method employed in csQCA. We demonstrate the consistency of the results obtained using both methodologies through two examples (a small-N study on internet shutdowns in Sub-Saharan Africa and a large-N analysis of immigration attitudes in Europe) and some numerical experiments. However, it is also clear that ARM offers improved scalability and robustness in high-dimensional contexts. Overall, these findings provide researchers with valuable theoretical and practical guidance when choosing between these approaches in qualitative data analysis.

Suggested Citation

  • Acácio Dom Luís & Rafael Benítez & María del Carmen Bas, 2025. "Bridging Crisp-Set Qualitative Comparative Analysis and Association Rule Mining: A Formal and Computational Integration," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 13(12), pages 1-28, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jmathe:v:13:y:2025:i:12:p:1939-:d:1676364
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7390/13/12/1939/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7390/13/12/1939/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jie Zhao & Can Yan, 2020. "User Acceptance of Information Feed Advertising: A Hybrid Method Based on SEM and QCA," Future Internet, MDPI, vol. 12(12), pages 1-17, November.
    2. Agrawal, Anup & Knoeber, Charles R., 1996. "Firm Performance and Mechanisms to Control Agency Problems between Managers and Shareholders," Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, Cambridge University Press, vol. 31(3), pages 377-397, September.
    3. Sofia Pagliarin & Salvatore Mendola & Barbara Vis, 2023. "The “qualitative” in qualitative comparative analysis (QCA): research moves, case-intimacy and face-to-face interviews," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 57(1), pages 489-507, February.
    4. Anup Agrawal & Charles R. Knoeber, "undated". "Firm Performance and Mechanisms to Control Agency Problems between Managers and Shareholders (Revision of 29-94)," Rodney L. White Center for Financial Research Working Papers 8-96, Wharton School Rodney L. White Center for Financial Research.
    5. Kaisa Korhonen-Kurki & Jenniver Sehring & Maria Brockhaus & Monica Di Gregorio, 2014. "Enabling factors for establishing REDD+ in a context of weak governance," Climate Policy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 14(2), pages 167-186, March.
    6. Kumar, Satish & Sahoo, Saumyaranjan & Lim, Weng Marc & Kraus, Sascha & Bamel, Umesh, 2022. "Fuzzy-set qualitative comparative analysis (fsQCA) in business and management research: A contemporary overview," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 178(C).
    7. Hahsler, Michael & Grün, Bettina & Hornik, Kurt, 2005. "arules - A Computational Environment for Mining Association Rules and Frequent Item Sets," Journal of Statistical Software, Foundation for Open Access Statistics, vol. 14(i15).
    8. Cheong Kim & Francis Joseph Costello & Kun Chang Lee, 2019. "Integrating Qualitative Comparative Analysis and Support Vector Machine Methods to Reduce Passengers’ Resistance to Biometric E-Gates for Sustainable Airport Operations," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(19), pages 1-22, September.
    9. Martyna Daria Swiatczak, 2022. "Different algorithms, different models," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 56(4), pages 1913-1937, August.
    10. Anup Agrawal & Charles R. Knoeber, "undated". "Firm Performance and Mechanisms to Control Agency Problems between Managers and Shareholders (Revision of 29-94)," Rodney L. White Center for Financial Research Working Papers 08-96, Wharton School Rodney L. White Center for Financial Research.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Martin Kyere & Marcel Ausloos, 2021. "Corporate governance and firms financial performance in the United Kingdom," International Journal of Finance & Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 26(2), pages 1871-1885, April.
    2. Randall S. Kroszner & Philip E. Strahan, 1999. "Bankers on Boards: Monitoring, Conflicts of Interest, and Lender Liability," NBER Working Papers 7319, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    3. Alley Ibrahim S. & Adebayo Abimbola L. & Oligbi Blessing O., 2016. "Corporate Governance and Financial Performance Nexus: Any Bidirectional Causality?," International Journal of Management and Economics, Warsaw School of Economics, Collegium of World Economy, vol. 50(1), pages 82-99, June.
    4. Arunima Haldar & S. V. D. Nageswara Rao & Kirankumar S. Momaya, 2016. "Can Flexibility in Corporate Governance Enhance International Competitiveness? Evidence from Knowledge-Based Industries in India," Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management, Springer;Global Institute of Flexible Systems Management, vol. 17(4), pages 389-402, December.
    5. Enrique Yacuzzi, 2005. "A primer on governance and performance in small and medium-sized enterprises," CEMA Working Papers: Serie Documentos de Trabajo. 293, Universidad del CEMA.
    6. Saito, Jun, 2016. "Boards of directors and bank performance in United Arab Emirates," IDE Discussion Papers 583, Institute of Developing Economies, Japan External Trade Organization(JETRO).
    7. Nadejda SERDIUC & Hanen KHEMAKHEM, 2015. "The Impact of SOX Adoption on the Compensation of Non-US Companies’ Boards: The Case of Canadian Companies," Expert Journal of Business and Management, Sprint Investify, vol. 3(2), pages 182-188.
    8. Ghosh, Saibal, 2007. "Leverage, managerial monitoring and firm valuation: A simultaneous equation approach," Research in Economics, Elsevier, vol. 61(2), pages 84-98, June.
    9. Andreas G. Georgantopoulos & Ioannis Filos, 2017. "Board Structure and Bank Performance: Evidence for the Greek Banking Industry during Crisis Period," International Journal of Economics and Financial Issues, Econjournals, vol. 7(1), pages 56-67.
    10. Callahan, William T. & Millar, James A. & Schulman, Craig, 2003. "An analysis of the effect of management participation in director selection on the long-term performance of the firm," Journal of Corporate Finance, Elsevier, vol. 9(2), pages 169-181, March.
    11. Iftekhar Hasan & Panagiotis Karavitis & Pantelis Kazakis & Woon Sau Leung, 2025. "Corporate Social Responsibility and Profit Shifting," European Accounting Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 34(1), pages 1-29, January.
    12. Thomas J. Chemmanur & Imants Paeglis & Karen Simonyan, 2011. "Management Quality and Antitakeover Provisions," Journal of Law and Economics, University of Chicago Press, vol. 54(3), pages 651-692.
    13. Goergen, M. & Renneboog, L.D.R., 1999. "Prediction of Ownership and Control Concentration in German and UK Initial Public Offerings," Other publications TiSEM e77b6027-aaf2-4f90-b0b1-5, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
    14. M. Ameziane Lasfer, 2006. "The Interrelationship Between Managerial Ownership and Board Structure," Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 33(7‐8), pages 1006-1033, September.
    15. Basma Sellami Mezghanni, 2009. "Investissement En R&D Et Performance De L'Entreprise : L'Effet Moderateur De La Gouvernance D'Entreprise," Post-Print halshs-00459415, HAL.
    16. Ogbaisi, Sebastine Abhus & Areo, Adebowale Biodun & Omotayo, Vincent Adewale, 2019. "Board Attributes And Quality Of Financial Reporting In Nigerian Companies: An Empirical Evidence," Malaysian E Commerce Journal (MECJ), Zibeline International Publishing, vol. 3(2), pages 01-05, January.
    17. Jia Xu & Jiuchang Wei & Liangdong Lu, 2019. "Strategic stakeholder management, environmental corporate social responsibility engagement, and financial performance of stigmatized firms derived from Chinese special environmental policy," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 28(6), pages 1027-1044, September.
    18. Yi-Chein Chiang & Hsin-Chiu Huang, 2012. "Equity Agency Costs And Internationalization: The Effect Of Revised Accounting Standards In Taiwan," The International Journal of Business and Finance Research, The Institute for Business and Finance Research, vol. 6(2), pages 101-111.
    19. Amjad Ali & Wajid Alim & Jawad Ahmed & Sabahat Nisar, 2022. "Yoke of corporate governance and firm performance: A study of listed firms in Pakistan," Indian Journal of Commerce and Management Studies, Educational Research Multimedia & Publications,India, vol. 13(1), pages 08-17, January.
    20. Najah Attig & Sean Cleary & Sadok El Ghoul & Omrane Guedhami, 2013. "Institutional Investment Horizons and the Cost of Equity Capital," Financial Management, Financial Management Association International, vol. 42(2), pages 441-477, June.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jmathe:v:13:y:2025:i:12:p:1939-:d:1676364. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.