IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jmathe/v13y2025i11p1855-d1670409.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Strategic Offerings of Return Freight Insurance by Insurers in Monopolistic and Duopolistic Markets

Author

Listed:
  • Liang Huang

    (Department of Decision Sciences, Macau University of Science and Technology, Macau 999078, China)

  • Jinyi Qin

    (Department of Decision Sciences, Macau University of Science and Technology, Macau 999078, China)

  • Yan Chen

    (Department of Decision Sciences, Macau University of Science and Technology, Macau 999078, China)

Abstract

With the rapid development of e-commerce, Return Freight Insurance (RFI) has emerged as a vital tool for retailers and customers to mitigate the financial burden posed by high return rates in online shopping. This paper investigates the strategic decision-making of RFI providers (insurers), examining whether they should offer fixed-compensation insurance at a lower price or full-coverage insurance at a higher price under varying market conditions. Specifically, we develop game-theoretic models to analyze insurers’ strategic decisions in both monopoly and duopoly markets, accounting for customer return cost and product mismatch probability heterogeneity. Our findings reveal that in a monopoly market, when customer return costs are relatively low and concentrated, insurers benefit from offering fixed compensation insurance (i.e., pre-set reimbursement amounts) at a lower price to attract a broader customer base. By contrast, when return costs are more dispersed and higher, full-coverage insurance (which reimburses actual freight costs) becomes more profitable, as the insurer can utilize its flexible pricing power to attract higher-paying customer segments. In a duopoly market, customer return cost heterogeneity significantly influences market equilibrium. When heterogeneity is high, full-coverage insurance dominates, as insurers can leverage precise market segmentation to justify higher premiums. Conversely, when return costs are more uniform, fixed compensation insurance is preferred for its affordability, appealing to a wider range of customers.

Suggested Citation

  • Liang Huang & Jinyi Qin & Yan Chen, 2025. "Strategic Offerings of Return Freight Insurance by Insurers in Monopolistic and Duopolistic Markets," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-20, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jmathe:v:13:y:2025:i:11:p:1855-:d:1670409
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7390/13/11/1855/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7390/13/11/1855/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Zhang, Chong & Yu, Man & Chen, Jian, 2022. "Signaling quality with return insurance: Theory and empirical evidence," Other publications TiSEM 184da313-a89e-4a81-9f23-c, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
    2. Berg, Erlend & Blake, Michael & Morsink, Karlijn, 2022. "Risk sharing and the demand for insurance: Theory and experimental evidence from Ethiopia," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 195(C), pages 236-256.
    3. Xuanming Su, 2009. "Consumer Returns Policies and Supply Chain Performance," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 11(4), pages 595-612, March.
    4. Li, Yiming & Li, Gang & Tayi, Giri Kumar & Cheng, T.C.E., 2021. "Return shipping insurance: Free versus for-a-fee?," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 235(C).
    5. Bruce McWilliams, 2012. "Money-Back Guarantees: Helping the Low-Quality Retailer," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 58(8), pages 1521-1524, August.
    6. Xiaohuan Wang & Jingchao Xie & Zhi-Ping Fan, 2021. "B2C cross-border E-commerce logistics mode selection considering product returns," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 59(13), pages 3841-3860, July.
    7. Anagnostopoulos, Ioannis, 2018. "Fintech and regtech: Impact on regulators and banks," Journal of Economics and Business, Elsevier, vol. 100(C), pages 7-25.
    8. Pnina Feldman & Yiangos Papanastasiou & Ella Segev, 2019. "Social Learning and the Design of New Experience Goods," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 65(5), pages 1502-1519, April.
    9. Chen, Zhongwei & Fan, Zhi-Ping & Zhu, Stuart X., 2023. "Extracting values from consumer returns: The role of return-freight insurance for competing e-sellers," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 306(1), pages 141-155.
    10. Jie Liu & Shujun Ye & Yujin Zhang & Lulu Zhang, 2023. "Research on InsurTech and the Technology Innovation Level of Insurance Enterprises," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(11), pages 1-19, May.
    11. Xiong, Hui & Liu, Jie, 2023. "Return insurance in a competitive market: Benefiting the high-quality or low-quality retailer?," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 255(C).
    12. Chong Zhang & Man Yu & Jian Chen, 2022. "Signaling Quality with Return Insurance: Theory and Empirical Evidence," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 68(8), pages 5847-5867, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Qiyuan Li & Yanli Fang & Yan Chen, 2025. "Return Strategies of Competing E-Sellers: Return Freight Insurance vs. Return Pickup Services," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 13(2), pages 1-36, January.
    2. Yiming Li & Gang Li & Xiajun Amy Pan, 2023. "Optimal return shipping insurance policy with consumers' anticipated regret," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 32(10), pages 3209-3226, October.
    3. Duong, Quang Huy & Zhou, Li & Meng, Meng & Nguyen, Truong Van & Ieromonachou, Petros & Nguyen, Duy Tiep, 2022. "Understanding product returns: A systematic literature review using machine learning and bibliometric analysis," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 243(C).
    4. Zhang, Xuelan & Lin, Jun & Li, Yifu, 2025. "Dual pricing with purchase hassle," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 280(C).
    5. Xiong, Hui & Liu, Jie, 2023. "Return insurance in a competitive market: Benefiting the high-quality or low-quality retailer?," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 255(C).
    6. Rezaei Kalantary, Mina & Hejazi, Seyed Reza & Khosroshahi, Hossein, 2023. "Pricing for different return policies in an online marketplace considering appeasement during a post-return out-of-stock," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 266(C).
    7. Zhao, Lianxia & Guo, Wen & Fang, Shu-Cherng & An, Qi, 2024. "Enhancing supply chain coordination through transparency initiatives to mitigate product returns," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 78(C).
    8. Bian, Yueqing & Xiao, Tiaojun, 2025. "Returns management in a supply chain considering freight insurance and consumer disappointment aversion," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 195(C).
    9. Lin, Jiaxin & Choi, Tsan-Ming & Kuo, Yong-Hong, 2023. "Will providing return-freight-insurances do more good than harm to dual-channel e-commerce retailers?," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 307(3), pages 1225-1239.
    10. Yang, Hui & Chen, Jing & Chen, Xu & Chen, Bintong, 2017. "The impact of customer returns in a supply chain with a common retailer," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 256(1), pages 139-150.
    11. He, Shan & Dai, Ying & Ma, Zu-Jun, 2023. "To offer or not to offer? The optimal value-insured strategy for crowdsourced delivery platforms," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 173(C).
    12. Ren, Minglun & Liu, Jiqiong & Feng, Shuai & Yang, Aifeng, 2021. "Pricing and return strategy of online retailers based on return insurance," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 59(C).
    13. Jin, Delong & Caliskan-Demirag, Ozgun & Chen, Frank (Youhua) & Huang, Min, 2020. "Omnichannel retailers’ return policy strategies in the presence of competition," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 225(C).
    14. Necati Ertekin & Jeffrey D. Shulman & Haipeng (Allan) Chen, 2019. "On the Profitability of Stacked Discounts: Identifying Revenue and Cost Effects of Discount Framing," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 38(2), pages 317-342, March.
    15. Marriott, Joshua & Bektaş, Tolga & Leung, Erik Ka Ho & Lyons, Andrew, 2025. "The billion-pound question in fashion E-commerce: Investigating the anatomy of returns," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 194(C).
    16. Wang, Chong & Chen, Jing & Chen, Xu, 2017. "Pricing and order decisions with option contracts in the presence of customer returns," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 193(C), pages 422-436.
    17. Ka Chun Cheung & Sheung Chi Phillip Yam & Fei Lung Yuen & Yiying Zhang, 2025. "Optimal design of reinsurance contracts under adverse selection with a continuum of types," Papers 2504.17468, arXiv.org.
    18. Liu, Xingfen & Zhou, Zhongbao & Zhong, Feimin & Hu, Minhui, 2024. "Resolving the information reliability issue in live streaming through blockchain adoption," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 189(C).
    19. Eruguz, Ayse Sena & Karabağ, Oktay & Tetteroo, Eline & van Heijst, Carl & van den Heuvel, Wilco & Dekker, Rommert, 2024. "Customer-to-customer returns logistics: Can it mitigate the negative impact of online returns?," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 128(C).
    20. Chong Zhang & Man Yu & Jian Chen, 2022. "Signaling Quality with Return Insurance: Theory and Empirical Evidence," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 68(8), pages 5847-5867, August.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jmathe:v:13:y:2025:i:11:p:1855-:d:1670409. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.