IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jmathe/v13y2025i11p1707-d1662345.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

AI Reasoning in Deep Learning Era: From Symbolic AI to Neural–Symbolic AI

Author

Listed:
  • Baoyu Liang

    (School of Computer Science and Engineering, Beihang University, 37 Xueyuan Road, Haidian District, Beijing 100191, China
    State Key Laboratory of Virtual Reality Technology and Systems, Beihang University, 37 Xueyuan Road, Haidian District, Beijing 100191, China)

  • Yuchen Wang

    (School of Computer Science and Engineering, Beihang University, 37 Xueyuan Road, Haidian District, Beijing 100191, China)

  • Chao Tong

    (School of Computer Science and Engineering, Beihang University, 37 Xueyuan Road, Haidian District, Beijing 100191, China
    State Key Laboratory of Virtual Reality Technology and Systems, Beihang University, 37 Xueyuan Road, Haidian District, Beijing 100191, China)

Abstract

The pursuit of Artificial General Intelligence (AGI) demands AI systems that not only perceive but also reason in a human-like manner. While symbolic systems pioneered early breakthroughs in logic-based reasoning, such as MYCIN and DENDRAL, they suffered from brittleness and poor scalability. Conversely, modern deep learning architectures have achieved remarkable success in perception tasks, yet continue to fall short in interpretable and structured reasoning. This dichotomy has motivated growing interest in Neural–Symbolic AI, a paradigm that integrates symbolic logic with neural computation to unify reasoning and learning. This survey provides a comprehensive and technically grounded overview of AI reasoning in the deep learning era, with a particular focus on Neural–Symbolic AI. Beyond a historical narrative, we introduce a formal definition of AI reasoning and propose a novel three-dimensional taxonomy that organizes reasoning paradigms by representation form, task structure, and application context. We then systematically review recent advances—including Differentiable Logic Programming, abductive learning, program induction, logic-aware Transformers, and LLM-based symbolic planning—highlighting their technical mechanisms, capabilities, and limitations. In contrast to prior surveys, this work bridges symbolic logic, neural computation, and emergent generative reasoning, offering a unified framework to understand and compare diverse approaches. We conclude by identifying key open challenges such as symbolic–continuous alignment, dynamic rule learning, and unified architectures, and we aim to provide a conceptual foundation for future developments in general-purpose reasoning systems.

Suggested Citation

  • Baoyu Liang & Yuchen Wang & Chao Tong, 2025. "AI Reasoning in Deep Learning Era: From Symbolic AI to Neural–Symbolic AI," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-42, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jmathe:v:13:y:2025:i:11:p:1707-:d:1662345
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7390/13/11/1707/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7390/13/11/1707/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jmathe:v:13:y:2025:i:11:p:1707-:d:1662345. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.