IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jmathe/v13y2024i1p93-d1555840.html

Financial Modeling of Common Institutional Ownership’s Governance Effect on Corporate Leverage Manipulation

Author

Listed:
  • Shiqi Liu

    (Department of Management and Economics, Tianjin University, Tianjin 300000, China)

  • Xiaoyu Wang

    (School of Economics, Qingdao University, Qingdao 266100, China)

  • Cong Li

    (School of Economics, Qingdao University, Qingdao 266100, China)

  • Yuchen Zhang

    (Department of Management and Economics, Tianjin University, Tianjin 300000, China)

Abstract

Common institutional ownership, as a pivotal link of equity interconnection among diverse enterprises and a vital medium of information dissemination, possesses enhanced motivation and capability of decision-making in the course of business operation and development. This paper examines the effect of common institutional ownership on corporate leverage manipulation by applying panel data analysis method based on a sample of Chinese A-share listed companies from 2007 to 2021. We find that firms with high levels of common institutional ownership significantly reduce leverage manipulation. We also find that common institutional ownership can significantly reduce corporate leverage manipulation by improving internal capital management capabilities and external audit environment. At the same time, we find that the synergistic governance effect of common institutional equity has heterogeneity in the aspects of capacity utilization rate, equity nature, leverage manipulation motivation, and macro industry environment. These conclusions collectively highlight the important role of institutional cross-holdings in enhancing internal management levels and facilitating information transmission within the same industry. They also demonstrate that, under circumstances where internal agency problems are prominent, financial stress is high, and external risks are increasing, institutional cross-holdings play a supervisory and mitigating role in corporate financial management. This can not only contribute to the existing literature on the factors that positively constrain corporate leverage manipulation and the economic implications of common institutional ownership, but also has implications for how to enhance corporate governance and promote high-quality economic development in China’s context.

Suggested Citation

  • Shiqi Liu & Xiaoyu Wang & Cong Li & Yuchen Zhang, 2024. "Financial Modeling of Common Institutional Ownership’s Governance Effect on Corporate Leverage Manipulation," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 13(1), pages 1-25, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jmathe:v:13:y:2024:i:1:p:93-:d:1555840
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7390/13/1/93/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7390/13/1/93/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Harry DeAngelo & Andrei S Gonçalves & René M Stulz, 2018. "Corporate Deleveraging and Financial Flexibility," The Review of Financial Studies, Society for Financial Studies, vol. 31(8), pages 3122-3174.
    2. Li, Cong & Liu, Jiaxuan & Liu, Yuwei & Wang, Xiaoyu, 2023. "Can digitalization empowerment improve the efficiency of corporate capital allocation? —Evidence from China," Economic Analysis and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 80(C), pages 1794-1810.
    3. He, Jie (Jack) & Huang, Jiekun & Zhao, Shan, 2019. "Internalizing governance externalities: The role of institutional cross-ownership," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 134(2), pages 400-418.
    4. Patrick Dennis & Kristopher Gerardi & Carola Schenone, 2022. "Common Ownership Does Not Have Anticompetitive Effects in the Airline Industry," Journal of Finance, American Finance Association, vol. 77(5), pages 2765-2798, October.
    5. repec:bla:jfinan:v:44:y:1989:i:1:p:19-40 is not listed on IDEAS
    6. Marcus Miller & Joseph Stiglitz, 2010. "Leverage and Asset Bubbles: Averting Armageddon with Chapter 11?," Economic Journal, Royal Economic Society, vol. 120(544), pages 500-518, May.
    7. Zhu, Ruoyu & Xin, Xiaohui & Tan, Kehu, 2024. "Reverse mixed ownership reform: Does state-owned capital injection inhibit corporate leverage manipulation?," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 59(C).
    8. Edward I. Altman, 1968. "Financial Ratios, Discriminant Analysis And The Prediction Of Corporate Bankruptcy," Journal of Finance, American Finance Association, vol. 23(4), pages 589-609, September.
    9. Crane, Alan D. & Koch, Andrew & Michenaud, Sébastien, 2019. "Institutional investor cliques and governance," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 133(1), pages 175-197.
    10. Kang, Jun-Koo & Luo, Juan & Na, Hyun Seung, 2018. "Are institutional investors with multiple blockholdings effective monitors?," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 128(3), pages 576-602.
    11. Jie (Jack) He & Jiekun Huang, 2017. "Product Market Competition in a World of Cross-Ownership: Evidence from Institutional Blockholdings," The Review of Financial Studies, Society for Financial Studies, vol. 30(8), pages 2674-2718.
    12. Li, Cong & Wang, Yiming & Sun, Weiguo & Yu, Yue & Ding, Yuzhen, 2024. "Green credit policy and corporate deleveraging: Evidence from China," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 66(C).
    13. Edward I. Altman, 1968. "The Prediction Of Corporate Bankruptcy: A Discriminant Analysis," Journal of Finance, American Finance Association, vol. 23(1), pages 193-194, March.
    14. Boone, Audra L. & White, Joshua T., 2015. "The effect of institutional ownership on firm transparency and information production," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 117(3), pages 508-533.
    15. Koch, Andrew & Panayides, Marios & Thomas, Shawn, 2021. "Common ownership and competition in product markets," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 139(1), pages 109-137.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Tian, Haowen & Wang, Junkai & Wu, Sirui, 2024. "Supply chain vertical common ownership and cost of loans," Journal of Corporate Finance, Elsevier, vol. 89(C).
    2. Chen, Zhen & Tang, Xudong & Wang, Yanying, 2025. "Punish one, teach a hundred: The impact of punishments on ex-post misconduct of unpunished firms," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 104(PB).
    3. Tang, Xudong & Jia, Yang & Li, Rui, 2024. "Common institutional ownership types and corporate innovation: A taxonomy based on whether the investees are in the same industry," Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 86(C).
    4. Yao, Rongrong & Xiao, Min & Lin, Ling & Zhang, Xiaoying, 2026. "Only the connected survive: Common ownership and corporate resilience," Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 95(C).
    5. Chen, Yangyang & Li, Qingyuan & Ng, Jeffrey & Wang, Chong, 2021. "Corporate financing of investment opportunities in a world of institutional cross-ownership," Journal of Corporate Finance, Elsevier, vol. 69(C).
    6. Ziwei Wang & Chunfeng Wang & Zhenming Fang, 2023. "Common institutional ownership and corporate misconduct," Managerial and Decision Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 44(1), pages 102-136, January.
    7. Liu, Xutang & Boubaker, Sabri & Liao, Jing & Yao, Shouyu, 2025. "The rise of common state ownership and corporate environmental performance," The British Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 57(5).
    8. Chen, Shenglan & Ma, Hui & Wu, Qiang & Zhang, Hao, 2023. "Does common ownership constrain managerial rent extraction? Evidence from insider trading profitability," Journal of Corporate Finance, Elsevier, vol. 80(C).
    9. Albert Banal-Estanol & Jo Seldeslachts & Xavier Vives, 2022. "Ownership Diversification and Product Market Pricing Incentives," Discussion Papers of DIW Berlin 2023, DIW Berlin, German Institute for Economic Research.
    10. Jie (Jack) He & Lantian Liang & Hui (Grace) Wang & Han Xia, 2024. "Networking Behind the Scenes: Institutional Cross-Industry Holdings and Corporate Loan Markets," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 70(7), pages 4932-4952, July.
    11. Hamza Nizar & Taher Hamza & Faten Lakhal, 2024. "How does institutional cross‐ownership affect firm productivity? The importance of the corporate social responsibility channel," International Journal of Finance & Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 29(2), pages 1988-2010, April.
    12. Geng, Heng & Hau, Harald & Michaely, Roni & Nguyen, Binh Hoang, 2025. "Common institutional investors and board representation in rival firms," Journal of Corporate Finance, Elsevier, vol. 94(C).
    13. Bin Dai & Shiyao Min & Qiqi Wu, 2025. "Common Institutional Ownership and Corporate Leverage Manipulation," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 16(2), pages 10452-10492, June.
    14. Zhou, Wei & Liu, Baohua & Chen, Tao & Chen, Yining, 2025. "Institutional investors' cross-ownership and internal control quality," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 106(C).
    15. Liu, Wenhua & Sun, Bohong & Zhao, Lili & Zhu, Pingheng, 2025. "Does common ownership affect stock price synchronicity?," Research in International Business and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 77(PB).
    16. Zeyu Wang & Qingze Wang, 2026. "Common ownership and corporate green innovation efficiency-based on a two stage value chain perspective," Asia-Pacific Journal of Regional Science, Springer, vol. 10(1), pages 1-35, March.
    17. Li, Feifei & Xue, Ruile & Du, Mingyue & Liu, Yuxing, 2025. "Fintech, banking competition and corporate leverage manipulation," Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 94(C).
    18. Yang, Huan, 2021. "Institutional dual holdings and risk-shifting: Evidence from corporate innovation," Journal of Corporate Finance, Elsevier, vol. 70(C).
    19. Qian Ding & Jinyu Chen & Wu Chen, 2026. "Can Common Institutional Ownership Govern CSR Decoupling? Evidence from China," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 204(2), pages 309-334, March.
    20. Li, Xiao-Lin & Hao, Jiawei & Liu, Liang, 2025. "Does common institutional ownership affect systemic risk of non-financial firms? Evidence from China," Economic Analysis and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 87(C), pages 235-255.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jmathe:v:13:y:2024:i:1:p:93-:d:1555840. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager The email address of this maintainer does not seem to be valid anymore. Please ask MDPI Indexing Manager to update the entry or send us the correct address (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.