IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jmathe/v11y2023i22p4709-d1284090.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Inferring Complementary and Substitutable Products Based on Knowledge Graph Reasoning

Author

Listed:
  • Yan Fang

    (School of Maritime Economics and Management, Dalian Maritime University, Dalian 116026, China)

  • Jiayin Yu

    (School of Maritime Economics and Management, Dalian Maritime University, Dalian 116026, China)

  • Yumei Ding

    (School of Maritime Economics and Management, Dalian Maritime University, Dalian 116026, China)

  • Xiaohua Lin

    (School of Economics and Management, Xiamen University of Technology, Xiamen 364021, China)

Abstract

Complementarity and substitutability between products are essential concepts in retail and marketing. To achieve this, existing approaches take advantage of knowledge graphs to learn more evidence for inference. However, they often omit the knowledge that lies in the unstructured data. In this research, we concentrate on inferring complementary and substitutable products in e-commerce from mass structured and unstructured data. An improved knowledge-graph-based reasoning model has been proposed which cannot only derive related products but also provide interpretable paths to explain the relationship. The methodology employed in our study unfolds through several stages. First, a knowledge graph refining entities and relationships from data was constructed. Second, we developed a two-stage knowledge representation learning method to better represent the structured and unstructured knowledge based on TransE and SBERT. Then, the relationship inferring problem was converted into a path reasoning problem under the Markov decision process environment by learning a dynamic policy network. We also applied a soft pruning strategy and a modified reward function to improve the effectiveness of the policy network training. We demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed method on standard Amazon datasets, and it gives about 5–15% relative improvement over the state-of-the-art models in terms of NDCG@10, Recall@10, Precision @10, and HR@10.

Suggested Citation

  • Yan Fang & Jiayin Yu & Yumei Ding & Xiaohua Lin, 2023. "Inferring Complementary and Substitutable Products Based on Knowledge Graph Reasoning," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(22), pages 1-29, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jmathe:v:11:y:2023:i:22:p:4709-:d:1284090
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7390/11/22/4709/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7390/11/22/4709/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Yu Tian & Sebastian Lautz & Alisdiar O. G. Wallis & Renaud Lambiotte, 2021. "Extracting Complements and Substitutes from Sales Data: A Network Perspective," Papers 2103.02042, arXiv.org, revised Aug 2021.
    2. A. Gürhan Kök & Marshall L. Fisher & Ramnath Vaidyanathan, 2015. "Assortment Planning: Review of Literature and Industry Practice," International Series in Operations Research & Management Science, in: Narendra Agrawal & Stephen A. Smith (ed.), Retail Supply Chain Management, edition 2, chapter 0, pages 175-236, Springer.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jalali, Hamed & Carmen, Raïsa & Van Nieuwenhuyse, Inneke & Boute, Robert, 2019. "Quality and pricing decisions in production/inventory systems," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 272(1), pages 195-206.
    2. Rhodes, Andrew & Watanabe, Makoto & Zhou, Jidong, 2017. "Multiproduct Intermediaries and Optimal Product Range," MPRA Paper 82136, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    3. Bianchi-Aguiar, Teresa & Hübner, Alexander & Carravilla, Maria Antónia & Oliveira, José Fernando, 2021. "Retail shelf space planning problems: A comprehensive review and classification framework," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 289(1), pages 1-16.
    4. Abdelaziz, Fouad Ben & Maddah, Bacel & Flamand, Tülay & Azar, Jimmy, 2024. "Store-Wide space planning balancing impulse and convenience," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 312(1), pages 211-226.
    5. Ostermeier, Manuel & Düsterhöft, Tobias & Hübner, Alexander, 2021. "A model and solution approach for store-wide shelf space allocation," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 102(C).
    6. Transchel, Sandra, 2017. "Inventory management under price-based and stockout-based substitution," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 262(3), pages 996-1008.
    7. Debjit Roy & Eirini Spiliotopoulou & Jelle de Vries, 2022. "Restaurant analytics: Emerging practice and research opportunities," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 31(10), pages 3687-3709, October.
    8. KabirMamdouh, Alireza & Kök, A. Gürhan, 2025. "A personalized content-based method to predict customers’ preferences in an online apparel retailer," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 280(C).
    9. Andrew Rhodes & Makoto Watanabe & Jidong Zhou, 2021. "Multiproduct Intermediaries," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 129(2), pages 421-464.
    10. Ali Aouad & Jacob Feldman & Danny Segev, 2023. "The Exponomial Choice Model for Assortment Optimization: An Alternative to the MNL Model?," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 69(5), pages 2814-2832, May.
    11. Rajesh, R., 2017. "Technological capabilities and supply chain resilience of firms: A relational analysis using Total Interpretive Structural Modeling (TISM)," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 118(C), pages 161-169.
    12. Alexander Hübner & Fabian Schäfer & Kai N. Schaal, 2020. "Maximizing Profit via Assortment and Shelf‐Space Optimization for Two‐Dimensional Shelves," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 29(3), pages 547-570, March.
    13. Hübner, Alexander & Schaal, Kai, 2017. "A shelf-space optimization model when demand is stochastic and space-elastic," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 68(C), pages 139-154.
    14. Alisha Lakra & Shubhkirti Gupta & Ravi Ranjan & Sushanta Tripathy & Deepak Singhal, 2022. "The Significance of Machine Learning in the Manufacturing Sector: An ISM Approach," Logistics, MDPI, vol. 6(4), pages 1-15, October.
    15. Zhang, Jinzhu & Shi, Jialu & Zhang, Peiyu, 2024. "An approach for identifying complementary patents based on deep learning," Journal of Informetrics, Elsevier, vol. 18(3).
    16. Joonkyum Lee & Vishal Gaur & Suresh Muthulingam & Gary F. Swisher, 2016. "Stockout-Based Substitution and Inventory Planning in Textbook Retailing," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 18(1), pages 104-121, February.
    17. Daria Dzyabura & Srikanth Jagabathula & Eitan Muller, 2019. "Accounting for Discrepancies Between Online and Offline Product Evaluations," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 38(1), pages 88-106, January.
    18. Chen, Yajing & Wu, Zhimin & Wang, Yunlong, 2024. "Omnichannel product selection and shelf space planning optimization," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 127(C).
    19. Quan Zheng & Xiajun Amy Pan & Asoo J. Vakharia, 2021. "Product Decoys: A Supply Chain Perspective," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 30(9), pages 2858-2870, September.
    20. Mofidi, Seyed Shahab & Pazour, Jennifer A., 2019. "When is it beneficial to provide freelance suppliers with choice? A hierarchical approach for peer-to-peer logistics platforms," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 126(C), pages 1-23.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jmathe:v:11:y:2023:i:22:p:4709-:d:1284090. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.