IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jmathe/v11y2023i1p239-d1023362.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The ISM Method to Analyze the Relationship between Blockchain Adoption Criteria in University: An Indonesian Case

Author

Listed:
  • Vincent F. Yu

    (Department of Industrial Management, National Taiwan University of Science and Technology, Taipei 106, Taiwan
    Center for Cyber-Physical System Innovation, National Taiwan University of Science and Technology, Taipei 106, Taiwan)

  • Achmad Bahauddin

    (Department of Industrial Management, National Taiwan University of Science and Technology, Taipei 106, Taiwan
    Department of Industrial Engineering, Universitas Sultan Ageng Tirtayasa, Serang 42435, Indonesia)

  • Putro F. Ferdinant

    (Department of Industrial Engineering, Universitas Sultan Ageng Tirtayasa, Serang 42435, Indonesia)

  • Agustina Fatmawati

    (Department of Industrial Engineering, Universitas Sultan Ageng Tirtayasa, Serang 42435, Indonesia)

  • Shih-Wei Lin

    (Department of Information Management, Chang Gung University, Taoyuan 333, Taiwan
    Department of Emergency Medicine, Keelung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Keelung City 204, Taiwan
    Department of Industrial Engineering and Management, Ming Chi University of Technology, New Taipei 243, Taiwan)

Abstract

Referring to the widespread problem of diploma forgery in Indonesian educational institutions as the impetus for UNTIRTA’s latest vision as an “Integrated, Smart, and Green University,” UNTIRTA intends to use blockchain technology to prevent diploma forgery and overcome issues related to existing platforms at UNTIRTA, such as frequent connection interruptions when accessed by a large number of users simultaneously. Before using blockchain technology, UNTIRTA must evaluate several readiness issues. This study presented the interpretative structural modeling (ISM) method to assess the primary preparedness elements for adopting blockchain technology in universities and sought to provide pertinent strategy ideas for UNTIRTA’s blockchain technology application. The results reveal sixteen major parameters that influence the adoption readiness of blockchain technology at UNTIRTA. The primary variables impacting the adoption and deployment of blockchain technology at UNTIRTA are management and employee support and a grasp of the technology. To realize UNTIRTA’s mission as an “Integrated, Smart, and Green University”, the proposed method entails determining an initial agreement in which all stakeholders have a shared understanding and commitment to Blockchain technology implementation at UNTIRTA. The objective of the tactical proposal is to establish each unit’s mission in the blockchain implementation program. The objective of the technical proposal is to construct a planning document that will serve as a coordination tool between the chairman and members, as well as all parties interested in the adoption of Blockchain technology at UNTIRTA.

Suggested Citation

  • Vincent F. Yu & Achmad Bahauddin & Putro F. Ferdinant & Agustina Fatmawati & Shih-Wei Lin, 2023. "The ISM Method to Analyze the Relationship between Blockchain Adoption Criteria in University: An Indonesian Case," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(1), pages 1-17, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jmathe:v:11:y:2023:i:1:p:239-:d:1023362
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7390/11/1/239/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7390/11/1/239/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Huaiqing Wang & Kun Chen & Dongming Xu, 2016. "A maturity model for blockchain adoption," Financial Innovation, Springer;Southwestern University of Finance and Economics, vol. 2(1), pages 1-5, December.
    2. Rocsana Bucea-Manea-Țoniş & Oliva M. D. Martins & Radu Bucea-Manea-Țoniş & Cătălin Gheorghiță & Valentin Kuleto & Milena P. Ilić & Violeta-Elena Simion, 2021. "Blockchain Technology Enhances Sustainable Higher Education," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(22), pages 1-21, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Debesh Mishra & Kamalakanta Muduli & Rakesh Raut & Balkrishna Eknath Narkhede & Himanshu Shee & Sujoy Kumar Jana, 2023. "Challenges Facing Artificial Intelligence Adoption during COVID-19 Pandemic: An Investigation into the Agriculture and Agri-Food Supply Chain in India," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(8), pages 1-25, April.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Christian Sillaber & Bernhard Waltl & Horst Treiblmaier & Ulrich Gallersdörfer & Michael Felderer, 2021. "Laying the foundation for smart contract development: an integrated engineering process model," Information Systems and e-Business Management, Springer, vol. 19(3), pages 863-882, September.
    2. Kwang O. Park, 2020. "A Study on Sustainable Usage Intention of Blockchain in the Big Data Era: Logistics and Supply Chain Management Companies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(24), pages 1-15, December.
    3. Sujata Seshadrinathan & Shalini Chandra, 2025. "Trusting the trustless blockchain for its adoption in accounting: theorizing the mediating role of technology-organization-environment framework," Financial Innovation, Springer;Southwestern University of Finance and Economics, vol. 11(1), pages 1-39, December.
    4. Kouhizadeh, Mahtab & Saberi, Sara & Sarkis, Joseph, 2021. "Blockchain technology and the sustainable supply chain: Theoretically exploring adoption barriers," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 231(C).
    5. Dulani Jayasuriya Daluwathumullagamage & Alexandra Sims, 2020. "Blockchain-Enabled Corporate Governance and Regulation," IJFS, MDPI, vol. 8(2), pages 1-41, June.
    6. Nusi Drljevic & Daniel Arias Aranda & Vladimir Stantchev, 2022. "An Integrated Adoption Model to Manage Blockchain-Driven Business Innovation in a Sustainable Way," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(5), pages 1-21, March.
    7. Tianyi Li & Xiaoquan (Michael) Zhang, 2024. "Development Trajectory of Blockchain Platforms: The Role of Multirole," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 35(3), pages 1296-1323, September.
    8. Alessandra Chiarini & Lorenzo Compagnucci, 2022. "Blockchain, Data Protection and P2P Energy Trading: A Review on Legal and Economic Challenges," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(23), pages 1-20, December.
    9. Bell Raj Eapen & Vishwanath V. Baba & Maarif Sohail, 2023. "Evidence-Based Management: A Design Theory, Template, and Technology for a Knowledge Delivery Platform," Metamorphosis: A Journal of Management Research, , vol. 22(1), pages 73-84, June.
    10. J. Leon Zhao & Shaokun Fan & Jiaqi Yan, 2016. "Overview of business innovations and research opportunities in blockchain and introduction to the special issue," Financial Innovation, Springer;Southwestern University of Finance and Economics, vol. 2(1), pages 1-7, December.
    11. Muzammil Hussain & Waheed Javed & Owais Hakeem & Abdullah Yousafzai & Alisha Younas & Mazhar Javed Awan & Haitham Nobanee & Azlan Mohd Zain, 2021. "Blockchain-Based IoT Devices in Supply Chain Management: A Systematic Literature Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(24), pages 1-23, December.
    12. Chagas, B.T. & Jesus, D. & Palma-dos-Reis, A., 2024. "Blockchain's value proposition for online gambling: The operators' perspective," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 200(C).
    13. Milica Jevremović & Nada Staletić & Gheorghe Orzan & Milena P. Ilić & Zorica Jelić & Cristina Teodora Bălăceanu & Oana Valeria Paraschiv, 2022. "Predicting User Behaviour Based on the Level of Interactivity Implemented in Blockchain Technologies in Websites and Used Devices," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(4), pages 1-20, February.
    14. Milica Jevremović & Cătălin Gheorghiță & Vladimir Cerić & Ovidiu Blăjină & Zorica Jelić & Milena P. Ilić & Rocsana Bucea-Manea-Țoniș, 2022. "An Empirical Study on Website Interactivity Impact among a Student Group, Beneficent for Companies, and Other Users," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(8), pages 1-20, April.
    15. Yunmei Liu & Shuai Zhang & Min Chen & Yenchun Wu & Zhengxian Chen, 2021. "The Sustainable Development of Financial Topic Detection and Trend Prediction by Data Mining," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(14), pages 1-19, July.
    16. Han-Xing Chen & Yikang Sun, 2023. "Applying War Heritage in the National World War II History Course for College Students in China: An Exploration of Digitization Strategies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-22, January.
    17. Chia-Chi Chen & Dian-Fu Chang, 2022. "Exploring International Faculty’s Perspectives on Their Campus Life by PLS-SEM," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(15), pages 1-15, July.
    18. Dulani Jayasuriya Daluwathumullagamage & Alexandra Sims, 2021. "Fantastic Beasts: Blockchain Based Banking," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 14(4), pages 1-43, April.
    19. Alireza Farnoush & Ashish Gupta & Hamidreza Ahady Dolarsara & David Paradice & Shashank Rao, 2022. "Going beyond intent to adopt Blockchain: an analytics approach to understand board member and financial health characteristics," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 308(1), pages 93-123, January.
    20. Ishteyaaq Ahmad & Sonal Sharma & Rajesh Singh & Anita Gehlot & Neeraj Priyadarshi & Bhekisipho Twala, 2022. "MOOC 5.0: A Roadmap to the Future of Learning," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(18), pages 1-17, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jmathe:v:11:y:2023:i:1:p:239-:d:1023362. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.