IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jlogis/v9y2025i3p113-d1721909.html

Enhancing Coordination and Decision Making in Humanitarian Logistics Through Artificial Intelligence: A Grounded Theory Approach

Author

Listed:
  • Panagiotis Pantiris

    (School of Social Sciences, Hellenic Open University, 18 Aristotelous St., 26335 Patras, Greece)

  • Petros L. Pallis

    (School of Social Sciences, Hellenic Open University, 18 Aristotelous St., 26335 Patras, Greece)

  • Panos T. Chountalas

    (School of Social Sciences, Hellenic Open University, 18 Aristotelous St., 26335 Patras, Greece)

  • Thomas K. Dasaklis

    (School of Social Sciences, Hellenic Open University, 18 Aristotelous St., 26335 Patras, Greece)

Abstract

Background: The adoption of artificial intelligence (AI) in humanitarian logistics is essential for improving coordination and decision making, especially in the challenging landscape of disaster-relief settings. However, the current literature offers limited empirical evidence with respect to the specific impact of AI on coordination and decision making for real-life humanitarian problems. Based on evidence from the humanitarian sector, this paper focuses on how AI could help humanitarian organizations collaborate better, streamline relief supply-chain operations and use resources more effectively. Methods: Twelve key themes influencing AI integration are identified by the study using a Grounded Theory (GT) approach based on interviews with experts from the humanitarian sector. These themes include data reliability, operational limitations, ethical considerations and cultural sensitivities, among others. Results: The findings suggest that AI improves forecasting, planning and inter-organizational coordination and is especially useful during the preparedness and mitigation stages of relief operations. Successful adoption, however, depends on adjusting tools to actual field conditions, building trust and training and striking a balance between algorithmic support and human expertise. Conclusions: The paper offers useful and practical advice for humanitarian organizations looking to use AI technologies in an ethical way while taking into account workforce capabilities, cross-agency cooperation and field-level realities.

Suggested Citation

  • Panagiotis Pantiris & Petros L. Pallis & Panos T. Chountalas & Thomas K. Dasaklis, 2025. "Enhancing Coordination and Decision Making in Humanitarian Logistics Through Artificial Intelligence: A Grounded Theory Approach," Logistics, MDPI, vol. 9(3), pages 1-33, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jlogis:v:9:y:2025:i:3:p:113-:d:1721909
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2305-6290/9/3/113/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2305-6290/9/3/113/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Muhammad Khan & Marwan Khan & Abbas Ali & Muhammad Imran Khan & Ihsan Ullah & Muhammad Iqbal, 2022. "Digitalization for Fast, Fair, and Safe Humanitarian Logistics," Logistics, MDPI, vol. 6(2), pages 1-18, May.
    2. Birdoğan Baki & Nermin Abuasad, 2020. "The Evaluation of Humanitarian Supply Chain Performance Based On Balanced Scorecard-DEMATEL Approach," Alphanumeric Journal, Bahadir Fatih Yildirim, vol. 8(2), pages 163-180, December.
    3. Barry Turner, 1981. "Some practical aspects of qualitative data analysis: One way of organising the cognitive processes associated with the generation of grounded theory," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 15(3), pages 225-247, June.
    4. Muhammad Khan & Gohar Saleem Parvaiz & Abbas Ali & Majid Jehangir & Noor Hassan & Junghan Bae, 2022. "A Model for Understanding the Mediating Association of Transparency between Emerging Technologies and Humanitarian Logistics Sustainability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(11), pages 1-23, June.
    5. Helmer Paz-Orozco & Irineu de Brito Junior & Mario Chong & Yesid Anacona-Mopan & Jhon Alexander Segura Dorado & Mariana Moyano, 2023. "Earthquake Decision-Making Tool for Humanitarian Logistics Network: An Application in Popayan, Colombia," Logistics, MDPI, vol. 7(4), pages 1-18, October.
    6. Kouhizadeh, Mahtab & Saberi, Sara & Sarkis, Joseph, 2021. "Blockchain technology and the sustainable supply chain: Theoretically exploring adoption barriers," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 231(C).
    7. Kovacs, Gyöngyi & Moshtari, Mohammad, 2019. "A roadmap for higher research quality in humanitarian operations: A methodological perspective," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 276(2), pages 395-408.
    8. Sarah Schiffling & Claire Hannibal & Matthew Tickle & Yiyi Fan, 2022. "The implications of complexity for humanitarian logistics: a complex adaptive systems perspective," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 319(1), pages 1379-1410, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Mahmoud Abdulhadi Alabdali & Mohammad Asif Salam, 2022. "The Impact of Digital Transformation on Supply Chain Procurement for Creating Competitive Advantage: An Empirical Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-17, September.
    2. Muhammad Khan & Amal Nasser Alshahrani & Julija Jacquemod, 2023. "Digital Platforms and Supply Chain Traceability for Robust Information and Effective Inventory Management: The Mediating Role of Transparency," Logistics, MDPI, vol. 7(2), pages 1-20, April.
    3. Fairouz Mustafa & Jan Smolarski & Ahmed A. Elamer, 2025. "The Convergence of Artificial Intelligence and Sustainability Reporting: A Systematic Review of Applications, Challenges and Future Directions," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 34(8), pages 9761-9784, December.
    4. Panos T. Chountalas & Stamatios K. Chrysikopoulos & Konstantina K. Agoraki & Natalia Chatzifoti, 2025. "Modeling Critical Success Factors for Green Energy Integration in Data Centers," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(8), pages 1-22, April.
    5. Howells, John, 1995. "A socio-cognitive approach to innovation," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 24(6), pages 883-894, November.
    6. Luo, Na & Feng, Zhangwei & Liu, Yanping & Wu, Sihong & Liang, Xiaoxiao, 2025. "Tackling food waste: The role of food suppliers’ investment in preservation technology and government intervention," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 282(C).
    7. Aditi S. Saha & Rakesh D. Raut & Vinay Surendra Yadav & Abhijit Majumdar, 2022. "Blockchain Changing the Outlook of the Sustainable Food Supply Chain to Achieve Net Zero?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(24), pages 1-21, December.
    8. A. Griffith & J. D. Headley, 1998. "Management of small building works," Construction Management and Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 16(6), pages 703-709.
    9. Quy-Thuan Bui & Son-Tung Le, 2025. "Barriers to Blockchain Technology Implementation in Small and Medium-Sized Logistics Enterprises," SAGE Open, , vol. 15(3), pages 21582440251, August.
    10. Aniruddh Nain & Deepika Jain & Shivam Gupta & Ashwani Kumar, 2023. "Improving First Responders' Effectiveness in Post-Disaster Scenarios Through a Hybrid Framework for Damage Assessment and Prioritization," Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management, Springer;Global Institute of Flexible Systems Management, vol. 24(3), pages 409-437, September.
    11. Ehsan Shekarian & Behrang Ijadi & Amirreza Zare & Jukka Majava, 2022. "Sustainable Supply Chain Management: A Comprehensive Systematic Review of Industrial Practices," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(13), pages 1-30, June.
    12. Muhammad Usman & Ahmed Abdul Hameed & Shahid Manzoor, 2018. "Exploring the links between Ethical Leadership and Organizational Unlearning: A Case Study of a European Multinational Company," Business & Economic Review, Institute of Management Sciences, Peshawar, Pakistan, vol. 10(2), pages 28-54, June.
    13. Woon Leong Lin, 2026. "The Influence of Circular Economy on Firm Orientation Toward Sustainable Development Goals: The Moderating Role of Technological Innovation in the Automotive Industry," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 34(2), pages 1596-1621, April.
    14. Mohammadreza Akbari & John L. Hopkins, 2022. "Digital technologies as enablers of supply chain sustainability in an emerging economy," Operations Management Research, Springer, vol. 15(3), pages 689-710, December.
    15. Weixia Yang & Congli Xie & Lindong Ma, 2023. "Dose blockchain-based agri-food supply chain guarantee the initial information authenticity? An evolutionary game perspective," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 18(6), pages 1-23, June.
    16. Heejoo Kim & Zhe Xiao & Xiaocai Zhang & Xiuju Fu & Zheng Qin, 2024. "Rethinking Blockchain Technologies for the Maritime Industry: An Overview of the Current Landscape," Future Internet, MDPI, vol. 16(12), pages 1-19, December.
    17. Lloyd C. Harris & Emmanuel Ogbonna, 2003. "The Organization of Marketing: A Study of Decentralized, Devolved and Dispersed Marketing Activity," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 40(2), pages 483-512, March.
    18. Wu, Haili, 2025. "Cultural biases in the investment decision-making process of institutional investors," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 106(C).
    19. Sunny Kareem & Julia A. Fehrer & Timofey Shalpegin & Christina Stringer, 2025. "Navigating tensions of sustainable supply chains in times of multiple crises: A systematic literature review," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 34(1), pages 316-337, January.
    20. Abderahman Rejeb & Karim Rejeb & John G. Keogh & Suhaiza Zailani, 2022. "Barriers to Blockchain Adoption in the Circular Economy: A Fuzzy Delphi and Best-Worst Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(6), pages 1-23, March.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jlogis:v:9:y:2025:i:3:p:113-:d:1721909. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.