IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/transe/v182y2024ics1366554523003836.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Contract design between relief organisations and private-sector vendors: A humanitarian logistics framework

Author

Listed:
  • Fan, Yu
  • Shao, Jianfang
  • Wang, Xihui
  • Liang, Liang

Abstract

Amid increasing threats from natural disasters, the demand for relief supplies is growing quickly. As such, private-sector collaborations have been an efficient way for relief organisations to mitigate the burden of supply procurement and inventory. However, due to the complexity of disasters, such collaboration contracts are not one-size-fits-all. Based on our field investigation and literature review, we summarize two important factors, the relief organisation’s objective and inventory management, which should determine the design of the contract. Each factor has three important elements, so we can build a framework for the corresponding nine kinds of contracts and propose their models. Through a common numerical experiment, we make comparisons and further clarify their characteristics. The results of this analysis may be helpful in determining which kind of contract is most suitable to promote collaboration between relief organisations and private-sector entities in different humanitarian situations.

Suggested Citation

  • Fan, Yu & Shao, Jianfang & Wang, Xihui & Liang, Liang, 2024. "Contract design between relief organisations and private-sector vendors: A humanitarian logistics framework," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 182(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:transe:v:182:y:2024:i:c:s1366554523003836
    DOI: 10.1016/j.tre.2023.103395
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1366554523003836
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.tre.2023.103395?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:transe:v:182:y:2024:i:c:s1366554523003836. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/600244/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.