IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jlands/v8y2019i2p38-d208178.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Making It Spatial Makes It Personal: Engaging Stakeholders with Geospatial Participatory Modeling

Author

Listed:
  • Jelena Vukomanovic

    (Department of Parks, Recreation and Tourism Management, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27695, USA
    Center for Geospatial Analytics, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27695, USA)

  • Megan M. Skrip

    (Center for Geospatial Analytics, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27695, USA)

  • Ross K. Meentemeyer

    (Center for Geospatial Analytics, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27695, USA
    Department of Forestry and Environmental Resources, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27695, USA)

Abstract

Participatory research methods are increasingly used to collectively understand complex social-environmental problems and to design solutions through diverse and inclusive stakeholder engagement. But participatory research rarely engages stakeholders to co-develop and co-interpret models that conceptualize and quantify system dynamics for comparing scenarios of alternate action. Even fewer participatory projects have engaged people using geospatial simulations of dynamic landscape processes and spatially explicit planning scenarios. We contend that geospatial participatory modeling (GPM) can confer multiple benefits over non-spatial approaches for participatory research processes, by (a) personalizing connections to problems and their solutions through visualizations of place, (b) resolving abstract notions of landscape connectivity, and (c) clarifying the spatial scales of drivers, data, and decision-making authority. We illustrate through a case study how GPM is bringing stakeholders together to balance population growth and conservation in a coastal region facing dramatic landscape change due to urbanization and sea level rise. We find that an adaptive, iterative process of model development, sharing, and revision drive innovation of methods and ultimately improve the realism of land change models. This co-production of knowledge enables all participants to fully understand problems, evaluate the acceptability of trade-offs, and build buy-in for management actions in the places where they live and work.

Suggested Citation

  • Jelena Vukomanovic & Megan M. Skrip & Ross K. Meentemeyer, 2019. "Making It Spatial Makes It Personal: Engaging Stakeholders with Geospatial Participatory Modeling," Land, MDPI, vol. 8(2), pages 1-11, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:8:y:2019:i:2:p:38-:d:208178
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/8/2/38/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/8/2/38/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Claudia Canedoli & Craig Bullock & Marcus J. Collier & Deirdre Joyce & Emilio Padoa-Schioppa, 2017. "Public Participatory Mapping of Cultural Ecosystem Services: Citizen Perception and Park Management in the Parco Nord of Milan (Italy)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(6), pages 1-27, May.
    2. Voinov, Alexey & Gaddis, Erica J. Brown, 2008. "Lessons for successful participatory watershed modeling: A perspective from modeling practitioners," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 216(2), pages 197-207.
    3. Usón, Tomás J. & Klonner, Carolin & Höfle, Bernhard, 2016. "Using participatory geographic approaches for urban flood risk in Santiago de Chile: Insights from a governance analysis," Environmental Science & Policy, Elsevier, vol. 66(C), pages 62-72.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Corey T. White & Helena Mitasova & Todd K. BenDor & Kevin Foy & Okan Pala & Jelena Vukomanovic & Ross K. Meentemeyer, 2021. "Spatially Explicit Fuzzy Cognitive Mapping for Participatory Modeling of Stormwater Management," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(11), pages 1-29, October.
    2. Alonso Gema Cárdenas & Masot Ana Nieto, 2020. "Rural Space Governance in Extremadura (SW Spain). Analysis of the Leader Approach," European Countryside, Sciendo, vol. 12(4), pages 448-468, December.
    3. Francisco J. Castellano-Álvarez & Ana Nieto Masot & José Castro-Serrano, 2020. "Intangibles of Rural Development. The Case Study of La Vera (Extremadura, Spain)," Land, MDPI, vol. 9(6), pages 1-18, June.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Wai Soe Zin & Aya Suzuki & Kelvin S.-H. Peh & Alexandros Gasparatos, 2019. "Economic Value of Cultural Ecosystem Services from Recreation in Popa Mountain National Park, Myanmar: A Comparison of Two Rapid Valuation Techniques," Land, MDPI, vol. 8(12), pages 1-20, December.
    2. Elizabeth Allen & Chad Kruger & Fok-Yan Leung & Jennie Stephens, 2013. "Diverse Perceptions of Stakeholder Engagement within an Environmental Modeling Research Team," Journal of Environmental Studies and Sciences, Springer;Association of Environmental Studies and Sciences, vol. 3(3), pages 343-356, September.
    3. Samuel Sandoval-Solis & Jose Pablo Ortiz Partida & Lindsay Floyd, 2022. "Multi-Objective Water Planning in a Poor Water Data Region: Aragvi River Basin," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(6), pages 1-16, March.
    4. Barbara Sowińska-Świerkosz & Malwina Michalik-Śnieżek, 2020. "The Methodology of Landscape Quality (LQ) Indicators Analysis Based on Remote Sensing Data: Polish National Parks Case Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(7), pages 1-18, April.
    5. Luciana das Dores de Jesus Da Silva & Susanne Kubisch & Mauricio Aguayo & Francisco Castro & Octavio Rojas & Octavio Lagos & Ricardo Figueroa, 2024. "Chilean Disaster Response and Alternative Measures for Improvement," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 13(2), pages 1-19, January.
    6. Dave D. White & Amber Y. Wutich & Kelli L. Larson & Tim Lant, 2015. "Water management decision makers' evaluations of uncertainty in a decision support system: the case of WaterSim in the Decision Theater," Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 58(4), pages 616-630, April.
    7. Mansour Mahamane & Pedro Zorrilla-Miras & Peter Verweij & Casey Ryan & Genevieve Patenaude & Isla Grundy & Isilda Nhantumbo & Marc Metzger & Natasha Ribeiro & Sophia Baumert & Frank Vollmer, 2017. "Understanding Land Use, Land Cover and Woodland-Based Ecosystem Services Change, Mabalane, Mozambique," Energy and Environment Research, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 7(1), pages 1-1, June.
    8. Jose-Luis Molina & Sergio Martos-Rosillo & Crisanto Martín-Montañés & Suzanne Pierce, 2012. "The Social Sustainable Aquifer Yield: An Indicator for the Analysis and Assessment of the Integrated Aquifers Management," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 26(10), pages 2951-2971, August.
    9. Bustillos Ardaya, A. & Evers, M. & Ribbe, L., 2019. "Participatory approaches for disaster risk governance? Exploring participatory mechanisms and mapping to close the communication gap between population living in flood risk areas and authorities in No," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 88(C).
    10. Lopolito, Antonio & Prosperi, Maurizio & Sisto, Roberta & De Meo, Emilio, 2011. "A FCMs approach to promote new business formation in rural areas under uncertainty conditions," 2011 International Congress, August 30-September 2, 2011, Zurich, Switzerland 114778, European Association of Agricultural Economists.
    11. Catharina Landström & Sarah J Whatmore & Stuart N Lane & Nicholas A Odoni & Neil Ward & Susan Bradley, 2011. "Coproducing Flood Risk Knowledge: Redistributing Expertise in Critical ‘Participatory Modelling’," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 43(7), pages 1617-1633, July.
    12. Scott A. Hemmerling & Christine A. DeMyers & Tim J. B. Carruthers, 2022. "Building Resilience through Collaborative Management of Coastal Protection and Restoration Planning in Plaquemines Parish, Louisiana, USA," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(5), pages 1-24, March.
    13. Zhang, H. & Huang, G.H., 2011. "Assessment of non-point source pollution using a spatial multicriteria analysis approach," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 222(2), pages 313-321.
    14. Liangjian Yang & Kaijun Cao, 2022. "Cultural Ecosystem Services Research Progress and Future Prospects: A Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-18, September.
    15. Ricart Casadevall, Sandra, 2016. "Improving the management of water multi-functionality through stakeholder involvement in decision-making processes," Utilities Policy, Elsevier, vol. 43(PA), pages 71-81.
    16. Loc, Ho Huu & Park, Edward & Thu, Tran Ngoc & Diep, Nguyen Thi Hong & Can, Nguyen Trong, 2021. "An enhanced analytical framework of participatory GIS for ecosystem services assessment applied to a Ramsar wetland site in the Vietnam Mekong Delta," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 48(C).
    17. Bram Oosterbroek & Joop de Kraker & Sandra Akkermans & Paola Esser & Pim Martens, 2024. "Participatory Design of Urban Green Spaces to Improve Residents’ Health," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(1), pages 1-24, January.
    18. Gregory Hill & Steven Kolmes & Michael Humphreys & Rebecca McLain & Eric T. Jones, 2019. "Using decision support tools in multistakeholder environmental planning: restorative justice and subbasin planning in the Columbia River Basin," Journal of Environmental Studies and Sciences, Springer;Association of Environmental Studies and Sciences, vol. 9(2), pages 170-186, June.
    19. Stefan P L de Jong & Corina Balaban, 2022. "How universities influence societal impact practices: Academics’ sense-making of organizational impact strategies [Between Relevance and Excellence? Research Impact Agenda and the Production of Pol," Science and Public Policy, Oxford University Press, vol. 49(4), pages 609-620.
    20. Claudio Fagarazzi & Carlotta Sergiacomi & Federico M. Stefanini & Enrico Marone, 2021. "A Model for the Economic Evaluation of Cultural Ecosystem Services: The Recreational Hunting Function in the Agroforestry Territories of Tuscany (Italy)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(20), pages 1-15, October.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:8:y:2019:i:2:p:38-:d:208178. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.