IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jlands/v8y2019i10p154-d277615.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Legal Boundaries of ‘Public Purpose’ in India and South Africa: A Comparative Assessment in Light of the Voluntary Guidelines

Author

Listed:
  • Björn Hoops

    (Faculty of Law, University of Groningen, P.O. Box 72, 9700 AB Groningen, The Netherlands)

  • Nicholas K. Tagliarino

    (Faculty of Law, University of Groningen, P.O. Box 72, 9700 AB Groningen, The Netherlands)

Abstract

The Voluntary Guidelines on the Responsible Governance of Tenure (VGGT) call for governments to clearly define the term ‘public purpose’ to allow for judicial review of the goals of expropriations of property. However, recent research indicates that national-level legal frameworks that govern expropriation decision-making not only vary greatly from country to country but also often fail to comply with the VGGT standards on expropriation. This creates the potential for unpredictable and, in some cases, arbitrary applications of expropriation law in practice. Focusing on legal norms and jurisprudence applicable to ‘public purpose’ decision-making in South Africa and India, this article provides a comparative analysis of these countries’ legal frameworks as means of ascertaining (1) the current legal boundaries to decisions on the expropriation’s goal; (2) whether these boundaries comply with the VGGTs; and (3) what these two countries can learn from one another in terms enacting legislation and regulations that comply with the VGGTs. To conduct this comparative analysis, we thoroughly examine constitutional provisions, relevant case law, legislation, regulations, and relevant secondary sources to highlight the current status of India’s and South Africa’s law on ‘public purpose’ and how they relate to the VGGTs. We conclude by distilling some key findings that can inform the decisions of expropriation lawmakers in both countries, especially in South Africa where a draft Expropriation Bill is currently being considered.

Suggested Citation

  • Björn Hoops & Nicholas K. Tagliarino, 2019. "The Legal Boundaries of ‘Public Purpose’ in India and South Africa: A Comparative Assessment in Light of the Voluntary Guidelines," Land, MDPI, vol. 8(10), pages 1-21, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:8:y:2019:i:10:p:154-:d:277615
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/8/10/154/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/8/10/154/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Nicholas K. Tagliarino & Yakubu A. Bununu & Magbagbeola O. Micheal & Marcello De Maria & Akintobi Olusanmi, 2018. "Compensation for Expropriated Community Farmland in Nigeria: An In-Depth Analysis of the Laws and Practices Related to Land Expropriation for the Lekki Free Trade Zone in Lagos," Land, MDPI, vol. 7(1), pages 1-38, February.
    2. Anthony Burns & Klaus Deininger & Harris Selod, 2012. "The Land Governance Assessment Framework : Identifying and Monitoring Good Practice in the Land Sector," World Bank Publications - Books, The World Bank Group, number 2376, April.
    3. Dhanmanjiri Sathe, 2017. "The Political Economy of Land Acquisition in India," Springer Books, Springer, number 978-981-10-5326-9, March.
    4. World Bank, 2015. "India Land Governance Assessment," World Bank Publications - Reports 24420, The World Bank Group.
    5. World Bank, 2015. "India Land Governance Assessment," World Bank Publications - Reports 28513, The World Bank Group.
    6. Christopher J. S. Gentle, 1996. "Europe in 2010," Palgrave Macmillan Books, in: After Liberalisation, chapter 7, pages 121-132, Palgrave Macmillan.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ernest Uwayezu & Walter T. de Vries, 2019. "Expropriation of Real Property in Kigali City: Scoping the Patterns of Spatial Justice," Land, MDPI, vol. 8(2), pages 1-29, January.
    2. Brijkumar Aggarwal & Diya Uday, 2023. "Technology in Land Administration," Working Papers 27, xKDR.
    3. Ernest Uwayezu & Walter T. De Vries, 2018. "Indicators for Measuring Spatial Justice and Land Tenure Security for Poor and Low Income Urban Dwellers," Land, MDPI, vol. 7(3), pages 1-34, July.
    4. Rabah Arezki & Klaus Deininger & Harris Selod, 2015. "What Drives the Global "Land Rush"?," The World Bank Economic Review, World Bank, vol. 29(2), pages 207-233.
    5. Sara Serra, 2016. "Temporary contracts' transitions: the role of training and institutions," Working Papers w201611, Banco de Portugal, Economics and Research Department.
    6. Lupale Mubanga & Hampwaye Godfrey, 2019. "Inclusiveness of Urban Land Administration in the City of Lusaka, Zambia," Bulletin of Geography. Socio-economic Series, Sciendo, vol. 46(46), pages 53-70, December.
    7. Ciara Brown & Colin Scott, 2010. "Regulation in Ireland: History, Structure, Style and Reform," Working Papers 201044, Geary Institute, University College Dublin.
    8. Lastauskas, Povilas & Stakėnas, Julius, 2020. "Labor market reforms and the monetary policy environment," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 128(C).
    9. Marta Silva & Luis Filipe Martins & Helena Lopes, 2015. "Asymmetric labour market reforms and wage growth with fixed-term contracts: does learning about match quality matter?," Working Papers Series 2 15-04, ISCTE-IUL, Business Research Unit (BRU-IUL).
    10. Thierry Ngoga & Francois Ntaganda & Karim Tushabe & David Niyonsenga & Nadia Ingabire & Pothin Muvara, 2017. "Land Governance Assessment Framework," World Bank Publications - Reports 28492, The World Bank Group.
    11. Nikita Sud, 2020. "The Unfixed State of Unfixed Land," Development and Change, International Institute of Social Studies, vol. 51(5), pages 1175-1198, September.
    12. Marta Sylla, & Julia Olszewska, & Małgorzata Świąder, 2017. "Status And Possibilities Of The Development Of Community Supported Agriculture In Poland As An Example Of Short Food Supply Chain," Journal of Agribusiness and Rural Development, University of Life Sciences, Poznan, Poland, vol. 43(01), March.
    13. Ciliberti, Stefano & Bröring, Stefanie & Martino, Gaetano, 2015. "Drivers, effects and peculiarities of innovation activities in the food industry: a comparison across EU Member States using CIS data," 2015 International European Forum (144th EAAE Seminar), February 9-13, 2015, Innsbruck-Igls, Austria 206249, International European Forum on System Dynamics and Innovation in Food Networks.
    14. N. Martin, 1999. "Population, Households and Domestic Water Use in Countries of the Mediterranean Middle East (Jordan, Lebanon, Syria, the West Bank, Gaza and Israel)," Working Papers ir99032, International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis.
    15. Matia Vannoni, 2011. "The Omc In The European Employment Policy: Bringing Socialisation In," CES Working Papers, Centre for European Studies, Alexandru Ioan Cuza University, vol. 3(2), pages 355-370, June.
    16. Marcello De Maria, 2019. "Understanding Land in the Context of Large-Scale Land Acquisitions: A Brief History of Land in Economics," Land, MDPI, vol. 8(1), pages 1-14, January.
    17. You, Jing & Wang, Shaoyang, 2018. "Unemployment duration and job-match quality in urban China: The dynamic impact of 2008 Labor Contract Law," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 71(C), pages 220-233.
    18. Aditya, Trias & Santosa, Purnama Budi & Yulaikhah, Yulaikhah & Widjajanti, Nurrohmat & Atunggal, Dedi & Sulistyawati, Miranty, 2021. "Title Validation and collaborative mapping to accelerate quality assurance of land registration," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 109(C).
    19. Michiel Bijlsma & Shahin Vallée, 2012. "The creation of euro area financial safety nets," Bruegel Working Papers 732, Bruegel.
    20. Frank Cowell & Eleni Karagiannaki & Abigail McKnight, 2012. "Accounting for Cross-Country Differences in Wealth Inequality," LWS Working papers 13, LIS Cross-National Data Center in Luxembourg.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:8:y:2019:i:10:p:154-:d:277615. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.