IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jlands/v14y2025i7p1405-d1694651.html

The Impact of Natural and Cultural Landscape Quality on Attachment to Place and the Intention to Recommend Tourism in a UNESCO World Heritage City

Author

Listed:
  • Dong Lv

    (School of Business Administration, Huaqiao University, Quanzhou 362021, China)

  • Shukun Qin

    (School of Business Administration, Huaqiao University, Quanzhou 362021, China)

  • Rui Sun

    (School of Business Administration, Huaqiao University, Quanzhou 362021, China)

  • Xuxin Jiang

    (School of Business Administration, Huaqiao University, Quanzhou 362021, China)

  • Ruxia Cheng

    (School of Business Administration, Huaqiao University, Quanzhou 362021, China)

  • Weimin Sun

    (Independent Researcher, Quanzhou 362021, China)

Abstract

Cultural landscapes in World Heritage cities are attracting a growing global tourist population. Given the limitations of self-report methods in capturing tourists’ immediate and deep perceptions, and the lack of comprehensive investigation into the cultural types and naturalness of landscapes, this study aims to investigate how cultural landscape types influence tourists’ recommendation intention through the mediating roles of place attachment and perceived restorativeness while examining the moderating effect of landscape naturalness. Integrating Place Attachment Theory (PAT), Attention Restoration Theory (ART), and the Associative–Propositional Evaluation Model (APE), three studies were conducted using behavioral and neurophysiological approaches. Study 1, a scenario-based experiment, revealed that high-culture landscapes enhance recommendation intention via place attachment, with the effect of perceived restorativeness being stronger under low naturalness conditions. Study 2, an event-related potential (ERP) experiment, showed that landscapes with low culture and low naturalness elicit stronger emotional responses, as indicated by heightened P2 and LPP amplitudes. Study 3 demonstrated the efficacy of a Decision Tree model in classifying landscape naturalness based on EEG features. This study deepens the understanding of the complexity of tourist experiences in cultural heritage sites, provides new evidence for the application of Place Attachment Theory in tourism contexts, and offers scientific foundations and practical implications for optimizing landscape design in heritage sites, enhancing tourist experiences, and exploring brain–computer interface applications in the tourism field.

Suggested Citation

  • Dong Lv & Shukun Qin & Rui Sun & Xuxin Jiang & Ruxia Cheng & Weimin Sun, 2025. "The Impact of Natural and Cultural Landscape Quality on Attachment to Place and the Intention to Recommend Tourism in a UNESCO World Heritage City," Land, MDPI, vol. 14(7), pages 1-33, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:14:y:2025:i:7:p:1405-:d:1694651
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/14/7/1405/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/14/7/1405/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Prati, Alberto, 2017. "Hedonic recall bias. Why you should not ask people how much they earn," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 143(C), pages 78-97.
    2. Yi-Hang Lin & Chun-Liang Chen, 2024. "The Service Experience Innovation Model of Cultural Tourism in Historic Districts: A Case Study on Zhongshan Road in Quanzhou, Fujian Province of China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(9), pages 1-17, April.
    3. Weiwei Deng & Lijun Chen, 2023. "Do first impressions matter? Effect of first impressions on tourists’ destination choice: an event-related potential study," Current Issues in Tourism, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 26(9), pages 1518-1535, May.
    4. Hanbin Shen & Xuecong He & Jing He & Danming Li & Mingjie Liang & Xubin Xie, 2024. "Back to the Village: Assessing the Effects of Naturalness, Landscape Types, and Landscape Elements on the Restorative Potential of Rural Landscapes," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(7), pages 1-30, June.
    5. Tatjana Stanovčić & Mileva Manojlović & Djurdjica Perovic, 2021. "The Relationship between Cultural Tourist Experience and Recommendation Intention: Empirical Evidence from Montenegr," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(23), pages 1-13, November.
    6. Fatih Uslu & Ozgur Yayla & Yigit Guven & Gozde Seval Ergun & Erdi Demir & Suzan Erol & Merve Nur Oklu Yıldırım & Huseyin Keles & Ebru Gozen, 2023. "The Perception of Cultural Authenticity, Destination Attachment, and Support for Cultural Heritage Tourism Development by Local People: The Moderator Role of Cultural Sustainability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(22), pages 1-19, November.
    7. Chen-Kim Lim & Kian-Lam Tan & Minhaz Farid Ahmed, 2023. "Conservation of Culture Heritage Tourism: A Case Study in Langkawi Kubang Badak Remnant Charcoal Kilns," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(8), pages 1-17, April.
    8. Yuting Wang & Ming Xu, 2021. "Electroencephalogram Application for the Analysis of Stress Relief in the Seasonal Landscape," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(16), pages 1-14, August.
    9. Yuting Wang & Shujian Wang & Ming Xu, 2021. "The Function of Color and Structure Based on EEG Features in Landscape Recognition," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(9), pages 1-14, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Yuting Wang & Shujian Wang & Ming Xu, 2022. "Landscape Perception Identification and Classification Based on Electroencephalogram (EEG) Features," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(2), pages 1-12, January.
    2. Grissom, Jason A. & Timmer, Jennifer D. & Nelson, Jennifer L. & Blissett, Richard S.L., 2021. "Unequal pay for equal work? Unpacking the gender gap in principal compensation," Economics of Education Review, Elsevier, vol. 82(C).
    3. Edika Quispe-Torreblanca & Jan-Emmanuel De Neve & Gordon D. A. Brown, 2026. "Social status and the relationship between income rank and well-being in 109 nations," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 17(1), pages 1-16, December.
    4. Shaohua Kong & Hanzun Li & Ziyi Yu, 2024. "A Review of Studies on the Mechanisms of Cultural Heritage Influencing Subjective Well-Being," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(24), pages 1-16, December.
    5. Qinzheng Fang & Wonkee Ko, 2025. "Beyond Satisfaction: Authenticity, Attachment, and Engagement in Shaping Revisit Intention of Palace Museum Visitors," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(19), pages 1-16, September.
    6. Çavuşa, Osman & Bayhan, Isa & Ismail, Balarabe B., 2022. "An Overview of the Effect of Covid-19 on Household Food Waste: How Does the Pandemic Affect Food Waste at the Household Level?," International Journal on Food System Dynamics, International Center for Management, Communication, and Research, vol. 13(01), January.
    7. Halkos, George & Gkargkavouzi, Anastasia, 2025. "Exploring the relationship among environmental identity, eco-emotions, perceived nature restorativeness, and psychological adaptation to climate change," MPRA Paper 126755, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    8. Nawaf Alhajaj & Amer Habibullah, 2025. "Assessing Walking Routes for Wheelchair Accessibility at a Historic District in Saudi Arabia to Enhance Social Sustainability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(8), pages 1-26, April.
    9. Mihai F. Băcilă & Raluca Ciornea & Luiza M. Souca & Alexandra M. Drule, 2022. "Content Analysis on Sustainability Dimensions in DMOs’ Social Media Videos Advertising the World’s Most Visited Cities," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-25, September.
    10. Xinman Wang & Baoqi Che & Qi Lou & Rong Zhu, 2024. "Integrated Eye-Tracking Response Surface Analysis to Optimize the Design of Garden Landscapes," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(7), pages 1-23, July.
    11. Hongya Tang & Wenlong Li & Xin Yan, 2025. "Spatiotemporal Evolution Characteristics and Influencing Factors of Cross-Regional Tourism Corridors: A Tourism Geography Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(3), pages 1-24, January.
    12. Kaiser, Caspar, 2022. "Using memories to assess the intrapersonal comparability of wellbeing reports," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 193(C), pages 410-442.
    13. Feran Aşur & Kübra Karaman & Okan Yeler & Simay Kaskan, 2025. "Assessing Rural Landscape Change Within the Planning and Management Framework: The Case of Topaktaş Village (Van, Turkiye)," Land, MDPI, vol. 14(10), pages 1-26, October.
    14. Pelz, Setu & Chindarkar, Namrata & Urpelainen, Johannes, 2021. "Energy access for marginalized communities: Evidence from rural North India, 2015–2018," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 137(C).
    15. Lepinteur, Anthony & Waltl, Sofie R., 2020. "Tracking Owners' Sentiments: Subjective Home Values, Expectations and House Price Dynamics," Department of Economics Working Paper Series 299, WU Vienna University of Economics and Business.
    16. Chen-Kim Lim & Muhammad Zaffwan Idris & Yi-Chee Chan & Kian-Lam Tan & Minhaz Farid Ahmed & Mazlin Bin Mokhtar, 2023. "Journeying through Time: Exploring the 19th Century Old Transportation Legacy of Weld Quay, Malaysia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(13), pages 1-22, July.
    17. Nikola Žižlavská & Stanislav Herber, 2025. "The use of LiDAR for the documentation and modelling of cultural heritage sites hidden by the forest canopy," Journal of Forest Science, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 71(10), pages 501-515.
    18. Nowak-Olejnik, Agnieszka & Schirpke, Uta & Tappeiner, Ulrike, 2022. "A systematic review on subjective well-being benefits associated with cultural ecosystem services," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 57(C).
    19. Ina Schöllgen & Norbert Kersten & Uwe Rose, 2019. "Income Trajectories and Subjective Well-Being: Linking Administrative Records and Survey Data," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(23), pages 1-14, November.
    20. Suarez-Fernandez, Sara & Perez-Villadoniga, Maria J. & Prieto-Rodriguez, Juan, 2022. "Price salience in opinion polls and observed behavior: The case of Spanish cinema," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 111(C).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:14:y:2025:i:7:p:1405-:d:1694651. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.