IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v17y2025i11p5057-d1669044.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Evaluation of Regional Characteristics of Rural Landscapes in the Yangtze River Delta from the Perspective of the Ecological–Production–Living Concept

Author

Listed:
  • Yuqing Zhang

    (College of Art and Design, Nanjing Tech University, Nanjing 211816, China
    School of Arts, Nanjing University, Nanjing 210093, China
    These authors contributed equally to this work.)

  • Jiaxin Huang

    (Academy of Art and Design, Anhui University of Technology, Maanshan 243000, China
    These authors contributed equally to this work.)

  • Kun Zhang

    (College of Art and Design, Nanjing Tech University, Nanjing 211816, China)

  • Yuhan Guo

    (Academy of Art and Design, Anhui University of Technology, Maanshan 243000, China)

  • Di Hu

    (Academy of Art and Design, Anhui University of Technology, Maanshan 243000, China
    School of Agriculture and Biology, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai 200240, China)

  • Zhang Wang

    (Academy of Art and Design, Anhui University of Technology, Maanshan 243000, China)

Abstract

The rural landscape serves as a window to showcase regional culture and can drive the development of the rural cultural tourism industry. However, driven by the rural revitalization strategy, the construction of rural landscapes in the Yangtze River Delta region faces the challenges of homogeneity and lack of authenticity. A regional evaluation of the rural landscape and strategic suggestions are key to solving this problem. Therefore, this study selected three representative villages in the Yangtze River Delta region and established a regional evaluation model of the rural landscape in the Yangtze River Delta from the perspective of the ecological–production–living concept, utilizing the analytic hierarchy process, a tourist questionnaire survey, IPA, and Munsell color analysis. The results show that (1) the core indicator of the rural landscape regionality is the life landscape, followed by the production landscape, and finally, the ecological landscape; (2) the overall satisfaction of the rural landscape is high, and the satisfaction of the water network landscape is significantly higher than other indicators; (3) the results of IPA show that what needs to be maintained are traditional dwellings and historical relics, and what needs to be improved are sign design and rural public art design; (4) Munsell color analysis shows that the characteristics the of rural landscape in the Yangtze River Delta region are diverse and inclusive. This study is of great significance for maintaining the characteristics of the rural landscape in the Yangtze River Delta region and promoting the protection of rural landscape style under different regional conditions.

Suggested Citation

  • Yuqing Zhang & Jiaxin Huang & Kun Zhang & Yuhan Guo & Di Hu & Zhang Wang, 2025. "Evaluation of Regional Characteristics of Rural Landscapes in the Yangtze River Delta from the Perspective of the Ecological–Production–Living Concept," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(11), pages 1-37, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:11:p:5057-:d:1669044
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/11/5057/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/11/5057/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Hanbin Shen & Xuecong He & Jing He & Danming Li & Mingjie Liang & Xubin Xie, 2024. "Back to the Village: Assessing the Effects of Naturalness, Landscape Types, and Landscape Elements on the Restorative Potential of Rural Landscapes," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(7), pages 1-30, June.
    2. Yue Tang & Li Zhu & Xiaokang Wang, 2024. "Quantitative Analysis of the Evolution of Production–Living–Ecological Space in Traditional Villages: A Comparative Study of Rural Areas in Tibet," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-23, November.
    3. Ziyang Wang & Qixuan Zhou & Tianjiao Man & Lai He & Yiwen He & Yi Qian, 2024. "Delineating Landscape Features Perception in Tourism-Based Traditional Villages: A Case Study of Xijiang Thousand Households Miao Village, Guizhou," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(13), pages 1-28, June.
    4. Xue Chen & Yue Yin & Mu Jiang & Hong Lin, 2023. "Deep Analysis of the Homogenization Phenomenon of the Ancient Water Towns in Jiangnan: A Dual Perspective on Landscape Patterns and Tourism Destination Images," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(16), pages 1-28, August.
    5. Weiwen Li & Yijiang Zhou & Ge Xun, 2022. "Evaluation of Rural Landscape Resources Based on Cloud Model and Probabilistic Linguistic Term Set," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(1), pages 1-17, January.
    6. Gang Lin & Dong Jiang & Jingying Fu & Yi Zhao, 2022. "A Review on the Overall Optimization of Production–Living–Ecological Space: Theoretical Basis and Conceptual Framework," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(3), pages 1-15, February.
    7. Saaty, Thomas L., 2003. "Decision-making with the AHP: Why is the principal eigenvector necessary," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 145(1), pages 85-91, February.
    8. Di Wang & Dong Jiang & Jingying Fu & Gang Lin & Jialun Zhang, 2020. "Comprehensive Assessment of Production–Living–Ecological Space Based on the Coupling Coordination Degree Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(5), pages 1-18, March.
    9. Gül Aslı Aksu & Nigar Küçük, 2020. "Evaluation of urban topography–biotope–population density relations for Istanbul–Beşiktaş urban landscape using AHP," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 22(2), pages 733-758, February.
    10. Wei-Ling Hsu & Miao Qiao & Haiying Xu & Chunmei Zhang & Hsin-Lung Liu & Yan-Chyuan Shiau, 2021. "Smart City Governance Evaluation in the Era of Internet of Things: An Empirical Analysis of Jiangsu, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(24), pages 1-20, December.
    11. Lan Shen & Yikang Zhang & Minfeng Yao & Siren Lan, 2022. "Combination Weighting Integrated with TOPSIS for Landscape Performance Evaluation: A Case Study of Microlandscape from Rural Areas in Southeast China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(15), pages 1-26, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Feran Aşur & Kübra Karaman & Okan Yeler & Simay Kaskan, 2025. "Assessing Rural Landscape Change Within the Planning and Management Framework: The Case of Topaktaş Village (Van, Turkiye)," Land, MDPI, vol. 14(10), pages 1-26, October.
    2. Stefano Bigiotti & Mariangela Ludovica Santarsiero & Anna Irene Del Monaco & Alvaro Marucci, 2025. "Eco-Efficient Retrofitting of Rural Heritage: A Systematic Review of Sustainable Strategies," Energies, MDPI, vol. 18(15), pages 1-48, July.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Shunqian Gao & Liu Yang & Hongzan Jiao, 2022. "Changes in and Patterns of the Tradeoffs and Synergies of Production-Living-Ecological Space: A Case Study of Longli County, Guizhou Province, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(14), pages 1-18, July.
    2. Rong Wang & Jinlong Wang & Wenhao Chen, 2023. "The Coordinated Development of Ecosystem Services and Farming Household Livelihood Security: A Case Study of the Dongting Lake Area in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(14), pages 1-18, July.
    3. Feran Aşur & Kübra Karaman & Okan Yeler & Simay Kaskan, 2025. "Assessing Rural Landscape Change Within the Planning and Management Framework: The Case of Topaktaş Village (Van, Turkiye)," Land, MDPI, vol. 14(10), pages 1-26, October.
    4. Xinghua Cui & Ning Xu & Wanxu Chen & Guanzheng Wang & Jiale Liang & Sipei Pan & Binqiao Duan, 2022. "Spatio-Temporal Variation and Influencing Factors of the Coupling Coordination Degree of Production-Living-Ecological Space in China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(16), pages 1-26, August.
    5. Tianyi Zhao & Yuning Cheng & Yiyang Fan & Xiangnan Fan, 2022. "Functional Tradeoffs and Feature Recognition of Rural Production–Living–Ecological Spaces," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(7), pages 1-27, July.
    6. Fang, Lei, 2022. "Measuring and decomposing group performance under centralized management," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 297(3), pages 1006-1013.
    7. Seyed Rakhshan & Ali Kamyad & Sohrab Effati, 2015. "Ranking decision-making units by using combination of analytical hierarchical process method and Tchebycheff model in data envelopment analysis," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 226(1), pages 505-525, March.
    8. Carmen Herrero & Antonio Villar, 2022. "Sports competitions and the Break-Even rule," Working Papers 22.13, Universidad Pablo de Olavide, Department of Economics.
    9. Madjid Tavana & Mariya Sodenkamp & Leena Suhl, 2010. "A soft multi-criteria decision analysis model with application to the European Union enlargement," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 181(1), pages 393-421, December.
    10. Yingfeng Ran & Wei Hou & Jingli Sun & Liang Zhai & Chuan Du & Jingyang Li, 2024. "Coordination Analysis Between Urban Livability and Population Distribution in China’s Major Urban Agglomerations," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(23), pages 1-14, November.
    11. Abdelmonaim Okacha & Adil Salhi & Kamal Abdelrahman & Hamid Fattasse & Kamal Lahrichi & Kaoutar Bakhouya & Biraj Kanti Mondal, 2024. "Balancing Environmental and Human Needs: Geographic Information System-Based Analytical Hierarchy Process Land Suitability Planning for Emerging Urban Areas in Bni Bouayach Amid Urban Transformation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(15), pages 1-24, July.
    12. Zola, Fernanda Cavicchioli & Colmenero, João Carlos & Aragão, Franciely Velozo & Rodrigues, Thaisa & Junior, Aldo Braghini, 2020. "Multicriterial model for selecting a charcoal kiln," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 190(C).
    13. Baghersad, Milad & Zobel, Christopher W., 2015. "Economic impact of production bottlenecks caused by disasters impacting interdependent industry sectors," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 168(C), pages 71-80.
    14. Aniruddh Nain & Deepika Jain & Shivam Gupta & Ashwani Kumar, 2023. "Improving First Responders' Effectiveness in Post-Disaster Scenarios Through a Hybrid Framework for Damage Assessment and Prioritization," Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management, Springer;Global Institute of Flexible Systems Management, vol. 24(3), pages 409-437, September.
    15. Gang Lin & Dong Jiang & Jingying Fu & Yi Zhao, 2022. "A Review on the Overall Optimization of Production–Living–Ecological Space: Theoretical Basis and Conceptual Framework," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(3), pages 1-15, February.
    16. Erivânia Kayelle & Emilia Kohlman Rabbani & Márcia Macedo, 2023. "Identifying the Causes of Delay Using the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) Method in Brazilian Public Road Infrastructure Projects," Journal of Management and Sustainability, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 13(2), pages 1-45, June.
    17. Andrzej Pacana & Dominika Siwiec & Robert Ulewicz & Malgorzata Ulewicz, 2024. "A Novelty Model Employing the Quality Life Cycle Assessment (QLCA) Indicator and Frameworks for Selecting Qualitative and Environmental Aspects for Sustainable Product Development," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(17), pages 1-24, September.
    18. Roh, Seungkook & Choi, Jae Young & Chang, Soon Heung, 2019. "Modeling of nuclear power plant export competitiveness and its implications: The case of Korea," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 166(C), pages 157-169.
    19. Wu, Zhibin & Huang, Shuai & Xu, Jiuping, 2019. "Multi-stage optimization models for individual consistency and group consensus with preference relations," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 275(1), pages 182-194.
    20. Valdecy Pereira & Helder Costa, 2015. "Nonlinear programming applied to the reduction of inconsistency in the AHP method," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 229(1), pages 635-655, June.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:11:p:5057-:d:1669044. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.