IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jlands/v13y2024i11p1889-d1518702.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Quantitative Analysis of the Evolution of Production–Living–Ecological Space in Traditional Villages: A Comparative Study of Rural Areas in Tibet

Author

Listed:
  • Yue Tang

    (School of Architecture and Art, Central South University, Changsha 410083, China)

  • Li Zhu

    (School of Architecture and Art, Central South University, Changsha 410083, China)

  • Xiaokang Wang

    (Research Center of Chinese Village Culture, Central South University, Changsha 410083, China)

Abstract

Since the introduction of the rural revitalization strategy by the 19th National Congress of the Communist Party of China in 2017, there have been significant transformations in the production–living–ecological space (PLES) within villages. Evaluating and enhancing villages’ PLES are crucial for fostering sustainable development. Therefore, this study utilized a multi-scale environmental assessment model and mathematical approach to conduct horizontal and vertical nested correlation analyses of indicators at different levels through a path analysis, a Spearman correlation analysis, a variance analysis, the entropy weight method, data simulation, and other methods to establish a “three-dimensional” comprehensive evaluation system for traditional village PLES. The findings indicate the following: (1) The ecological space of traditional villages in Tibet significantly impacts the overall environment of the PLES, with the components’ impact ranked as follows: ecological space > production space > living space. Furthermore, industry and tourism resources show a significant positive correlation with traditional villages’ PLES; (2) There are no significant differences in natural environmental factors, such as air relative humidity, temperature, humidity index, and wind efficiency index among traditional villages in neighboring cities in Tibet. However, they all possess profound ecological and cultural heritage; (3) There are notable disparities in living space between traditional villages in Lhasa and Nyingchi, indicating unbalanced development. It is evident that traditional village construction should not only focus on the development of certain PLES but also pay attention to the balanced development of the overall spatial environment. This study holds great significance for enhancing the living environment of traditional villages in Tibet and promoting sustainable development through protection efforts in these villages.

Suggested Citation

  • Yue Tang & Li Zhu & Xiaokang Wang, 2024. "Quantitative Analysis of the Evolution of Production–Living–Ecological Space in Traditional Villages: A Comparative Study of Rural Areas in Tibet," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-23, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:13:y:2024:i:11:p:1889-:d:1518702
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/13/11/1889/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/13/11/1889/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Kai Xie & Yin Zhang & Wenyang Han, 2024. "Architectural Heritage Preservation for Rural Revitalization: Typical Case of Traditional Village Retrofitting in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(2), pages 1-19, January.
    2. Wei Li & Yang Zhou & Zhanwei Zhang, 2021. "Strategies of Landscape Planning in Peri-Urban Rural Tourism: A Comparison between Two Villages in China," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(3), pages 1-13, March.
    3. Xin Wang & Jingjing Lai & Yanlong Guo, 2024. "Study on Tourism Responsiveness and Habitat Environment-Influencing Factors of Traditional Villages in Huizhou Area," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(8), pages 1-15, April.
    4. Hai-fan Wang & Shang-chia Chiou, 2019. "Study on the Sustainable Development of Human Settlement Space Environment in Traditional Villages," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(15), pages 1-22, August.
    5. Xuelan Li & Jiyu Jiang & Javier Cifuentes-Faura, 2023. "Coordinated Development and Sustainability of the Agriculture, Climate and Society System in China: Based on the PLE Analysis Framework," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-19, March.
    6. Zhuxiao Yu & Erqi Xu & Hongqi Zhang & Erping Shang, 2020. "Spatio-Temporal Coordination and Conflict of Production-Living-Ecology Land Functions in the Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei Region, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 9(5), pages 1-22, May.
    7. Shihai Wu & Jianzhong Yan & Liu Yang & Xian Cheng & Ya Wu, 2021. "Farmers and herders reclaim cropland to adapt to climate change in the eastern Tibetan Plateau: a case study in Zamtang County, China," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 165(3), pages 1-23, April.
    8. Rob Eisinga & Manfred Grotenhuis & Ben Pelzer, 2013. "The reliability of a two-item scale: Pearson, Cronbach, or Spearman-Brown?," International Journal of Public Health, Springer;Swiss School of Public Health (SSPH+), vol. 58(4), pages 637-642, August.
    9. Di Wang & Dong Jiang & Jingying Fu & Gang Lin & Jialun Zhang, 2020. "Comprehensive Assessment of Production–Living–Ecological Space Based on the Coupling Coordination Degree Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(5), pages 1-18, March.
    10. Kai Xie & Ran Xiong & Yan Bai & Menglong Zhang & Yin Zhang & Wenyang Han, 2024. "Traditional Architectural Heritage Conservation and Green Renovation with Eco Materials: Design Strategy and Field Practice in Cultural Tibetan Town," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(16), pages 1-24, August.
    11. Qin Li & Shuangning Lv & Jingya Cui & Yijun Liu & Zonghao Chen, 2024. "Research on the Public Environment Renewal of Traditional Villages Based on the Social Network Analysis Method," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(3), pages 1-17, January.
    12. Lingyu Kong & Xiaodong Xu & Wei Wang & Jinxiu Wu & Meiying Zhang, 2021. "Comprehensive Evaluation and Quantitative Research on the Living Protection of Traditional Villages from the Perspective of “Production–Living–Ecology”," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(6), pages 1-25, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Rouyu Zhengchen & Jiaming Liu & Jiamin Ren & Shuying Zhang & Bingzhi Liu, 2025. "Spatio-Temporal Distribution Evolution Characteristics and Geographical Influencing Factors of Cultural Heritage Sites in Xinjiang, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 14(5), pages 1-25, April.
    2. Yuqing Zhang & Jiaxin Huang & Kun Zhang & Yuhan Guo & Di Hu & Zhang Wang, 2025. "Evaluation of Regional Characteristics of Rural Landscapes in the Yangtze River Delta from the Perspective of the Ecological–Production–Living Concept," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(11), pages 1-37, May.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Lingyu Kong & Xiaodong Xu & Wei Wang & Jinxiu Wu & Meiying Zhang, 2021. "Comprehensive Evaluation and Quantitative Research on the Living Protection of Traditional Villages from the Perspective of “Production–Living–Ecology”," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(6), pages 1-25, May.
    2. Xiaofang Sun & Chao Yu & Junbang Wang & Meng Wang, 2020. "The Intensity Analysis of Production Living Ecological Land in Shandong Province, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(20), pages 1-17, October.
    3. Zhang, Zuo & Li, Jiaming, 2022. "Spatial suitability and multi-scenarios for land use: Simulation and policy insights from the production-living-ecological perspective," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 119(C).
    4. Xinghua Cui & Ning Xu & Wanxu Chen & Guanzheng Wang & Jiale Liang & Sipei Pan & Binqiao Duan, 2022. "Spatio-Temporal Variation and Influencing Factors of the Coupling Coordination Degree of Production-Living-Ecological Space in China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(16), pages 1-26, August.
    5. Cong Tian, 2024. "Decoupling Characteristics between Coupling Coordination Degree of Production-Living-Ecological Function and Carbon Emissions in the Urban Agglomeration of the Shandong Peninsula," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(7), pages 1-22, July.
    6. Jiarong Xu & Zhijun Tong & Xingpeng Liu & Jiquan Zhang, 2024. "Evaluation of Ecological Carrying Capacity in Western Jilin Province from the Perspective of “Production–Living–Ecological Spaces” Coupling Coordination," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(1), pages 1-27, December.
    7. Tianyi Zhao & Yuning Cheng & Yiyang Fan & Xiangnan Fan, 2022. "Functional Tradeoffs and Feature Recognition of Rural Production–Living–Ecological Spaces," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(7), pages 1-27, July.
    8. Haoran Su & Yaowu Wang & Zhen Zhang & Wen Dong, 2022. "Characteristics and Influencing Factors of Traditional Village Distribution in China," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(10), pages 1-26, September.
    9. Ying Yang & Yawen Liu & Congmou Zhu & Xinming Chen & Yi Rong & Jing Zhang & Bingbing Huang & Longlong Bai & Qi Chen & Yue Su & Shaofeng Yuan, 2022. "Spatial Identification and Interactive Analysis of Urban Production—Living—Ecological Spaces Using Point of Interest Data and a Two-Level Scoring Evaluation Model," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(10), pages 1-17, October.
    10. Peng Zeng & Sihui Wu & Zongyao Sun & Yujia Zhu & Yuqi Chen & Zhi Qiao & Liangwa Cai, 2021. "Does Rural Production–Living–Ecological Spaces Have a Preference for Regional Endowments? A Case of Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(11), pages 1-21, November.
    11. Francesco La Barbera & Mario Amato & Roberta Riverso & Fabio Verneau, 2022. "Social Emotions and Good Provider Norms in Tackling Household Food Waste: An Extension of the Theory of Planned Behavior," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(15), pages 1-12, August.
    12. Kong Juan & Kepili Ema Izati Binti Zull, 2023. "A Survey Analysis: The Current Real Estate Marketing Situation in the China Greater Bay Area in the Context of the COVID-19 Epidemic," Real Estate Management and Valuation, Sciendo, vol. 31(3), pages 1-19, September.
    13. Yingfeng Ran & Wei Hou & Jingli Sun & Liang Zhai & Chuan Du & Jingyang Li, 2024. "Coordination Analysis Between Urban Livability and Population Distribution in China’s Major Urban Agglomerations," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(23), pages 1-14, November.
    14. Karen Birna Thorvaldsdottir & Sigridur Halldorsdottir & Denise M. Saint Arnault, 2021. "Understanding and Measuring Help-Seeking Barriers among Intimate Partner Violence Survivors: Mixed-Methods Validation Study of the Icelandic Barriers to Help-Seeking for Trauma (BHS-TR) Scale," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(1), pages 1-21, December.
    15. Shunqian Gao & Liu Yang & Hongzan Jiao, 2022. "Changes in and Patterns of the Tradeoffs and Synergies of Production-Living-Ecological Space: A Case Study of Longli County, Guizhou Province, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(14), pages 1-18, July.
    16. Stefan Hoffmann & Tom Joerß & Robert Mai & Payam Akbar, 2022. "Augmented reality-delivered product information at the point of sale: when information controllability backfires," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Springer, vol. 50(4), pages 743-776, July.
    17. Simon Fauser & David Agola, 2021. "The influence of regional Italian images on consumer behaviour: a study of consumers in Germany," Italian Journal of Marketing, Springer, vol. 2021(1), pages 129-158, June.
    18. Peter Heimerl & Marco Haid & Lea Benedikt & Ursula Scholl-Grissemann, 2020. "Factors Influencing Job Satisfaction in Hospitality Industry," SAGE Open, , vol. 10(4), pages 21582440209, December.
    19. Andrea Guazzini & Marina Baroni & Maria Fiorenza & Sofia Sprugnoli & Giulia Valdrighi & Mirko Duradoni, 2025. "Development and Validation of the New Environmental Locus of Control (NE-LOC) Scale: A Novel Measure of Internal, External, and Community Locus of Control for Sustainability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(13), pages 1-23, July.
    20. Gang Lin & Dong Jiang & Jingying Fu & Yi Zhao, 2022. "A Review on the Overall Optimization of Production–Living–Ecological Space: Theoretical Basis and Conceptual Framework," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(3), pages 1-15, February.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:13:y:2024:i:11:p:1889-:d:1518702. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.