IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jlands/v14y2025i7p1344-d1686489.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

An Upscaling-Based Strategy to Improve the Ephemeral Gully Mapping Accuracy

Author

Listed:
  • Solmaz Fathololoumi

    (School of Environmental Sciences, University of Guelph, Guelph, ON N1G 2W1, Canada)

  • Daniel D. Saurette

    (School of Environmental Sciences, University of Guelph, Guelph, ON N1G 2W1, Canada)

  • Harnoordeep Singh Mann

    (School of Environmental Sciences, University of Guelph, Guelph, ON N1G 2W1, Canada)

  • Naoya Kadota

    (School of Environmental Sciences, University of Guelph, Guelph, ON N1G 2W1, Canada)

  • Hiteshkumar B. Vasava

    (School of Environmental Sciences, University of Guelph, Guelph, ON N1G 2W1, Canada)

  • Mojtaba Naeimi

    (School of Environmental Sciences, University of Guelph, Guelph, ON N1G 2W1, Canada)

  • Prasad Daggupati

    (School of Engineering, University of Guelph, Guelph, ON N1G 2W1, Canada)

  • Asim Biswas

    (School of Environmental Sciences, University of Guelph, Guelph, ON N1G 2W1, Canada)

Abstract

Understanding and mapping ephemeral gullies (EGs) are vital for enhancing agricultural productivity and achieving food security. This study proposes an upscaling-based strategy to refine the predictive mapping of EGs, utilizing high-resolution Pléiades Neo (0.6 m) and medium-resolution Sentinel-2 (10 m) satellite imagery, alongside ground-truth EGs mapping in Niagara Region, Canada. The research involved generating spectral feature maps using Blue, Green, Red, and Near-infrared spectral bands, complemented by indices indicative of surface wetness, vegetation, color, and soil texture. Employing the Random Forest (RF) algorithm, this study executed three distinct strategies for EGs identification. The first strategy involved direct calibration using Sentinel-2 spectral features for 10 m resolution mapping. The second strategy utilized high-resolution Pléiades Neo data for model calibration, enabling EGs mapping at resolutions of 0.6, 2, 4, 6, and 8 m. The third, or upscaling strategy, applied the high-resolution calibrated model to medium-resolution Sentinel-2 imagery, producing 10 m resolution EGs maps. The accuracy of these maps was evaluated against actual data and compared across strategies. The findings highlight the Variable Importance Measure (VIM) of different spectral features in EGs identification, with normalized near-infrared (Norm NIR) and normalized red reflectance (Norm Red) exhibiting the highest and lowest VIM, respectively. Vegetation-related indices demonstrated a higher VIM compared to surface wetness indices. The overall classification error of the upscaling strategy at spatial resolutions of 0.6, 2, 4, 6, 8, and 10 m (Upscaled), as well as that of the direct Sentinel-2 model, were 7.9%, 8.2%, 9.1%, 10.3%, 11.2%, 12.5%, and 14.5%, respectively. The errors for EGs maps at various resolutions revealed an increase in identification error with higher spatial resolution. However, the upscaling strategy significantly improved the accuracy of EGs identification in medium spatial resolution scenarios. This study not only advances the methodology for EGs mapping but also contributes to the broader field of precision agriculture and environmental management. By providing a scalable and accessible approach to EGs mapping, this research supports enhanced soil conservation practices and sustainable land management, addressing key challenges in agricultural sustainability and environmental stewardship.

Suggested Citation

  • Solmaz Fathololoumi & Daniel D. Saurette & Harnoordeep Singh Mann & Naoya Kadota & Hiteshkumar B. Vasava & Mojtaba Naeimi & Prasad Daggupati & Asim Biswas, 2025. "An Upscaling-Based Strategy to Improve the Ephemeral Gully Mapping Accuracy," Land, MDPI, vol. 14(7), pages 1-21, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:14:y:2025:i:7:p:1344-:d:1686489
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/14/7/1344/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/14/7/1344/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Md Hasanuzzaman & Pravat Kumar Shit & Saeed Alqadhi & Hussein Almohamad & Fahdah Falah ben Hasher & Hazem Ghassan Abdo & Javed Mallick, 2024. "Utilizing Machine Learning Algorithms for the Development of Gully Erosion Susceptibility Maps: Evidence from the Chotanagpur Plateau Region, India," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(15), pages 1-20, July.
    2. David Pimentel, 2006. "Soil Erosion: A Food and Environmental Threat," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 8(1), pages 119-137, February.
    3. David Tilman & Kenneth G. Cassman & Pamela A. Matson & Rosamond Naylor & Stephen Polasky, 2002. "Agricultural sustainability and intensive production practices," Nature, Nature, vol. 418(6898), pages 671-677, August.
    4. Hamid Mohebzadeh & Asim Biswas & Ben DeVries & Ramesh Rudra & Prasad Daggupati, 2024. "Transferability of predictive models to map susceptibility of ephemeral gullies at large scale," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 120(5), pages 4527-4561, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Aditi Sengupta & Priyanka Kushwaha & Antonia Jim & Peter A. Troch & Raina Maier, 2020. "New Soil, Old Plants, and Ubiquitous Microbes: Evaluating the Potential of Incipient Basaltic Soil to Support Native Plant Growth and Influence Belowground Soil Microbial Community Composition," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(10), pages 1-18, May.
    2. Merante, Paolo & Van Passel, Steven & Pacini, Cesare, 2015. "Using agro-environmental models to design a sustainable benchmark for the sustainable value method," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 136(C), pages 1-13.
    3. Semih Ediş & Özgür Burhan Timur & Gamze Tuttu & İbrahim Aytaş & Ceyhun Göl & Ali Uğur Özcan, 2023. "Assessing the Impact of Engineering Measures and Vegetation Restoration on Soil Erosion: A Case Study in Osmancık, Türkiye," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(15), pages 1-16, August.
    4. Elisa Morri & Riccardo Santolini, 2021. "Ecosystem Services Valuation for the Sustainable Land Use Management by Nature-Based Solution (NbS) in the Common Agricultural Policy Actions: A Case Study on the Foglia River Basin (Marche Region, It," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(1), pages 1-23, December.
    5. Katarina Arvidsson Segerkvist & Helena Hansson & Ulf Sonesson & Stefan Gunnarsson, 2021. "A Systematic Mapping of Current Literature on Sustainability at Farm-Level in Beef and Lamb Meat Production," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(5), pages 1-14, February.
    6. Hualin Xie & Yingqian Huang & Qianru Chen & Yanwei Zhang & Qing Wu, 2019. "Prospects for Agricultural Sustainable Intensification: A Review of Research," Land, MDPI, vol. 8(11), pages 1-27, October.
    7. Smith, Helen F. & Sullivan, Caroline A., 2014. "Ecosystem services within agricultural landscapes—Farmers' perceptions," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 98(C), pages 72-80.
    8. Aude Ridier & Caroline Roussy & Karim Chaib, 2021. "Adoption of crop diversification by specialized grain farmers in south-western France: evidence from a choice-modelling experiment," Review of Agricultural, Food and Environmental Studies, Springer, vol. 102(3), pages 265-283, September.
    9. Paul L. G. Vlek & Asia Khamzina & Hossein Azadi & Anik Bhaduri & Luna Bharati & Ademola Braimoh & Christopher Martius & Terry Sunderland & Fatemeh Taheri, 2017. "Trade-Offs in Multi-Purpose Land Use under Land Degradation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(12), pages 1-19, November.
    10. Diriba Shiferaw G., 2017. "Water-Nutrients Interaction: Exploring the Effects of Water as a Central Role for Availability & Use Efficiency of Nutrients by Shallow Rooted Vegetable Crops - A Review," Journal of Agriculture and Crops, Academic Research Publishing Group, vol. 3(10), pages 78-93, 10-2017.
    11. Sheng Gong & Jason.S. Bergtold & Elizabeth Yeager, 2021. "Assessing the joint adoption and complementarity between in-field conservation practices of Kansas farmers," Agricultural and Food Economics, Springer;Italian Society of Agricultural Economics (SIDEA), vol. 9(1), pages 1-24, December.
    12. Seufert, Verena & Ramankutty, Navin & Mayerhofer, Tabea, 2017. "What is this thing called organic? – How organic farming is codified in regulations," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 68(C), pages 10-20.
    13. Aznarul Islam & Sanat Kumar Guchhait, 2017. "Search for social justice for the victims of erosion hazard along the banks of river Bhagirathi by hydraulic control: a case study of West Bengal, India," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 19(2), pages 433-459, April.
    14. Kataki, Sampriti & West, Helen & Clarke, Michèle & Baruah, D.C., 2016. "Phosphorus recovery as struvite: Recent concerns for use of seed, alternative Mg source, nitrogen conservation and fertilizer potential," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 107(C), pages 142-156.
    15. Alexander D. Chapman & Stephen E. Darby & Hoàng M. Hồng & Emma L. Tompkins & Tri P. D. Van, 2016. "Adaptation and development trade-offs: fluvial sediment deposition and the sustainability of rice-cropping in An Giang Province, Mekong Delta," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 137(3), pages 593-608, August.
    16. Rosa, R.D. & Ramos, T.B. & Pereira, L.S., 2016. "The dual Kc approach to assess maize and sweet sorghum transpiration and soil evaporation under saline conditions: Application of the SIMDualKc model," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 177(C), pages 77-94.
    17. Chen, Chien-Ming & van Dalen, Jan, 2010. "Measuring dynamic efficiency: Theories and an integrated methodology," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 203(3), pages 749-760, June.
    18. Ethan Gordon & Federico Davila & Chris Riedy, 2022. "Transforming landscapes and mindscapes through regenerative agriculture," Agriculture and Human Values, Springer;The Agriculture, Food, & Human Values Society (AFHVS), vol. 39(2), pages 809-826, June.
    19. Teklewold, Hailemariam & Kassie, Menale & Shiferaw, Bekele & Köhlin, Gunnar, 2013. "Cropping system diversification, conservation tillage and modern seed adoption in Ethiopia: Impacts on household income, agrochemical use and demand for labor," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 93(C), pages 85-93.
    20. Václav BRANT & Milan KROULÍK & Jan PIVEC & Petr ZÁBRANSKÝ & Josef HAKL & Josef HOLEC & Zdeněk KVÍZ & Luděk PROCHÁZKA, 2017. "Splash erosion in maize crops under conservation management in combination with shallow strip-tillage before sowing," Soil and Water Research, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 12(2), pages 106-116.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:14:y:2025:i:7:p:1344-:d:1686489. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.