Author
Listed:
- Luke Macaulay
(University of Maryland Extension, College of Agriculture & Natural Resources, University of Maryland, College Park, 124 Wye Narrows Dr, Queenstown, MD 21658, USA)
- Yashwanth Reddy Pinnapu Reddy
(University of Maryland Extension, College of Agriculture & Natural Resources, University of Maryland, College Park, 124 Wye Narrows Dr, Queenstown, MD 21658, USA)
- Evan Griffiths
(University of Maryland Extension, College of Agriculture & Natural Resources, University of Maryland, College Park, 124 Wye Narrows Dr, Queenstown, MD 21658, USA)
Abstract
Land management decisions and conservation value are heavily influenced by land ownership, land cover, and land use. Our research aimed to examine ownership and land cover distribution, classify landowners based on land cover composition, and evaluate the ability of land cover clustering to be predictive of landowner motivations and behaviors in Maryland, USA. We tabulated a high-resolution land cover map against ownership boundaries, applied hierarchical clustering, and identified five landowner types characterized by a dominant land cover: (1) forest, (2) turf grass, (3) developed, (4) hay/pasture, and (5) crops. We analyzed a landowner survey of 3344 respondents to reveal how clusters predicted recreation, conservation, income, and other motivations. We found a skewed ownership distribution: 95.3% of smaller ownerships (<5 acres) cover 27.3% of the land, while 4.7% of larger owners hold 72.7%. Ownership patterns vary by cover, with forests and wetlands showing bimodal distributions, unimodal for cropland and hay/pasture, and turf grass concentrated in smaller properties. Survey analysis showed that crop, hay/pasture, and forest clusters had income percentages increasing with property size, with crop and hay/pasture accelerating more; conservation interest rose with size for forest and crop, but not hay/pasture; hunting motivation was highest in forest but increased with size similarly across clusters; non-hunting recreation motivation was highest in smaller hay/pasture properties, but decreased with size for all. Although each landowner has unique motivations and goals, our results reveal trends mediated by size of property and land cover that can be used to target outreach and improve conservation outcomes across Maryland’s diverse landscape.
Suggested Citation
Luke Macaulay & Yashwanth Reddy Pinnapu Reddy & Evan Griffiths, 2025.
"Ownership Patterns and Landscape Diversity: Conservation Implications in Maryland,"
Land, MDPI, vol. 14(7), pages 1-30, June.
Handle:
RePEc:gam:jlands:v:14:y:2025:i:7:p:1342-:d:1686352
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:14:y:2025:i:7:p:1342-:d:1686352. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.