IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jlands/v14y2025i6p1231-d1673797.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Impact of Geographical Location of Households’ Residences on the Livelihoods of Households Surrounding Protected Areas: An Empirical Analysis of Seven Nature Reserves Across Three Provinces in China

Author

Listed:
  • Changhai Wang

    (School of Government, University of Chinese Academy of Social Sciences, Beijing 102488, China)

  • Wei Zhang

    (Faculty of Applied Economics, University of Chinese Academy of Social Sciences, Beijing 102488, China)

  • Yueting Gao

    (College of Economics and Management, Yunnan Agricultural University, Kunming 102488, China)

  • Jun Sun

    (Chinese Academy of Natural Resources Economics, Beijing 101149, China)

Abstract

China has effectively safeguarded biodiversity by building the world’s largest system of nature reserves, but the livelihoods of farmers near the reserves are often not guaranteed. This paper aimed to deeply explore the intrinsic relationship between the geographical location of households and their livelihood outcomes within seven nature reserves across three provinces in China. Innovatively, this study subdivided households’ livelihood outcomes into four patterns: high well-being with high dependency (H-H), high well-being with low dependency (H-L), low well-being with high dependency (L-H), and low well-being with low dependency (L-L), in order to comprehensively analyze the diversity of households’ livelihoods and further reveal the spatial logic and mechanisms underlying regional development imbalances. Methodologically, a combination of quantitative analysis and qualitative research was adopted. Representative villages in the protected area and outside the protected area were selected for semi-structured interviews with the village heads. Meanwhile, farmers were randomly selected in the villages for structured interviews and 1106 questionnaires were collected. Through variance analysis, the study first identified the unique advantages of H-H-pattern households in natural resource utilization. Subsequently, a multinomial logistic model was used to deeply analyze how geographical location (including whether a household was located within a protected area and the distance to markets) affected the transition mechanisms of the other three livelihood outcomes towards the H-H pattern. Based on this, marginal effect analysis was employed to further delineate the specific influence pathways of geographical factor changes on households’ livelihood outcome selection probabilities. The results showed that the geographical location of households’ residences had a significant impact on their livelihood outcomes. For households in the L-L and H-L patterns, proximity to markets could significantly increase the probability of their livelihood transitioning to the H-H pattern. Meanwhile, residing within protected areas significantly promoted the transition of L-L and H-L households to the H-H pattern but showed a certain inhibitory effect on L-H households. Marginal effects analysis further shows that both living in protected areas and reducing distance to markets increase the tendency of households to be highly dependent on natural resources for livelihood outcomes. Compensation policies should be designed according to local conditions, and subsidies for the development of ecotourism and other service industries should be increased for rural households in protected areas to ensure sustainable development rather than transfer payments.

Suggested Citation

  • Changhai Wang & Wei Zhang & Yueting Gao & Jun Sun, 2025. "The Impact of Geographical Location of Households’ Residences on the Livelihoods of Households Surrounding Protected Areas: An Empirical Analysis of Seven Nature Reserves Across Three Provinces in Chi," Land, MDPI, vol. 14(6), pages 1-26, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:14:y:2025:i:6:p:1231-:d:1673797
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/14/6/1231/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/14/6/1231/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Fengchun Wang & Hua Zheng & Xiaoke Wang & Wenjia Peng & Dongchun Ma & Cong Li, 2017. "Classification of the Relationship between Household Welfare and Ecosystem Reliance in the Miyun Reservoir Watershed, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(12), pages 1-15, December.
    2. Bonye, Samuel Ziem & Yiridomoh, Gordon Yenglier & Nsiah, Vivian, 2023. "Our forest, our livelihood: Natural resources’ use controversies and community livelihood sustainability in the Mole National Park, Ghana," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 127(C).
    3. Ma, Wanglin & Rahut, Dil Bahadur & Sonobe, Tetsushi & Gong, Binlei, 2024. "Linking farmers to markets: Barriers, solutions, and policy options," Economic Analysis and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 82(C), pages 1102-1112.
    4. Guerbois, Chloé & Fritz, Hervé, 2017. "Patterns and perceived sustainability of provisioning ecosystem services on the edge of a protected area in times of crisis," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 28(PB), pages 196-206.
    5. Negi, Digvijay S. & Birthal, Pratap S. & Roy, Devesh & Khan, Md. Tajuddin, 2018. "Farmers’ choice of market channels and producer prices in India: Role of transportation and communication networks," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 81(C), pages 106-121.
    6. Langle-Flores, Alfonso & Quijas, Sandra, 2020. "A systematic review of ecosystem services of Islas Marietas National Park, Mexico, an insular marine protected area," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 46(C).
    7. Amadu, Festus O. & Miller, Daniel C., 2024. "The impact of forest product collection and processing on household income in rural Liberia," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 158(C).
    8. Yang, Zhe & Li, Qingqing & Xue, Wenhao & Xu, Zhihua, 2022. "Impacts of nature reserves on local residents' income in China," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 199(C).
    9. Shuyi Wang & Daizhong Su, 2022. "Sustainable Product Innovation and Consumer Communication," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(14), pages 1-19, July.
    10. Schmidt-Soltau, Kai & Brockington, Dan, 2007. "Protected Areas and Resettlement: What Scope for Voluntary Relocation?," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 35(12), pages 2182-2202, December.
    11. Santiago Saavedra, 2025. "Economic Development and Environmental Conservation: Evidence from Ecotourism," Economic Development and Cultural Change, University of Chicago Press, vol. 73(3), pages 1297-1324.
    12. Natarajan, Nithya & Newsham, Andrew & Rigg, Jonathan & Suhardiman, Diana, 2022. "A sustainable livelihoods framework for the 21st century," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 155(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Yuyang Li & Jiahui Li & Xinjie Li & Qian Lu, 2024. "Does Participation in Digital Supply and Marketing Promote Smallholder Farmers’ Adoption of Green Agricultural Production Technologies?," Land, MDPI, vol. 14(1), pages 1-24, December.
    2. Caviedes, Julián & Ibarra, José Tomás & Calvet-Mir, Laura & Álvarez-Fernández, Santiago & Junqueira, André Braga, 2024. "Indigenous and local knowledge on social-ecological changes is positively associated with livelihood resilience in a Globally Important Agricultural Heritage System," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 216(C).
    3. Dai, Xuhuan & Li, Bo & Zheng, Hua & Yang, Yanzheng & Yang, Zihan & Peng, Chenchen, 2023. "Can sedentarization decrease the dependence of pastoral livelihoods on ecosystem services?," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 203(C).
    4. Verena Preusse & Nils Nölke & Meike Wollni, 2024. "Urbanization and adoption of sustainable agricultural practices in the rural‐urban interface of Bangalore, India," Canadian Journal of Agricultural Economics/Revue canadienne d'agroeconomie, Canadian Agricultural Economics Society/Societe canadienne d'agroeconomie, vol. 72(2), pages 167-198, June.
    5. Xiaodi Qin & Haitao Wu & Tiecheng Shan, 2022. "Rural infrastructure and poverty in China," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 17(6), pages 1-19, June.
    6. Julius Uti Nchor, 2023. "Livelihood Strategies and Their Determinants among Informal Households in Calabar, Nigeria," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-20, February.
    7. Guang Han & Zehao Wei & Huawei Zheng & Liqun Zhu, 2024. "Evaluation Index System of Rural Ecological Revitalization in China: A National Empirical Study Based on the Driver-Pressure-State-Impact-Response Framework," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(8), pages 1-26, August.
    8. Huixia Zou & Shaowei Li & Huiyuan Zou & Wei Sun & Yingnan Niu & Chengqun Yu, 2022. "Livelihood Sustainability of Herder Households in North Tibet, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-14, April.
    9. Summer K. Mohamed & Sandra Haddad & Mahmoud Barakat & Bojan Rosi, 2023. "Blockchain Technology Adoption for Improved Environmental Supply Chain Performance: The Mediation Effect of Supply Chain Resilience, Customer Integration, and Green Customer Information Sharing," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(10), pages 1-20, May.
    10. Xiaoze Liu & Daehwan Kim, 2025. "The Effect of Green Marketing Mix on Outdoor Brand Attitude and Loyalty: A Bifactor Structural Model Approach with a Moderator of Outdoor Involvement," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(9), pages 1-21, May.
    11. Thakur, Vikramaditya, 2025. "Vernacular Modernity: The politics of the Project-Affected people in rural western India," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 189(C).
    12. Yuxuan Xu & Jiangbo Chang & Fang Su, 2024. "Multi-Scale Evaluation and Simulation of Livelihood Efficiency in Post-Poverty Mountainous Areas," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-35, October.
    13. Siewe Siewe & Jacqueline M. Vadjunec & Beth Caniglia, 2017. "The Politics of Land Use in the Korup National Park," Land, MDPI, vol. 6(1), pages 1-22, January.
    14. Katsushi S. Imai & Nidhi Kaicker & Raghav Gaiha, 2020. "The Covid-19 Impact on Agricultural Prices in India," Discussion Paper Series DP2020-25, Research Institute for Economics & Business Administration, Kobe University, revised Dec 2020.
    15. Vatta, Kamal & Budhiraja, Parisha, 2020. "Farmers’ income in India: trends and prospects for future growth," Agricultural Economics Research Review, Agricultural Economics Research Association (India), vol. 33(2), December.
    16. Cariappa, A.G. Adeeth & Chandel, B.S., 2020. "Interlink between factor and product markets: opportunity for the future of Indian agriculture," Agricultural Economics Research Review, Agricultural Economics Research Association (India), vol. 33(Conferenc), December.
    17. Aashish Argade & Arnab Kumar Laha & Anand Kumar Jaiswal, 2022. "Electronic marketplaces under conditions of oligopsony and relational marketing – an empirical exploration of electronic agricultural markets in India," Electronic Markets, Springer;IIM University of St. Gallen, vol. 32(3), pages 1541-1554, September.
    18. Junwu Wang & Yinghui Song & Mao Li & Cong Yuan & Feng Guo, 2022. "Study on Low-Carbon Technology Innovation Strategies through Government–University–Enterprise Cooperation under Carbon Trading Policy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(15), pages 1-26, July.
    19. Bo Cheng & Wenhao Xue & Yi Zheng & Zhe Yang & Yulu Tian, 2023. "The Impact of Establishment of Nature Reserves on the Urban–Rural Income Gap: Evidence from County-Level Analysis in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(17), pages 1-12, August.
    20. Shoufeng Ji & Pengyun Zhao & Tingting Ji, 2023. "A Hybrid Optimization Method for Sustainable and Flexible Design of Supply–Production–Distribution Network in the Physical Internet," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(7), pages 1-34, April.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:14:y:2025:i:6:p:1231-:d:1673797. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.