IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jlands/v14y2025i5p1043-d1653341.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Potential Assessment and Community Environment Support Strategies for Social Interaction, Based on the Spatiotemporal Behavior of Accompanying Elderly Migrants: A Case Study in Hangzhou

Author

Listed:
  • Zhi Qiu

    (Institute of Architectural Design and Theoretical Research, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310058, China
    Center for Balance Architecture, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310027, China
    These authors contributed equally to this work and should be considered co-first authors.)

  • Bo Jin

    (Institute of Architectural Design and Theoretical Research, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310058, China
    These authors contributed equally to this work and should be considered co-first authors.)

  • Binwei Yun

    (Institute of Architectural Design and Theoretical Research, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310058, China)

  • Zhu Wang

    (Institute of Architectural Design and Theoretical Research, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310058, China)

  • Xincheng Pu

    (Institute of Architectural Design and Theoretical Research, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310058, China)

Abstract

With the growing trend of population mobility and the aging process in China, a significant number of accompanying elderly migrants have moved to major cities. However, in community public spaces, the behavioral differences between caregiver-oriented elderly migrants (CO-AEMs), family reunion-motivated elderly migrants (FR-AEMs), and local elderly residents hinder social interactions between these groups. This study aims to explore opportunities for cross-group social interaction within the community environment. By utilizing GPS data collection and activity log analysis, along with spatiotemporal behavioral research methods, this study reconstructs the spatiotemporal trajectories of three groups of elderly individuals. The study proposes a social interaction potential (SIP) model based on the “support-constraint” framework. Through qualitative analysis of spatiotemporal behavioral characteristics and quantitative measurement of the degree of spatiotemporal behavioral co-occurrence across four modes, this study reveals the differentiated impact mechanisms of spatial and behavioral factors on social interactions, ultimately assessing SIP in differentiated community spaces and activities. This research highlights differences across spatial, behavioral, and temporal dimensions that hinder social interactions between the groups. Spatial and behavioral differences are primarily attributable to the lifestyle habits and activity preferences of the elderly, while temporal discrepancies reflect varying degrees of family-related constraints across the different groups. Furthermore, informal community public spaces show higher SIP than formal facilities. Additionally, the similarity in behaviors across groups facilitates social interactions. FR-AEMs and local elderly residents show higher SIP in self-care behaviors, while CO-AEMs and local elderly residents demonstrate stronger SIP in behaviors related to their family and grandchildren. Based on the segmented assimilation theory, this study proposes hierarchical community governance and spatial optimization strategies for activities and spaces with different SIP. The aim is to cultivate opportunities for interaction while respecting the characteristics of accompanying elderly migrants and to foster the construction of an inclusive community environment. The findings provide theoretical support and practical pathways for community space planning and social governance in the context of an aging society.

Suggested Citation

  • Zhi Qiu & Bo Jin & Binwei Yun & Zhu Wang & Xincheng Pu, 2025. "Potential Assessment and Community Environment Support Strategies for Social Interaction, Based on the Spatiotemporal Behavior of Accompanying Elderly Migrants: A Case Study in Hangzhou," Land, MDPI, vol. 14(5), pages 1-26, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:14:y:2025:i:5:p:1043-:d:1653341
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/14/5/1043/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/14/5/1043/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Yaxuan Zhang & Chunjiang Li & Ying Song & Yanwei Chai & Yingling Fan, 2024. "Personalizing the dichotomy of fixed and flexible activities in everyday life: deriving prism anchors from GPS-enabled survey data," Transportation, Springer, vol. 51(3), pages 1063-1088, June.
    2. Laura L. Lien & Carmen D. Steggell & Susanne Iwarsson, 2015. "Adaptive Strategies and Person-Environment Fit among Functionally Limited Older Adults Aging in Place: A Mixed Methods Approach," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 12(9), pages 1-21, September.
    3. Hui Wang & Mei-Po Kwan & Mingxing Hu & Junheng Qi & Jiemin Zheng & Bin Han, 2022. "Time Allocation and the Activity-Space-Based Segregation of Different Income Groups: A Case Study of Nanjing," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(10), pages 1-17, October.
    4. Donald R. Davis & Jonathan I. Dingel & Joan Monras & Eduardo Morales, 2019. "How Segregated Is Urban Consumption?," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 127(4), pages 1684-1738.
    5. Yuqi Chen & Zongyao Sun & Liangwa Cai, 2021. "Population Flow Mechanism Study of Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei Urban Agglomeration from Industrial Space Supply Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(17), pages 1-15, September.
    6. Wei Li & Yujia Ma & Jianwu Qi & Jianping Jiao, 2022. "Daily Behavior Characteristics and Environmental Symbiosis Mechanism of Village Residents in Alpine Pastoral Areas: Meiwu Village, Gannan Tibetan Autonomous Prefecture," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(20), pages 1-21, October.
    7. Shi Cheng & Dunsong Zhang & Yijing Wang & Xiaohan Zhang, 2024. "Exploring the Relationships between Mini Urban Green Space Layout and Human Activity," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(6), pages 1-24, June.
    8. Xiangjing Zhang & Wusi Zhou & Biya Jiang, 2022. "Patterns of Living Lost? Measuring Community Participation and Other Influences on the Health of Older Migrants in China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(8), pages 1-15, April.
    9. Farber, Steven & O'Kelly, Morton & Miller, Harvey J. & Neutens, Tijs, 2015. "Measuring segregation using patterns of daily travel behavior: A social interaction based model of exposure," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 49(C), pages 26-38.
    10. Tingting Lu & Fangzhu Zhang & Fulong Wu, 2020. "The variegated role of the state in different gated neighbourhoods in China," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 57(8), pages 1642-1659, June.
    11. Bassel Daher & Silva Hamie & Konstantinos Pappas & Mohammad Nahidul Karim & Tessa Thomas, 2021. "Toward Resilient Water-Energy-Food Systems under Shocks: Understanding the Impact of Migration, Pandemics, and Natural Disasters," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(16), pages 1-22, August.
    12. Bilecen, Başak & Vacca, Raffaele, 2021. "The isolation paradox: A comparative study of social support and health across migrant generations in the U.S," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 283(C).
    13. Mayumi Ono, 2015. "Commoditization of Lifestyle Migration: Japanese Retirees in Malaysia," Mobilities, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 10(4), pages 609-627, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Joan Monras, 2020. "Immigration and Wage Dynamics: Evidence from the Mexican Peso Crisis," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 128(8), pages 3017-3089.
    2. Jonathan I. Dingel & Felix Tintelnot, 2020. "Spatial Economics for Granular Settings," NBER Working Papers 27287, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    3. Breithaupt, Patrick & Kesler, Reinhold & Niebel, Thomas & Rammer, Christian, 2020. "Intangible capital indicators based on web scraping of social media," ZEW Discussion Papers 20-046, ZEW - Leibniz Centre for European Economic Research.
    4. Abe Dunn & Mahsa Gholizadeh, 2025. "The Geography of Consumption and Local Economic Shocks: The Case of the Great Recession," American Economic Journal: Macroeconomics, American Economic Association, vol. 17(2), pages 206-244, April.
    5. Zheng Wang & Jie Shen & Xiang Luo, 2023. "Can residents regain their community relations after resettlement? Insights from Shanghai," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 60(5), pages 962-980, April.
    6. Hansen, Benjamin & Miller, Keaton & Weber, Caroline, 2020. "Federalism, partial prohibition, and cross-border sales: Evidence from recreational marijuana," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 187(C).
    7. Dieter Pennerstorfer & Nora Schindler & Christoph Weiss & Biliana Yontcheva, 2020. "Income Inequality and Product Variety: Empirical Evidence," Economics working papers 2020-17, Department of Economics, Johannes Kepler University Linz, Austria.
    8. Zhilin Liu & Sainan Lin & Tingting Lu & Yue Shen & Sisi Liang, 2023. "Towards a constructed order of co-governance: Understanding the state–society dynamics of neighbourhood collaborative responses to COVID-19 in urban China," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 60(9), pages 1730-1749, July.
    9. David C Maré & Jacques Poot, 2022. "Accounting for social difference when measuring cultural diversity," Working Papers 22_04, Motu Economic and Public Policy Research.
    10. Vinicius M. Netto & Joao Meirelles & Fabiano L. Ribeiro, 2017. "Social Interaction and the City: The Effect of Space on the Reduction of Entropy," Complexity, Hindawi, vol. 2017, pages 1-16, August.
    11. Alberto Hidalgo & Massimo Riccaboni & Francisco J. Velázquez, 2024. "The effect of short‐term rentals on local consumption amenities: Evidence from Madrid," Journal of Regional Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 64(3), pages 621-648, June.
    12. Nakagawa, Mariko & Sato, Yasuhiro & Tabuchi, Takatoshi & Yamamoto, Kazuhiro, 2022. "Do people accept different cultures?," Journal of Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 130(C).
    13. Luigi Pellizzoni & Laura Centemeri & Maura Benegiamo & Carla Panico, 2025. "A new food security approach? Continuity and novelty in the European Union’s turn to preparedness," Agriculture and Human Values, Springer;The Agriculture, Food, & Human Values Society (AFHVS), vol. 42(1), pages 89-105, March.
    14. Selman Erol & Camilo Garcia-Jimeno, 2024. "Civil Liberties and Social Structure," Working Paper Series WP 2024-05, Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago.
    15. Yiru Jia & Nicky Morrison & Franziska Sielker, 2023. "Delivering common property in Chinese contractual communities: Law, power and practice," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 60(16), pages 3272-3293, December.
    16. Savas, Esma Betul & Spaan, Juul & Henkens, Kène & Kalmijn, Matthijs & van Dalen, Hendrik Peter, 2023. "Migrating to a new country in late life: A review of the literature on international retirement migration," Other publications TiSEM 5d958f16-41db-4f8f-b0c3-d, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
    17. Gilles Duranton & Diego Puga, 2020. "The Economics of Urban Density," Journal of Economic Perspectives, American Economic Association, vol. 34(3), pages 3-26, Summer.
    18. Yuhei Miyauchi & Kentaro Nakajima & Stephen J. Redding, 2021. "The Economics of Spatial Mobility: Theory and Evidence Using Smartphone Data," NBER Working Papers 28497, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    19. Elliot Anenberg & Chun Kuang & Edward Kung, 2022. "Social learning and local consumption amenities: Evidence from Yelp," Journal of Industrial Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 70(2), pages 294-322, June.
    20. Monte, Ferdinando & Jensen, J Bradford & Agarwal, Sumit, 2017. "Consumer Mobility and the Local Structure of Consumption Industries," CEPR Discussion Papers 12150, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:14:y:2025:i:5:p:1043-:d:1653341. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.