IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jlands/v14y2025i4p873-d1635739.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Does Intercity Transportation Accessibility Matter? Its Effects on Regional Network Centrality in South Korea

Author

Listed:
  • Sangwan Lee

    (LX Spatial Information Research Institute, Korea Land and Geospatial Informatix Corporation, Jeonju 54870, Republic of Korea)

  • Jeongbae Jeon

    (LX Spatial Information Research Institute, Korea Land and Geospatial Informatix Corporation, Jeonju 54870, Republic of Korea)

  • Kuk Cho

    (LX Spatial Information Research Institute, Korea Land and Geospatial Informatix Corporation, Jeonju 54870, Republic of Korea)

  • Junhyuck Im

    (LX Spatial Information Research Institute, Korea Land and Geospatial Informatix Corporation, Jeonju 54870, Republic of Korea)

Abstract

This study investigates the relationship between intercity transportation accessibility and network centrality across South Korea by integrating Global Positioning System (GPS)-based mobility data with graph-theoretic centrality measures, including degree, PageRank, local clustering coefficient, harmonic, Katz, and information centrality. Employing both statistical modeling and machine learning techniques, this analysis uncovers key structural patterns and interaction effects within the national mobility network. The findings yield several important insights. First, the Seoul Metropolitan Area emerges as the dominant mobility hub, with Busan, Daegu, and Daejeon functioning as secondary centers, reflecting a polycentric urban configuration. Second, intermediary transfer hubs—despite having lower direct connectivity—substantially enhance overall network efficiency and interregional mobility. Third, transportation accessibility, particularly in relation to regional transit and highway infrastructure, exhibits a significant association with centrality measures and strong feature importance, identifying these modes as primary determinants of spatial connectivity. Fourth, the impact of accessibility on centrality is characterized by nonlinear relationships and threshold effects. By elucidating the complex interplay between mobility infrastructure and spatial network dynamics, this study contributes to a more comprehensive understanding of regional connectivity and network centrality and offers policy-relevant insights for future transportation planning.

Suggested Citation

  • Sangwan Lee & Jeongbae Jeon & Kuk Cho & Junhyuck Im, 2025. "Does Intercity Transportation Accessibility Matter? Its Effects on Regional Network Centrality in South Korea," Land, MDPI, vol. 14(4), pages 1-19, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:14:y:2025:i:4:p:873-:d:1635739
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/14/4/873/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/14/4/873/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. He, Sylvia Y., 2020. "Regional impact of rail network accessibility on residential property price: Modelling spatial heterogeneous capitalisation effects in Hong Kong," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 135(C), pages 244-263.
    2. Roger Vickerman & Klaus Spiekermann & Michael Wegener, 1999. "Accessibility and Economic Development in Europe," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 33(1), pages 1-15.
    3. Beaudoin, Justin & Lin Lawell, C.-Y. Cynthia, 2018. "The effects of public transit supply on the demand for automobile travel," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 88(C), pages 447-467.
    4. Zhang, Panpan & Wang, Tiandong & Yan, Jun, 2022. "PageRank centrality and algorithms for weighted, directed networks," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 586(C).
    5. Bardaka, Eleni & Delgado, Michael S. & Florax, Raymond J.G.M., 2019. "A spatial multiple treatment/multiple outcome difference-in-differences model with an application to urban rail infrastructure and gentrification," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 121(C), pages 325-345.
    6. Liu, Chengliang & Duan, Dezhong, 2020. "Spatial inequality of bus transit dependence on urban streets and its relationships with socioeconomic intensities: A tale of two megacities in China," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 86(C).
    7. Nantian Huang & Guobo Lu & Dianguo Xu, 2016. "A Permutation Importance-Based Feature Selection Method for Short-Term Electricity Load Forecasting Using Random Forest," Energies, MDPI, vol. 9(10), pages 1-24, September.
    8. Ding, Chuan & Cao, Xinyu (Jason) & Næss, Petter, 2018. "Applying gradient boosting decision trees to examine non-linear effects of the built environment on driving distance in Oslo," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 110(C), pages 107-117.
    9. Chakrabarti, Sandip & Kushari, Triparnee & Mazumder, Taraknath, 2022. "Does transportation network centrality determine housing price?," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 103(C).
    10. Jiang, Yu & Li, Zhichao & Wang, Yasha & Xue, Qingwen, 2025. "Vertiport location for eVTOL considering multidimensional demand of urban air mobility: An application in Beijing," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 192(C).
    11. Dong, Wei & Wang, Naidi & Dong, Yu & Cao, Jason, 2025. "Examining the nonlinear and interactive effects of built environment characteristics on travel satisfaction," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 123(C).
    12. Evert Meijers & Martijn Burger & Martijn J. Burger & Evert J. Meijers, 2016. "Agglomerations and the rise of urban network externalities," Papers in Regional Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 95(1), pages 5-15, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Tao, Sui & Cheng, Long & He, Sylvia & Witlox, Frank, 2023. "Examining the non-linear effects of transit accessibility on daily trip duration: A focus on the low-income population," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 109(C).
    2. Liang, Cong & Huang, Yaoxuan & Yip, Tsz Leung & Li, Victor Jing, 2022. "Does rail transit development gentrify neighborhoods? Evidence from Hong Kong," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 155(C), pages 354-372.
    3. Schmidt, Adam & Bardaka, Eleni & Thill, Jean-Claude, 2022. "Causal, spatiotemporal impacts of transit investments: Exploring spatial heterogeneity from announcement through long-run operation," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 161(C), pages 151-169.
    4. Liu, Xueli & Jiang, Chunxia & Wang, Feng & Yao, Shujie, 2021. "The impact of high-speed railway on urban housing prices in China: A network accessibility perspective," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 152(C), pages 84-99.
    5. Shuai Shi & Kathy Pain, 2020. "Investigating China’s Mid-Yangtze River economic growth region using a spatial network growth model," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 57(14), pages 2973-2993, November.
    6. Andrés Rodríguez-Pose & Yannis Psycharis & Vassilis Tselios, 2012. "Public investment and regional growth and convergence: Evidence from Greece," Papers in Regional Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 91(3), pages 543-568, August.
    7. Miren Lafourcade & Jacques-François Thisse, 2011. "New Economic Geography: The Role of Transport Costs," Chapters, in: André de Palma & Robin Lindsey & Emile Quinet & Roger Vickerman (ed.), A Handbook of Transport Economics, chapter 4, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    8. Kanis Saengchote & Voraprapa Nakavachara & Yishuang Xu, 2023. "Capitalising the Network Externalities of New Land Supply in the Metaverse," Papers 2303.17180, arXiv.org.
    9. Mohíno, Inmaculada & Ureña, José M. & Solís, Eloy, 2016. "Transport infrastructure and territorial cohesion in rural metro-adjacent regions: A multimodal accessibility approach. The case of Castilla-La Mancha in the context of Madrid (Spain)," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 57(C), pages 115-133.
    10. Xiang Liu & Xiaohong Chen & Scott Orford & Mingshu Tian & Guojian Zou, 2024. "Does better accessibility always mean higher house prices?," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 51(9), pages 2179-2195, November.
    11. Demidova, Olga, 2021. "Methods of spatial econometrics and evaluation of government programs effectiveness," Applied Econometrics, Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration (RANEPA), vol. 64, pages 107-134.
    12. Fink, Christian G. & Fullin, Kelly & Gutierrez, Guillermo & Omodt, Nathan & Zinnecker, Sydney & Sprint, Gina & McCulloch, Sean, 2023. "A centrality measure for quantifying spread on weighted, directed networks," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 626(C).
    13. Piotr Rosik & Julia Wójcik, 2022. "Transport Infrastructure and Regional Development: A Survey of Literature on Wider Economic and Spatial Impacts," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(1), pages 1-19, December.
    14. Zhu, Siying & Zhu, Feng, 2019. "Cycling comfort evaluation with instrumented probe bicycle," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 129(C), pages 217-231.
    15. Xian Ji & Furui Shang & Chang Liu & Qinggong Kang & Rui Wang & Chenxi Dou, 2024. "Prioritizing Environmental Attributes to Enhance Residents’ Satisfaction in Post-Industrial Neighborhoods: An Application of Machine Learning-Augmented Asymmetric Impact-Performance Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(10), pages 1-26, May.
    16. Cao, Jason & Tao, Tao, 2025. "Can an identified environmental correlate of car ownership serve as a practical planning tool?," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 191(C).
    17. Jiao, Jingjuan & Wang, Jiaoe & Jin, Fengjun & Dunford, Michael, 2014. "Impacts on accessibility of China’s present and future HSR network," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 40(C), pages 123-132.
    18. Sandy Dall’erba, 2005. "Distribution of regional income and regional funds in Europe 1989–1999: An exploratory spatial data analysis," The Annals of Regional Science, Springer;Western Regional Science Association, vol. 39(1), pages 121-148, March.
    19. repec:onb:oenbwp:y::i:169:b:1 is not listed on IDEAS
    20. Ascani, Andrea & Bettarelli, Luca & Resmini, Laura & Balland, Pierre-Alexandre, 2020. "Global networks, local specialisation and regional patterns of innovation," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 49(8).
    21. Philippe Gagnepain & Sébastien Massoni & Alexandre Mayol & Carine Staropoli, 2024. "The Effect of Public Transport Pricing Policy: Experimental Evidence," PSE Working Papers halshs-04610702, HAL.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:14:y:2025:i:4:p:873-:d:1635739. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.