IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jlands/v14y2025i4p684-d1618929.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Developing a Framework for Sustainable Management of Archaeological Site Parks: Cross-Case Analysis Based on Public Perception

Author

Listed:
  • Yueting Xi

    (School of Economics and Management, Chang’an University, Xi’an 710064, China)

  • Taili Liu

    (School of Economics and Management, Chang’an University, Xi’an 710064, China)

  • Yan Wang

    (School of Economics and Management, Chang’an University, Xi’an 710064, China)

  • Fei J. Ying

    (School of Built Environment, Massey University, Auckland 0745, New Zealand)

  • Yuru Han

    (School of Economics and Management, Chang’an University, Xi’an 710064, China)

  • Sha Luo

    (School of Economics and Management, Chang’an University, Xi’an 710064, China)

  • Pei Zhang

    (School of Economics and Management, Chang’an University, Xi’an 710064, China)

Abstract

As official terms included in the International Council on Monuments and Sites (ICOMOS) documents, archaeological site parks have gradually emphasized the establishment of sustainable management frameworks for archaeological sites open to the public and enhancing public experiences. The management frameworks should be closely related to the goals of the United Nations and other international conventions on sustainable development. However, they lack implementation strategies to promote archaeological site protection and provide responsible tourism. This research adopts a multi-case study approach to analyze the management of representative archaeological site parks in the United States, Japan, and China to develop a framework for the sustainable management of archaeological site parks. Various values, heritage tourism activities, and public perceptions of each park are examined based on cross-case analysis, which identifies principal elements and strategies for the sustainable management of archaeological parks. The principal elements reflect the archaeological parks’ intrinsic value, utility value, and other values. The strategies are closely related to the design of heritage tourism activities and are in alignment with the UN’s sustainable development goals. The theoretical and practical contributions of this research include the reflection and explanation of the sustainable management practices of archaeological site parks in different national and cultural contexts, considering public perceptions. The proposed framework and strategy integrate management guidelines, theoretical knowledge, and practical experience of public archaeological site parks. The outcomes of this research provide a reference for the study of archaeological parks and the management of heritage landscapes.

Suggested Citation

  • Yueting Xi & Taili Liu & Yan Wang & Fei J. Ying & Yuru Han & Sha Luo & Pei Zhang, 2025. "Developing a Framework for Sustainable Management of Archaeological Site Parks: Cross-Case Analysis Based on Public Perception," Land, MDPI, vol. 14(4), pages 1-27, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:14:y:2025:i:4:p:684-:d:1618929
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/14/4/684/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/14/4/684/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ray F. Iunius & Laura Cismaru & Diana Foris, 2015. "Raising Competitiveness for Tourist Destinations through Information Technologies within the Newest Tourism Action Framework Proposed by the European Commission," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 7(9), pages 1-19, September.
    2. Fernando Enseñat-Soberanis & Rocío Blanco-Gregory, 2022. "Crowding Perception at the Archaeological Site of Tulum, Mexico: A Key Indicator for Sustainable Cultural Tourism," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(10), pages 1-12, September.
    3. Lu, Weilin & Stepchenkova, Svetlana, 2012. "Ecotourism experiences reported online: Classification of satisfaction attributes," Tourism Management, Elsevier, vol. 33(3), pages 702-712.
    4. Sifeng Nian & Donghe Li & Jie Zhang & Song Lu & Xiaowan Zhang, 2023. "Stimulus-Organism-Response Framework: Is the Perceived Outstanding Universal Value Attractiveness of Tourists Beneficial to World Heritage Site Conservation?," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(2), pages 1-21, January.
    5. Yuheng Tao & Po-Hsien Lin, 2023. "Analyses of Sustainable Development of Cultural and Creative Parks: A Pilot Study Based on the Approach of CiteSpace Knowledge Mapping," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(13), pages 1-28, July.
    6. Deery, Margaret & Jago, Leo & Fredline, Liz, 2012. "Rethinking social impacts of tourism research: A new research agenda," Tourism Management, Elsevier, vol. 33(1), pages 64-73.
    7. Aspasia E. Fafouti & Anastasia Vythoulka & Ekaterini T. Delegou & Nikolaos Farmakidis & Maria Ioannou & Komninos Perellis & Antonis Giannikouris & Nikolaos A. Kampanis & George Alexandrakis & Antonia , 2023. "Designing Cultural Routes as a Tool of Responsible Tourism and Sustainable Local Development in Isolated and Less Developed Islands: The Case of Symi Island in Greece," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(8), pages 1-39, August.
    8. Alazaizeh, Mohammad M. & Hallo, Jeffrey C. & Backman, Sheila J. & Norman, William C. & Vogel, Melissa A., 2016. "Value orientations and heritage tourism management at Petra Archaeological Park, Jordan," Tourism Management, Elsevier, vol. 57(C), pages 149-158.
    9. Hossein Mousazadeh & Amir Ghorbani & Hossein Azadi & Farahnaz Akbarzadeh Almani & Ali Zangiabadi & Kai Zhu & Lóránt Dénes Dávid, 2023. "Developing Sustainable Behaviors for Underground Heritage Tourism Management: The Case of Persian Qanats, a UNESCO World Heritage Property," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(4), pages 1-17, April.
    10. Rasa Pranskūnienė & Erika Zabulionienė, 2023. "Towards Heritage Transformation Perspectives," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(7), pages 1-23, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Luc Beal & Hugues Séraphin & Giuseppe Modica & Manuela Pilato & Marco Platania, 2019. "Analysing the Mediating Effect of Heritage Between Locals and Visitors: An Exploratory Study Using Mission Patrimoine as a Case Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(11), pages 1-15, May.
    2. Nuria Huete-Alcocer & Miguel Ángel Valero-Tévar, 2021. "Impact of Information Sources on Promoting Tourism in a Rural Region: The Case of the Roman Villa of Noheda," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(14), pages 1-23, July.
    3. Bart Neuts & Senne Kimps & Jan van der Borg, 2021. "Resident Support for Tourism Development: Application of a Simplified Resident Empowerment through Tourism Scale on Developing Destinations in Flanders," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(12), pages 1-19, June.
    4. Suess, Courtney & Mody, Makarand, 2016. "Gaming can be sustainable too! Using Social Representation Theory to examine the moderating effects of tourism diversification on residents' tax paying behavior," Tourism Management, Elsevier, vol. 56(C), pages 20-39.
    5. Hung-Ming Tu, 2020. "Sustainable Heritage Management: Exploring Dimensions of Pull and Push Factors," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(19), pages 1-17, October.
    6. Doru Marian Tudorache & Tamara Simon & Cristi Frenț & Mărioara Musteaţă-Pavel, 2017. "Difficulties and Challenges in Applying the European Tourism Indicators System (ETIS) for Sustainable Tourist Destinations: The Case of Braşov County in the Romanian Carpathians," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(10), pages 1-19, October.
    7. Guillermo Bermúdez-González & Eva María Sánchez-Teba & María-Dolores Benítez-Márquez & José Jesús Vegas-Melero, 2023. "Generation Z members‘ intentions to work in tourism in their World Heritage Site hometowns," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 10(1), pages 1-14, December.
    8. Wen Zhang & Yuting Yang & Huigang Liang, 2023. "A Bibliometric Analysis of Enterprise Social Media in Digital Economy: Research Hotspots and Trends," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(16), pages 1-21, August.
    9. Ferdinand Augusty Tae, 2021. "Destination authentic value advantage: an SDL perspective," Management & Marketing, Sciendo, vol. 16(2), pages 101-117, June.
    10. Sparks, Beverley A. & Perkins, Helen E. & Buckley, Ralf, 2013. "Online travel reviews as persuasive communication: The effects of content type, source, and certification logos on consumer behavior," Tourism Management, Elsevier, vol. 39(C), pages 1-9.
    11. Chen, Xiaoqing & Zhang, Carol Xiaoyue & Stone, Timothy & Lamb, John, 2020. "Existentially understanding tourism in locale: A dwelling perspective," Annals of Tourism Research, Elsevier, vol. 80(C).
    12. Pasquale Del Vecchio & Gioconda Mele & Valentina Ndou & Giustina Secundo, 2018. "Open Innovation and Social Big Data for Sustainability: Evidence from the Tourism Industry," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(9), pages 1-15, September.
    13. Patrizia Modica & Alessandro Capocchi & Ilaria Foroni & Mariangela Zenga, 2018. "An Assessment of the Implementation of the European Tourism Indicator System for Sustainable Destinations in Italy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(9), pages 1-21, September.
    14. Guido Sechi & Zaiga Krisjane & Maris Berzins & Daina Vinklere, 2014. "Quality of Life and Tourism-Related Perceptions among Residents: Evidence from Lake Engure Area, Latvia," ERSA conference papers ersa14p597, European Regional Science Association.
    15. Guo, Yue & Barnes, Stuart J. & Jia, Qiong, 2017. "Mining meaning from online ratings and reviews: Tourist satisfaction analysis using latent dirichlet allocation," Tourism Management, Elsevier, vol. 59(C), pages 467-483.
    16. Lau, Chammy & Li, Yiping, 2019. "Analyzing the effects of an urban food festival: A place theory approach," Annals of Tourism Research, Elsevier, vol. 74(C), pages 43-55.
    17. Wu, Mao-Ying & Wall, Geoffrey & Pearce, Philip L., 2014. "Shopping experiences: International tourists in Beijing's Silk Market," Tourism Management, Elsevier, vol. 41(C), pages 96-106.
    18. Yaomin Zheng & Minghan Wu & Jinlian Shi & Huize Yang & Jiaxin Wang & Xiaoyuan Zhang & Xin Zhang, 2024. "The Evolution of the Spatial–Temporal Pattern of Tourism Development and Its Influencing Factors: Evidence from China (2010–2022)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(23), pages 1-21, December.
    19. Ana María Campón-Cerro & José Antonio Folgado-Fernández & José Manuel Hernández-Mogollón, 2017. "Rural Destination Development Based on Olive Oil Tourism: The Impact of Residents’ Community Attachment and Quality of Life on Their Support for Tourism Development," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(9), pages 1-16, September.
    20. Rasoolimanesh, S. Mostafa & Ringle, Christian M. & Jaafar, Mastura & Ramayah, T., 2017. "Urban vs. rural destinations: Residents’ perceptions, community participation and support for tourism development," Tourism Management, Elsevier, vol. 60(C), pages 147-158.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:14:y:2025:i:4:p:684-:d:1618929. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.