IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jlands/v14y2025i3p528-d1604341.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

An Improved Quantitative Analysis Method for the Unequal Supply and Demand of Ecosystem Services and Hierarchical Governance Suggestions

Author

Listed:
  • Quanyi Liu

    (School of Remote Sensing and Information Engineering, Wuhan University, 129 Luoyu Road, Wuhan 430079, China)

  • Binbin Lu

    (School of Remote Sensing and Information Engineering, Wuhan University, 129 Luoyu Road, Wuhan 430079, China)

  • Weikang Lin

    (Yongkang Surveying and Geographic Information Center, 309 Huayuan Road, Yongkang 321300, China)

  • Jiansong Li

    (School of Remote Sensing and Information Engineering, Wuhan University, 129 Luoyu Road, Wuhan 430079, China)

  • Yixin Lu

    (Guangxi Communications Design Group Co., Ltd., 153 Minzu Avenue, Qingxiu District, Nanning 530029, China)

  • Yansong Duan

    (School of Remote Sensing and Information Engineering, Wuhan University, 129 Luoyu Road, Wuhan 430079, China)

Abstract

Quantifying the unequal supply and demand of ecosystem services (ESs) is a prerequisite for hierarchical ecological governance decisions. However, previous studies have largely overlooked the scale effect of spatially adjacent units and the role of spatial compactness in shaping inequality. To address these research gaps, this study conducted a survey in six counties within the Danjiangkou Basin in China. By adopting a moving window-based local Gini coefficient method, we quantified the inequality in the supply and demand of ESs in this region, and introduced a refined coefficient of variation to measure spatial compactness, analyzing the impact of urbanization on this inequality. The results indicate that the inequality in the supply and demand of ESs in this region is gradually intensifying. However, from a local perspective, the inequality exhibits significant spatial heterogeneity, decreasing gradually from urban centers to suburbs and rural areas, while maintaining strong spatial continuity. Furthermore, we found that urbanization is the primary factor exacerbating this inequality, while compact urban development can mitigate it. The findings of this study can provide practical guidance for cross-county ecological coordination, ecological restoration, and sustainable urban development.

Suggested Citation

  • Quanyi Liu & Binbin Lu & Weikang Lin & Jiansong Li & Yixin Lu & Yansong Duan, 2025. "An Improved Quantitative Analysis Method for the Unequal Supply and Demand of Ecosystem Services and Hierarchical Governance Suggestions," Land, MDPI, vol. 14(3), pages 1-21, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:14:y:2025:i:3:p:528-:d:1604341
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/14/3/528/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/14/3/528/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Zhen Shi & Huinan Huang & Yingju Wu & Yung-Ho Chiu & Shijiong Qin, 2020. "Climate Change Impacts on Agricultural Production and Crop Disaster Area in China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(13), pages 1-23, July.
    2. Larondelle, Neele & Lauf, Steffen, 2016. "Balancing demand and supply of multiple urban ecosystem services on different spatial scales," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 22(PA), pages 18-31.
    3. González-García, Alberto & Palomo, Ignacio & González, José A. & López, César A. & Montes, Carlos, 2020. "Quantifying spatial supply-demand mismatches in ecosystem services provides insights for land-use planning," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 94(C).
    4. Henderson, J. Vernon & Nigmatulina, Dzhamilya & Kriticos, Sebastian, 2021. "Measuring urban economic density," Journal of Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 125(C).
    5. Costanza, Robert & de Groot, Rudolf & Braat, Leon & Kubiszewski, Ida & Fioramonti, Lorenzo & Sutton, Paul & Farber, Steve & Grasso, Monica, 2017. "Twenty years of ecosystem services: How far have we come and how far do we still need to go?," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 28(PA), pages 1-16.
    6. Qu, Hongjiao & You, Chang & Wang, Weiyin & Guo, Luo, 2024. "Spatio-temporal interplay between ecosystem services and urbanization in the Yangtze River Economic Belt: A new perspective for considering the scarcity effect," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 147(C).
    7. Frank Bickenbach & Eckhardt Bode, 2008. "Disproportionality Measures of Concentration, Specialization, and Localization," International Regional Science Review, , vol. 31(4), pages 359-388, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Peng Tian & Jialin Li & Luodan Cao & Ruiliang Pu & Hongbo Gong & Haitao Zhang & Huilin Chen & Xiaodong Yang, 2021. "Assessing Matching Characteristics and Spatial Differences between Supply and Demand of Ecosystem Services: A Case Study in Hangzhou, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(6), pages 1-20, May.
    2. Tianlin Zhai & Jing Wang & Ying Fang & Longyang Huang & Jingjing Liu & Chenchen Zhao, 2021. "Integrating Ecosystem Services Supply, Demand and Flow in Ecological Compensation: A Case Study of Carbon Sequestration Services," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-19, February.
    3. EW Linders, Theo & Bekele, Ketema & Schaffner, Urs & Allan, Eric & Alamirew, Tena & Choge, Simon K. & Eckert, Sandra & Haji, Jema & Muturi, Gabriel & Mbaabu, Purity Rima & Shiferaw, Hailu & Eschen, Re, 2020. "The impact of invasive species on social-ecological systems: Relating supply and use of selected provisioning ecosystem services," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 41(C).
    4. Longjiang Zhang & Guoping Chen & Junsan Zhao & Yilin Lin & Haibo Yang & Jianhua He, 2025. "Spatiotemporal Characteristics and Scale Effects of Ecosystem Service Bundles in the Xijiang River Basin: Implications for Territorial Spatial Planning and Sustainable Land Management," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(5), pages 1-23, February.
    5. David Doran & Tim O’Higgins, 2020. "Applications of a Novel Method of Ecosystem Services Assessment into Local Policy Making in the River Blackwater Estuary, Ireland," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(21), pages 1-16, October.
    6. Yue Wang & Qi Fu & Tinghui Wang & Mengfan Gao & Jinhua Chen, 2022. "Multiscale Characteristics and Drivers of the Bundles of Ecosystem Service Budgets in the Su-Xi-Chang Region, China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(19), pages 1-26, October.
    7. Luwen Liu & Jiahui Wu & Liyan Yang & Guiling Tang & Wanxu Chen & Haifeng Wu & Yan Chen, 2024. "Conflict or Coordination? Ecosystem Services Supply and Demand in Chinese Urban Agglomerations," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(10), pages 1-18, October.
    8. Elliot, Thomas & Bertrand, Alexandre & Babí Almenar, Javier & Petucco, Claudio & Proença, Vânia & Rugani, Benedetto, 2019. "Spatial optimisation of urban ecosystem services through integrated participatory and multi-objective integer linear programming," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 409(C), pages 1-1.
    9. Tianlin Zhai & Yuanbo Ma & Ying Fang & Mingyuan Chang & Longyang Huang & Ziyi Ma & Ling Li & Chenchen Zhao, 2024. "Research on the Optimization of Urban Ecological Infrastructure Based on Ecosystem Service Supply, Demand, and Flow," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(2), pages 1-25, February.
    10. Giedrius Dabašinskas & Gintarė Sujetovienė, 2024. "Spatial and Temporal Changes in Supply and Demand for Ecosystem Services in Response to Urbanization: A Case Study in Vilnius, Lithuania," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-15, April.
    11. Zhang, Ling & Huang, Qingxu & Qiu, Jiangxiao & Liao, Chuan & Liu, Ziwen & He, Chunyang & Bai, Yansong & Chen, Peiyuan & Zhou, Yuchen & Liu, Yimeng & Bryan, Brett A., 2024. "Measuring virtual flows of ecosystem services embedded in traded goods across an urban agglomeration in China," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 69(C).
    12. Wu, Shuyao & Liu, Kai-Di & Zhang, Wentao & Dou, Yuehan & Chen, Yuqing & Zhang, Taiping & Li, Delong, 2024. "An integrated analysis framework of supply, demand, flow, and use to better understand realized ecosystem services," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 69(C).
    13. Wang, Zhuangzhuang & Fu, Bojie & Zhang, Liwei & Wu, Xutong & Li, Yingjie, 2022. "Ecosystem service assessments across cascade levels: typology and an evidence map," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 57(C).
    14. Peng, Jian & Wang, Xiaoyu & Liu, Yanxu & Zhao, Yan & Xu, Zihan & Zhao, Mingyue & Qiu, Sijing & Wu, Jiansheng, 2020. "Urbanization impact on the supply-demand budget of ecosystem services: Decoupling analysis," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 44(C).
    15. Xu Yang & Xuan Zou & Xueqi Liu & Qixuan Li & Siqian Zou & Ming Li, 2023. "The Spatiotemporal Pattern and Driving Mechanism of Urban Sprawl in China’s Counties," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-16, March.
    16. Olga Alonso-Villar & Coral Del RÍo, 2012. "Concentration of Economic Activity: Inequality-Based Measures," Spatial Economic Analysis, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 7(2), pages 223-246, June.
    17. Aryal, Kishor & Maraseni, Tek & Apan, Armando, 2023. "Examining policy−institution−program (PIP) responses against the drivers of ecosystem dynamics. A chronological review (1960–2020) from Nepal," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 132(C).
    18. Busch, Christin & Specht, Kathrin & Inostroza, Luis & Falke, Matthias & Zepp, Harald, 2024. "Disentangling cultural ecosystem services co-production in urban green spaces through social media reviews," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 70(C).
    19. Shuzhen Song & Xingyan Chen & Yuehua Song & Yongkuan Chi, 2024. "Vegetation Restoration Patterns Influence the Supply and Interrelations of Grassland Ecosystem Services in Karst Desertification Control," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(12), pages 1-16, November.
    20. Miguel A. Márquez & Elena Lasarte & Marcelo Lufin, 2019. "The Role of Neighborhood in the Analysis of Spatial Economic Inequality," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 141(1), pages 245-273, January.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:14:y:2025:i:3:p:528-:d:1604341. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.