IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jlands/v14y2025i3p476-d1599404.html

Scale-Dependent Relationships Between Urban Morphology and Noise Perception: A Multi-Scale Spatiotemporal Analysis in New York City

Author

Listed:
  • Siting Chen

    (School of Architecture, Southwest Jiaotong University, Chengdu 611756, China)

  • Bingjie Yu

    (School of Architecture, Southwest Jiaotong University, Chengdu 611756, China)

  • Guang Shi

    (School of Architecture, Southwest Jiaotong University, Chengdu 611756, China)

  • Yiping Cai

    (School of Public Administration, Southwest Jiaotong University, Chengdu 611756, China)

  • Yanyu Wang

    (School of Architecture, Southwest Jiaotong University, Chengdu 611756, China)

  • Pingge He

    (School of Architecture, Southwest Jiaotong University, Chengdu 611756, China)

Abstract

Urban morphology significantly influences residents’ noise perceptions, yet the impact across different spatial and temporal scales remains unclear. This study investigates the scale-dependent relationship between urban morphology and noise perception in New York City using noise complaint rates (NCR) as a proxy for perceived noise levels. A multi-scale analysis framework was applied, including four spatial scales (100 m, 200 m, 500 m, and 1000 m) and three temporal classifications (daytime/nighttime/dawn, weekdays/weekends, and seasonal divisions). Statistical analyses, including Spearman correlation, Moran’s I test, and Geographically Weighted Regression (GWR), examined spatiotemporal heterogeneity. Results show: (1) NCR and urban morphology indicators vary significantly across spatial and temporal aggregations. (2) Correlations between NCR and urban morphology indicators generally strengthen with larger spatial units, revealing a scale effect. Temporal variations, e.g., residential land ratio (RES) and greenery percentage (SVI Green), show stronger correlations with NCR in summer than in winter. (3) The Moran’s I index revealed significant spatial clustering at the 1000 m scale. Multi-temporal GWR analysis revealed spatial variations in urban morphology-noise relationships across different temporal contexts; in residential areas, building density exacerbates complaints more during non-working periods than during working hours. This study enhances understanding of urban sound environments, offering insights required for more precise urban planning policies.

Suggested Citation

  • Siting Chen & Bingjie Yu & Guang Shi & Yiping Cai & Yanyu Wang & Pingge He, 2025. "Scale-Dependent Relationships Between Urban Morphology and Noise Perception: A Multi-Scale Spatiotemporal Analysis in New York City," Land, MDPI, vol. 14(3), pages 1-32, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:14:y:2025:i:3:p:476-:d:1599404
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/14/3/476/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/14/3/476/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Millward, Hugh & Spinney, Jamie & Scott, Darren, 2013. "Active-transport walking behavior: destinations, durations, distances," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 28(C), pages 101-110.
    2. Qu, Fei & Kang, Jian, 2017. "Effects of built environment morphology on wind turbine noise exposure at building façades," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 107(C), pages 629-638.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Eric T. H. Chan & Tim Schwanen & David Banister, 2021. "The role of perceived environment, neighbourhood characteristics, and attitudes in walking behaviour: evidence from a rapidly developing city in China," Transportation, Springer, vol. 48(1), pages 431-454, February.
    2. Marta Oliveira & Hélder Coutinho & Paulo Mendonça & Martin Tenpierik & José F. Silva & Lígia Torres Silva, 2025. "How Can Urban Forms Balance Solar and Noise Exposition for a Sustainable Design?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(11), pages 1-21, June.
    3. O'Driscoll, Conor & Crowley, Frank & Doran, Justin & McCarthy, Nóirín, 2022. "Retail sprawl and CO2 emissions: Retail centres in Irish cities," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 102(C).
    4. Li, Aoyong & Huang, Yizhe & Axhausen, Kay W., 2020. "An approach to imputing destination activities for inclusion in measures of bicycle accessibility," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 82(C).
    5. Neatt, Kevin & Millward, Hugh & Spinney, Jamie, 2017. "Neighborhood walking densities: A multivariate analysis in Halifax, Canada," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 61(C), pages 9-16.
    6. Paul Czioska & Ronny Kutadinata & Aleksandar Trifunović & Stephan Winter & Monika Sester & Bernhard Friedrich, 2019. "Real-world meeting points for shared demand-responsive transportation systems," Public Transport, Springer, vol. 11(2), pages 341-377, August.
    7. Chen, Yu & Liu, Gengyuan & Yan, Ningyu & Yang, Qing & Gao, He & Su, Liya & Santagata, Remo, 2023. "Comprehensive evaluation of urban greenspace ecological values marketability through the spatial relationship between housing price and ecosystem services," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 484(C).
    8. Easton, Sue & Ferrari, Ed, 2015. "Children's travel to school—the interaction of individual, neighbourhood and school factors," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 44(C), pages 9-18.
    9. Yoo, Sunbin & Kumagai, Junya & Kim, Sung Hoo & Managi, Shunsuke, 2026. "Shared e-mopeds and equity implications: Insights from trip-level data in Fukuoka, Japan," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 130(C).
    10. Eizaguirre-Iribar, Arritokieta & Etxepare Igiñiz, Lauren & Hernández-Minguillón, Rufino Javier, 2016. "A multilevel approach of non-motorised accessibility in disused railway systems: The case-study of the Vasco-Navarro railway," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 57(C), pages 35-43.
    11. Mona Jabbari & Fernando Fonseca & Rui Ramos, 2018. "Combining multi-criteria and space syntax analysis to assess a pedestrian network: the case of Oporto," Journal of Urban Design, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 23(1), pages 23-41, January.
    12. Pablo Sáinz-Ruiz & José Ramón Martínez-Riera, 2022. "Community Assets for Health Model and Assessment Scale: A Delphi-Based Analysis and Expert Validation," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(21), pages 1-19, October.
    13. Hatamzadeh, Yaser, 2021. "Working commuters’ tendency toward a travel pattern with potentially more walking: Examining the relative influence of personal and environmental measures," Research in Transportation Economics, Elsevier, vol. 86(C).
    14. Mireia Gascon & Margarita Triguero-Mas & David Martínez & Payam Dadvand & Joan Forns & Antoni Plasència & Mark J. Nieuwenhuijsen, 2015. "Mental Health Benefits of Long-Term Exposure to Residential Green and Blue Spaces: A Systematic Review," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 12(4), pages 1-26, April.
    15. Peiravian, Farideddin & Derrible, Sybil & Ijaz, Farukh, 2014. "Development and application of the Pedestrian Environment Index (PEI)," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 39(C), pages 73-84.
    16. Rashidi, Eghbal & Parsafard, Mohsen & Medal, Hugh & Li, Xiaopeng, 2016. "Optimal traffic calming: A mixed-integer bi-level programming model for locating sidewalks and crosswalks in a multimodal transportation network to maximize pedestrians’ safety and network usability," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 91(C), pages 33-50.
    17. Mingyu Kang & Anne Vernez Moudon & Haena Kim & Linda Ng Boyle, 2019. "Intersections and Non-Intersections: A Protocol for Identifying Pedestrian Crash Risk Locations in GIS," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(19), pages 1-14, September.
    18. repec:plo:pone00:0137402 is not listed on IDEAS
    19. Senes, Giulio & Rovelli, Roberto & Bertoni, Danilo & Arata, Laura & Fumagalli, Natalia & Toccolini, Alessandro, 2017. "Factors influencing greenways use: Definition of a method for estimation in the Italian context," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 65(C), pages 175-187.
    20. Mingzhu Song & Yi Zhang & Meng Li & Yi Zhang, 2021. "Accessibility of Transit Stops with Multiple Feeder Modes: Walking and Private-Bike Cycling," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(6), pages 1-27, March.
    21. Ryan, Jean & Pereira, Rafael H.M., 2021. "What are we missing when we measure accessibility? Comparing calculated and self-reported accounts among older people," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 93(C).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:14:y:2025:i:3:p:476-:d:1599404. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager The email address of this maintainer does not seem to be valid anymore. Please ask MDPI Indexing Manager to update the entry or send us the correct address (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.