IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jlands/v14y2025i1p129-d1563917.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Exploring the Relationship Between Residential Perceptions and Satisfaction: A Demographic Analysis in Wuhan, China

Author

Listed:
  • Mengyao Hong

    (School of Urban Design, Wuhan University, Wuhan 430072, China)

  • Hongrui Li

    (School of Urban Design, Wuhan University, Wuhan 430072, China)

  • Wei Wei

    (School of Urban Design, Wuhan University, Wuhan 430072, China
    China Institute of Development Strategy and Planning, Wuhan 430072, China)

  • Jialing Chao

    (Wuhan Planning & Design Institute, Wuhan 430072, China)

  • Junnan Xia

    (School of Resource and Environmental Sciences, Wuhan University, Wuhan 430072, China)

Abstract

Previous research has shown that residents’ perceptions significantly influence their residential satisfaction. However, the internal relationships within these perceptions and their impact on satisfaction across different demographic groups remain underexplored. This study, guided by Maslow’s hierarchy and Homo-urbanicus, categorizes residents’ perceptions into four dimensions: safety, convenience, comfort, and aesthetics. Using multi-group structural equation modeling, an empirical investigation was conducted in Wuhan, China. The findings indicate that perceptions of safety, convenience, comfort, and aesthetics exert a chained mediating effect on satisfaction, with the impact pathway being safety → convenience → comfort → aesthetics → satisfaction. Both convenience and comfort also directly influence satisfaction. Notably, perception pathways vary among different demographic groups: women are more influenced by perceptions, younger individuals prioritize convenience and aesthetics, and older adults emphasize safety and comfort. This study highlights demographic differences in perception and satisfaction levels, offering insights into the hierarchical relationships among resident perceptions and their impact pathways on satisfaction. This research suggests enhancing residential satisfaction by optimizing these perceptions, particularly for vulnerable groups. Policy implications include improving human settlement elements at the residential area level, incorporating cultural and innovative elements, and expanding public participation in communities.

Suggested Citation

  • Mengyao Hong & Hongrui Li & Wei Wei & Jialing Chao & Junnan Xia, 2025. "Exploring the Relationship Between Residential Perceptions and Satisfaction: A Demographic Analysis in Wuhan, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 14(1), pages 1-21, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:14:y:2025:i:1:p:129-:d:1563917
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/14/1/129/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/14/1/129/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Joost Van Hoof & Jan K. Kazak & Jolanta M. Perek-Białas & Sebastiaan T. M. Peek, 2018. "The Challenges of Urban Ageing: Making Cities Age-Friendly in Europe," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 15(11), pages 1-17, November.
    2. Phillips, David R. & Siu, Oi-ling & Yeh, Anthony G.O. & Cheng, Kevin H.C., 2005. "The impacts of dwelling conditions on older persons' psychological well-being in Hong Kong: the mediating role of residential satisfaction," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 60(12), pages 2785-2797, June.
    3. Olfindo, Rosechin, 2021. "Transport accessibility, residential satisfaction, and moving intention in a context of limited travel mode choice," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 145(C), pages 153-166.
    4. Hui Zeng & Qiulin Ke & Xiaofen Yu, 2021. "Investigating the factors affecting the residential satisfaction of new-generation migrants: a case study of Hangzhou in China," International Journal of Urban Sciences, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 25(1), pages 16-30, January.
    5. Jorge J. Varela & Jaime Alfaro & Roberto Melipillán & Denise Oyarzún Gómez & Mònica González-Carrasco, 2020. "Perceptions of Safety, Satisfaction with Neighborhood and Life Satisfaction Among Chilean Adolescents," Child Indicators Research, Springer;The International Society of Child Indicators (ISCI), vol. 13(4), pages 1489-1502, August.
    6. Ren, Fang & Kwan, Mei-Po, 2009. "The impact of the Internet on human activity–travel patterns: analysis of gender differences using multi-group structural equation models," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 17(6), pages 440-450.
    7. Rojas, Mariano & Méndez, Alfonso & Watkins-Fassler, Karen, 2023. "The hierarchy of needs empirical examination of Maslow’s theory and lessons for development," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 165(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Chen, Jie & Shaw, Shih-Lung & Yu, Hongbo & Lu, Feng & Chai, Yanwei & Jia, Qinglei, 2011. "Exploratory data analysis of activity diary data: a space–time GIS approach," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 19(3), pages 394-404.
    2. Shi Chen & Yi Sun & Bo Kyong Seo, 2022. "The Effects of Public Open Space on Older People’s Well-Being: From Neighborhood Social Cohesion to Place Dependence," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(23), pages 1-16, December.
    3. Mingyu Sun & Leizi Min & Na Xu & Lei Huang & Xuemei Li, 2021. "The Effect of Exercise Intervention on Reducing the Fall Risk in Older Adults: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(23), pages 1-14, November.
    4. Katrien Luijkx & Leonieke van Boekel & Meriam Janssen & Marjolein Verbiest & Annerieke Stoop, 2020. "The Academic Collaborative Center Older Adults: A Description of Co-Creation between Science, Care Practice and Education with the Aim to Contribute to Person-Centered Care for Older Adults," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(23), pages 1-14, December.
    5. Lei Kang & Zhaoping Yang & Yunxiao Dang & Wenzhong Zhang & Caicai Liu, 2022. "Can Tourism Development Make Cities More Livable? Investigating 40 Cities in China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(1), pages 1-17, January.
    6. Joost van Hoof & Helen Bennetts & Alana Hansen & Jan K. Kazak & Veronica Soebarto, 2019. "The Living Environment and Thermal Behaviours of Older South Australians: A Multi-Focus Group Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(6), pages 1-19, March.
    7. Ettema, Dick & Zwartbol, Danielle, 2013. "The structure of joint leisure trips: analyzing two-person leisure trips of Dutch students," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 31(C), pages 216-225.
    8. Maša Filipovič Hrast & Richard Sendi & Boštjan Kerbler, 2023. "Person–Environment Fit in Urban Neighbourhoods in Slovenia: Challenges and Coping Strategies," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(6), pages 1-14, March.
    9. Marlena Piekut, 2024. "Housing conditions in European one-person households," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 19(5), pages 1-23, May.
    10. Frans Sengers & Alexander Peine, 2021. "Innovation Pathways for Age-Friendly Homes in Europe," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(3), pages 1-25, January.
    11. Ravid, Batel Yossef & Gutman, Meirav Aharon, 2024. "The place of co-production: A physital space for collaborative urban government," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 209(C).
    12. Yang Zhang & Agnes E. Van den Berg & Terry Van Dijk & Gerd Weitkamp, 2017. "Quality over Quantity: Contribution of Urban Green Space to Neighborhood Satisfaction," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 14(5), pages 1-10, May.
    13. Kevin Cheng & David Phillips & Oi-Ling Siu & Anthony Yeh, 2014. "Patterns of Residential Adjustment for Older Person: Who will Recover and How Do They Recover? A Study in Different Residential Environments in Hong Kong," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 119(1), pages 295-319, October.
    14. Ruohan Zhang & Jialan Zhang & Kuan Zhang & Dingde Xu & Yanbin Qi & Xin Deng, 2024. "Do Clean Toilets Help Improve Farmers’ Mental Health? Empirical Evidence from China’s Rural Toilet Revolution," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 14(1), pages 1-14, January.
    15. Joost van Hoof & Hannah R. Marston, 2021. "Age-Friendly Cities and Communities: State of the Art and Future Perspectives," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(4), pages 1-13, February.
    16. Chaoxin Jiang & Jiaming Shi, 2024. "Community Violence, Perceived Neighborhood Quality, Collectivism and Children’s Life Satisfaction: A Cross-national Perspective," Child Indicators Research, Springer;The International Society of Child Indicators (ISCI), vol. 17(2), pages 509-524, April.
    17. Mònica González-Carrasco & Lívia Bedin & Ferran Casas & Jaime Alfaro & Jorge Castellá Sarriera, 2023. "Safety, Perceptions of Good Treatment and Subjective Well-Being in 10- and 12-year-old Children in Three Countries," Applied Research in Quality of Life, Springer;International Society for Quality-of-Life Studies, vol. 18(3), pages 1521-1544, June.
    18. Yan, Bingqiu & Gao, Xiaolu & Lyon, Michael, 2014. "Modeling satisfaction amongst the elderly in different Chinese urban neighborhoods," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 118(C), pages 127-134.
    19. Han, Chenglin & Luo, Lichen & Parady, Giancarlos & Takami, Kiyoshi & Chikaraishi, Makoto & Harata, Noboru, 2023. "Modeling joint eating-out destination choices incorporating group-level impedance: A case study of the Greater Tokyo Area," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 111(C).
    20. Jianbo Han & Edwin H. W. Chan & Esther H. K. Yung & Queena K. Qian & Patrick T. I. Lam, 2022. "A Policy Framework for Producing Age-Friendly Communities from the Perspective of Production of Space," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(4), pages 1-23, February.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:14:y:2025:i:1:p:129-:d:1563917. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.