IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jlands/v13y2024i9p1375-d1465476.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Ecologically Regenerative Building Systems through Exergy Efficiency: Designing for Structural Order and Ecosystem Services

Author

Listed:
  • Katharina Hecht

    (Faculty of Science, Department of Biology, Utrecht University, Padualaan 8, 3584 CS Utrecht, The Netherlands)

  • Abraham Ortega Reboso

    (Faculty of Science, Department of Biology, Utrecht University, Padualaan 8, 3584 CS Utrecht, The Netherlands)

  • Michelle van der Vegt

    (Faculty of Science, Department of Biology, Utrecht University, Padualaan 8, 3584 CS Utrecht, The Netherlands)

  • Jaco Appelman

    (Faculty of Science, Department of Biology, Utrecht University, Padualaan 8, 3584 CS Utrecht, The Netherlands)

  • Maibritt Pedersen Zari

    (School of Future Environments, Auckland University of Technology, 55 Wellesley Street East, Auckland 1010, New Zealand)

Abstract

Regenerative design is being increasingly explored in urban environments to counteract and adapt to the changing climate and degradation of ecosystems. A critical success factor for the implementation of regenerative design is the evaluation of urban and building systems in relation to ecological performance and benefits. In biological ecosystems, the availability of high-quality energy, called exergy, and structural order can be used as indicators of the efficiency of on-going ecological processes. Structural order refers to the organization and systematic arrangements of biotic and abiotic elements within an ecosystem based on the available space and interactions with the goal to form a functional system. Ecological processes use the available exergy and generate ecosystem services (ESs) upon which human survival and that of other living organisms depend. In this article, structural order and ESs generation are proposed as indicators for exergy efficiency and accumulation in building systems, respectively, which can evaluate to what extent they are ecologically functional and regenerative. Based on this insight, design strategies are derived from the functioning of ecosystems that describe how buildings could become habitats that host living, non-living, and hybrid systems with optimized thermodynamic efficiency and that can generate ESs. This research suggests that when buildings improve structural order (an ecological concept) and implement ESs generating processes similar to biological ecosystems, they can facilitate regenerative processes more effectively that consume and generate resources and, with this, destroy but also accumulate exergy.

Suggested Citation

  • Katharina Hecht & Abraham Ortega Reboso & Michelle van der Vegt & Jaco Appelman & Maibritt Pedersen Zari, 2024. "Ecologically Regenerative Building Systems through Exergy Efficiency: Designing for Structural Order and Ecosystem Services," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-18, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:13:y:2024:i:9:p:1375-:d:1465476
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/13/9/1375/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/13/9/1375/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Sciubba, Enrico & Zullo, Federico, 2014. "An exergy-based analysis of the co-evolution of different species sharing common resources," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 273(C), pages 277-283.
    2. Mads S. Thomsen & Andrew H. Altieri & Christine Angelini & Melanie J. Bishop & Fabio Bulleri & Roxanne Farhan & Viktoria M. M. Frühling & Paul E. Gribben & Seamus B. Harrison & Qiang He & Moritz Kling, 2022. "Heterogeneity within and among co-occurring foundation species increases biodiversity," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-9, December.
    3. Skene, Keith R., 2013. "The energetics of ecological succession: A logistic model of entropic output," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 250(C), pages 287-293.
    4. Snyder, Hannah, 2019. "Literature review as a research methodology: An overview and guidelines," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 104(C), pages 333-339.
    5. Sciubba, Enrico, 2019. "Exergy-based ecological indicators: From Thermo-Economics to cumulative exergy consumption to Thermo-Ecological Cost and Extended Exergy Accounting," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 168(C), pages 462-476.
    6. Ludovisi, A., 2009. "Exergy vs information in ecological successions: Interpreting community changes by a classical thermodynamic approach," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 220(13), pages 1566-1577.
    7. Czúcz, Bálint & Arany, Ildikó & Potschin-Young, Marion & Bereczki, Krisztina & Kertész, Miklós & Kiss, Márton & Aszalós, Réka & Haines-Young, Roy, 2018. "Where concepts meet the real world: A systematic review of ecosystem service indicators and their classification using CICES," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 29(PA), pages 145-157.
    8. Christopher G. Kirwan & Stefan V. Dobrev, 2022. "Cities as Convergent Autopoietic Systems," Springer Optimization and Its Applications, in: Panos M. Pardalos & Stamatina Th. Rassia & Arsenios Tsokas (ed.), Artificial Intelligence, Machine Learning, and Optimization Tools for Smart Cities, pages 1-26, Springer.
    9. Hamid Reza Pourghasemi & Soheila Pouyan & Mojgan Bordbar & Foroogh Golkar & John J. Clague, 2023. "Flood, landslides, forest fire, and earthquake susceptibility maps using machine learning techniques and their combination," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 116(3), pages 3797-3816, April.
    10. Eduardo Blanco & Maibritt Pedersen Zari & Kalina Raskin & Philippe Clergeau, 2021. "Urban Ecosystem-Level Biomimicry and Regenerative Design: Linking Ecosystem Functioning and Urban Built Environments," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(1), pages 1-12, January.
    11. Zhang, Chenghu & Li, Yaping, 2017. "Thermodynamic analysis on theoretical models of cycle combined heat exchange process: The reversible heat exchange process," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 124(C), pages 565-578.
    12. Hamid Reza Pourghasemi & Soheila Pouyan & Mojgan Bordbar & Foroogh Golkar & John J. Clague, 2023. "Correction to: Flood, landslides, forest fire, and earthquake susceptibility maps using machine learning techniques and their combination," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 118(1), pages 871-874, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Fathima Nuzla Ismail & Brendon J. Woodford & Sherlock A. Licorish & Aubrey D. Miller, 2024. "An assessment of existing wildfire danger indices in comparison to one-class machine learning models," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 120(15), pages 14837-14868, December.
    2. Fanfan Huang & Dan Zhu & Yichen Zhang & Jiquan Zhang & Ning Wang & Zhennan Dong, 2024. "Urban Flooding Disaster Risk Assessment Utilizing the MaxEnt Model and Game Theory: A Case Study of Changchun, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(19), pages 1-23, October.
    3. Maryono, Maryono & Killoes, Aditya Marendra & Adhikari, Rajendra & Abdul Aziz, Ammar, 2024. "Agriculture development through multi-stakeholder partnerships in developing countries: A systematic literature review," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 213(C).
    4. Ali Zackery & Joseph Amankwah-Amoah & Zahra Heidari Darani & Shiva Ghasemi, 2022. "COVID-19 Research in Business and Management: A Review and Future Research Agenda," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(16), pages 1-32, August.
    5. Liu, Duan & Tang, Runcheng & Xie, Jun & Tian, Jingjing & Shi, Rui & Zhang, Kai, 2020. "Valuation of ecosystem services of rice–fish coculture systems in Ruyuan County, China," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 41(C).
    6. Eusebius Pantja Pramudya & Lukas Rumboko Wibowo & Fitri Nurfatriani & Iman Kasiman Nawireja & Dewi Ratna Kurniasari & Sakti Hutabarat & Yohanes Berenika Kadarusman & Ananda Oemi Iswardhani & Rukaiyah , 2022. "Incentives for Palm Oil Smallholders in Mandatory Certification in Indonesia," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(4), pages 1-28, April.
    7. Peter Schnell & Phillip Haag & Hans Christian Jünger, 2022. "Implementation of Digital Technologies in Construction Companies: Establishing a Holistic Process which Addresses Current Barriers," Businesses, MDPI, vol. 3(1), pages 1-18, December.
    8. Chen, Yanyan & Mandler, Timo & Meyer-Waarden, Lars, 2021. "Three decades of research on loyalty programs: A literature review and future research agenda," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 124(C), pages 179-197.
    9. Fabio Magnacca & Riccardo Giannetti, 2024. "Management accounting and new product development: a systematic literature review and future research directions," Journal of Management & Governance, Springer;Accademia Italiana di Economia Aziendale (AIDEA), vol. 28(2), pages 651-685, June.
    10. Hongxia Jin & Lu Lu & Haojun Fan, 2022. "Global Trends and Research Hotspots in Long COVID: A Bibliometric Analysis," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(6), pages 1-14, March.
    11. Prince Donkor Ameyaw & Walter Timo de Vries, 2020. "Transparency of Land Administration and the Role of Blockchain Technology, a Four-Dimensional Framework Analysis from the Ghanaian Land Perspective," Land, MDPI, vol. 9(12), pages 1-25, December.
    12. Amal Almansour & Reem Alotaibi & Hajar Alharbi, 2022. "Text-rating review discrepancy (TRRD): an integrative review and implications for research," Future Business Journal, Springer, vol. 8(1), pages 1-15, December.
    13. van der Hoff, Richard & Nascimento, Nathália & Fabrício-Neto, Ailton & Jaramillo-Giraldo, Carolina & Ambrosio, Geanderson & Arieira, Julia & Afonso Nobre, Carlos & Rajão, Raoni, 2022. "Policy-oriented ecosystem services research on tropical forests in South America: A systematic literature review," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 56(C).
    14. Švarc, Jadranka & Dabić, Marina, 2021. "Transformative innovation policy or how to escape peripheral policy paradox in European research peripheral countries," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 67(C).
    15. So, Hau Wing & Lafortezza, Raffaele, 2022. "Reviewing the impacts of eco-labelling of forest products on different dimensions of sustainability in Europe," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 145(C).
    16. Mónica de Castro-Pardo & Pascual Fernández Martínez & Amelia Pérez Zabaleta & João C. Azevedo, 2021. "Dealing with Water Conflicts: A Comprehensive Review of MCDM Approaches to Manage Freshwater Ecosystem Services," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(5), pages 1-32, April.
    17. Abrefa Busia, Kwaku & Arthur-Holmes, Francis, 2024. "Women and gender in artisanal and small-scale mining: A review and future research directions," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 98(C).
    18. Mackey, Jeremy D., 2022. "The effect of cultural values on the strength of the relationship between interpersonal and organizational workplace deviance," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 149(C), pages 760-771.
    19. Silva, Daiane Vitória da & Pavan, Ana Laura Raymundo & Faria, Luiz Carlos de & Piekarski, Cassiano Moro & Saavedra, Yovana María Barrera & Lopes Silva, Diogo A., 2024. "Opportunities to integrate Ecosystem Services into Life Cycle Assessment (LCA): a case study of milk production in Brazil," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 69(C).
    20. Akshita Singh & Shailendra Kumar & Utkarsh Goel & Amar Johri, 2023. "Behavioural biases in real estate investment: a literature review and future research agenda," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 10(1), pages 1-17, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:13:y:2024:i:9:p:1375-:d:1465476. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.