IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jlands/v12y2023i1p218-d1030785.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Collective Properties of Trentino: From Traditional Competences to Modern Solution Providers

Author

Listed:
  • Alisia Tognon

    (Dipartimento di Architettura e Studi Urbani (DAStU)-Politecnico di Milano, 20133 Milano, Italy
    Laboratorio di Storia delle Alpi (LabiSAlp), Accademia di Architettura, Università della Svizzera Italiana (USI), 6850 Mendrisio, Switzerland)

  • Nicola Martellozzo

    (Department of Foreign Languages, Literature and Modern Cultures-University of Turin, 10125 Torino, Italy
    Centro Universitario (GREEN) Groupe de Recherche en Education à l’Environnement et à la Nature, l’Università della Valle d’Aosta—Université de la Vallée d’Aoste, 11100 Aosta, Italy)

  • Alessandro Gretter

    (Centro Universitario (GREEN) Groupe de Recherche en Education à l’Environnement et à la Nature, l’Università della Valle d’Aosta—Université de la Vallée d’Aoste, 11100 Aosta, Italy
    Research and Innovation Centre-Fondazione Edmund Mach, San Michele all’Adige, 38098 Trento, Italy)

Abstract

This paper focuses on the context of the Autonomous Province of Trento in Northern Italy, which has hosted common regime institutions that manage collective mountain properties daily since the 13th century. These institutions operate in the most significant part of the territory and adapt their routines to emerging challenges. From different scientific perspectives (economic, anthropological, and architectural), we analyzed how this method has been actualized as the most effective management of local resources, generating opportunities for commoners, new citizens, and external users. This includes the exposure of the communities to novel economic activities, adaptation of the internal normative and planning systems, and reflection on how to combine natural resources with local needs and global scenarios.

Suggested Citation

  • Alisia Tognon & Nicola Martellozzo & Alessandro Gretter, 2023. "Collective Properties of Trentino: From Traditional Competences to Modern Solution Providers," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(1), pages 1-20, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:12:y:2023:i:1:p:218-:d:1030785
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/12/1/218/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/12/1/218/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Werner Krauß, 2018. "Alpine landscapes in the Anthropocene: alternative common futures," Landscape Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 43(8), pages 1021-1031, November.
    2. Gatto, Paola & Bogataj, Nevenka, 2015. "Disturbances, robustness and adaptation in forest commons: Comparative insights from two cases in the Southeastern Alps," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 58(C), pages 56-64.
    3. Gios, Geremia & Santuari, Alceste, 2002. "Agricultural Cooperatives in the County of Trento (Italy): Economic, Organizational and Legal Perspectives," Journal of Rural Cooperation, Hebrew University, Center for Agricultural Economic Research, vol. 30(01), pages 1-10.
    4. De Moor,Tine, 2017. "The Dilemma of the Commoners," Cambridge Books, Cambridge University Press, number 9781316645826, Enero.
    5. Casari, Marco & Plott, Charles R., 2003. "Decentralized management of common property resources: experiments with a centuries-old institution," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 51(2), pages 217-247, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Arhan Ertan & Talbot Page & Louis Putterman, 2005. "Can Endogenously Chosen Institutions Mitigate the Free-Rider Problem and Reduce Perverse Punishment?," Working Papers 2005-13, Brown University, Department of Economics.
    2. Marco Casari, 2002. "Can genetic algorithms explain experimental anomalies? An application to common property resources," UFAE and IAE Working Papers 542.02, Unitat de Fonaments de l'Anàlisi Econòmica (UAB) and Institut d'Anàlisi Econòmica (CSIC).
    3. Casari, Marco, 2008. "Markets in equilibrium with firms out of equilibrium: A simulation study," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 65(2), pages 261-276, February.
    4. Tarui, Nori & Mason, Charles F. & Polasky, Stephen & Ellis, Greg, 2008. "Cooperation in the commons with unobservable actions," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 55(1), pages 37-51, January.
    5. Casari, Marco & Luini, Luigi, 2006. "Peer Punishment in Teams: Emotional or Strategic Choice?," Purdue University Economics Working Papers 1188, Purdue University, Department of Economics.
    6. Hayo, Bernd & Vollan, Björn, 2012. "Group interaction, heterogeneity, rules, and co-operative behaviour: Evidence from a common-pool resource experiment in South Africa and Namibia," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 81(1), pages 9-28.
    7. Muhammad Abdul Aziz & Giulia Mattalia & Naji Sulaiman & Adnan Ali Shah & Zbynek Polesny & Raivo Kalle & Renata Sõukand & Andrea Pieroni, 2024. "The nexus between traditional foraging and its sustainability: a qualitative assessment among a few selected Eurasian case studies," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 26(12), pages 29813-29838, December.
    8. Jason Delaney & Sarah Jacobson, 2016. "Payments or Persuasion: Common Pool Resource Management with Price and Non-price Measures," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 65(4), pages 747-772, December.
    9. James C. Cox & Elinor Ostrom & James M. Walker, 2011. "Bosses and Kings: Asymmetric Power in Paired Common Pool and Public Good Games," Experimental Economics Center Working Paper Series 2011-06, Experimental Economics Center, Andrew Young School of Policy Studies, Georgia State University, revised Aug 2012.
    10. Vittorio Tigrino, 2015. "Risorse collettive e comunit? locali: un approccio storico," ECONOMIA E SOCIET? REGIONALE, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 0(3), pages 23-44.
    11. Nicole Rogge & Insa Theesfeld & Carola Strassner, 2018. "Social Sustainability through Social Interaction—A National Survey on Community Gardens in Germany," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(4), pages 1-18, April.
    12. Jean-Philippe Atzenhoffer, 2012. "Could free-riders promote cooperation in the commons?," Environmental Economics and Policy Studies, Springer;Society for Environmental Economics and Policy Studies - SEEPS, vol. 14(1), pages 85-101, January.
    13. Arruñada, Benito & Casari, Marco, 2016. "Fragile markets: An experiment on judicial independence," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 129(C), pages 142-156.
    14. John Byrne & Job Taminiau, 2016. "A review of sustainable energy utility and energy service utility concepts and applications: realizing ecological and social sustainability with a community utility," Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Energy and Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 5(2), pages 136-154, March.
    15. Elinor Ostrom, 2010. "Beyond Markets and States: Polycentric Governance of Complex Economic Systems," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 100(3), pages 641-672, June.
    16. Ganga Shreedhar, Alessandro Tavoni, Carmen Marchiori, 2018. "Monitoring and punishment networks in a common-pool resource dilemma: experimental evidence," GRI Working Papers 292, Grantham Research Institute on Climate Change and the Environment.
    17. Velez, Maria Alejandra & Stranlund, John K. & Murphy, James J., 2009. "What motivates common pool resource users? Experimental evidence from the field," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 70(3), pages 485-497, June.
    18. Velez, Maria Alejandra & Murphy, James J. & Stranlund, John K., 2006. "Within and Between Group Variation of Individual Strategies in Common Pool Resources: Evidence from Field Experiments," Working Paper Series 14504, University of Massachusetts, Amherst, Department of Resource Economics.
    19. Vollan, Björn & Prediger, Sebastian & Frölich, Markus, 2013. "Co-managing common-pool resources: Do formal rules have to be adapted to traditional ecological norms?," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 95(C), pages 51-62.
    20. José Nederhand & Erik-Hans Klijn & Martijn Steen & Mark Twist, 2019. "The governance of self-organization: Which governance strategy do policy officials and citizens prefer?," Policy Sciences, Springer;Society of Policy Sciences, vol. 52(2), pages 233-253, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:12:y:2023:i:1:p:218-:d:1030785. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.