IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jlands/v12y2023i1p148-d1022571.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Model of Priority Ranking of Cadastral Parcels for Planning the Implementation of Urban Consolidation

Author

Listed:
  • Jelena Kilić Pamuković

    (Faculty of Civil Engineering, Architecture and Geodesy, University of Split, 21000 Split, Croatia)

  • Katarina Rogulj

    (Faculty of Civil Engineering, Architecture and Geodesy, University of Split, 21000 Split, Croatia)

  • Nikša Jajac

    (Faculty of Civil Engineering, Architecture and Geodesy, University of Split, 21000 Split, Croatia)

  • Siniša Mastelić-Ivić

    (Faculty of Geodesy, University of Zagreb, 10000 Zagreb, Croatia)

Abstract

The paper proposes a Model of priority ranking of cadastral parcels for planning the implementation of urban consolidation, which is a continuation of the published research on the assessment of fragmentation and assessment bonitet values of cadastral parcels. The research deals with one segment of the Spatial Decision Support System and is one process in the planning of urban consolidation. Comparison criteria were identified for the evaluation and priority ranking of cadastral parcels. The subject of the research is private cadastral parcels in the area of large public project construction. The goal of the research is to find the optimal way to compare conflicting and incomparable criteria for the evaluation of private cadastral parcels and, at the same time, a way of fitting the opinions of stakeholders in the implementation planning process of urban consolidation. Due to the complexity of the task and realizing certain spatial criteria, unique models were developed. Special attention was paid to the participatory approach to problem-solving, in which all groups of stakeholders were identified, and the way of expressing their views was defined. The Complex proportional assessment (COPRAS) method and the Analytic Hierarchy Process method (AHP) methods were used to solve the problem. The defined models were tested in the field of construction of a large public project Campus at the University of Split.

Suggested Citation

  • Jelena Kilić Pamuković & Katarina Rogulj & Nikša Jajac & Siniša Mastelić-Ivić, 2023. "Model of Priority Ranking of Cadastral Parcels for Planning the Implementation of Urban Consolidation," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(1), pages 1-26, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:12:y:2023:i:1:p:148-:d:1022571
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/12/1/148/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/12/1/148/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Wang, Ying-Ming & Luo, Ying & Hua, Zhongsheng, 2008. "On the extent analysis method for fuzzy AHP and its applications," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 186(2), pages 735-747, April.
    2. Alireza Alinezhad & Javad Khalili, 2019. "New Methods and Applications in Multiple Attribute Decision Making (MADM)," International Series in Operations Research and Management Science, Springer, number 978-3-030-15009-9, June.
    3. Banaitiene, Nerija & Banaitis, Audrius & Kaklauskas, Arturas & Zavadskas, Edmundas Kazimieras, 2008. "Evaluating the life cycle of a building: A multivariant and multiple criteria approach," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 36(3), pages 429-441, June.
    4. Majda Ivić & Jelena Kilić & Katarina Rogulj & Nikša Jajac, 2020. "Decision Support to Sustainable Parking Management—Investment Planning through Parking Fines to Improve Pedestrian Flows," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(22), pages 1-19, November.
    5. Zhu, Ke-Jun & Jing, Yu & Chang, Da-Yong, 1999. "A discussion on Extent Analysis Method and applications of fuzzy AHP," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 116(2), pages 450-456, July.
    6. Jelena Kilić & Nikša Jajac & Katarina Rogulj & Siniša Mastelić-Ivić, 2019. "Assessing Land Fragmentation in Planning Sustainable Urban Renewal," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(9), pages 1-24, May.
    7. James J.H. Liou & Jolanta Tamošaitienė & Edmundas K. Zavadskas & Gwo-Hshiung Tzeng, 2016. "New hybrid COPRAS-G MADM Model for improving and selecting suppliers in green supply chain management," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 54(1), pages 114-134, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Müge Kirmikil, 2025. "Which Factors Are More Important in Land Consolidation Block Planning? An Analytic Hierarchy Process Approach for Prioritization," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(5), pages 1-12, March.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Grošelj, Petra & Hodges, Donald G. & Zadnik Stirn, Lidija, 2016. "Participatory and multi-criteria analysis for forest (ecosystem) management: A case study of Pohorje, Slovenia," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 71(C), pages 80-86.
    2. María Carmen Carnero & Andrés Gómez, 2019. "Optimization of Decision Making in the Supply of Medicinal Gases Used in Health Care," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(10), pages 1-31, May.
    3. Faramondi, Luca & Oliva, Gabriele & Setola, Roberto & Bozóki, Sándor, 2023. "Robustness to rank reversal in pairwise comparison matrices based on uncertainty bounds," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 304(2), pages 676-688.
    4. Yu-Jie Wang, 2023. "Extending Quality Function Deployment and Analytic Hierarchy Process under Interval-Valued Fuzzy Environment for Evaluating Port Sustainability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(7), pages 1-19, March.
    5. Rezaei, Jafar & Ortt, Roland, 2013. "Multi-criteria supplier segmentation using a fuzzy preference relations based AHP," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 225(1), pages 75-84.
    6. Xinyi Zhou & Yong Hu & Yong Deng & Felix T. S. Chan & Alessio Ishizaka, 2018. "A DEMATEL-based completion method for incomplete pairwise comparison matrix in AHP," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 271(2), pages 1045-1066, December.
    7. Heo, Eunnyeong & Kim, Jinsoo & Boo, Kyung-Jin, 2010. "Analysis of the assessment factors for renewable energy dissemination program evaluation using fuzzy AHP," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 14(8), pages 2214-2220, October.
    8. Satish Tyagi, 2016. "An improved fuzzy-AHP (IFAHP) approach to compare SECI modes," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 54(15), pages 4520-4536, August.
    9. Jelena Kilić & Nikša Jajac & Katarina Rogulj & Siniša Mastelić-Ivić, 2019. "Assessing Land Fragmentation in Planning Sustainable Urban Renewal," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(9), pages 1-24, May.
    10. Edmundas Kazimieras Zavadskas & Fausto Cavallaro & Valentinas Podvezko & Ieva Ubarte & Arturas Kaklauskas, 2017. "MCDM Assessment of a Healthy and Safe Built Environment According to Sustainable Development Principles: A Practical Neighborhood Approach in Vilnius," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(5), pages 1-30, April.
    11. Kai Zhou & Xiang Yuan & Ziyuan Guo & Jianrui Wu & Ruijia Li, 2024. "Research on Sustainable Port: Evaluation of Green Port Policies on China’s Coasts," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(10), pages 1-25, May.
    12. Mulliner, Emma & Smallbone, Kieran & Maliene, Vida, 2013. "An assessment of sustainable housing affordability using a multiple criteria decision making method," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 41(2), pages 270-279.
    13. Mohammed Ifkirne & Houssam El Bouhi & Siham Acharki & Quoc Bao Pham & Abdelouahed Farah & Nguyen Thi Thuy Linh, 2022. "Multi-Criteria GIS-Based Analysis for Mapping Suitable Sites for Onshore Wind Farms in Southeast France," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(10), pages 1-26, October.
    14. Mahmut Baydaş & Orhan Emre Elma & Željko Stević, 2024. "Proposal of an innovative MCDA evaluation methodology: knowledge discovery through rank reversal, standard deviation, and relationship with stock return," Financial Innovation, Springer;Southwestern University of Finance and Economics, vol. 10(1), pages 1-35, December.
    15. Bojan Srdjevic & Yvonilde Medeiros, 2008. "Fuzzy AHP Assessment of Water Management Plans," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 22(7), pages 877-894, July.
    16. Amin Mahmoudi & Saad Ahmed Javed, 2022. "Probabilistic Approach to Multi-Stage Supplier Evaluation: Confidence Level Measurement in Ordinal Priority Approach," Group Decision and Negotiation, Springer, vol. 31(5), pages 1051-1096, October.
    17. Wang, Ying-Ming & Luo, Ying & Hua, Zhongsheng, 2008. "On the extent analysis method for fuzzy AHP and its applications," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 186(2), pages 735-747, April.
    18. Nitidetch Koohathongsumrit & Pongchanun Luangpaiboon, 2022. "An integrated FAHP–ZODP approach for strategic marketing information system project selection," Managerial and Decision Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 43(6), pages 1792-1809, September.
    19. Pedro Jose Gudiel Pineda & Chao-Che Hsu & James J. H. Liou & Huai-Wei Lo, 2018. "A Hybrid Model for Aircraft Type Determination Following Flight Cancellation," International Journal of Information Technology & Decision Making (IJITDM), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 17(04), pages 1147-1172, July.
    20. Xiao-Juan Li & Chen Wang & Wei-bin Chen & Shilpi Bora & Jeffrey Boon Hui Yap & Bimenyimana Samuel, 2022. "Green building performance assessment in China using a cloud model," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 24(10), pages 11626-11650, October.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:12:y:2023:i:1:p:148-:d:1022571. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.