IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jlands/v14y2025i6p1254-d1676559.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

AI-Based Identification and Redevelopment Prioritization of Inefficient Industrial Land Using Street View Imagery and Multi-Criteria Modeling

Author

Listed:
  • Yan Yu

    (School of Resources and Environmental Engineering, Wuhan University of Technology, Wuhan 430070, China)

  • Qiqi Yan

    (School of Resources and Environmental Engineering, Wuhan University of Technology, Wuhan 430070, China)

  • Yu Guo

    (Zhejiang Space-Time Sophon Big Data Co., Ltd., Ningbo 315101, China)

  • Chenhe Zhang

    (School of Resource and Environmental Science, Wuhan University, Wuhan 430070, China)

  • Zhixiang Huang

    (School of Resources and Environmental Engineering, Wuhan University of Technology, Wuhan 430070, China)

  • Liangze Lin

    (School of Resources and Environmental Engineering, Wuhan University of Technology, Wuhan 430070, China)

Abstract

The strategic prioritization of inefficient industrial land (IIL) redevelopment is critical for directing capital allocation toward sustainable urban regeneration. However, current redevelopment prioritization suffers from inefficient identification of IIL and ambiguous characterization of redevelopment potential, which hinders the efficiency of land resource allocation. To address these challenges, this study develops an AI-driven redevelopment prioritization framework for identifying IIL, evaluating redevelopment potential, and establishing implementation priorities. For land identification we propose an improved YOLOv11 model with an AdditiveBlock module to enhance feature extraction in complex street view scenes, achieving an 80.1% mAP on a self-built dataset of abandoned industrial buildings. On this basis, a redevelopment potential evaluation index system is constructed based on the necessity, maturity, and urgency of redevelopment, and the Particle Swarm Optimization-Projection Pursuit (PSO-PP) model is introduced to objectively evaluate redevelopment potential by adaptively reducing the reliance on expert judgment. Subsequently, the redevelopment priorities were classified according to the calculated potential values. The proposed framework is empirically tested in the central urban area of Ningbo City, China, where inefficient industrial land is successfully identified and redevelopment priority is categorized into near-term, medium-term, and long-term stages. Results show that the framework integrating computer vision and machine learning technology can effectively provide decision support for the redevelopment of IIL and offer a new method for promoting the smart growth of urban space.

Suggested Citation

  • Yan Yu & Qiqi Yan & Yu Guo & Chenhe Zhang & Zhixiang Huang & Liangze Lin, 2025. "AI-Based Identification and Redevelopment Prioritization of Inefficient Industrial Land Using Street View Imagery and Multi-Criteria Modeling," Land, MDPI, vol. 14(6), pages 1-19, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:14:y:2025:i:6:p:1254-:d:1676559
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/14/6/1254/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/14/6/1254/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ryan Greenaway-McGrevy & Gail Pacheco & Kade Sorensen, 2021. "The effect of upzoning on house prices and redevelopment premiums in Auckland, New Zealand," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 58(5), pages 959-976, April.
    2. Jelena Kilić Pamuković & Katarina Rogulj & Nikša Jajac & Siniša Mastelić-Ivić, 2023. "Model of Priority Ranking of Cadastral Parcels for Planning the Implementation of Urban Consolidation," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(1), pages 1-26, January.
    3. Fang He & Yuan Yi & Yuxuan Si, 2024. "Evolution Process of Urban Industrial Land Redevelopment in China: A Perspective of Original Land Users," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-22, April.
    4. Zihao Wang & Xiaoqiang Chen & Na Huang & Yinan Yang & Li Wang & Yuan Wang, 2022. "Spatial Identification and Redevelopment Evaluation of Brownfields in the Perspective of Urban Complex Ecosystems: A Case of Wuhu City, China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(1), pages 1-25, January.
    5. Rui Jin & Chunyuan Huang & Pei Wang & Junyong Ma & Yiliang Wan, 2023. "Identification of Inefficient Urban Land for Urban Regeneration Considering Land Use Differentiation," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(10), pages 1-24, October.
    6. Pan, Wenjian & Du, Juan, 2021. "Towards sustainable urban transition: A critical review of strategies and policies of urban village renewal in Shenzhen, China," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 111(C).
    7. Naveed Ahmad & Yuming Zhu & Muhammad Ibrahim & Muhammad Waqas & Abdul Waheed, 2018. "Development of a Standard Brownfield Definition, Guidelines, and Evaluation Index System for Brownfield Redevelopment in Developing Countries: The Case of Pakistan," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(12), pages 1-22, November.
    8. Liu, Yilun & Zhu, A-Xing & Wang, Jingli & Li, Wenkai & Hu, Guohua & Hu, Yueming, 2019. "Land-use decision support in brownfield redevelopment for urban renewal based on crowdsourced data and a presence-and-background learning (PBL) method," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 88(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Nina Danilina & Anna Korobeinikova & Irina Teplova, 2024. "Decision-Making Approach for Land Use in Urban Industrial Area Redevelopment Projects," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(22), pages 1-33, November.
    2. Lin, Chuan & Liu, Yilun & Yuan, Zhongyou & Wang, Hongmei & Li, Guang & Zhou, Zegen & Wang, Han & An, Xinyue, 2025. "Harmonizing stakeholder interests in urban renewal: A novel planning approach using explainable machine learning and spatial optimization," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 155(C).
    3. Müge Kirmikil, 2025. "Which Factors Are More Important in Land Consolidation Block Planning? An Analytic Hierarchy Process Approach for Prioritization," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(5), pages 1-12, March.
    4. He Jian & Hu Hao & Pan Haize & Liu Chuan & Li Xiaoqin & Wei Yan & Jiang Haidan & Zhang Changliang, 2022. "Research on brownfield redevelopment based on Wuli-Shili-Renli system theory and catastrophe progression method," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 17(11), pages 1-22, November.
    5. Jinkun Yang & Linchuan Yang & Haitao Ma, 2022. "Community Participation Strategy for Sustainable Urban Regeneration in Xiamen, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(5), pages 1-14, April.
    6. Murray, Cameron & Limb, Mark, 2020. "We zoned for density and got higher house prices: Supply and price effects of upzoning over 20 years," OSF Preprints zkt7v, Center for Open Science.
    7. Lea Rebernik & Barbara Vojvodíková & Barbara Lampič, 2023. "Brownfield Data and Database Management—The Key to Address Land Recycling," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(1), pages 1-20, January.
    8. Yuanyuan Huang & Scott N. Lieske & Yan Liu, 2023. "Factors influencing vertical urban development at the parcel scale: The case in Brisbane, Australia," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 50(3), pages 694-708, March.
    9. Zhibiao Chen & Leyan Yang & Yonghong Gan & Zhongping Wu, 2025. "The Economic–Cultural Dynamics of Urban Regeneration: Calibrating a Tripartite Evolutionary Game and Policy Thresholds for High-Quality Operational Renovation in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(20), pages 1-18, October.
    10. Lingyan Huang & Shanshan Xiang & Jianzhuang Zheng, 2022. "Fine-Scale Monitoring of Industrial Land and Its Intra-Structure Using Remote Sensing Images and POIs in the Hangzhou Bay Urban Agglomeration, China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(1), pages 1-21, December.
    11. Weixuan Chen & Ali Cheshmehzangi & Eugenio Mangi & Timothy Heath, 2022. "Implementations of China’s New-Type Urbanisation: A Comparative Analysis between Targets and Practices of Key Elements’ Policies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(10), pages 1-15, May.
    12. Donovan, Stuart & Maltman, Matthew, 2025. "Dispelling myths: Reviewing the evidence on zoning reforms in Auckland," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 151(C).
    13. Han, Ze & Deng, Xiangzheng & Li, Zhihui & Huang, Xiankai, 2024. "Mechanism and simulation of intensive use of urban inefficient land based on evolutionary game theory," Journal of Asian Economics, Elsevier, vol. 95(C).
    14. Changzheng Gao & Juepin Hou & Yanchen Ma & Jianxin Yang, 2022. "Evaluation and Analysis of Design Elements for Sustainable Renewal of Urban Vulnerable Spaces," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(24), pages 1-14, December.
    15. Yue Wu & Yi Zhang & Zexu Han & Siyuan Zhang & Xiangyi Li, 2022. "Examining the Planning Policies of Urban Villages Guided by China’s New-Type Urbanization: A Case Study of Hangzhou City," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(24), pages 1-25, December.
    16. Hui Sun & Yiyue Zhang & Yihan Wang & Jidong Chen & Huicang Wu, 2025. "How to Improve Collaboration in Sustainable Urban Community Renewal? An Evolutionary Game Model," Land, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-21, September.
    17. Christina Stacy & Chris Davis & Yonah Slifkin Freemark & Lydia Lo & Graham MacDonald & Vivian Zheng & Rolf Pendall, 2023. "Land-use reforms and housing costs: Does allowing for increased density lead to greater affordability?," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 60(14), pages 2919-2940, November.
    18. Emil Mendoza & Fabian Dunker & Marco Reale, 2023. "Changes in Risk Appreciation, and Short Memory of House Buyers When the Market is Hot, a Case Study of Christchurch, New Zealand," Papers 2307.13232, arXiv.org.
    19. Xinran Xu & Qiong Li & Zhiyan Liao & Xi Yu, 2025. "Risk Governance of Centralized Farmers’ Residence Policy in Rural-Urban Integration: A Case Study of Shanghai L Town," Land, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-25, September.
    20. Igal Charney, 2024. "Rezoning a top-notch CBD: The choreography of land-use regulation and creative destruction in Manhattan’s East Midtown," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 61(8), pages 1451-1467, June.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:14:y:2025:i:6:p:1254-:d:1676559. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.