IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jlands/v12y2023i10p1908-d1257388.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Resident Effect Perception in Urban Spaces to Inform Urban Design Strategies

Author

Listed:
  • Zichen Zhao

    (College of Design and Innovation, Tongji University, Shanghai 200093, China)

  • Zhiqiang Wu

    (College of Architecture and Urban Planning, Tongji University, Shanghai 200092, China)

  • Shiqi Zhou

    (College of Design and Innovation, Tongji University, Shanghai 200093, China)

  • Wen Dong

    (Department of Civil, Environment & Geomatics Engineering, University College London, 22 Gordon St, London WC1E 6BT, UK)

  • Wei Gan

    (College of Architecture and Urban Planning, Tongji University, Shanghai 200092, China)

  • Yixuan Zou

    (Department of Civil, Environment & Geomatics Engineering, University College London, 22 Gordon St, London WC1E 6BT, UK)

  • Mo Wang

    (College of Architecture and Urban Planning, Guangzhou University, Guangzhou 510006, China)

Abstract

In the field of urban design, current research has shifted towards resident preference perception and computer-aided design methods that rely on deep learning techniques. In this study, we aimed to provide a quantitative design method for urban space design that could take into account the preferences of different populations. Through empirical research, we collected real urban space and population data, which we then quantified using advanced intelligent recognition tools based on deep learning techniques. Our ensuing analysis illuminated the intricate interplay between constituent elements of urban spaces and the structural and emotional changes of residents. By taking into account the specific driving relationships between each element and residents, we proposed a new evaluation methodology for constructing an intelligent design evaluation model for urban spaces. This intelligent design evaluation model was subsequently used to evaluate the urban space both pre- and post-design. The standard deviation of the difference results demonstrated that the design option (SD value = 0.103) and the desired option for Space 1 were lower than the current option (SD value = 0.129) and the expected scheme. Our findings provide quantitative configuration strategies and program evaluation for urban space design, thus helping designers to design urban spaces that are more popular with residents.

Suggested Citation

  • Zichen Zhao & Zhiqiang Wu & Shiqi Zhou & Wen Dong & Wei Gan & Yixuan Zou & Mo Wang, 2023. "Resident Effect Perception in Urban Spaces to Inform Urban Design Strategies," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(10), pages 1-24, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:12:y:2023:i:10:p:1908-:d:1257388
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/12/10/1908/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/12/10/1908/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Nikhil Naik & Ramesh Raskar & César A. Hidalgo, 2016. "Cities Are Physical Too: Using Computer Vision to Measure the Quality and Impact of Urban Appearance," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 106(5), pages 128-132, May.
    2. Zhiqiang Wu & Yuankai Wang & Wei Gan & Yixuan Zou & Wen Dong & Shiqi Zhou & Mo Wang, 2023. "A Survey of the Landscape Visibility Analysis Tools and Technical Improvements," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(3), pages 1-23, January.
    3. Beran, R. & Bilodeau, M. & Lafaye de Micheaux, P., 2007. "Nonparametric tests of independence between random vectors," Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 98(9), pages 1805-1824, October.
    4. Jingxuan Hou & Long Chen & Enjia Zhang & Haifeng Jia & Ying Long, 2020. "Quantifying the usage of small public spaces using deep convolutional neural network," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(10), pages 1-14, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Edward L. Glaeser & Scott Duke Kominers & Michael Luca & Nikhil Naik, 2018. "Big Data And Big Cities: The Promises And Limitations Of Improved Measures Of Urban Life," Economic Inquiry, Western Economic Association International, vol. 56(1), pages 114-137, January.
    2. Yue Liu & Xiangmin Guo, 2024. "A Dynamic Prediction Framework for Urban Public Space Vitality: From Hypothesis to Algorithm and Verification," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(7), pages 1-19, March.
    3. Galdo, Virgilio & Li, Yue & Rama, Martin, 2021. "Identifying urban areas by combining human judgment and machine learning: An application to India," Journal of Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 125(C).
    4. Nasri, Bouchra R., 2022. "Tests of serial dependence for multivariate time series with arbitrary distributions," Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 192(C).
    5. Julian Manning & Catriona Macleod & Vanessa Lucieer, 2023. "Seascape Visual Characterization: Combining Viewing Geometry and Physical Features to Quantify the Perception of Seascape," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(10), pages 1-20, May.
    6. Helmut Herwartz & Simone Maxand, 2020. "Nonparametric tests for independence: a review and comparative simulation study with an application to malnutrition data in India," Statistical Papers, Springer, vol. 61(5), pages 2175-2201, October.
    7. Huishu Chen & Li Yang, 2023. "Spatio-Temporal Experience of Tour Routes in the Humble Administrator’s Garden Based on Isovist Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(16), pages 1-24, August.
    8. Mercadier, Cécile & Roustant, Olivier & Genest, Christian, 2022. "Linking the Hoeffding–Sobol and Möbius formulas through a decomposition of Kuo, Sloan, Wasilkowski, and Woźniakowski," Statistics & Probability Letters, Elsevier, vol. 185(C).
    9. , 2019. "A roundtable discussion: Defining urban data science," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 46(9), pages 1756-1768, November.
    10. Ajit Desai, 2023. "Machine Learning for Economics Research: When What and How?," Papers 2304.00086, arXiv.org, revised Apr 2023.
    11. Suss, Joel, 2023. "Measuring local, salient economic inequality in the UK," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 117884, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    12. Kojadinovic, Ivan, 2010. "Hierarchical clustering of continuous variables based on the empirical copula process and permutation linkages," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 54(1), pages 90-108, January.
    13. Xinyu Hu & Yifan Ren & Ying Tan & Yi Shi, 2023. "Research on the Spatial and Temporal Dynamics of Crowd Activities in Commercial Streets and Their Relationship with Formats—A Case Study of Lao Men Dong Commercial Street in Nanjing," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(24), pages 1-23, December.
    14. Bianchi, Pascal & Elgui, Kevin & Portier, François, 2023. "Conditional independence testing via weighted partial copulas," Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 193(C).
    15. Mohamed R Ibrahim & James Haworth & Tao Cheng, 2021. "URBAN-i: From urban scenes to mapping slums, transport modes, and pedestrians in cities using deep learning and computer vision," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 48(1), pages 76-93, January.
    16. Wan, Wayne Xinwei & Lindenthal, Thies, 2022. "Towards accountability in machine learning applications: A system-testing approach," ZEW Discussion Papers 22-001, ZEW - Leibniz Centre for European Economic Research.
    17. Imryoung Jeong & Hyunjoo Yang, 2021. "Using maps to predict economic activity," Papers 2112.13850, arXiv.org, revised Apr 2022.
    18. Ka Shing Cheung & Chung Yim Yiu, 2022. "The economics of architectural aesthetics: Identifying price effect of urban ambiences by different house cohorts," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 49(6), pages 1741-1756, July.
    19. Kojadinovic, Ivan & Holmes, Mark, 2009. "Tests of independence among continuous random vectors based on Cramr-von Mises functionals of the empirical copula process," Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 100(6), pages 1137-1154, July.
    20. Kalemkerian, Juan & Fernández, Diego, 2020. "An independence test based on recurrence rates," Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 178(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:12:y:2023:i:10:p:1908-:d:1257388. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.