IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/lauspo/v111y2021ics0264837721004853.html

Some searches may not work properly. We apologize for the inconvenience.

   My bibliography  Save this article

Quantifying physical and psychological perceptions of urban scenes using deep learning

Author

Listed:
  • Zhang, Yonglin
  • Li, Shanlin
  • Dong, Rencai
  • Deng, Hongbing
  • Fu, Xiao
  • Wang, Chenxing
  • Yu, Tianshu
  • Jia, Tianxia
  • Zhao, Jingzhu

Abstract

The complicated relationship between urban scenes and public perceptions has long been a concern in many disciplines. Previous studies have lacked human-oriented technical paths and high-throughput datasets to quantify physical and psychological perceptions in different land-use scenarios. This paper adopts a novel transfer learning approach to quantify the six types of landsense indices (LSIs) as psychological perception metrics and employs panoptic segmentation to parameterize the view index (VI) and the number of foreground instances (NFIs) as physical perception measures. Then, a quantitative analysis is conducted in Beijing’s six Ring Road areas, and the connections between people’s physical and psychological perceptions of heterogeneous land use are explored. The landsense maps can depict the distribution of LSIs and facilitate the understanding of complex perceptions distributed at a large scale. The regression model shows that natural landscapes (trees, grasses, and mountains) in the Beijing built-up area exhibit an overall positive performance. Moreover, for several block-level land uses, industrial scenery is related to overall negative psychological feelings. Parks and green spaces are positively related to psychological perceptions, because of the greater exposure opportunities to natural landscapes for residents. The framework in this research has potential in assisting urban planning and land-use management, and it enriches the datasets with extensive information, thereby improving the psychological perceptions of urban scenes from residents’ perspectives. The novel approaches in this paper take a step forward in quantifying and understanding the public perceptions of urban landscapes.

Suggested Citation

  • Zhang, Yonglin & Li, Shanlin & Dong, Rencai & Deng, Hongbing & Fu, Xiao & Wang, Chenxing & Yu, Tianshu & Jia, Tianxia & Zhao, Jingzhu, 2021. "Quantifying physical and psychological perceptions of urban scenes using deep learning," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 111(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:lauspo:v:111:y:2021:i:c:s0264837721004853
    DOI: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2021.105762
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0264837721004853
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.landusepol.2021.105762?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Philip Salesses & Katja Schechtner & César A Hidalgo, 2013. "The Collaborative Image of The City: Mapping the Inequality of Urban Perception," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 8(7), pages 1-12, July.
    2. Nikhil Naik & Ramesh Raskar & César A. Hidalgo, 2016. "Cities Are Physical Too: Using Computer Vision to Measure the Quality and Impact of Urban Appearance," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 106(5), pages 128-132, May.
    3. Lu, Yi & Sarkar, Chinmoy & Xiao, Yang, 2018. "The effect of street-level greenery on walking behavior: Evidence from Hong Kong," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 208(C), pages 41-49.
    4. Yu Ye & Wei Zeng & Qiaomu Shen & Xiaohu Zhang & Yi Lu, 2019. "The visual quality of streets: A human-centred continuous measurement based on machine learning algorithms and street view images," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 46(8), pages 1439-1457, October.
    5. Yoshimura, Nobuhiko & Hiura, Tsutom, 2017. "Demand and supply of cultural ecosystem services: Use of geotagged photos to map the aesthetic value of landscapes in Hokkaido," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 24(C), pages 68-78.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Xu, Jiwei & Liu, Yaolin & Liu, Yanfang & An, Rui & Tong, Zhaomin, 2023. "Integrating street view images and deep learning to explore the association between human perceptions of the built environment and cardiovascular disease in older adults," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 338(C).
    2. Mian Yang & Wenjie Fan & Jian Qiu & Sining Zhang & Jinting Li, 2022. "The Evaluation of Rural Outdoor Dining Environment from Consumer Perspective," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(21), pages 1-16, October.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Edward L. Glaeser & Scott Duke Kominers & Michael Luca & Nikhil Naik, 2018. "Big Data And Big Cities: The Promises And Limitations Of Improved Measures Of Urban Life," Economic Inquiry, Western Economic Association International, vol. 56(1), pages 114-137, January.
    2. Galdo, Virgilio & Li, Yue & Rama, Martin, 2021. "Identifying urban areas by combining human judgment and machine learning: An application to India," Journal of Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 125(C).
    3. Yilei Tao & Ying Wang & Xinyu Wang & Guohang Tian & Shumei Zhang, 2022. "Measuring the Correlation between Human Activity Density and Streetscape Perceptions: An Analysis Based on Baidu Street View Images in Zhengzhou, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(3), pages 1-19, March.
    4. Mohamed R Ibrahim & James Haworth & Tao Cheng, 2021. "URBAN-i: From urban scenes to mapping slums, transport modes, and pedestrians in cities using deep learning and computer vision," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 48(1), pages 76-93, January.
    5. Yu Ye & Hanting Xie & Jia Fang & Hetao Jiang & De Wang, 2019. "Daily Accessed Street Greenery and Housing Price: Measuring Economic Performance of Human-Scale Streetscapes via New Urban Data," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(6), pages 1-21, March.
    6. Mingshu Wang & Floris Vermeulen, 2021. "Life between buildings from a street view image: What do big data analytics reveal about neighbourhood organisational vitality?," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 58(15), pages 3118-3139, November.
    7. Zijiao Zhang & Kangfu Zhuo & Wenhan Wei & Fu Li & Jie Yin & Liyan Xu, 2021. "Emotional Responses to the Visual Patterns of Urban Streets: Evidence from Physiological and Subjective Indicators," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(18), pages 1-20, September.
    8. Gao, Jiong & Ma, Shoufeng & Wang, Lei & Shuai, Ling & Du, Huibin, 2023. "Does greenness bring more green travelling? Evidence from free-floating bike-sharing in Beijing," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 109(C).
    9. Bohong Zheng & Rui Guo & Komi Bernard Bedra & Yanfen Xiang, 2022. "Quantitative Evaluation of Urban Style at Street Level: A Case Study of Hengyang County, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(4), pages 1-28, March.
    10. Li-Pei Peng & Wei-Ming Wang, 2020. "Hybrid Decision-Making Evaluation for Future Scenarios of Cultural Ecosystem Services," Land, MDPI, vol. 9(8), pages 1-20, August.
    11. Lingchao Meng & Kuo-Hsun Wen & Zhijie Zeng & Richard Brewin & Xiaolei Fan & Qiong Wu, 2020. "The Impact of Street Space Perception Factors on Elderly Health in High-Density Cities in Macau—Analysis Based on Street View Images and Deep Learning Technology," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(5), pages 1-19, February.
    12. Ioanna Arkoudi & Carlos Lima Azevedo & Francisco C. Pereira, 2021. "Combining Discrete Choice Models and Neural Networks through Embeddings: Formulation, Interpretability and Performance," Papers 2109.12042, arXiv.org, revised Sep 2021.
    13. Sarah Williams & Elizabeth Currid-Halkett, 2014. "Industry in Motion: Using Smart Phones to Explore the Spatial Network of the Garment Industry in New York City," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 9(2), pages 1-11, February.
    14. Ahmad Adeel & Bruno Notteboom & Ansar Yasar & Kris Scheerlinck & Jeroen Stevens, 2021. "Sustainable Streetscape and Built Environment Designs around BRT Stations: A Stated Choice Experiment Using 3D Visualizations," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(12), pages 1-21, June.
    15. Lingzhu Zhang & Yu Ye & Wenxin Zeng & Alain Chiaradia, 2019. "A Systematic Measurement of Street Quality through Multi-Sourced Urban Data: A Human-Oriented Analysis," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(10), pages 1-24, May.
    16. Bartzokas-Tsiompras, Alexandros & Bakogiannis, Efthimios & Nikitas, Alexandros, 2023. "Global microscale walkability ratings and rankings: A novel composite indicator for 59 European city centres," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 111(C).
    17. Been, Vicki & Ellen, Ingrid Gould & Gedal, Michael & Glaeser, Edward & McCabe, Brian J., 2016. "Preserving history or restricting development? The heterogeneous effects of historic districts on local housing markets in New York City," Journal of Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 92(C), pages 16-30.
    18. Francesc Valls Dalmau & Pilar Garcia-Almirall & Ernest Redondo Domínguez & David Fonseca Escudero, 2014. "From Raw Data to Meaningful Information: A Representational Approach to Cadastral Databases in Relation to Urban Planning," Future Internet, MDPI, vol. 6(4), pages 1-28, October.
    19. Khalid Mohammed Almatar, 2024. "Rehumanize the Streets and Make Them More Smart and Livable in Arab Cities: Case Study: Tahlia Street; Riyadh City, Saudi Arabia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(8), pages 1-17, April.
    20. Jing Shen & Jian Cui & Mengfei Li & Caitlin Vitosky Clarke & Yuanyuan Gao & Ruopeng An, 2021. "Green Space and Physical Activity in China: A Systematic Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(23), pages 1-21, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:lauspo:v:111:y:2021:i:c:s0264837721004853. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Joice Jiang (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/land-use-policy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.