IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jlands/v11y2022i8p1196-d875805.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Research on the Evaluation of Geological Environment Carrying Capacity Based on the AHP-CRITIC Empowerment Method

Author

Listed:
  • Jiawei Qi

    (College of Surveying and Mapping Engineering, Changchun Institute of Technology, Changchun 130021, China)

  • Yichen Zhang

    (College of Jilin Emergency Management, Changchun Institute of Technology, Changchun 130012, China)

  • Jiquan Zhang

    (School of Environment, Northeast Normal University, Changchun 130117, China)

  • Yanan Chen

    (College of Jilin Emergency Management, Changchun Institute of Technology, Changchun 130012, China)

  • Chenyang Wu

    (College of Surveying and Mapping Engineering, Changchun Institute of Technology, Changchun 130021, China)

  • Chenyu Duan

    (College of Water and Environmental Engineering, Changchun Institute of Technology, Changchun 130012, China)

  • Zhongshuai Cheng

    (College of Jilin Emergency Management, Changchun Institute of Technology, Changchun 130012, China)

  • Zengkai Pan

    (College of Surveying and Mapping Engineering, Changchun Institute of Technology, Changchun 130021, China)

Abstract

In this study, two districts, Erdaojiang District and Dongchang District, in Tonghua City, Jilin Province, were evaluated for their geological environment carrying capacity. A total of 14 evaluation indicators were selected from the three aspects of the geological environment, ecological environment, and social environment to make it more comprehensive to evaluate the carrying capacity of the geological environment. Using the AHP and CRITIC methods, the subjective weight and objective weight of each evaluation index are obtained, and the combined weight is calculated by game theory. When combined with the GIS and combined weights, the distribution map of the geological environment carrying capacity is obtained, and it is classified into four grades: excellent, good, medium, and poor. A comprehensive evaluation of the carrying capacity of the geological environment is carried out. The following conclusions are drawn: the overall carrying capacity of the geological environment in the study area is good, and the carrying capacity of individual areas is poor. The comparative analysis of the good and poor areas provides a scientific basis for future environmental governance and urban planning and provides a scientific basis for geological disasters and mines.

Suggested Citation

  • Jiawei Qi & Yichen Zhang & Jiquan Zhang & Yanan Chen & Chenyang Wu & Chenyu Duan & Zhongshuai Cheng & Zengkai Pan, 2022. "Research on the Evaluation of Geological Environment Carrying Capacity Based on the AHP-CRITIC Empowerment Method," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(8), pages 1-17, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:11:y:2022:i:8:p:1196-:d:875805
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/11/8/1196/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/11/8/1196/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Wen Song & Wei Song & Haihong Gu & Fuping Li, 2020. "Progress in the Remote Sensing Monitoring of the Ecological Environment in Mining Areas," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(6), pages 1-17, March.
    2. Alireza Alinezhad & Javad Khalili, 2019. "New Methods and Applications in Multiple Attribute Decision Making (MADM)," International Series in Operations Research and Management Science, Springer, number 978-3-030-15009-9, June.
    3. Shuaibing Zhang & Kaixu Zhao & Shuoyang Ji & Yafang Guo & Fengqi Wu & Jingxian Liu & Fei Xie, 2022. "Evolution Characteristics, Eco-Environmental Response and Influencing Factors of Production-Living-Ecological Space in the Qinghai–Tibet Plateau," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(7), pages 1-26, July.
    4. Xiaotong Wang & Jiazheng Han & Jian Lin, 2022. "Response of Land Use and Net Primary Productivity to Coal Mining: A Case Study of Huainan City and Its Mining Areas," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(7), pages 1-16, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Jinsheng Li & Tianhao Li & Tingting Jing & Zhi Wang & Tianhao Zhong & Lina Zhou & Hailong Jiang, 2025. "Evaluation of Environmental Quality in Northern Winter Fattening Pig Houses Based on AHP-EWM," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 15(6), pages 1-16, March.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Mohammed Ifkirne & Houssam El Bouhi & Siham Acharki & Quoc Bao Pham & Abdelouahed Farah & Nguyen Thi Thuy Linh, 2022. "Multi-Criteria GIS-Based Analysis for Mapping Suitable Sites for Onshore Wind Farms in Southeast France," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(10), pages 1-26, October.
    2. Martina Kuncova & Jana Seknickova, 2022. "Two-stage weighted PROMETHEE II with results’ visualization," Central European Journal of Operations Research, Springer;Slovak Society for Operations Research;Hungarian Operational Research Society;Czech Society for Operations Research;Österr. Gesellschaft für Operations Research (ÖGOR);Slovenian Society Informatika - Section for Operational Research;Croatian Operational Research Society, vol. 30(2), pages 547-571, June.
    3. Stefan Jovčić & Petr Průša, 2021. "A Hybrid MCDM Approach in Third-Party Logistics (3PL) Provider Selection," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 9(21), pages 1-19, October.
    4. Marco Locurcio & Francesco Tajani & Pierluigi Morano & Debora Anelli & Benedetto Manganelli, 2021. "Credit Risk Management of Property Investments through Multi-Criteria Indicators," Risks, MDPI, vol. 9(6), pages 1-23, June.
    5. Ahmed, Umair & Carpitella, Silvia & Certa, Antonella, 2021. "An integrated methodological approach for optimising complex systems subjected to predictive maintenance," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 216(C).
    6. Ning Lu & Yefei Li & Bochu Xu, 2022. "Evaluation of the Suitability of Smart Health Products for Aging Based on the IIVAHP-CRITIC Model: A Case Study of Smart Health Kiosk," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(15), pages 1-16, July.
    7. Halil Kete & Fatih Karasaç, 2022. "Evaluation of the Economic Performances of the European Union Countries and Turkey in the Covid-19 Process with the COPRAS Method," Journal of Economic Policy Researches, Istanbul University, Faculty of Economics, vol. 9(2), pages 373-395, July.
    8. Guan, Yanjun & Wang, Juan & Zhou, Wei & Bai, Zhongke & Cao, Yingui, 2023. "Delimiting supervision zones to inform the revision of land reclamation management modes in coal mining areas: A perspective from the succession characteristics of rehabilitated vegetation," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 131(C).
    9. He Gao & Wei Song, 2022. "Assessing the Landscape Ecological Risks of Land-Use Change," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(21), pages 1-25, October.
    10. Zhu, Mengshu & Fang, Jiakun & Ai, Xiaomeng & Cui, Shichang & Feng, Yuang & Li, Peng & Zhang, Yihan & Zheng, Yongle & Chen, Zhe & Wen, Jinyu, 2023. "A comprehensive methodology for optimal planning of remote integrated energy systems," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 285(C).
    11. Lei Zhang & Wei Song & Wen Song, 2020. "Assessment of Agricultural Drought Risk in the Lancang-Mekong Region, South East Asia," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(17), pages 1-24, August.
    12. Ji-Min Sur & Young-Ju Kim, 2024. "Multi-Criteria Model for Identifying and Ranking Risky Types of Maritime Accidents Using Integrated Ordinal Priority Approach and Grey Relational Analysis Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(14), pages 1-18, July.
    13. Ziyu Qin & Jia Wang & Yunhan Wang & Lihao Liu & Junye Zhou & Xinyu Fu, 2025. "Assessing the Impacts of New Quality Productivity on Sustainable Agriculture: Structural Mechanisms and Optimization Strategies—Empirical Evidence from China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(6), pages 1-47, March.
    14. Indre Siksnelyte-Butkiene & Dalia Streimikiene & Tomas Balezentis & Virgilijus Skulskis, 2021. "A Systematic Literature Review of Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Methods for Sustainable Selection of Insulation Materials in Buildings," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(2), pages 1-21, January.
    15. Shanfeng Wu & Wenbo Mo & Runlei Zhang & Xuan Xiao & E Li & Xi Liu & Nan Yang, 2025. "Spatiotemporal Evolution and Driving Mechanism of Production–Living–Ecological Space from 1990 to 2020 in Hunan, Central China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(4), pages 1-25, February.
    16. Yueming Sun & Yanling Zhao & He Ren & Zhibin Li & Yanjie Tang, 2024. "Waterlogging Stability Identification: Ray-Based Model Application in Mining Areas with High Groundwater Levels—A Case Study of Huainan Coal Field," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(12), pages 1-18, November.
    17. Selef García-Orozco & Gregorio Vargas-Gutiérrez & Stephanie Ordóñez-Sánchez & Rodolfo Silva, 2023. "Using Multi-Criteria Decision Making in Quality Function Deployment for Offshore Renewable Energies," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(18), pages 1-21, September.
    18. Jelena Kilić Pamuković & Katarina Rogulj & Nikša Jajac & Siniša Mastelić-Ivić, 2023. "Model of Priority Ranking of Cadastral Parcels for Planning the Implementation of Urban Consolidation," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(1), pages 1-26, January.
    19. Tsigdinos, Stefanos & Paraskevopoulos, Yannis & Tzouras, Panagiotis G. & Kepaptsoglou, Konstantinos, 2024. "Development of a complete method for re-conceptualizing street classification in an urban municipality," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 121(C).
    20. Parishani, Maede & Rasti-Barzoki, Morteza, 2024. "CWBCM method to determine the importance of classification performance evaluation criteria in machine learning: Case studies of COVID-19, Diabetes, and Thyroid Disease," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 127(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:11:y:2022:i:8:p:1196-:d:875805. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.