Author
Listed:
- Zhengtong Lv
(School of Emergency Management and Safety Engineering, Jiangxi University of Science and Technology, Ganzhou 341000, China
Jiangxi Provincial Key Laboratory of Safe and Efficient Mining of Rare Metal Resource, Jiangxi University of Science and Technology, Ganzhou 341000, China)
- Junqiao Xiong
(School of Emergency Management and Safety Engineering, Jiangxi University of Science and Technology, Ganzhou 341000, China
Jiangxi Provincial Key Laboratory of Safe and Efficient Mining of Rare Metal Resource, Jiangxi University of Science and Technology, Ganzhou 341000, China)
- Mingfu Zhuo
(School of Civil and Surveying & Mapping Engineering, Jiangxi University of Science and Technology, Ganzhou 341000, China)
- Yuxian Ke
(School of Emergency Management and Safety Engineering, Jiangxi University of Science and Technology, Ganzhou 341000, China
Jiangxi Provincial Key Laboratory of Safe and Efficient Mining of Rare Metal Resource, Jiangxi University of Science and Technology, Ganzhou 341000, China
Yichun Lithium New Energy Industry Research Institute, Jiangxi University of Science and Technology, Yichun 336000, China)
- Qian Kang
(School of Emergency Management and Safety Engineering, Jiangxi University of Science and Technology, Ganzhou 341000, China
Jiangxi Provincial Key Laboratory of Safe and Efficient Mining of Rare Metal Resource, Jiangxi University of Science and Technology, Ganzhou 341000, China)
Abstract
The increasing frequency and severity of forest fires, driven by climate change and intensified human activities, pose substantial threats to ecological security and sustainable development. However, most assessments remain centered on occurrence risk, lack a resilience-oriented perspective and comprehensive indicator systems, and therefore offer limited guidance for building system resilience. This study developed a forest fire resilience (FFR) assessment framework with 25 indicators in three levels and six domains across four resilience dimensions. Balancing expert judgment and data, we obtained indicator weights by integrating the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) and the Criteria Importance Through Intercriteria Correlation (CRITIC) via a game-theoretic scheme. The analysis revealed that, among the level-2 indicators, climate factors, infrastructure, and vegetation characteristics exert the greatest influence on FFR. At the level-3 indicator scale, monthly minimum relative humidity, fine fuel load per unit area, and the deployment of smart monitoring systems were critical. Among the four resilience dimensions, absorption capacity plays the predominant role in shaping disaster response. Building on these findings, the study proposes targeted strategies to enhance FFR and applies the assessment framework to twelve administrative divisions of Baise City, China, highlighting marked spatial variability in resilience levels. The results offer valuable theoretical insights and practical guidance for strengthening FFR.
Suggested Citation
Zhengtong Lv & Junqiao Xiong & Mingfu Zhuo & Yuxian Ke & Qian Kang, 2025.
"Resilience Assessment of Forest Fires Based on a Game-Theoretic Combination Weighting Method,"
Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(17), pages 1-24, September.
Handle:
RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:17:p:7907-:d:1740766
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:17:p:7907-:d:1740766. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.