IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jlands/v11y2022i4p561-d790814.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Agroecological Efficiency Evaluation Based on Multi-Source Remote Sensing Data in a Typical County of the Tibetan Plateau

Author

Listed:
  • Qizhi Wang

    (Key Laboratory of Agricultural Remote Sensing, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Institute of Agricultural Resources and Regional Planning, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing 100081, China)

  • Maofang Gao

    (Key Laboratory of Agricultural Remote Sensing, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Institute of Agricultural Resources and Regional Planning, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing 100081, China)

  • Huijie Zhang

    (Agricultural Information Institute, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing 100081, China)

Abstract

Evaluating agricultural ecology can help us to understand regional environmental status and contribute to the sustainable development of agricultural ecosystems. Furthermore, the results of eco-environmental assessment can provide data support for policy-making and agricultural production. The application of multi-source remote-sensing technology has the advantages of being fast, accurate and wide ranging. It can reveal the status of regional ecological environments, and is of great significance to monitoring their quality. In this paper, an agroecological efficiency evaluation model was constructed by combining remote sensing data and ecological index (EI). Multi-source remote-sensing data were used to obtain the evaluation index. Indicators collected from satellites, such as biological richness, vegetation cover, water network density, land stress, and pollution load, were used to quantitatively evaluate the agroecological efficiency of Rangtang County in the Tibetan Plateau. The results showed that the EI of Rangtang County increased from 61.77 to 65.10 during 2000–2020, which means that the eco-environmental quality of this area was good, and it has shown an obviously improving trend over the past 20 years. Rangtang County has converted more than 30 km²of grassland into woodland over the past 20 years. Climate change and human activities have had combined effects on the ecological environment of this area. The change in ecological environment quality is greatly affected by human disturbance. Policymakers should continue setting up nature reserves and should implement the policy of returning farmland to forests. Unreasonable grazing and rational allocation of land resources are still critical points of concern for future ecological environment construction. EI, combined with remote sensing and statistical data, is proven to be able to reasonably represent changes in ecological environment in Rangtang County, thus providing more possibilities for ecological evaluation on the Tibetan Plateau, and even the whole world.

Suggested Citation

  • Qizhi Wang & Maofang Gao & Huijie Zhang, 2022. "Agroecological Efficiency Evaluation Based on Multi-Source Remote Sensing Data in a Typical County of the Tibetan Plateau," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(4), pages 1-24, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:11:y:2022:i:4:p:561-:d:790814
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/11/4/561/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/11/4/561/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Yahui Lv & Chao Zhang & Jiani Ma & Wenju Yun & Lulu Gao & Pengshan Li, 2019. "Sustainability Assessment of Smallholder Farmland Systems: Healthy Farmland System Assessment Framework," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(17), pages 1-19, August.
    2. Luong Van Pham & Carl Smith, 2014. "Drivers of agricultural sustainability in developing countries: a review," Environment Systems and Decisions, Springer, vol. 34(2), pages 326-341, June.
    3. Jianping Huang & Haipeng Yu & Aiguo Dai & Yun Wei & Litai Kang, 2017. "Drylands face potential threat under 2 °C global warming target," Nature Climate Change, Nature, vol. 7(6), pages 417-422, June.
    4. Aguilera, Eduardo & Díaz-Gaona, Cipriano & García-Laureano, Raquel & Reyes-Palomo, Carolina & Guzmán, Gloria I. & Ortolani, Livia & Sánchez-Rodríguez, Manuel & Rodríguez-Estévez, Vicente, 2020. "Agroecology for adaptation to climate change and resource depletion in the Mediterranean region. A review," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 181(C).
    5. Chen, Shaoqing & Chen, Bin & Fath, Brian D., 2013. "Ecological risk assessment on the system scale: A review of state-of-the-art models and future perspectives," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 250(C), pages 25-33.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Huan Tang & Jiawei Fang & Ruijie Xie & Xiuli Ji & Dayong Li & Jing Yuan, 2022. "Impact of Land Cover Change on a Typical Mining Region and Its Ecological Environment Quality Evaluation Using Remote Sensing Based Ecological Index (RSEI)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-22, October.
    2. Luís Silva & Luís Alcino Conceição & Fernando Cebola Lidon & Benvindo Maçãs, 2023. "Remote Monitoring of Crop Nitrogen Nutrition to Adjust Crop Models: A Review," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-23, April.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Blazquez-Soriano, Amparo & Ramos-Sandoval, Rosmery, 2022. "Information transfer as a tool to improve the resilience of farmers against the effects of climate change: The case of the Peruvian National Agrarian Innovation System," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 200(C).
    2. Begoña García Castellanos & Benjamín García García & José García García, 2023. "Economic and Environmental Effects of Replacing Inorganic Fertilizers with Organic Fertilizers in Three Rainfed Crops in a Semi-Arid Area," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(24), pages 1-22, December.
    3. Grechi, Laura & Franco, Antonio & Palmeri, Luca & Pivato, Alberto & Barausse, Alberto, 2016. "An ecosystem model of the lower Po river for use in ecological risk assessment of xenobiotics," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 332(C), pages 42-58.
    4. Xu Bi & Bianrong Chang & Fen Hou & Zihan Yang & Qi Fu & Bo Li, 2021. "Assessment of Spatio-Temporal Variation and Driving Mechanism of Ecological Environment Quality in the Arid Regions of Central Asia, Xinjiang," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(13), pages 1-23, July.
    5. Borrett, Stuart R. & Sheble, Laura & Moody, James & Anway, Evan C., 2018. "Bibliometric review of ecological network analysis: 2010–2016," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 382(C), pages 63-82.
    6. Samane Ghazali & Hossein Azadi & Kristina Janečková & Petr Sklenička & Alishir Kurban & Sedef Cakir, 2021. "Indigenous knowledge about climate change and sustainability of nomadic livelihoods: understanding adaptability coping strategies," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 23(11), pages 16744-16768, November.
    7. Manuel González-Rosado & Luis Parras-Alcántara & Jesús Aguilera-Huertas & Beatriz Lozano-García, 2021. "Building an Agroecological Process towards Agricultural Sustainability: A Case Study from Southern Spain," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 11(10), pages 1-16, October.
    8. Li Li & Xiaoping Zhou & Lan Yang & Jinglong Duan & Zhuo Zeng, 2022. "Spatio-Temporal Characteristics and Influencing Factors of Ecological Risk in China’s North–South Transition Zone," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-17, May.
    9. Jiani Ma & Chao Zhang & Wenju Yun & Yahui Lv & Wanling Chen & Dehai Zhu, 2020. "The Temporal Analysis of Regional Cultivated Land Productivity with GPP Based on 2000–2018 MODIS Data," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(1), pages 1-16, January.
    10. Yang, Jin & Chen, Bin, 2016. "Energy–water nexus of wind power generation systems," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 169(C), pages 1-13.
    11. Chen, Shaoqing & Chen, Bin & Fath, Brian D., 2015. "Assessing the cumulative environmental impact of hydropower construction on river systems based on energy network model," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 42(C), pages 78-92.
    12. Yuan-Wei Du & Yi-Pin Fan, 2023. "Spatiotemporal Dynamics of Agricultural Sustainability Assessment: A Study across 30 Chinese Provinces," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(11), pages 1-23, June.
    13. Andrzej Bialas, 2022. "Towards a Software Tool Supporting Decisions in Planning Heap Revitalization Processes," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(5), pages 1-33, February.
    14. Razieh Doregar Zavareh & Tooraj Dana & Emad Roayaei & Seyed Massoud Monavari & Seyed Ali Jozi, 2022. "The Environmental Risk Assessment of Fire and Explosion in Storage Tanks of Petroleum Products," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(17), pages 1-17, August.
    15. Zagaria, Cecilia & Schulp, Catharina J.E. & Malek, Žiga & Verburg, Peter H., 2023. "Potential for land and water management adaptations in Mediterranean croplands under climate change," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 205(C).
    16. Dardonville, Manon & Legrand, Baptiste & Clivot, Hugues & Bernardin, Claire & Bockstaller, Christian & Therond, Olivier, 2022. "Assessment of ecosystem services and natural capital dynamics in agroecosystems," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 54(C).
    17. Andrzej Białas & Artur Kozłowski, 2024. "Computer-Aided Planning for Land Development of Post-Mining Degraded Areas," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(4), pages 1-30, February.
    18. Chrysanthi Charatsari & Evagelos D. Lioutas & Afroditi Papadaki-Klavdianou & Alex Koutsouris & Anastasios Michailidis, 2022. "Experiential, Social, Connectivist, or Transformative Learning? Farm Advisors and the Construction of Agroecological Knowledge," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(4), pages 1-15, February.
    19. Liu, Yating & Chen, Bin, 2020. "Water-energy scarcity nexus risk in the national trade system based on multiregional input-output and network environ analyses," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 268(C).
    20. Maria G. Lampridi & Claus G. Sørensen & Dionysis Bochtis, 2019. "Agricultural Sustainability: A Review of Concepts and Methods," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(18), pages 1-27, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:11:y:2022:i:4:p:561-:d:790814. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.