IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jlands/v10y2021i9p903-d623018.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Land Use Transitions: Progress, Challenges and Prospects

Author

Listed:
  • Hualou Long

    (School of Public Administration, Guangxi University, Nanning 530004, China
    Institute of Geographic Sciences and Natural Resources Research, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, China)

  • Yingnan Zhang

    (School of Public Affairs, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310058, China)

  • Li Ma

    (School of Public Affairs, Chongqing University, Chongqing 400044, China)

  • Shuangshuang Tu

    (Institute of Geographic Sciences and Natural Resources Research, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, China
    Key Laboratory of Environment Change and Resources Use in Beibu Gulf, Nanning Normal University, The Ministry of Education, Nanning 530001, China)

Abstract

The study of land use transition has generally become an important breakthrough point to deeply understand the human-land interaction and reveal major socio-economic development issues and related environmental effects. Attempting to provide scientific support for sustainable land use and environmental management, this review systematically analyzes the overall picture, development trends, key fields and hot topics of land use transition research in the past two decades from a comprehensive perspective, which incorporates two complementary parts including the systematic quantitative literature review (based on CiteSpace) and the traditional literature review. The results reveal that: a. current research presents three characteristics, i.e., focusing on complex social issues, driven by realistic demand, and research branches becoming clearer and more systematic; b. there are four key fields and hot topics in land use transition research, i.e., i. theories and hypothesis of land use transition; ii. measuring land use transition; iii. the impacts of land use transition on “social-economic-ecological” system; iv. drivers and regulation of land use transition. However, challenges remain, current land use transition research is still to some extent fragmented, and it should be enriched by integrating with land system science. The dominant morphology biased should be redressed by underlining the recessive morphology transition process. Meanwhile, new techniques and methods are necessary to observe, track, monitor and model the recessive attributes. Finally, distant drivers of land use transition should not be ignored in this rapidly globalizing world.

Suggested Citation

  • Hualou Long & Yingnan Zhang & Li Ma & Shuangshuang Tu, 2021. "Land Use Transitions: Progress, Challenges and Prospects," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(9), pages 1-20, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:10:y:2021:i:9:p:903-:d:623018
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/10/9/903/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/10/9/903/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Drummond, Mark A. & Griffith, Glenn E. & Auch, Roger F. & Stier, Michael P. & Taylor, Janis L. & Hester, David J. & Riegle, Jodi L. & McBeth, Jamie L., 2017. "Understanding recurrent land use processes and long-term transitions in the dynamic south-central United States, c. 1800 to 2006," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 68(C), pages 345-354.
    2. Ma, Li & Long, Hualou & Tu, Shuangshuang & Zhang, Yingnan & Zheng, Yuhan, 2020. "Farmland transition in China and its policy implications," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 92(C).
    3. Johansen, Pia Heike & Ejrnæs, Rasmus & Kronvang, Brian & Olsen, Jakob Vesterlund & Præstholm, Søren & Schou, Jesper S., 2018. "Pursuing collective impact: A novel indicator-based approach to assessment of shared measurements when planning for multifunctional land consolidation," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 73(C), pages 102-114.
    4. Chaomei Chen, 2006. "CiteSpace II: Detecting and visualizing emerging trends and transient patterns in scientific literature," Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 57(3), pages 359-377, February.
    5. Deines, Jillian M. & Schipanski, Meagan E. & Golden, Bill & Zipper, Samuel C. & Nozari, Soheil & Rottler, Caitlin & Guerrero, Bridget & Sharda, Vaishali, 2020. "Transitions from irrigated to dryland agriculture in the Ogallala Aquifer: Land use suitability and regional economic impacts," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 233(C).
    6. Beardmore, Leslie & Heagney, Elizabeth & Sullivan, Caroline A., 2019. "Complementary land use in the Richmond River catchment: Evaluating economic and environmental benefits," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 87(C).
    7. Stuart L. Pimm & Peter Raven, 2000. "Extinction by numbers," Nature, Nature, vol. 403(6772), pages 843-845, February.
    8. Quintero-Angel, Mauricio & Coles, Ashley & Duque-Nivia, Andrés A., 2021. "A historical perspective of landscape appropriation and land use transitions in the Colombian South Pacific," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 181(C).
    9. Fan, Ze-Meng & Li, Jing & Yue, Tian-Xiang, 2013. "Land-cover changes of biome transition zones in Loess Plateau of China," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 252(C), pages 129-140.
    10. Bertoni, Danilo & Aletti, Giacomo & Ferrandi, Giulia & Micheletti, Alessandra & Cavicchioli, Daniele & Pretolani, Roberto, 2018. "Farmland Use Transitions After the CAP Greening: a Preliminary Analysis Using Markov Chains Approach," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 79(C), pages 789-800.
    11. Bonilla-Moheno, Martha & Aide, T. Mitchell, 2020. "Beyond deforestation: Land cover transitions in Mexico," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 178(C).
    12. Nolte, Christoph & Gobbi, Beatriz & le Polain de Waroux, Yann & Piquer-Rodríguez, María & Butsic, Van & Lambin, Eric F., 2017. "Decentralized Land Use Zoning Reduces Large-scale Deforestation in a Major Agricultural Frontier," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 136(C), pages 30-40.
    13. Shin, HaeRan & Chae, Sangwon, 2018. "Urbanisation and land use transition in a second-tier city: The emergence of small factories in Gimpo, South Korea," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 77(C), pages 534-541.
    14. Zhao, Pengjun & Yang, Hanzi & Kong, Lu & Liu, Yunshu & Liu, Di, 2018. "Disintegration of metro and land development in transition China: A dynamic analysis in Beijing," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 116(C), pages 290-307.
    15. Hinojosa, Leonith & Lambin, Eric F. & Mzoughi, Naoufel & Napoléone, Claude, 2018. "Constraints to farming in the Mediterranean Alps: Reconciling environmental and agricultural policies," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 75(C), pages 726-733.
    16. Richard Aspinall & Michele Staiano, 2017. "A Conceptual Model for Land System Dynamics as a Coupled Human–Environment System," Land, MDPI, vol. 6(4), pages 1-9, November.
    17. Qu, Yanbo & Jiang, Guang-hui & Li, Zitong & Tian, Yaya & Wei, Shuwen, 2019. "Understanding rural land use transition and regional consolidation implications in China," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 82(C), pages 742-753.
    18. Nguyen, Quang & Kim, Doo-Chul, 2020. "Reconsidering rural land use and livelihood transition under the pressure of urbanization in Vietnam: A case study of Hanoi," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 99(C).
    19. Chen, Kunqiu & Long, Hualou & Liao, Liuwen & Tu, Shuangshuang & Li, Tingting, 2020. "Land use transitions and urban-rural integrated development: Theoretical framework and China’s evidence," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 92(C).
    20. Křeček, Josef & Haigh, Martin, 2019. "Land use policy in headwater catchments," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 80(C), pages 410-414.
    21. Ge, Dazhuan & Wang, Zhihua & Tu, Shuangshuang & Long, Hualou & Yan, Huili & Sun, Dongqi & Qiao, Weifeng, 2019. "Coupling analysis of greenhouse-led farmland transition and rural transformation development in China’s traditional farming area: A case of Qingzhou City," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 86(C), pages 113-125.
    22. Xu, Mengyao & Zhang, Zhengfeng, 2021. "Spatial differentiation characteristics and driving mechanism of rural-industrial Land transition: A case study of Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei region, China," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 102(C).
    23. Tian, Junfeng & Wang, Binyan & Zhang, Chuanrong & Li, Weidong & Wang, Shijun, 2020. "Mechanism of regional land use transition in underdeveloped areas of China: A case study of northeast China," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 94(C).
    24. Lu, Xiao & Shi, Yangyang & Chen, Changling & Yu, Miao, 2017. "Monitoring cropland transition and its impact on ecosystem services value in developed regions of China: A case study of Jiangsu Province," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 69(C), pages 25-40.
    25. Janus, Jaroslaw & Markuszewska, Iwona, 2019. "Forty years later: Assessment of the long-lasting effectiveness of land consolidation projects," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 83(C), pages 22-31.
    26. Zhu, Fengkai & Zhang, Fengrong & Ke, Xinli, 2018. "Rural industrial restructuring in China’s metropolitan suburbs: Evidence from the land use transition of rural enterprises in suburban Beijing," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 74(C), pages 121-129.
    27. Rignall, Karen & Kusunose, Yoko, 2018. "Governing livelihood and land use transitions: The role of customary tenure in southeastern Morocco," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 78(C), pages 91-103.
    28. Wentland, Scott A. & Ancona, Zachary H. & Bagstad, Kenneth J. & Boyd, James & Hass, Julie L. & Gindelsky, Marina & Moulton, Jeremy G., 2020. "Accounting for land in the United States: Integrating physical land cover, land use, and monetary valuation," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 46(C).
    29. Karina Winkler & Richard Fuchs & Mark Rounsevell & Martin Herold, 2021. "Global land use changes are four times greater than previously estimated," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 12(1), pages 1-10, December.
    30. Aquilué, Núria & De Cáceres, Miquel & Fortin, Marie-Josée & Fall, Andrew & Brotons, Lluís, 2017. "A spatial allocation procedure to model land-use/land-cover changes: Accounting for occurrence and spread processes," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 344(C), pages 73-86.
    31. Djanibekov, Utkur & Finger, Robert, 2018. "Agricultural risks and farm land consolidation process in transition countries: The case of cotton production in Uzbekistan," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 164(C), pages 223-235.
    32. Weber, Jean-Louis, 2007. "Implementation of land and ecosystem accounts at the European Environment Agency," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 61(4), pages 695-707, March.
    33. Ge, Dazhuan & Long, Hualou & Zhang, Yingnan & Ma, Li & Li, Tingting, 2018. "Farmland transition and its influences on grain production in China," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 70(C), pages 94-105.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Dong Han & Jiajun Qiao & Qiankun Zhu & Jie Xiao & Yuling Ma, 2022. "Endogenous Driving Forces in Ecology-Production-Living Space Changes at Micro-Scale: A Mountain Town Example in Inland China," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(12), pages 1-30, December.
    2. Xinyao Li & Lingzhi Wang & Bryan Pijanowski & Lingpeng Pan & Hichem Omrani & Anqi Liang & Yi Qu, 2022. "The Spatio-Temporal Pattern and Transition Mode of Recessive Cultivated Land Use Morphology in the Huaibei Region of the Jiangsu Province," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(11), pages 1-16, November.
    3. Ma, Li & Long, Hualou & Tu, Shuangshuang & Zhang, Yingnan & Zheng, Yuhan, 2020. "Farmland transition in China and its policy implications," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 92(C).
    4. Yanbo Qu & Xiaozhen Dong & Lingyun Zhan & Hongyun Si & Zongli Ping & Weiya Zhu, 2021. "Scale Transition and Structure–Function Synergy Differentiation of Rural Residential Land: A Dimensionality Reduction Transmission Process from Macro to Micro Scale," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(6), pages 1-26, June.
    5. Xuan Luo & Zhaomin Tong & Yifan Xie & Rui An & Zhaochen Yang & Yanfang Liu, 2022. "Land Use Change under Population Migration and Its Implications for Human–Land Relationship," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(6), pages 1-22, June.
    6. Yuanyuan Yang & Wenkai Bao & Yuheng Li & Yongsheng Wang & Zongfeng Chen, 2020. "Land Use Transition and Its Eco-Environmental Effects in the Beijing–Tianjin–Hebei Urban Agglomeration: A Production–Living–Ecological Perspective," Land, MDPI, vol. 9(9), pages 1-24, August.
    7. Shangan Ke & Yueqi Wu & Haiying Cui & Xinhai Lu & Kun Ge & Danling Chen, 2021. "The Temporal-Spatial Pattern and Coupling Coordination of the Green Transition of Farmland Use: Evidence from Hubei Province," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(21), pages 1-15, October.
    8. Meijing Chen & Zhongke Bai & Qingri Wang & Zeyu Shi, 2021. "Habitat Quality Effect and Driving Mechanism of Land Use Transitions: A Case Study of Henan Water Source Area of the Middle Route of the South-to-North Water Transfer Project," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(8), pages 1-20, July.
    9. Yuchen Pan & Li Ma & Hong Tang & Yiwen Wu & Zhongjian Yang, 2021. "Land Use Transitions under Rapid Urbanization in Chengdu-Chongqing Region: A Perspective of Coupling Water and Land Resources," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(8), pages 1-21, August.
    10. Feifei Jiang & Fu Chen & Yan Sun & Ziyi Hua & Xinhua Zhu & Jing Ma, 2023. "Spatiotemporal Pattern and Driving Mechanism of Cultivated Land Use Transition in China," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(10), pages 1-20, September.
    11. Xu, Mengyao & Zhang, Zhengfeng, 2021. "Spatial differentiation characteristics and driving mechanism of rural-industrial Land transition: A case study of Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei region, China," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 102(C).
    12. Tao, Jieyi & Lu, Yuqi & Ge, Dazhuan & Dong, Ping & Gong, Xiao & Ma, Xiaobin, 2022. "The spatial pattern of agricultural ecosystem services from the production-living-ecology perspective: A case study of the Huaihai Economic Zone, China," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 122(C).
    13. Ligang Lyu & Zhoubing Gao & Hualou Long & Xiaorui Wang & Yeting Fan, 2021. "Farmland Use Transition in a Typical Farming Area: The Case of Sihong County in the Huang-Huai-Hai Plain of China," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(4), pages 1-16, March.
    14. Xiao Lyu & Yanan Wang & Yuntai Zhao & Shandong Niu, 2022. "Spatio‐temporal pattern and mechanism of coordinated development of “population–land–industry–money” in rural areas of three provinces in Northeast China," Growth and Change, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 53(3), pages 1333-1361, September.
    15. Yi Lou & Guanyi Yin & Yue Xin & Shuai Xie & Guanghao Li & Shuang Liu & Xiaoming Wang, 2021. "Recessive Transition Mechanism of Arable Land Use Based on the Perspective of Coupling Coordination of Input–Output: A Case Study of 31 Provinces in China," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(1), pages 1-27, January.
    16. Dang, Yuxuan & Zhao, Zhenting & Kong, Xiangbin & Lei, Ming & Liao, Yubo & Xie, Zhen & Song, Wei, 2023. "Discerning the process of cultivated land governance transition in China since the reform and opening-up-- Based on the multiple streams framework," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 133(C).
    17. Zhiyuan Zhu & Zhenzhong Dai & Shilin Li & Yongzhong Feng, 2022. "Spatiotemporal Evolution of Non-Grain Production of Cultivated Land and Its Underlying Factors in China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(13), pages 1-15, July.
    18. Zhiheng Yang & Nengneng Shen & Yanbo Qu & Bailin Zhang, 2021. "Association between Rural Land Use Transition and Urban–Rural Integration Development: From 2009 to 2018 Based on County-Level Data in Shandong Province, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(11), pages 1-22, November.
    19. Xing Niu & Fenghua Liao & Ziming Liu & Guancen Wu, 2022. "Spatial–Temporal Characteristics and Driving Mechanisms of Land–Use Transition from the Perspective of Urban–Rural Transformation Development: A Case Study of the Yangtze River Delta," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(5), pages 1-20, April.
    20. Yanbo Qu & Meijing Wu & Lingyun Zhan & Ran Shang, 2023. "Multifunctional Evolution and Allocation Optimization of Rural Residential Land in China," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(2), pages 1-23, January.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:10:y:2021:i:9:p:903-:d:623018. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.