IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jlands/v10y2021i2p128-d489295.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Implications of Bioenergy Cropping for Soil: Remote Sensing Identification of Silage Maize Cultivation and Risk Assessment Concerning Soil Erosion and Compaction

Author

Listed:
  • Thorsten Ruf

    (Department of Soil Science, Faculty of Regional and Environmental Sciences, University of Trier, 54296 Trier, Germany)

  • Mario Gilcher

    (Department of Environmental Remote Sensing and Geoinformatics, Faculty of Regional and Environmental Sciences, University of Trier, 54296 Trier, Germany)

  • Thomas Udelhoven

    (Department of Environmental Remote Sensing and Geoinformatics, Faculty of Regional and Environmental Sciences, University of Trier, 54296 Trier, Germany)

  • Christoph Emmerling

    (Department of Soil Science, Faculty of Regional and Environmental Sciences, University of Trier, 54296 Trier, Germany)

Abstract

Energy transition strategies in Germany have led to an expansion of energy crop cultivation in landscape, with silage maize as most valuable feedstock. The changes in the traditional cropping systems, with increasing shares of maize, raised concerns about the sustainability of agricultural feedstock production regarding threats to soil health. However, spatially explicit data about silage maize cultivation are missing; thus, implications for soil cannot be estimated in a precise way. With this study, we firstly aimed to track the fields cultivated with maize based on remote sensing data. Secondly, available soil data were target-specifically processed to determine the site-specific vulnerability of the soils for erosion and compaction. The generated, spatially-explicit data served as basis for a differentiated analysis of the development of the agricultural biogas sector, associated maize cultivation and its implications for soil health. In the study area, located in a low mountain range region in Western Germany, the number and capacity of biogas producing units increased by 25 installations and 10,163 kW from 2009 to 2016. The remote sensing-based classification approach showed that the maize cultivation area was expanded by 16% from 7305 to 8447 hectares. Thus, maize cultivation accounted for about 20% of the arable land use; however, with distinct local differences. Significant shares of about 30% of the maize cultivation was done on fields that show at least high potentials for soil erosion exceeding 25 t soil ha −1 a −1 . Furthermore, about 10% of the maize cultivation was done on fields that pedogenetically show an elevated risk for soil compaction. In order to reach more sustainable cultivation systems of feedstock for anaerobic digestion, changes in cultivated crops and management strategies are urgently required, particularly against first signs of climate change. The presented approach can regionally be modified in order to develop site-adapted, sustainable bioenergy cropping systems.

Suggested Citation

  • Thorsten Ruf & Mario Gilcher & Thomas Udelhoven & Christoph Emmerling, 2021. "Implications of Bioenergy Cropping for Soil: Remote Sensing Identification of Silage Maize Cultivation and Risk Assessment Concerning Soil Erosion and Compaction," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(2), pages 1-16, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:10:y:2021:i:2:p:128-:d:489295
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/10/2/128/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/10/2/128/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Michael Kuhwald & Katja Dörnhöfer & Natascha Oppelt & Rainer Duttmann, 2018. "Spatially Explicit Soil Compaction Risk Assessment of Arable Soils at Regional Scale: The SaSCiA-Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(5), pages 1-29, May.
    2. Wright, Marvin N. & Ziegler, Andreas, 2017. "ranger: A Fast Implementation of Random Forests for High Dimensional Data in C++ and R," Journal of Statistical Software, Foundation for Open Access Statistics, vol. 77(i01).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Lena Wöhl & Thorsten Ruf & Christoph Emmerling & Jan Thiele & Stefan Schrader, 2023. "Assessment of Earthworm Services on Litter Mineralisation and Nutrient Release in Annual and Perennial Energy Crops ( Zea mays vs. Silphium perfoliatum )," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 13(2), pages 1-20, February.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Mariana Oliveira & Luís Torgo & Vítor Santos Costa, 2021. "Evaluation Procedures for Forecasting with Spatiotemporal Data," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 9(6), pages 1-27, March.
    2. Monika Vilkiene & Ieva Mockeviciene & Grazina Kadziene & Danute Karcauskiene & Regina Repsiene & Ona Auskalniene, 2023. "Bacterial Communities: Interaction to Abiotic Conditions under Effect of Anthropogenic Pressure," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(14), pages 1-15, July.
    3. Arjan S. Gosal & Janine A. McMahon & Katharine M. Bowgen & Catherine H. Hoppe & Guy Ziv, 2021. "Identifying and Mapping Groups of Protected Area Visitors by Environmental Awareness," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(6), pages 1-14, May.
    4. Albert Stuart Reece & Gary Kenneth Hulse, 2022. "European Epidemiological Patterns of Cannabis- and Substance-Related Congenital Neurological Anomalies: Geospatiotemporal and Causal Inferential Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(1), pages 1-35, December.
    5. Michael Parzinger & Lucia Hanfstaengl & Ferdinand Sigg & Uli Spindler & Ulrich Wellisch & Markus Wirnsberger, 2020. "Residual Analysis of Predictive Modelling Data for Automated Fault Detection in Building’s Heating, Ventilation and Air Conditioning Systems," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(17), pages 1-18, August.
    6. Van Belle, Jente & Guns, Tias & Verbeke, Wouter, 2021. "Using shared sell-through data to forecast wholesaler demand in multi-echelon supply chains," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 288(2), pages 466-479.
    7. Albert Stuart Reece & Gary Kenneth Hulse, 2022. "European Epidemiological Patterns of Cannabis- and Substance-Related Body Wall Congenital Anomalies: Geospatiotemporal and Causal Inferential Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(15), pages 1-38, July.
    8. Philipp Bach & Victor Chernozhukov & Malte S. Kurz & Martin Spindler & Sven Klaassen, 2021. "DoubleML -- An Object-Oriented Implementation of Double Machine Learning in R," Papers 2103.09603, arXiv.org, revised Feb 2024.
    9. Marchetto, Elisa & Da Re, Daniele & Tordoni, Enrico & Bazzichetto, Manuele & Zannini, Piero & Celebrin, Simone & Chieffallo, Ludovico & Malavasi, Marco & Rocchini, Duccio, 2023. "Testing the effect of sample prevalence and sampling methods on probability- and favourability-based SDMs," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 477(C).
    10. Jorge Luis Andrade & José Luis Valencia, 2022. "A Fuzzy Random Survival Forest for Predicting Lapses in Insurance Portfolios Containing Imprecise Data," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(1), pages 1-16, December.
    11. Eeva-Katri Kumpula & Pauline Norris & Adam C Pomerleau, 2020. "Stocks of paracetamol products stored in urban New Zealand households: A cross-sectional study," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(6), pages 1-11, June.
    12. Michael Bucker & Gero Szepannek & Alicja Gosiewska & Przemyslaw Biecek, 2020. "Transparency, Auditability and eXplainability of Machine Learning Models in Credit Scoring," Papers 2009.13384, arXiv.org.
    13. Jian Lu & Raheel Ahmad & Thomas Nguyen & Jeffrey Cifello & Humza Hemani & Jiangyuan Li & Jinguo Chen & Siyi Li & Jing Wang & Achouak Achour & Joseph Chen & Meagan Colie & Ana Lustig & Christopher Dunn, 2022. "Heterogeneity and transcriptome changes of human CD8+ T cells across nine decades of life," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-13, December.
    14. Timo Schulte & Tillmann Wurz & Oliver Groene & Sabine Bohnet-Joschko, 2023. "Big Data Analytics to Reduce Preventable Hospitalizations—Using Real-World Data to Predict Ambulatory Care-Sensitive Conditions," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(6), pages 1-16, March.
    15. Fogliato Riccardo & Oliveira Natalia L. & Yurko Ronald, 2021. "TRAP: a predictive framework for the Assessment of Performance in Trail Running," Journal of Quantitative Analysis in Sports, De Gruyter, vol. 17(2), pages 129-143, June.
    16. Edward J Gregr & Dana R Haggarty & Sarah C Davies & Cole Fields & Joanne Lessard, 2021. "Comprehensive marine substrate classification applied to Canada’s Pacific shelf," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 16(10), pages 1-28, October.
    17. Roman Hornung, 2020. "Ordinal Forests," Journal of Classification, Springer;The Classification Society, vol. 37(1), pages 4-17, April.
    18. Lyubchich, Vyacheslav & Woodland, Ryan J., 2019. "Using isotope composition and other node attributes to predict edges in fish trophic networks," Statistics & Probability Letters, Elsevier, vol. 144(C), pages 63-68.
    19. Marc Deffland & Claudia Spies & Bjoern Weiss & Niklas Keller & Mirjam Jenny & Jochen Kruppa & Felix Balzer, 2020. "Effects of pain, sedation and delirium monitoring on clinical and economic outcome: A retrospective study," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(9), pages 1-14, September.
    20. Preston Thomas Sorenson & Jeremy Kiss & Angela Bedard-Haughn, 2024. "A Proposed Methodology for Determining the Economically Optimal Number of Sample Points for Carbon Stock Estimation in the Canadian Prairies," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(1), pages 1-16, January.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:10:y:2021:i:2:p:128-:d:489295. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.