IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jagris/v13y2023i2p494-d1073668.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Assessment of Earthworm Services on Litter Mineralisation and Nutrient Release in Annual and Perennial Energy Crops ( Zea mays vs. Silphium perfoliatum )

Author

Listed:
  • Lena Wöhl

    (Thünen Institute of Biodiversity, Bundesallee 65, D-38116 Braunschweig, Germany)

  • Thorsten Ruf

    (Department of Soil Science, Faculty of Regional and Environmental Sciences, University of Trier, Campus II, Behringstraße 21, D-54296 Trier, Germany)

  • Christoph Emmerling

    (Department of Soil Science, Faculty of Regional and Environmental Sciences, University of Trier, Campus II, Behringstraße 21, D-54296 Trier, Germany)

  • Jan Thiele

    (Thünen Institute of Biodiversity, Bundesallee 65, D-38116 Braunschweig, Germany)

  • Stefan Schrader

    (Thünen Institute of Biodiversity, Bundesallee 65, D-38116 Braunschweig, Germany)

Abstract

Abundant and functionally diverse earthworm communities in perennials deliver ecosystem services like increasing nutrient availability by incorporating organic matter. This study aimed to analyse the decomposition of annual and perennial energy crop residues, and the subsequent nutrient release, depending on earthworm functional diversity. In a laboratory experiment, two ecological earthworm groups—anecics (detritivorous Lumbricus terrestris (L.)) and endogeics (geophagous Aporrectodea caliginosa and A. rosea )—were incubated with wilted cup plant ( Silphium perfoliatum ) and maize ( Zea mays ) litter for 4 or 8 weeks. Decomposition and consumption rates were calculated. The C, N and P in litter and casts were analysed. Mineralisation was a function of earthworm biomass and the number of individuals. Functional diversity had no beneficial effect. Decomposition was found to be highest in treatments with detritivorous earthworms, i.e., higher earthworm biomass, yet consumption and nutrient turnover in relation to earthworm biomass were higher in treatments with geophages indicating enhanced competition. N limitation became apparent in both litter treatments and was predominant with cup plant litter. N limitation and recalcitrant cell wall compounds affected consumption rates and the egestion of total C and P. While N in casts was lower than expected, P was increased. We observed that the effects manifested at different stages of decomposition of maize and cup plant, highlighting differences in temporal development of decomposition and nutrient turnover between litter types. Our results indicate that earthworms promote decomposition of recalcitrant litter and nutrient turnover, but N limitation may hamper nutrient release. Cup plant systems offer a suitable habitat for soil-dwelling organisms, but management approaches must consider the adequate input of organic matter as an energy and nutrient source to enhance ecosystem service provision.

Suggested Citation

  • Lena Wöhl & Thorsten Ruf & Christoph Emmerling & Jan Thiele & Stefan Schrader, 2023. "Assessment of Earthworm Services on Litter Mineralisation and Nutrient Release in Annual and Perennial Energy Crops ( Zea mays vs. Silphium perfoliatum )," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 13(2), pages 1-20, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jagris:v:13:y:2023:i:2:p:494-:d:1073668
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/13/2/494/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/13/2/494/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Thorsten Ruf & Mario Gilcher & Thomas Udelhoven & Christoph Emmerling, 2021. "Implications of Bioenergy Cropping for Soil: Remote Sensing Identification of Silage Maize Cultivation and Risk Assessment Concerning Soil Erosion and Compaction," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(2), pages 1-16, January.
    2. Ingrid M. Lubbers & Kees Jan van Groenigen & Steven J. Fonte & Johan Six & Lijbert Brussaard & Jan Willem van Groenigen, 2013. "Greenhouse-gas emissions from soils increased by earthworms," Nature Climate Change, Nature, vol. 3(3), pages 187-194, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Yafei Guo & Xiaoping Zhang & Yan Zhang & Donghui Wu & Neil McLaughlin & Shixiu Zhang & Xuewen Chen & Shuxia Jia & Aizhen Liang, 2019. "Temporal Variation of Earthworm Impacts on Soil Organic Carbon under Different Tillage Systems," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(11), pages 1-18, May.
    2. Toru Hamamoto & Yoshitaka Uchida, 2019. "The Role of Different Earthworm Species ( Metaphire Hilgendorfi and Eisenia Fetida ) on CO 2 Emissions and Microbial Biomass during Barley Decomposition," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(23), pages 1-10, November.
    3. Plaas, Elke & Meyer-Wolfarth, Friederike & Banse, Martin & Bengtsson, Jan & Bergmann, Holger & Faber, Jack & Potthoff, Martin & Runge, Tania & Schrader, Stefan & Taylor, Astrid, 2019. "Towards valuation of biodiversity in agricultural soils: A case for earthworms," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 159(C), pages 291-300.
    4. Elizabeth M. Bach & Kelly S. Ramirez & Tandra D. Fraser & Diana H. Wall, 2020. "Soil Biodiversity Integrates Solutions for a Sustainable Future," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(7), pages 1-20, March.
    5. Gang Cao & Bokun Chang & Zhiying Zhou & Liang Hu & Wei Du & Jialong Lv, 2022. "Soil Aggregate Breakdown with Colloidal Particles Release and Transport in Soil: A Perspective from Column Experiments," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 12(12), pages 1-16, December.
    6. Syed Turab Raza & Jia Liang Tang & Zulfiqar Ali & Zhiyuan Yao & Hamidou Bah & Hassan Iqbal & Xiao Ren, 2020. "Ammonia Volatilization and Greenhouse Gases Emissions during Vermicomposting with Animal Manures and Biochar to Enhance Sustainability," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(1), pages 1-18, December.
    7. Amrita Kumari Panda & Rojita Mishra & Joystu Dutta & Zishan Ahmad Wani & Shreekar Pant & Sazada Siddiqui & Saad Abdulrahman Alamri & Sulaiman A. Alrumman & Mohammed Ali Alkahtani & Satpal Singh Bisht, 2022. "Impact of Vermicomposting on Greenhouse Gas Emission: A Short Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(18), pages 1-11, September.
    8. Alessia Spada & Mariantonietta Fiore & Umberto Monarca & Nicola Faccilongo, 2019. "R&D Expenditure for New Technology in Livestock Farming: Impact on GHG Reduction in Developing Countries," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(24), pages 1-12, December.
    9. Madalina Iordache, 2023. "Chemical composition of earthworm casts as a tool in understanding the earthworm contribution to ecosystem sustainability - a review," Plant, Soil and Environment, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 69(6), pages 247-268.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jagris:v:13:y:2023:i:2:p:494-:d:1073668. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.